LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 24, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

Obama Heckled During Speech, Warren Lands a Book Deal, and More

A Call to Action

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * New York City’s Summers May Heat Up

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
The Idea of Justice

The Idea of Justice

By Amartya Sen
$19.77

more items

 
Reports

Our ‘Dumb Wars’ Will Go On

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Sep 6, 2010
Flickr / U.S. Army

A U.S. Army soldier patrols with Afghan soldiers in the village of Yawez in Wardak province, Afghanistan, in February.

By Stanley Kutler

“It is time to turn the page,” President Barack Obama said as he announced the “end” of combat operations in Iraq. Meanwhile, those who brought us that unnecessary war remain committed to such policies and, if returned to power, are likely to carry them out. Sadly, the president neither confronted nor repudiated his critics. They are shameless and unrepentant for designing the Iraq War, and they now call for a resumption of the policies that have resulted in a series of long, bloody and eventually unwinnable wars. It was not just the time to mark the departure of American troops; it was also the president’s moment to forcefully challenge and repudiate the policies that led us into what he once called “dumb wars.” He took a pass.

The day of the president’s speech, Paul Wolfowitz and John Bolton anticipated and criticized Obama and reiterated why we went to war. Wolfowitz had the prime space of the New York Times Op-Ed page, while Bolton appeared in the Daily Beast, with his usual meat ax, in a piece entitled “Obama’s Lose-Lose Policy.” 

Wolfowitz, it should be remembered, promised that American soldiers would be welcomed as liberators, that Iraqi oil would pay the costs of the war, that occupation would be as easy as that of post-1945 Germany and Japan, and that Army Chief of Staff Gen. Eric Shinseki (who would be dismissed) was “wildly off the mark” when he estimated that an occupation would require several hundred thousand troops. Wolfowitz simply failed to anticipate the Iraqis’ now seven-year-long “insurgency.”

Wolfowitz was nothing if not disingenuous in his Op-Ed piece. He did not repeat his May 3, 2003, assertion that in going to war “we settled on the one issue that everyone could agree on[,] which was weapons of mass destruction as the core reason [for going to war]”; that was a bald-faced lie. Instead, in the grand tradition of our “Defense Intellectuals” and servants of power, he projected the six decades of American military presence in South Korea as a model for ensuring the safety and stability of Iraq. It is six months and counting since Iraq held elections, and still it has no new legally constituted government; of course, we know that even “advanced societies” can have protracted election outcomes. Meanwhile, 50,000 American remain. Some stability. 

Wolfowitz views our continued presence in South Korea as a buffer against the North, and he similarly envisions a continued presence in Iraq as a means of reining in Iran. 

Advertisement

Bolton nimbly avoided any look backward to say what he said so vocally in 2002-03, namely that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. Instead, he now justifies the war because Iraq “was moving rapidly to break loose from United Nations sanctions [and just how would Saddam do that?] and to rid itself of U.N. weapons inspectors.”

But U.N. inspectors who returned to Iraq had found no WMDs. No problem: Deny and shelve that report. Bolton is indefatigable: When Saddam was free of sanctions (he was not) and inspectors (who were recalled to escape our WMDs), he wrote, it would be “only a matter of time before Iraq would again produce weapons of mass destruction. …” How neat. Saddam had no WMDs, but he might have them in the future, so we saddled up, and the war came—a thoroughly justified one, according to Bolton.

If removing Saddam Hussein was the reason for war, then we succeeded. George W. Bush could have partied promptly. While Wolfowitz talked of an occupation ostensibly to “establish democracy,” more truthfully he favored a greater military presence on the sea of oil that is the Persian Gulf region. The chicanery of Bush and his minions knew no bounds.

Wolfowitz now believes the U.S. should remain in Iraq because of its vital strategic value in the Persian Gulf, “a position that is all the more important because of the dangerous ambitions of Iran’s rulers.” So, we stay in Iraq, he says, to provide security, stability and material support. “Nation-building,” he cavalierly states, would cost $53 billion—a substantial sum in itself, but only part of the $3 trillion war costs that economist Joseph Stiglitz and budget expert Linda Bilmes have estimated. Just as we ignored Vietnamese casualties, North and South, in backward looks at another endless war, Wolfowitz ignores the hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqis. Saddam Hussein was a piker compared with what we inflicted on the Iraqi people with our sanctions and military force. 

Bolton berates the “simplistic” war critics who now oppose “U.S. or Israeli” military action against Iran’s nuclear capability. Iran is a “threat,” and “always there, and metastasizing, no matter what the United States did about Saddam,” he insists. So, if and when Bolton returns to power, his target is clear—and presto! the rest of us can prepare for another Forever War. 

On a Kennedyesque note, Obama said we remained willing “to bear the burden of promoting liberty and human dignity overseas, understanding its link to our liberty and security.” He correctly drew the link to our prosperity and strength at home. Fine, but he never acknowledged the four or five lengthy, fruitless and costly (in terms of U.S. lives and money) wars that the nation has endured for nearly 60 years, while at home it now groans under the yoke of sustaining and feeding our empire.

Bolton and Wolfowitz are discredited rejects from the past—or are they? The novelist F. Scott Fitzgerald, living nearly a century ago, was wrong when he wrote that “there are no second acts in American lives.” In a more innocent time, he never knew the power of well-oiled connections, coupled with the force of modern media chatter, to make for self-rehab.

The presidential “bully pulpit” today competes with a relentless, bold and tremendously large chorus of naysayers. Any talk proclaiming an “end” to our combat operations in Iraq fades quickly into collective memory, while the loud voices of opposition are emboldened. Messrs. Bolton and Wolfowitz are back, ready and eager to resume power.

Stanley Kutler is the author of “The Wars of Watergate” and other writings.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Night-Gaunt's avatar

By Night-Gaunt, September 9, 2010 at 10:41 am Link to this comment

Nice, now please stop SHOUTING! It isn’t nice in polite company.

Report this

By DIANE J ROBINSON, September 9, 2010 at 5:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“YOU SHALL NOT MURDER, AND WHOEVER MURDERS WILL BE IN DANGER OF THE JUDGMENT.” BUT I SAY TO YOU THAT WHOEVER IS ANGRY WITH HIS BROTHER WITHOUT A CAUSE SHALL BE IN DANGER OF THE JUDGMENT. AND WHOEVER SAYS TO HIS BROTHER, “RACA!’ SHALL BE IN DANGER OF THE COUNCIL. BUT WHOEVER SAYS, “YOU FOOL! SHALL BE IN DANGER OF HELL FIRE” THOSE WHO CAST THEM IN THIS LIGHT MISUNDERSTAND GOD’S INTENT AND PURPOSE IN GIVING US HIS LAW.
GOD PLAINLY TELLS US THAT ALL OF HIS COMMANDMENTS ARE FOR OUR GOOD. THEY HAVE A PURPOSE. THEY ARE TO BE A BLESSING AND BENEFIT TO HUMAN KIND.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, September 8, 2010 at 8:00 pm Link to this comment

If you want a third party, or to advance an existing third party (like, say, the Greens), or to mount a primary challenge in 2012, now is the time to start organizing.  Most progs sat on their hands (except for posting rants in blogs) for the last two years and as a result they have no influence and nothing to vote for in the coming election.

Report this

By Sylvia Barksdale, September 8, 2010 at 12:21 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Wolfowitz and Bolton are prime asses [or idiots] for their continued support of the Bush wars.  Kudos for Stanley Kutler.  He has hit them where it hurts!

If any president had a “lose-lose” policy it was none other than GW Bush.  It gives me a knot in my stomach to even have to write the word president along with his name.  [One of history’s greatest despots since Adolph Hitler.]  The idea that such a thing was head of my country for eight years actually makes me shudder in disbelief.

Moreover, it is a stone cold fact that should induce all thinking people to take a good long look at the voting public.  Indeed, the first election was tampered with thus we shall never know the truth of it.  Yet, so far as we know, the people put him in office for a second term.  Brrrr….  Sorry, cold chills beset me.

Now, we have the “tea partiers” and goofs like Beck and Limbaugh led by the spot light chaser, Palin, laying the blame for our sinking country squarely on the shoulders of President Obama.  The really sad thing is that they have so many thousands of voters bowing to their every word.  Wonder if they’ve considered the motivation behind these individuals?  Wonder if they’ve questioned their bank accounts?

I cannot bring myself to believe that America will put another republican in office in 2012.  Like so many others, I long for a third party candidate who would provide a sturdy ladder for us to climb out of the Bush pit.

Report this

By ray keith, September 8, 2010 at 10:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Obama embraced Wall Street just prior to the election due to his insecurity of not obtaining the presidency w/o Wall Street money & hence must adhere to their directives within the parameters they dictated.
If Obama attempts to force banks to assist homeowners with their toxic mortgages- O signs his “Death Warrant”- it’s that simple.
Regardless of those putting him above others with his intelligence- his limitations in surmising what his promise’s to Wall Street would really incur, clearly shows his limitations in completely assessing what his choice really cost him in decision making.
Don’t expect anything of ‘real change’ in his last ‘2’ remaining years- O is a 1 term president that will go down in history as further facilitating the demise of a ‘once great nation’
Amen O- good to see you made the bucks & enjoyed the false glory of your ‘so-called’ stature.
Does anyone believe O would have been elected had he truthfully stated- “We are leaving Iraq & re-entering Afghanistan? & P.S. Good luck homeowners, I answer to Wall Street Now!

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, September 8, 2010 at 7:40 am Link to this comment

PGRP—I myself would rather see a formally correct war crimes trial.  Then the bayonet, perhaps, although the Nazis were disposed of pretty efficiently by hanging.

The trouble is, so many people would have to be tried, and a good many of them almost certainly executed.  (Going by the standards of Nuremberg.)  Well, it would provide a couple of years of reality television, anyway.  Maybe the advertising would pay for it.

Report this

By PRGP, September 8, 2010 at 6:43 am Link to this comment

As a former combat infantry officer who served a year in South Vietnam, I would dearly love to shove a bayonet up arses of everyone in the lying Bush administration.  These wars, Iraq and Afghanistan, have destroyed America’s credibility and economy.  When will the Obama administration grow a pair and start kicking ass instead of puking and mewling about b.s.?

Report this

By jjohnjj, September 7, 2010 at 5:45 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Hold your nose and vote for a Democrat. If you can’t do that, send money to a Democrat you respect in another district or state. If you can’t do that, campaign against the Republican running in your district.

Hitler didn’t surrender the day after Allied troops landed in Normandy. And the Warpublicans didn’t surrender the day after Obama was elected.

The struggle has only just begun.

Report this
Mike789's avatar

By Mike789, September 7, 2010 at 4:25 pm Link to this comment

Citing Anarcissie citing me: [‘I’m not going to argue the rightness or the wrongness of invading Iraq. It’s a done deal. ...’


Not really]

My intent was to say that it is irrevocable. I was pointing to the phoney B.S.

Otherwise, I concur with your post.

Report this
Night-Gaunt's avatar

By Night-Gaunt, September 7, 2010 at 4:21 pm Link to this comment

The total death toll of Iraqis from 1990-2010 are as follows;

1990-2003:1.525 million Counting sanctions and the destruction by US military of water pumping stations, hospitals, factories, etc. 500,000 of them were under 5 years old. [Madaline Albright was recorded as saying that it was acceptable to her those losses.

2003-2010: Estimated over 1.92 million and counting and should include all deaths attributed to local civil wars started by the occupation and destruction of society.

Grossly under counted, thousands? Not a chance.

The wars are smart for someone. Just not us. Wars of empire not a republic. Which do we want? If the former, do nothing, the latter how do we cut off the money? Cut the money it all ends.

Not just 50,000 troops, also 7,000 guards and over 100,000 corporate troops & their logistical crews there too. Iraq is an occupied country and they got what they wanted out of it. The oil is still under foreign control not local. They have won even if we lose.

Yes SteveE his act is wearing thin but too many are still too desperate for any thing else but a Democrat even if he is a crypto-fascist in disguise. Hope can be used as a weapon against the sincere. A false hope that will never be realized.

Unfortunately our voting system is now set up to only allow the two official parties to have an equal chance to be elected. Corporations can now give unlimited money. (The unions can too but they are few and weak. Can’t begin to match the corporations that have greater GDP’s than half the countries on earth.

The metaphorical “turning the page” can cover a multitude of crimes. Such pragmatism can hide the worst things our gov’t has done in the past and will continue to do into the future if nothing changes.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, September 7, 2010 at 3:20 pm Link to this comment

November 2nd enables and empowers you and I, the citizens of the United States, the ability to get rid of the dumb ass making the decision to carry on their war.

Report this

By glider, September 7, 2010 at 2:28 pm Link to this comment

Forget Wolfowitz and Bolton.  Endless war is now the policy of the New Republican Party (aka Democrats) even if they may be outdone by the New Tea Bagger-Repug Fascist Party.  The next election will be another opportunity to pick our poison from the Corporatist Broth that now defines America.

We are not getting out of this mess unless people have the guts and intelligence to yell out lier when Obama waxes on about the “service” to the country by those in the military that are being driven into war crimes by our institutionalized MIC profiteers.

Report this
bogglesthemind's avatar

By bogglesthemind, September 7, 2010 at 1:59 pm Link to this comment

“Our ‘Dumb Wars’ Will Go On”

There’s money in them thar wars.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, September 7, 2010 at 12:26 pm Link to this comment

gerard—‘Bleeds’ is right.

Report this

By gerard, September 7, 2010 at 11:00 am Link to this comment

The lie behind the popular “turn the page” idea is that in human behavior—good or bad, right or wrong—there are no pages to turn.  One act feeds or bleeds into the next.  The effects of the past are visible and fade only slowly, if ever.
  Recognition of bad opens the door to good. Change is as possible as stasis, and there is always a choice, and often more than one.  Conscious choice for the better can be made, but first the possibilites have to be recognized—and good results usually have to be worked for. They don’t come without effort.
  Drift most often leads to deterioration or worse. Ditto for ignoring facts.
  The one legitimate purpose of media is to reveal facts, and only secondarily, opinions. Commercial media are in revolt against democracy, along with other big businesses. They do not reveal facts. The only hope left is the internet—plus the common sense of the majority of people.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, September 7, 2010 at 8:08 am Link to this comment

Mike789, September 7 at 8:33 am:

‘I’m not going to argue the rightness or the wrongness of invading Iraq. It’s a done deal. ...’

Not really.  There are a lot of inconvenient facts hanging around that won’t go away, such as the 50,000 US troops still in the country, and the enormous expense of the war, financial and spiritual, most of it still to be paid.  By the standards of the Nuremberg Trials, Bush, Cheney, Powell, Rice, Rumsfeld and so forth are all war criminals of the sort who were condemned to death and hanged at Nuremberg.  They won’t be tried in a court of law but they will be tried in history, along with the fact that their supposed competitors, the Democrats, enabled their activities and later refused to prosecute or even investigate them.  Non of that is going to go away either.

In any case, the kind of people who started the war are not ‘rejects from the past’.  It’s obvious they’re still in power.

Report this

By Jim Yell, September 7, 2010 at 7:45 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I was confused by a post on another article that said if we continue to vote for the Democrats we can expect the wars to continue. I agree that this administration has been a disappointment in bringing these un-necessary military adventures to a close, but who are we supposed to vote for? The Republicans are the ones who engineered these wars, who botched the execution of these wars and who in fact lied to get America to comply with theire gangsterism. So who do we vote for.

It is the Republicans the the Republicrats who are dedicated to destroying minimum wage, the social network and any chance of justice for labor. There ideas are best suited to turn us into a 3rd World country, one in which there are the mega rich and most people barely get paid.

It is time to stop worshipping the military in a way that leads to war and wasted resources, all for the benifit of Intenational Corporations that do not pay their taxes.

Report this

By FRTothus, September 7, 2010 at 7:13 am Link to this comment

Perhaps willful ignorance is a prerequisite for columnists.  The fact is that this Administration is as pro-war as any Republican, and there is no difference between the two when it comes to war-mongering and subsidizing the wealthy.  Sure, one party talks a better populist game at times, but the real “dumb” are those who believe the differences are more than that. Obama signaled what he was well before he was appointed by the corporate class that installed him, and he has yet to let them down.

Report this

By gerald vest, September 7, 2010 at 6:56 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This is a great article that tells us that our Wars never end, they make good movies, but in reality they kill, maim, destroy, injure everyone involved and serve the big corporations and the criminal type politicians. “When will we ever Learn….”

Report this

By madisolation, September 7, 2010 at 6:38 am Link to this comment

Petraeus is asking for more troops for Afghanistan.
“Well, a funny thing happened roughly halfway between the announcement of the escalation and the now thoroughly irrelevant “drawdown” date. Gen. David Petraeus, the new commander in Afghanistan, is now asking for more troops.”
http://news.antiwar.com/2010/09/06/petraeus-seeks-more-troops-for-afghanistan/
It seems rather hypocritical to talk about the warmongering Chickenhawk Republicans when Obama’s hand-picked Annointed One is wanting another troop escalation.

Report this

By Rosemary Molloy, September 7, 2010 at 5:16 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

To Hammondeggs:
Ditto…ditto…ditto…

Report this
Mike789's avatar

By Mike789, September 7, 2010 at 4:33 am Link to this comment

I’m not going to argue the rightness or the wrongness of invading Iraq. It’s a done deal. The fact that literally decades of military experience was ignored is bad enouth, but what pisses me off more than anything is the continued subterfuge the Bush bunch think they have to employ in order to sell the war. As a military retiree, though not a “my country right or wrong” robot, (I can make an informed decision), I do prefer the facts up front. So although, I can acknowledge the underlying reason of a military presence in the Mid-East, I disdain the deceit. Just tell me it’s a logical chess move, with it’s concomittant “risk/reward” consequences, good and bad, and get on with it. This war was concocted by chicken hawks and that imprint will not ever wash.

Sending soldiers into a war theatre on shallow, trumped up assertions eventually diluted the “raison etre” of the whole shebang and will add confusion to its historic significance.

It is not insignificant for the soldier and he should know the naked truth. And the truth is we are a nation that has a deep-seated proclivity to project power. We are a violent race. Don’t believe it? Just wait until climate change tips the scales.

Acknowledging one’s inherent violent nature is the first step in controlling that nature. To candy-coat the selling of this war to the American public reveals s contempt for that public by its leaders.

Report this

By Steve E, September 7, 2010 at 2:37 am Link to this comment

I can’t get over the fine tuning Obama has performed on The Constitution while in
power. When the Repugs get back in and they will, watch out. They are going to
love their new toys. No wonder Dawn Johnsen was left hanging in the wind waiting
for her appointment to be confirmed. Most Americans don’t realize how badly
their Dept. of Justice is thrashed. We can blame a lot on the MSM.

Report this
thebeerdoctor's avatar

By thebeerdoctor, September 7, 2010 at 1:01 am Link to this comment

There is very little worse than lying about your own self created lies.

Report this

By Hammond Eggs, September 6, 2010 at 9:03 pm Link to this comment

No one’s “act” has worn out so quickly and so completely as Barack Obama’s.  This man, totally, thoroughly devoid of any leadership ability, still doesn’t realize that he is merely another well paid worker on the assembly line of American national disaster. He will sleepwalk his way to political oblivion still believing that a hundred years from now there will be statues of him in every town square in the United States. This man, this human blank slate, every bit the failure George W. Bush was and still is, is the current lying face of America’s heedless and half-assed march into irreversible mediocrity.

Report this

By GrinningFool, September 6, 2010 at 8:43 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I shuddered when reading this article.  Wolfowitz needs to stay far, far away.  It pains me a great deal to read about how these, these, well, rejects from the past actually have a chance to inflict more damage on America.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.