LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 25, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Marching in Chicago: Resisting Rahm Emanuel’s Neoliberal Savagery

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

Corporate Tax Cheats by the Numbers

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * A Cooler Century? Wait and See
New York City’s Summers May Heat Up

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
Changing Venezuela

Changing Venezuela

By Gregory Wilpert
$17.79

Speechwright

Speechwright

By William F. Gavin

more items

 
Reports

On Health Care, Listen to the Nuns

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Mar 17, 2010

By E.J. Dionne, Jr.

One of the tragedies of the viciously politicized battle over health care reform is the defection of the nation’s Roman Catholic bishops from a cause they have championed for decades.

Indifferent to political fashions, the bishops were the strongest voices in support of universal health coverage, a position rooted in Catholic social thought that calls for a special solicitude toward the poor.

Yet on the make-or-break roll call that will determine the fate of health care reform, bishops are urging that the bill be voted down. They are doing so on the basis of a highly tendentious reading of the abortion provisions in the Senate measure. If health reform is defeated, the bishops will have played a major role in its demise.

The provisions they dislike were written by two Democratic senators strongly opposed to abortion, Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Bob Casey of Pennsylvania. Pro-choice groups condemned the Nelson-Casey language from the start.

Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, called their amendment “anti-choice,” “outrageous” and “inexplicable.” Planned Parenthood and the National Organization for Women were equally critical.

Advertisement

But the Nelson-Casey language still didn’t go far enough for the bishops. Earlier this week, Cardinal Francis George of Chicago, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, claimed the flaws and loopholes in the bill’s abortion section are “so fundamental that they vitiate the good that the bill intends to promote.” As a result, he said, “the Catholic bishops regretfully hold that it must be opposed.”

Fortunately, major Catholic leaders—most of them women in religious orders—have picked up the flag of social justice discarded by a bishops conference under increasing right-wing influence.

On Wednesday, a group representing 59,000 Catholic nuns plus more than 50 heads of religious congregations issued a strong statement urging “a life-affirming ‘yes’ vote” in support of the Senate bill. “While it is an imperfect measure, it is a crucial next step in realizing health care for all,” the statement said, adding that the bill’s support for pregnant women represented “the real pro-life stance.”

“We as sisters focus on the needs of people,” said Sister Simone Campbell, a spokeswoman for the group. “When people are suffering, we respond.”

No one was more troubled by the bishops’ decision than Sister Carol Keehan, president of the Catholic Health Association (CHA). She loyally refuses to criticize the bishops but argues that their interpretation of the abortion language is simply wrong. She, too, released a forceful statement in support of the Senate bill.

“We looked at the bill. We spent a lot of time with Sens. Casey and Nelson,” she said in an interview. “We agreed to support it because we believe it meets the test of no federal funding for abortion. Perhaps the language is not the way I would write it, but it meets the test. ... I was not going to take a little bit of abortion [in the bill] to get federal funding.”

She added: “I can’t walk away from extending coverage to more than 30 million people.”

Rather astonishingly, the bishops’ statement misrepresented the view of the CHA, whose members include 600 Catholic hospitals and 1,400 nursing homes.

Cardinal George acknowledged that the bishops’ “analysis of the flaws in the legislation is not completely shared by the leaders of the Catholic Health Association.” Then he said: “They believe, moreover, that the defects that they do recognize can be corrected after the passage of the final bill.”

But Sister Carol, as she is known, said the latter assertion was flatly not true. “We’re not saying that,” she said. Her organization believes the bill as currently written guarantees that there will be no federal funding for abortion and does not need to be “corrected.” Why the bishops would distort the position of the church’s major health association is, to be charitable, a mystery.

House members voting on health care will be representing primarily their positions as Americans and as agents of their constituents, though many will also be influenced by their faith. Those with a special affection for the Roman Catholic Church have an extra reason for voting in favor of the health bill.

By passing it, they would save the bishops from the moral opprobrium that would rightly fall upon them if they succeeded in killing the best chance we have to extend health coverage to 30 million Americans. My hunch is that many bishops would be quietly grateful. In their hearts, they know the nuns are right.
   
E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com.
   
© 2010, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By rosebud, March 20, 2010 at 12:50 am Link to this comment

Priests don’t tell the truth - Nuns do. Priests like to f—-little boys in the ass. Should they abstain from the act they still commit a mortal sin of omission by their silence. Red robes and tall hats cannot cover their guilt.
The Nuns were thrown under the bus for years by the ‘men’ of they church. So many Nuns do not even collect Social Security because they were never given wages - nothing was documented. What goodness remains in the church is carried by these women. The Nuns see the need for health care first hand - in caring for the poor and the elderly. If only the priests were as vocal about child rape as they are about health care reform.
I am a product of 16 years of Catholic education - but I give credit to not a single priest but to the many Nuns who taught me. Catholic Nuns were and are role models - simply by example of their lives. Nuns may be suppressed by the church but speak the truth and I feel such pride they have stood up to voice their support for health care legislation - the priests & bishops, on the other hand, spout the corporate line of the church - members of the big boys club so impressed with themselves -  still thinking they can fool the rest of us.

Report this

By berniem, March 19, 2010 at 6:26 pm Link to this comment

Hey, if we allow abortions to take place willy-nilly, where are all those bishops going to find an ample supply of choir boys? The nuns figured the game was up when brutalizing school kids was outlawed as assualt and, well, who never heard of convent abortions for the “good of the faith”?

Report this

By rollzone, March 18, 2010 at 7:51 pm Link to this comment

hello. what do wealthy religious groups have to do with
tax paying Americans? i no longer hear of religions
paying the tab for hurt people. do they spend all their
wealth on art? they have no credible voice.

Report this

By myxzptlk, March 18, 2010 at 5:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

While the Catholic church is not a force for good in the world, some Catholics,
like Sister Carol and the CHA, are.  Thanks to them for their moral courage.

Report this
Hulk2008's avatar

By Hulk2008, March 18, 2010 at 3:20 pm Link to this comment

To Not One More!:
  As a firm supporter of single payer and a veteran of many, many years in the health care industry, I must say that we cannot allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good.  We cannot allow insurance companies, big pharma, and big business another chance to delay any reform.  Even a flawed bill at this point is better than none. 
  Obama will survive if the bill is nixed.  It really matters little whether the Dems or Repugs take control in November.  What matters is starting a process that grows the pool of insured significantly - that blocks pre-existing condition obstacles - that removes lifetime caps - that blocks recission. 
  Right now the only thing that puts patients at the center of health care is the billing.  There was a time when the center was actual treatment.  Discrepancies in billing were addressed with providers, not patients.  The change was that insurers converted from mutual non-profits to all-out-for-profits.  Remember the adage that a man cannot serve two masters ?  An insurer cannot effectively protect patients and shareholders at the same time. 
  The Church used to serve the poor as a priority.  Now it too often allies itself with the wealthy.  If the anti-abortion forces really mean what they say, why do they call financial aid to single mothers “a handout”?  If they held the power of their own convictions, they would pay any price financially to support women and children - even when the kids are the result of unwanted pregnancies.

Report this

By markpkessinger, March 18, 2010 at 2:33 pm Link to this comment

Then again, I suppose this debate is far preferable to the good bishops than one about the shell game played by a certain German Cardinal…

Report this

By markpkessinger, March 18, 2010 at 2:27 pm Link to this comment

The Roman Catholic hierarchy’s views concerning abortion are well known.  They are certainly entitled to hold those beliefs, as well as to teach, preach and advocate in the political sphere for laws they believe are right.  But they are being fundamentally dishonest in trying to hold hostage a health care bill that will benefit millions in order to try to insert de facto abortion restrictions into a bill that, quite intentionally, avoided doing anything to change the current abortion law.  As bishops, if they believe the current laws are wrong or immoral, then their calling is to convert the hearts and minds of the public and the public’s representative; what they should not engage in, if they wish to retain any shred of credibility in the public sphere, is any attempts to obtain by coercion what they so far have been unable to obtain through moral suasion.

Report this

By gerard, March 18, 2010 at 12:07 pm Link to this comment

No group should be able to dictate a certain decision—moral, financial or political—affecting a majority who will be caused pain and suffering by that decision. The offense is not only in the suffering but in the power of the few over the many, which is, in itself, unjust.

Priests, politicians, policemen and plutocrats frequently put themselves in this position, and it takes a fifth “p” to amend the imbalance—people.

Report this

By balkas, March 18, 2010 at 8:16 am Link to this comment

People teach people by how they behave. Priests of all stripes are organized just like an army; teaching by example that a bishop is more important than a priest and a priest more important than a person.

Christians are also aware of one of jesus’ logions [sayings]: ye shall always have poor among u! No god or god-loving-respecting of people wld ever say such a stupidity or lie.

And few people are secluded from life as priests are.
They also teach their serfs to be with us and not of us. Why? What is wrong with us that isn’t even more wrong with priests and their mental serfs?

In short, priests behave as separatists, supremacists,snake oil salesmen, liars, deceivers just like world plutos. And that’s why they support one another! tnx

Report this
Not One More!'s avatar

By Not One More!, March 17, 2010 at 11:24 pm Link to this comment

Hey,

There are other compassionate people out there who want the bill defeated because it is no bill at all (abortion is not the issue). It will further remove single payer health care from being established, and in the long run more people may end up dying since the current bill will still be keeping a significant number of citizens without health care.

Is demanding that either we all get health care, or none, have a certain power to it, a commitment to each other?

If you are the one that is getting the health care, are you going to think it is good enough? And what if you are one of the people who will not be covered, should you think it was good enough?

Don’t support the health care bill because this will only serve to get the insurance industry further entrenched in the money, without providing health care for all. That is unacceptable.

Everybody keeps talking about how many more people will be added to the insured, but not the number that will still be excluded. A shame.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.