|
|
May 25, 2013
|
|
Obama’s Feminist TouchPosted on May 12, 2010By Joe Conason Someday, when Americans have learned to live the true meaning of our creed, a Supreme Court nomination of a woman, a Latino, an African-American or any other variety of human being—including a gay man or gay woman—will provoke no comment or concern. Until then, we should applaud every step toward that future. The latest is President Barack Obama’s choice of Elena Kagan to become the third female justice among the nine justices on the nation’s highest court. Beyond the inevitable and proper inquiries about the character and views of his latest nominee, Obama’s decision tells us something important about him, too. Surely he appreciates her reputation as a conciliator who listens to all sides. He is probably reassured by the fact that the Senate easily confirmed her last year as solicitor general. But what this nomination reminds us is that he is not only the first African-American in the Oval Office, but the first president raised on feminist principles, as well. As he stood next to Kagan in announcing her selection, Obama referred to her late mother, a public elementary school teacher who showed a special interest in bright little girls. “I think she [Kagan’s mother] would relish, as do I, the prospect of three women taking their seat on the nation’s highest court for the first time in history—a court that would be more inclusive, more representative, more reflective of us as a people than ever before,” the president said. Certain exceptions on the far right aside, the potential elevation of Kagan has been met with admirable restraint so far. Critics have noted that her written record is thin compared with that of previous nominees, especially for a former Harvard Law Review editor and Harvard Law School dean. At 50, she is relatively young, lacks extensive experience in a courtroom and has none as a judge (thanks to the Republican senators who refused to permit a hearing when President Bill Clinton nominated her to the federal bench). The daughter of immigrant parents, a lawyer and a teacher, she was a highly talented girl who won admission to the finest colleges and universities, strictly on merit. Advertisement Remember that his mother, Ann, though unlucky in marriage, was deeply persistent, adventurous and professional in her career as an anthropologist. This “girl from Kansas” brought her children with her to distant lands, and even left teenage Barry with his grandparents for a time while she worked abroad. Recall also that his beloved grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, whom he knew as “Toot,” was a working woman who rose daily before dawn to arrive at the bank where she toiled for more than 20 years until, at long last, she won promotion to vice president. Owing to her gender, her advancement came far more slowly than she deserved—and the fact that she earned more than her husband was often a source of friction at home. Today, there is nothing unusual about a bank vice president—or a peripatetic academic—who happens to be female. Back when Obama was growing up, however, those two brave women shaped his outlook profoundly. We cannot yet know how three female justices will change the culture of the court and the jurisprudence of the nation. But the dream that Elena Kagan cherished and pursued just became a little easier for other girls to imagine. Joe Conason writes for The New York Observer. © 2010 Creators.com New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Ralph Woods, May 17, 2010 at 11:08 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
You don’t get it do you?
Obama is another corporatist ladder climber and so is Kagan. That is why she has expressed virtually no opinion on anything of substance after decades in policy positions.
The USA is on its death march to total fascism unless the media wake the Hell up. This includes you.
Get with it dude- or you are part of the problem.
Report thisBy G.Anderson, May 14, 2010 at 11:47 pm Link to this comment
Yes, I guess your right, he was raised on feminist principals… in a home without a father.
Report thisBy msreason, May 14, 2010 at 11:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Thanks for noting this, Mr. Conason. Despite my misgivings about some of the president’s decisions, I am grateful for his feminist sensibility. I don’t think it was an accident at all that the first bill he signed was the Lilly Ledbetter bill. He was sending a strong message to women everywhere, and perhaps to those who (still) try to oppress women and girls whenever they think they can get away with it.
His mom’s real name was Stanley, by the way, which says a lot too.
Report thisBy Tobysgirl, May 14, 2010 at 6:45 am Link to this comment
Hammond Eggs said it succinctly. What Conason is confusing is the equal rights movement and feminism. This confusion was exploited by celebrity adherents of equal rights (the equal right to exploit people economically, the equal right to promote militarism, the equal right to serve the interests of the ruling class) and lapped up by the media.
Feminism was and is a radical analysis of human society. It is an analysis that does not equate killing people with “freeing” them. Despite what liberals think, we do not save women from the Taliban by prosecuting a vicious war in their country. Feminism as I understand it sees the world as grotesquely imbalanced. The virtues of peace, justice, creativity, warmth, wisdom, and nurturance are devalued and discarded. The virtues of self-promotion, aggression, opportunism, coolness, and leaving the realities of daily life to others (cooking your food, cleaning your clothes, raising your children) are the values of our society.
Neither Obama nor Kagan threaten the established order in any way; they are proponents of the established order. It has served them well if you consider being POTUS or a Supreme Court justice the pinnacle of human success. Personally, I do not.
Report thisBy Marisacat, May 14, 2010 at 5:50 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
What a limited, blinkered and, in fact, ignorant of the real world take on Obama’s nomination of a narrow UWS Democratic party operative, basically a DLC baby (read the memos from the Clinton WH).
The party line from the Dems - and its anemic cadres of white liberals - is just so tired. Worn out.
Report thisBy antispin, May 13, 2010 at 3:55 pm Link to this comment
i gotta call bullhickey on this. Kagan shows very strong indications that she’s either war happy or a lap dog for the war happy. No feminism there.
Report thisBy gerard, May 13, 2010 at 3:04 pm Link to this comment
Joe, it’s gonna take more than Kagan to “... change the culture of the court and the jurisprudence of the nation.” In fact, the Supremes just recently levelled a death blow on “jurisprudence” in America with its ruling that will funnel corporate money into political campaigns. That made it pretty clear where “the culture of the court” is, and it’s not in the public interest, definitely.
Report thisBy G.Anderson, May 13, 2010 at 1:54 pm Link to this comment
Yes maybe someday, it won’t matter, and maybe someday, no one will need to qualify as a victim, to prove that they are a liberal…
And maybe someday, people will be able to be their own person, and not have to resort to being called by any “ism”, or “ist”, whatever the case maybe, as a way of replacing a sense of self, that doesn’t exist inside.
and Just maybe that day is today..
Report thisBy NYCartist, May 13, 2010 at 12:27 pm Link to this comment
His mama would yell at him for dropping bombs/missiles from drones, and keep yelling….
Report thisBy RdV, May 13, 2010 at 10:35 am Link to this comment
It is all so tailored to Obama to have the superficial symbols of identity politics but the substance is of a woman who advocated to weaken women’s rights.
Report thisAll those insider elites protect the economic interests of class at the expense of the public at large, so in these times, this crap is little more than fluff.
By Hammond Eggs, May 13, 2010 at 8:55 am Link to this comment
If Obama is a feminist, then John Gotti was Robin Hood.
Report thisBy Mike, May 13, 2010 at 8:15 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
There is a good chance that Kagan will move the court even farther to the right despite the fact that Obama ran as center left candidate, but lets all give the president a big pat on the back for nominating two women! It was disturbing to read fawning articles like these during the Bush years, its just as disturbing now.
Report thisBy T Groan, May 13, 2010 at 7:17 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
More fluff. Unfortunately obama is succeeding in little more than moving the court to the right. What a joke!
Report thisBy Louis Proyect, May 13, 2010 at 6:19 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
What garbage, but what you would expect from a hardened DP supporter like Conason. Kagan urged Clinton to ban some late-term abortions and helped him draft the “reform” that would gut the welfare system, thus victimizing poor women of color. And I thought that Truthdig was supposed to be an alternative to the mainstream media…
Report thisBy Don't Worry About It, May 13, 2010 at 6:09 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“We, the Jewish people, control America and the Americans know it.”
Ariel Sharon
FREE AMERICA
DIRECT DEMOCRACY
Report thisBy Lance Bukoff, May 13, 2010 at 4:44 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
If only, though, Obama and his White House were sufficiently politically attuned to craft a different response than “She’s not gay” when the subject was first raised. Most of the right will join the shit-tossing bridge, because it will stick to the wall, and eventually Kagan will withdraw her own name from consideration.
The Obama administration in particular and Democrats in general fail over and over to anticipate the manner in which Republicans fight fights, and as a consequence lose most of them. Unfortunately, we lose with them.
Report this