Top Leaderboard, Site wide
September 1, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Help us grow by sharing
and liking Truthdig:
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Newsletter

sign up to get updates


Satellite Mapping Shows Ice Caps’ Faster Melt Rate






Truthdig Bazaar
America and the Islamic Bomb: The Deadly Compromise

America and the Islamic Bomb: The Deadly Compromise

By David Armstrong and Joseph J. Trento
$16.47

more items

 
Report

Obama’s Mission Accomplished Moment?

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jan 14, 2012
U.S. Army (CC-BY)

President Obama speaks to military members at Fort Hood in Texas.

By Tom Engelhardt, TomDispatch

This piece originally appeared at TomDispatch.

Here’s the ad for this moment in Washington (as I imagine it): Militarized superpower adrift and anxious in alien world.  Needs advice.  Will pay.  Pls respond qkly.  PO Box 1776-2012, Washington, DC.

Here’s the way it actually went down in Washington last week: a triumphant performance by a commander-in-chief who wants you to know that he’s at the top of his game.

When it came to rolling out a new 10-year plan for the future of the U.S. military, the leaks to the media began early and the message was clear.  One man is in charge of your future safety and security.  His name is Barack Obama.  And—not to worry—he has things in hand.

Unlike the typical president, so the reports went, he held six (count ‘em: six!) meetings with top Pentagon officials, the Joint Chiefs, the service heads, and his military commanders to plan out the next decade of American war making.  And he was no civilian bystander at those meetings either.  On a planet where no other power has more than two aircraft carriers in service, he personally nixed a Pentagon suggestion that the country’s aircraft carrier battle groups be reduced from 11 to 10, lest China think our power-projection capabilities were weakening in Asia.

Advertisement

Square, Site wide
His secretary of defense, Leon Panetta, spared no words when it came to the president’s role, praising his “vision and guidance and leadership” (as would Chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Martin E. Dempsey).  Panetta described Obama’s involvement thusly: “[T]his has been an unprecedented process, to have the president of the United States participate in discussions involving the development of a defense strategy, and to spend time with our service chiefs and spend time with our combatant commanders to get their views.”

In other words, Obama taking ownership of the rollout of “Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense,” a 16-page document summarizing a review of America’s strategic interests, defense priorities, and military spending.  Its public unveiling was to reflect the steady hand of a commander-in-chief destined to be in charge of American security for years to come.

The president even made a “rare visit” to the Pentagon.  There, he was hailed as the first occupant of the Oval Office ever to make comments, no less present a new “more realistic” strategic guidance document, from its press office.  All of this, in turn, was billed as introducing “major change” into the country’s military stance, leading to (shades of former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld) a “leaner, meaner” force, slimmed down and recalibrated for economic tough times and a global “moment of transition.”

As political theater, it couldn’t have been smarter.  For a president, vulnerable like all Democrats to charges of national security weakness in an election year, it was a chance for great photo ops and headlines.  And it left his Republican opponents (Ron Paul, of course, excepted) in the dust, sputtering, fuming, and complaining that he was “leading from behind” and “imperiling” the nation.

Even better, in an election season which has mesmerized the media, not a single reporter or pundit seemed to notice that, whatever the new Pentagon plan might mean for the U.S. military globally, it was great domestic politics for a president whose second term was in peril.

Another “Mission Accomplished” Moment?

The actual Pentagon planning document, released the day of the president’s Pentagon appearance, might as well have been written in cuneiform script or hieroglyphics.  Just about any military future might have been read into or out of its purposely foggy, not to say impenetrable, pages.  That, too, seemed politically canny, offering the president a militarized version of have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too-ism.

While the document only referred to the Pentagon budget-cutting process that had been making headlines for weeks in the most oblique manner, the briefings offered by the president, the secretary of defense, and other top officials highlighted those “cuts”: $487 billion over the next decade. It was the sort of thing that should have made any deficit hawk’s heart flutter.  Yet somehow—a bow to defense hawks?—the same budget, already humongous from an unprecedented 12 straight years of expansion, was, Obama assured his audience, actually slated to keep on growing.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Michael, January 16, 2012 at 11:38 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Given the new legal climate & renewed, expanded powers of our central military
government, we can expect more of those weapons being pointed at “We the People”.
Just another reason to vote Ron Paul the only candidate making sense these days.

Report this

By Sombrio, January 16, 2012 at 6:43 pm Link to this comment

It’s a good article: A good launching pad to a sober reflection on probable futures. One has to remember that the control mechanisms of principalities and the powers that be, differ between good times and bad. In good times material satisfaction is enough to buy compliance to global vivasection. In bad times violence is the only control method availble.
This yin yang effect is due to the nature of power structures. Elites are all based the leadership principal which only results in the debasement of those entrusted with that kind of decision making. Barak Obama is a perfect example and the purposes of power structures are not to solve problems: Their purpose is to keep and magnify control.
In this way the military program outlined by the Pentagon makes perfect sense. The probabilty of a financial/currency collapse only leaves open the option of escalating violence. The design of this military has finally shifted to its ultimate continious total warfare concept: Massive Terrorism to punish whoever stands in the way of the control of the Global New World Order. I would suggest that the complimentry NDAA bill is a vital compenent to the conclusion of a program that seemingly is a US initiative but really includes both friend and foe world wide.

Report this

By bob zimway, January 16, 2012 at 9:53 am Link to this comment

Welcome to the Obamney police state.

Report this

By Arianna, January 16, 2012 at 7:22 am Link to this comment

It seems that what MollyJ says is true.  In regard to the National Defense Authorization Act, Congress passed the buck when Mr. Obama asked that the indefinite detention part of the bill be added.  Why
didn’t they tell him no?  Are these representatives so
spineless that they are scared into sumission when their beliefs are forcefully altered by intimidation?
What happened to questioning what the President does?
What happende to voicing an opinion?  Are they so afraid that their lobbyists will cease to contribute to their coffers?  We have been lulled into believing
everything we are told.  Critical thinking has taken a
back seat to strong-arming tactics.  We are in trouble
if we can’t voice our opinions and make decisions, even if it means sometimes going against the current.
Our Bill of Rights has been shredded and the rest of the Constitution is in jeopardy of being destroyed.
Our financial institutions run rough-shod over our elected officials.  Our police look at all of us as if
we are criminals.  Our government wants us to all shut
up and do what we’re told.  This is so wrong in a
Republic where dissent is critical in keeping the system in check.  If we don’t have a voice, opinion or
dissent, we are all doomed to slavery and domination.

Report this

By Steve E, January 15, 2012 at 7:19 pm Link to this comment

Leave the driving to us, we just need your children once and awhile for military
purposes.

Report this

By balkas, January 15, 2012 at 12:18 pm Link to this comment

well, folks, i got news for you: pissing on dead people could have
happened to me also. i, too, had been once much mindless or
mindful [comes to the same thing, anyway] as 99% of the regionals
aka, “americans”.
however, with help from the best educators and ‘best’ liars, i had
been able to perform volte face in my thinking.
but not until just 30 or so yrs ago.
yes, folks, we can learn a lot from rabbis, ulema [body of mullahs],
reverends, priests, MSM columnists, ‘teachers’, army echelons,
bankers, politocos, thinktanks, orgs, movements, constitutions,
earls, aghas, lords, warlords, people owners, counts, barons, princes,
kings, et al.

Report this

By balkas, January 15, 2012 at 10:18 am Link to this comment

greens: “if voters continue to be mindless mass….”.  could or should be changed thus: since the voters had been
over 200 yrs or so deliberately educated to behave mindlessly [i hate also that ‘explanation’]—you’re free fill in
the rest.
people are never mindless—people are always mindful. how they became mindful and what had been crammed
into their minds from childhood up, is what we need to study.
and it is a myth that only american children have been rendered semantically [ability to think and use language in
order to properly evaluate any situation] blind; ie., enhancing one’s survival on this planet!

look what happened to german, japanese, italian [just to list a few lands or empires] children since the www1!!
and alas, the same process is still applied to them in most lands and not just in usa.
the methodology of rendering children serfs is extremely simple: always tell them the biggest lies you can invent.
make sure that also schooling is mandatory! thanks bozhidar balkas, planet.

Report this

By balkas, January 15, 2012 at 9:41 am Link to this comment

i assert that jill stein is wrong in blaming only the w.h. for violating 6th, 7th, and 8th amendment to
the constitution.
MSM, cia/fbi, army echelons, large shareholders, bankers, congress, and judiciary are also involved
in the interpretation of whether these amendments are being violated or not.
there is only one USA and one ‘correct’ interpretation of any and all u.s constitutional directives,
wishes, pipe dreams, and demands.
fathers of the confederation weren’t that dumb not have realized what has to be done in order that
the their THOUGHT forever prevails; seemingly split the governance in three pieces.
they knew, i suggest, that as long as there is but one ideology in usa, it makes no difference of how
many branches of governance there is or what constitution says or doesn’t say.
actually, the THOUGHT early americans adopted and tacitly/explicitly proclaimed holy and infallible,
already existed in all of asia and europe and very dear to all of the nobles, very rich people, and all
of the clergy. thanks

Report this

By balkas, January 15, 2012 at 9:11 am Link to this comment

i do not recall when for the first time the thought arose in my head that one
shouldn’t split usa foreign policy into a democratic and republican ones.
and not just foreign policy but most other domestic policies, as well.
perhaps the truth of it dawned on me just 10 yrs ago.
as i have noted, some things never change. usa ideology; its quest for planet, and
imposition of usa ‘justice’, americanism, etc., on world has not changed an iota.

and if you don’t change u.s ideology, you change nothing. and it can be changed
only in one way: by a political party with a different ideology. thanks

Report this

By Arianna, January 15, 2012 at 7:47 am Link to this comment

This seems to me, to be nothing more than rhetoric garnered from Project for a New American Century, a
Neo-conservative document written by Paul Wolfowitz, et al.  It reflects the desire to continue nation-building and the cooperation of other nations to co-mingle their military with ours.  Could this be a way
for our government to deploy foreign troops on US soil?  In the event of catastrophy or natural disaster
we could see that occuring.  It would alleviate the
responsibility of US troops having to arrest American
citizens and herding them off to FEMA detention centers.

Report this
thecrow's avatar

By thecrow, January 15, 2012 at 6:26 am Link to this comment

“First, I’ve never been much of an “in”-sider. Second, I truly wonder how you can trust a leader who carries no compunction to keep his promises or his word — whether those words and promises were made in support of gay rights, to not start or perpetuate illegal/useless/costly military campaigns (or wars), in support of environmental causes even to the detriment of big business, to put an immediate end to torture and unlawful detainment, to rein in the bloat and greed of Wall Street, to oppose gun control, or to correct the broad overreach of a previous administration.

But perhaps most pointedly, if you can’t trust what a man says to a group of widows and children, then what words and promises of his can you trust?

So President Obama, am I IN? Will you be receiving my check?

Hell no.”

- Kristen Breitweiser

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/guaranteed/

Report this
thecrow's avatar

By thecrow, January 15, 2012 at 6:22 am Link to this comment

Doing what he was installed to do, nothing more.

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/meet-the-new-boss/

Report this

By MollyJ, January 15, 2012 at 6:20 am Link to this comment

The most bizarre aspect of living in these times is that the powers that be can say really stupid and transparent stuff and no one—NO ONE—calls them on it.

But, Tom, I wish you’d come to Kansas.  Our Governor is turning KS into the lab for far right ideas and he recently proposed in his state of the state a tax structure to move us toward a flat tax structure.  (We’ll go from having three major tax brackets to two.)  Lots of gifts for corporations and incentives for frackers to come to KS.

The news papers—KC Star, Capitol-Journal, Wichita Eagle are eerily quiet about all of this.  No one is writing stories about how this would play out for the education system, the social safety net, community budgets.  Oh, the Chamber of Commerce likes it.

The quiet is deafening.  And so on the last day of the session is a couple of months, Brownback and the tea party will get just what they wanted.  ANd that was the same process that got us Brownback.  That he would govern as he has was certainly my fear but during the campaign his opponent was the invisble man and there was no effort to even try to project how his legislative agenda would transpose to a KS government agenda.

And yet NOTHING he has done is surprising.

My local paper continues to run chit-chat and stories about “the underserving poor”.  Is there another kind?  We remain oblivious to the personal coup de grace delivered to us by long time KS company Boeing and talk about how we cannot maintain the social safety net but how we must incentivize jobs in KS through corporate America’s favorite modes—the tax cut and local incentives to come to town which are consumed and then leave behind abandoned structures and work forces.  The blindness and unwillingness to connect any dots is simply staggering.

David Cyr, I enjoy your comments and I will join you in voting for either Anderson or Stein whichever may appear on my ballot.

But the fallacy in only voting for these groups is that they still assume some shred of a functioning democracy.

And it is clear that is no longer true. 

So that leaves us with activism.

Report this
David J. Cyr's avatar

By David J. Cyr, January 15, 2012 at 6:03 am Link to this comment

Cyr’s Law of FEARS:

Frightened Electorates Always React Stupidly (FEARS)

Only (D) sheeple vote for FEARS dependent Democrats.

Jill Stein for President:

http://www.jillstein.org

Voter Consent Wastes Dissent:

http://chenangogreens.org/home/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=498&Itemid=1

Report this

By ardee, January 15, 2012 at 5:57 am Link to this comment

Outraged’s partisan nonsense vs. Englehardt’s reasoned accuracies.

Report this

By reXteryalizer, January 15, 2012 at 3:27 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Want to thank all of you, for your Powerfull stand against Oboma & His Corrupted political partners.
But there is so much more we can

do. Being aggressive and focusing on the facts and truth is only the first step.
We musT follow Up with more details standing by our

convictions and dont back down.

Oboma has NOT brought CHANGE, In fact ~! ~ THE ONLY real THING needing CHANGE !....Was

Barack Hussein Obama II.

            HIMSELF
Barack Hussein Obama II ( Who hates American Values ) who is A ” SELF PROCLAIMED

Enemy” ~of responsible, Morally Conscious HARD WORKING Americans.

oBOMAS Irresponsible & DRUG MAFIA and reckless

supporters KNOW~ that Barack Hussein Obama II,

WILL FORCE YOU to paY THEM, out of your PockeT

.{ FOR all of their UNCHECKED

Vices and THRILLS/ { All on YOU | / At your COST & Sacrifice

...This UN~CHANGABLE fraud, has done His VERY BEST to Inspire

VIOLENCE.

THESE ARE OBAMAS OWN WORDS.. saying .........To his supporters.

Saying “Get ready for hand-to-hand combat with your

Fellow Americans”

– Obama has ALSO DECLARED to his Supporters

“I want all Americans to get in each others faces!– Obama

demands !

“You bring a knife to a fight pal, we’ll bring a gun” –
THESE ARE OBAMAS OWN WORDS..
ANGER VIOLENCE and more

taxes….. THIS IS OBAMAS Change for america

/“Hit Back Twice As Hard”. He commands !

*Obama on the private sector: ~~ “We talk

to these folks…~ / so I know whose a*$ to KICK.“ OBOMA wants to KICK your a*$ /

Shouting THAT Republican victory would mean ~

“hand to hand combat”

HE IS EXPECTING people to be on Edge and BORDERLINE killing MODE, VIOLENT / and STAND up for their

immoral CAUSES

THIS IS WHAT HE LIVES FOR ./ ./ ./ THESE ARE OBAMAS OWN WORDS.. !

* Obama Tells democrats: “ I’m itching for a

fight.” !

....PLEASE…. go to reXes NEW WebsiTe ~ ! Oboma *( Just like Adolf Hitler~~\

oBOMA~~~ Demands !—[ THE FINAL SOLUTION -

for Un~Wanted Children

Barak Obama is A MURDERER .~Torturing UNWANTED babys on DEATH ROE

CLICK HERE

http://obomlnation.webstarts.com/index.html

OBAMA TAKES a little NEW BORN innocent child. BORN. ALIVE sTabS it iN the head

SUCKs ITS BRAINS OUT.

Report this
Outraged's avatar

By Outraged, January 15, 2012 at 2:26 am Link to this comment

As I have not read your book Mr. Engelhardt, it is
difficult to ascertain what your meaning with this
article is. I’m speaking of the book you’ve titled ”
The United States of Fear”....... however, it seems
to me that you have written a very FEAR BASED
article. I’m sick of the fear, as I would like to
engage the reality.. all the good and all the bad,
but either way SIMPLY the reality. A couple of
examples of your fear mongering (which btw, are not
unlike the righties)

“One man is in charge of your future safety and
security.”

” In that future, there would be nothing but neat,
high-tech military operations (and war toys) to the
horizon.”

“These would include our latest perfect weapon, the
pilotless drone; nifty cyberwar-style online combat;
plenty of new spy and advanced surveillance gear; and
sexy shadow wars,”

“it offered something for just about anyone who
mattered in imperial Washington”

“Hostilities of the old nasty sort were practically
at an end and a new era of high-tech, super-secret,
elite warfare was upon us.”

“More miraculous yet, it was doing so without giving
up its global military dreams.”

“Consider this a form of begrudging imperial realism

” massively armed American small towns at sea.”

“we already know how this story ends”

“It hardly matters whether those planes in the
distant heavens have pilots or not, or whether they
can see ants crawl from 20,000 feet and blast them
away with precision.”

“without endangering the military-industrial-crony-
capitalist way of life.  That’s about as radical as
Obama’s Washington is likely to get.”

“storming the rhetorical barricades daily,
threatening war with Iran nightly, promising to
reinvade Iraq,”

“and to the passing, modestly apocalyptic eye, this
planet still looks as if it were destabilizing.”

Need I go on…...?

Anally stupid. Enough is enough.

Report this

By Michael_Murry, January 14, 2012 at 8:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
Defeat is Victory

Report this

By westcoaster, January 14, 2012 at 8:08 pm Link to this comment

Very good article.  question:  In order to use
drones, we need to know what it is we are shooting
at, which requires people on the ground.  Seems to me
that this is the problem.  Drones are only as good as
the spooks calling in the shots. 

Economy:  A world economy is subject to a world melt
down.  All banks are now interconnected. 

Obama’s military budget is suicidal.  Now I know why
Obama is not a progressive, or even a liberal.

Report this

By gerard, January 14, 2012 at 6:19 pm Link to this comment

A healthy degree of courage, awareness, honesty, empathy and willingness to
work for essential changes and restore democracy is evident in the Occupy
Movement.  If a large enough number of the 99% get behind them and offer
support and elbow grease, intelligent and democratic restoration may yet be
possible.

Report this

By Jerry, January 14, 2012 at 4:50 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Obama is like an abusive husband.  Whispers sweat nothings to his base and then s*rews ‘em over as soon as they turn their back.

Report this
David J. Cyr's avatar

By David J. Cyr, January 14, 2012 at 3:27 pm Link to this comment

The corporate party’s Obama delivers the deceits (D) dedicated “progressive” liberals love to vote for… greater evil appearing to be less.

War has virtually “ended” for liberals, with robotic weaponry now making murder for profit a sterile impersonal procedure.

VIDEO - A Message of Change, on Which Real Hope Depends:

http://www.jillstein.org/message_of_change

Voter Consent Wastes Dissent:

http://chenangogreens.org/home/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=498&Itemid=1

Report this

By Dr Bones, January 14, 2012 at 2:53 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Election silly season.  They’ll be jacking the funding up again next year.  And surely there will be more unexpected wars.

Report this
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.

Like Truthdig on Facebook