Top Leaderboard, Site wide
July 25, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Help us grow by sharing
and liking Truthdig:
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Newsletter

sign up to get updates


Losing the Moral High Ground




The Sixth Extinction
War of the Whales


Truthdig Bazaar
The Making of Global Capitalism

The Making of Global Capitalism

By Sam Gindin and Leo Panitch
$29.95

more items

 
Report

Obama’s Reset: Arab Spring or Same Old Thing?

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on May 17, 2011
White House / Pete Souza

By Nick Turse

This article was originally published by TomDispatch.com.

Introduction by Tom Engelhardt

Say it ain’t so, Osama! 

His take-down was the story that grabbed almost 69% of the American “news hole” the week it happened, and from a media point of view it turns out to be the gift that never stops giving.  Small wonder, since it’s got just about everything: multiple wives, lost high-tech stealth helicopters, brave cyborg canines, killer tractors, championship-style celebrations, tiny helmet cams, private diaries, evil plans for future destruction, recalcitrant Pakistanis, shots of the world’s arch-villain changing channels whenever his arch-enemy, the president of the United States, comes on-screen, and now -- the ultimate fundamentalist hypocrisy -- “a stash of porn.”  If that isn’t God’s gift to web traffic, what is?

As Reuters first reported and no one on this planet can now not know, in the treasure trove of computer hard drives and thumb drives collected by the Navy SEAL team that hit bin Laden’s Abbottabad compound, CIA analysts claim to have found a cache of now-classified pornographic videos.  News of this was leaked to the press in hopes of “tarnishing” the reputation of the man who, in 2002, denounced American culture for its “exploitation of women’s bodies in dress, advertising, and popular culture.” 

Advertisement

Square, Site wide
Of course, with so much crucial news pouring out and news staffs shrinking across the media landscape, choices need to be made.  Under the circumstances, there are always a few stories that have to give way before what’s truly crucial, and so go unreported.  In recent years -- explain it as you will -- the Pentagon’s ongoing weapons trade with Middle Eastern despots has largely fallen into this category.  Someday, perhaps, this trade, which can take place with the most fervent of Islamic fundamentalists, might be reclassified as pornographic and so get the attention it deserves.  In the meantime, thanks to the reporting of Nick Turse, TomDispatch will continue to spend time in the unexplored interstices between what fascinates the media.  -- Tom

*****

If you follow the words, one Middle East comes into view; if you follow the weapons, quite another.

This week, the words will take center stage.  On Thursday, according to administration officials, President Obama will “reset” American policy in the Middle East with a major address offering a comprehensive look at the Arab Spring, “a unified theory about the popular uprisings from Tunisia to Bahrain,” and possibly a new administration approach to the region.

In the meantime, all signs indicate that the Pentagon will quietly maintain antithetical policies, just as it has throughout the Obama years.  Barring an unprecedented and almost inconceivable policy shift, it will continue to broker lucrative deals to send weapons systems and military equipment to Arab despots.  Nothing indicates that it will be deterred from its course, whatever the president says, which means that Barack Obama’s reset rhetoric is unlikely to translate into meaningful policy change in the region.

For months now, the world has watched as protesters have taken to the streets across the Middle East to demand a greater say in their lives.  In Tunisia and Egypt, they toppled decades-old dictatorships.  In Bahrain and Yemen, they were shot down in the streets as they demanded democracy.  In the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Jordan and Saudi Arabia, they called for reforms, free speech, and basic rights, and ended up bloodied and often in jail cells.  In Iraq, they protested a lack of food and jobs, and in response got bullets and beatings.

As the world watched, trained eyes couldn’t help noticing something startling about the tools of repression in those countries.  The armored personnel carriers, tanks, and helicopters used to intimidate or even kill peaceful protesters were often American models. 

For decades, the U.S. has provided military aid, facilitated the sale of weaponry, and transferred vast quantities of arms to a host of Middle Eastern despots.  Arming Arab autocrats, however, isn’t only the work of presidents past.  A TomDispatch analysis of Pentagon documents finds that the Obama administration has sought to send billions of dollars in weapons systems -- from advanced helicopters to fighter jets -- to the very regimes that have beaten, jailed, and killed pro-democracy demonstrators, journalists, and reform activists throughout the Arab Spring. 

The administration’s abiding support for the militaries of repressive regimes calls into question the president’s rhetoric about change.  The arms deals of recent years also shed light on the shadowy, mutually supportive relationships among the U.S. military, top arms dealers, and Arab states that are of increasing importance to the Pentagon.

Since the summer of 2009, President Obama, by way of the Pentagon and with State Department approval, has regularly notified Congress of his intent to sell advanced weaponry to governments across the Middle East, including Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).  Under U.S. law, Congress then has 30 days to review the sale before the Pentagon and associated military contractors enter into more formal contract talks with individual nations.      

In July 2009, according to an analysis of Pentagon documents by TomDispatch, notifications were sent to Congress regarding the sale to Kuwait of Browning machine guns, advanced targeting systems for armored vehicles, KC-130 aircraft, and technical support for F/A-18 attack aircraft.  Later that summer, the White House announced plans to outfit both Bahrain’s and Jordan’s militaries with advanced air-to-air missiles to the tune of $74 million and $131 million, respectively, to equip the United Arab Emirates with $526 million worth of Hellfire missiles and other materiel, to send more than $2 billion worth of advanced surveillance and navigation equipment to aid Saudi Arabia’s air force, and to see to it that Egypt’s military received a shipment of new Chinook troop transport helicopters and other high-tech equipment valued at $308 million.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By gerard, May 19, 2011 at 10:54 am Link to this comment

Obama has faults.  Over and above and all around that, the United States has faults (which means you and I have faults) imbedded in the policies of our history and our refusal to live up to our stated ideals. 

IMO, our biggest single unmet ideal is to free ourselves from habitual wars for economic power. Wars provide huge profits to weapons sellers at the same time they stoke the fires of fear, hatred and violence. The people of the U.S (means US) must take the initiative now to draw up specific plans on how to curb the domination of war industries step by step, and shift our economic base away from war production.

Protest and complaint without a specific practical method to free us from this economic slavery is bound to appear weak and ineffective. Surely this country has people with the ability and the will to meet this obvious need.

Once such a plan is adopted, it will make all the difference in national and international politics.

Report this

By LibyaWest, May 18, 2011 at 5:36 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The only speech I want to hear barrage insane o’bomber give is his resignation speech.  He’s murdered enough people to show us that he’s just another bush.

Report this
Arabian Sinbad's avatar

By Arabian Sinbad, May 18, 2011 at 4:17 pm Link to this comment

As far as I am concerned, Obama is not welcomed to say anything about the Arab Spring. Arabs will be fine without his hypocritical interference. Besides being unqualified to say anything of substance, he should devote his time and energy to solve the huge problems America is facing.

Who have appointed him king of the world to have a saying about what’s happening in the Arab World?!

Enough is enough with with hypocritical interference in the affairs of other people. If he thinks himself as a “doctor”, I would say to him: “Doctor! Heal thyself!”

Report this
LetIdB's avatar

By LetIdB, May 18, 2011 at 10:29 am Link to this comment

We Americans (oh that there were a more geographically appropriate term for us ‘exceptionals’ and ‘enablers’) have exulted in having a standard of living higher than that of any other country.  The genesis of a lot of that derives from
the free labor of millions of slaves over 250 years.  Our standard of living continues to be born on the backs of the poor of the world.  Selling arms to autocrats enables them to buy our WMD toys at the price of further economic enslavement of their citizens. 

I’d like to see three objective and impartial studies (dumb me to believe that such are possible) conducted to determine: (1) how much (by $ and percentage) the sale of our WMD and black ops civilian armies contributes to our economy, i.e. what we would lose if these were shrunk by 80-100 percent; (2) what our
“national security” (that hot-button, knee jerker) would look like if our military was reduced to 10 or 25 percent of its current size; and (3) how effectively we could retrain/redeploy X tens/hundreds of thousands of military personnel to
repair the crumbling infrastructure of our country.

What can we sacrifice to turn our descent around?  We can sacrifice our indifference to learning about our history and how our “exceptionalism” plays out in the world and in our country.

Report this

By tedmurphy41, May 18, 2011 at 6:35 am Link to this comment

With what is currently going on in the Middle East, perhaps events are moving too fast even for America to try to get involved in steering a course for this part of the World which suits its own narrow agenda.

Report this

By Marc Schlee, May 18, 2011 at 2:47 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

SmoovB is a sick, sad joke.

FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

Report this
Virginia777's avatar

By Virginia777, May 17, 2011 at 11:29 pm Link to this comment

Arabian Sinbad:

Obama is not George Bush.

Report this
Arabian Sinbad's avatar

By Arabian Sinbad, May 17, 2011 at 8:16 pm Link to this comment

It would be same old B.Sh. plus a new dose of deceptive rhetoric!

God save as from the Devils-in-Chief who might change in color and cosmetics, but it’s always the same old big B.Sh.!

Report this

By TDoff, May 17, 2011 at 6:47 pm Link to this comment

Oh my, Oh my, SOB*, SOB*, der Mittle East is a quagmire, everything is going to hell, the US is a beacon for peoples longing for freedom and democracy, while keeping it’s MIC and DOD healthy and thriving by selling the weapons the despots need to slaughter their peoples who strive to be free. What to do?

How about trying honesty? Either warn the democracy-yearners that it ain’t gonna happen, because the US needs to enrich it’s plutocrats by making a profit on selling the weapons their dictators are going to use to murder them.

Or tell the plutocrats to be satisfied with the loot they’ve accumulated to date, because we’re going to help those who need our help escape tyranny just as the incipient US did almost two hundred and fifty years ago, and if the plutos don’t accept that, they are going to face hazards they’ve not faced before, legal and otherwise. Who’s gonna do this telling? We, the People, in conjunction with our government.

Naive, right!? Have a better solution, another answer? Let’s hear it. Either we change this country, or we give up. Sacrifices will need to be made.

*SameOldBullshit

Report this
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.

Like Truthdig on Facebook