Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 18, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

The Terror Con

The FBI May Have Finally Found Jimmy Hoffa

Say Hello to the 'Super Rich'

The Making of a Global Security State

This Will Not End Well

Most Comments
Most Emailed

 * NEW! * The Making of a Global Security State
 * NEW! * Climate Change Puts Lake Life at Risk
 * NEW! * The Terror Con



The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar
Dissent: Voices of Conscience

Dissent: Voices of Conscience

By Colonel (Ret.) Ann Wright and Susan Dixon
$15.00

more items

 
Reports

Obama on the Color Line

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Aug 6, 2010
Obama on 'The View'
AP / Pablo Martinez Monsivais

President Barack Obama appears on the ABC television show “The View” in New York on July 28.

By Marcia Alesan Dawkins

In his first major comment on race and race relations in our nation since his “A More Perfect Union Speech” on March 18, 2008, President Barack Obama called for frank discussion about race last week. In both a speech to the National Urban League and on the ABC daytime talk show “The View,” the president talked about race relations in the context of the political controversy over last month’s firing of longtime Agriculture Department employee Shirley Sherrod.

Obama agreed with those who have been calling for some sort of national conversation on race beyond CNN’s “Black in America” and “Latino in America.” He invited us to “look inward” and find the space to have “mature” dialogues about “the divides that still exist.” For Obama, these honest conversations should be based on our personal experiences and occur “around kitchen tables and water coolers and church basements.” However, many are left wondering whether Obama’s remarks represent a racial dialogue initiative or a post-racial accomplishment. 

Here’s a question we might consider: Does Obama want us to talk about race while he effectively sidesteps the conversation himself?

Obama appeared to begin his part of the conversation with a statement and a story that deserve attention. The statement, aired on “The View,” was an answer to questions about Obama’s own experience as an African-American of multiracial ancestry. As the president put it, “We are sort of a mongrel people.” Elaborating on his use of what can be considered an offensive term, he said, “I mean we’re [African-Americans] all kinds of mixed up. That’s actually true of white people as well, but we just know more about it.”

Some might argue that statements like this one are clever attempts to use multiracial identity to sanitize the country’s history of chattel slavery and racist discrimination. After all, Obama made no mention of how black and white people got “all kinds of mixed up” in the first place. It follows that if we hear Obama from this perspective, then we may be hearing a call to transcend race without getting beyond racial inequalities. On the other hand, there are those who assert that Obama makes use of his multiracial identity to do precisely the opposite: to acknowledge racial division as well as its problems and awkwardness. If we hear Obama from this perspective, then we can identify with the call for a more equitable future without “bogus” racial controversies and can recognize the giant strides made since the slavery and segregation eras.

Advertisement

The second of Obama’s noteworthy remarks is a story that closed his speech to the National Urban League. The story is about a letter “from Na’Dreya Lattimore, 10 years old—about the same age as [his daughter] Sasha.” In the letter Na’Dreya wrote “about how her school had closed, so she had enrolled in another. Then she … bumped up against other barriers to what she felt was her potential. So Na’Dreya was explaining … how we need to improve our education system. She closed by saying this … ‘You need to look at us differently. We are not black, we’re not white, biracial, Hispanic, Asian, or any other nationality.’ No, she wrote—‘We are the future.’ Na’Dreya, you are right.”

By agreeing with Na’Dreya it seems that Obama is inviting us to consider perspectives of the next generation, which sees the possibility for liberation from the burden of older racial narratives. By focusing on the ways in which individuals and societies can create positive change through open dialogue, Obama presents us with an occasion to reconsider what W.E.B. Du Bois called “the problem of the color line.” But therein lies the paradox. By agreeing with Na’Dreya, Obama ignores a racially differentiated nation. And, as a result, important questions raised by this letter go unanswered. Why did Na’Dreya’s school close? What were the “other barriers” that hindered the girl’s potential? 

Few can embody and embrace these changing concepts of race talk like President Obama. His multiracial identification allows him to relate and communicate with multiple audiences, suggesting that it can be a tool to question the construction of the color line. However, because multiracial identification capitalizes on the absence of reliable evidence of difference among racial groups, it begs the question of whether we can actually say anything about race now that differs substantially from what we have been able to say about it historically. In light of this, it may be most appropriate to understand our present moment as our president suggests: as one of racial dialogue initiation and not as a post-racial monologue or epilogue. 


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

drbhelthi's avatar

By drbhelthi, August 10, 2010 at 4:18 am Link to this comment

Yes. His experiences as a CIA operative prepared him
well to put up a good front and deliver a speech,
well-written by his highly-qualified wife, or
speech-writers.
However.
His father was Kenyan, purportedly Negroid. His
mother was Caucasion - carrying a UK passport -
perhaps. Thus he is neither Negroid nor Caucasian,
but rather a mixture. Doesn´t matter to me. Nor did
he have input into who his parents were nor what
name was written on his birth certificate - if he
has one.
When his loving old Grandma said he was born in
Kenya, his wife said, ” - when we visited Barack´s
homeland, Kenya—” and the former records custodian
of birth records in Hawaii said there was no birth
record for Barack Hussein Obama. This means to me
that he is was not born in the U.S.A. The U.S.A.
operates on the basis of the U.S. Constitution,
which requires that U.S. presidents be born in the
U.S.A.
Until it is established, with genuine documents, not
falsified by the CIA or U.S. Treasury, who falsified
passports for approx. 2,000 NAZI-types secreted into
the USA, 1945-1948, I will consider him to be an
imposter, fraudulently “installed” by the same NAZI
thugs.
Until he begins to support the U.S. Constitution,
instead of punishing those who do, he is just
another imposter, who wants to destroy the U.S.A.

Report this

By Maani, August 8, 2010 at 4:19 pm Link to this comment

Uh…excuse me?  This man gave one of the most powerful and effective speeches on race ever spoken to the American public.  How many of those speeches is he “required” to give to prove his “bona fides” in this regard?

If we couldn’t get it together enough after his FIRST one to REALLY have a discussion on race - and start decreasing its continued pernicious effect on our society - what makes anyone think that another one is going to make any difference?

Peace.

Report this

By ofersince72, August 8, 2010 at 4:15 pm Link to this comment

I attack Prisident Obama’s conservative policies

and I am enlightened liberal…

Please of you want to call yourself an Obama supporter
don’t call your self an enlightened liberal.

Report this

By REDHORSE, August 8, 2010 at 12:33 pm Link to this comment

By the way:That “The View” is offered as a serious platform for a Presidential discussion about Race says a lot about the state of our airways and National access to important dialogue. We need to tax corporate media who profit from “-the peoples-” airways ‘till they bleed.

      The only place the beautiful and free America you love exists, is inside you. Your physical world, is a debt indentured WalMartesque prison landscape, run by a corporate security machine, which allows its inmates nightly home furlough.

      Serious discussion of Race, Class and Social Reform is the last thing they want. They’ll destroy your family before they’ll allow a “living wage”. Why? Because education, personal wealth, community and family are POWER. The megalomaniacal psychopath (think Herod—think Boehner) fears health and wholeness in its victims. What do you think the “illegals” issue is about? The American worker paid huge dues in both labor and blood and built the greatest economy in the world. The fascist Cheney/Bush regime and their Wall Street minions gutted it. Now, in the face of GCC Doom and Natural Disaster, they treat you like a puppy who pissed the carpet, tell you you’re lazy, and allow the country to be overrun with cheap labor. And, your tax dollars pay for the adverse financial and social consequences while they profit. While this and other issues of magnitude press for address, they twiddle and smirk. Our European counterparts (”—but they pay high taxes—”) don’t put up with this crap and live fine lives. You don’t deserve it??

      Two more quick ones for you.

      Notice that the political/Wall Street Clinton wedding shut down the little town where it was held? High private corporate and Federal security monitored citizens and closed the roads in and out. Just like our airports, it will become permanent. The private enclave for the rich ascends. “All animals are equal, but some animals, are more equal than others.”

      GOOD NEWS!! We have a corrupt Republican “oil industry” Senator in my state. T.V. commercials are appearing that challenge and expose the slimebags record with facts and reason. Guess who’s behind it? Our local grass roots environmental organizations. I’m sending money today!!

      “Off with their heads!!”

Report this

By call me roy, August 7, 2010 at 4:59 pm Link to this comment

It is refreshing to see that Barry Barack and the “Progressives” don’t play the race card. Uh- wait a second, what is this? Cha?rlie Rangel and Maxine “Dirty” Waters said what?

Nevermind

Report this

By REDHORSE, August 7, 2010 at 1:49 pm Link to this comment

Poverty, class, economy and sane effective moral leadership are the real issue. Health care, jobs, a living wage, access to good education, sane drug law, enforcement of current immigration law, GCC legislation, population control, all and any approach to a dignified human American future will never be allowed by the Republithugs, the Dumbocrats or the vicious megalomaniacal financial narcissists who control them.

    Thinly disguised racist contempt of whites and American Culture, the framing of the Constitution as “only” a document meant to protect the property rights of white men, and the twisting of American history by the “politically correct”, to obscure the real struggles of all Americans, has served its’ intended purpose. The American Southwest is a defacto second “illegal” latino nation, with its’ own black market economy. Fascist for profit repression of Black Americans, who populate a manufactured warzone, (think E.St. Louis) fill the largest industrial prison complex in the world. How could hope survive that reality? It’s bull#@it and Black Americans know it!! Native Americans live in their own Nations, and the rest huddle in innercity economic zones.

      All races here once held, at least some common vision, hope and purpose for the American future. American leadership betrayed the vision. The fascist Cheney/Bush regime overthrew the Constitution, installed a Police State and the looting began. They ain’t gonna quit. Welcome to apocalypse and perpetual war. There are no non-combatants. Everyone hates everyone, and everyone, is betting on the firestorm where, you get both the “bang and the whimper”.

      By mid-century population will explode. GCC will drive millions north from the tropics. Natural resources will begin to fail worldwide. National Borders will be armed and mined by the military. Governments and the rich will retreat into protected enclaves (think Xe). It’s ten o’clock. Do you know where you’re children are? Because that’s where your grandchildren will be. Republithugs are already trying to nationalize water and Monsanto wants to make it illegal for you to grow your own food.

      There’s still time to not cut each others throats. Everyone knows that jobs, access to education, good conservation of natural resources and a sane approach to population builds a strong equitable societal structure. Race is an airball. Guns, thugs and money are the problem. That’s the real trickle down that the fascist elite offer. What part of Sieg Heil don’t you understand?

Report this

By FiftyGigs, August 7, 2010 at 6:54 am Link to this comment

“many are left wondering whether Obama’s remarks represent a racial dialogue initiative or a post-racial accomplishment.”

Many are, huh.

Oh, brother.

And is Al Franken REALLY representing an elected Congressman or just cleverly promoting Saturday Night Live?

Please. At least be honest. If you want to attack the President, have the guts to call yourself a conservative, and not pretend to be an enlightened liberal.

Report this

By Old Man Turtle, August 6, 2010 at 7:12 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“gerard’ seeks always to present the ‘rational’ and ‘positive’ spin on these
things, which is reputed to be an admirable trait, especially by those
endeavoring to exhibit it.  To carry it off, though, she has to resort to
displaying frequently what are really only doctored word pictures of an archaic
virtual world that never actually existed nor was it intended ever to exist.

“Equality” is a pretty enough notion, alright, but it is one of those “self”-
satisfying conceits of the “civilized” which exists only in their own fevered
imaginations.  It has no real meaning whatsoever in the Natural Living
Arrangement of our Mother Earth, which is where we all still actually live and
breathe every Day despite grandiose pretensions to-the-contrary among the
domesticated peoples.  “Race,” too, as it is commonly understood and applied,
is but another cobbled-together invention of the miserably displaced, part of
their vain efforts to make sense of a virtual world designed, built, and operated
intentionally to be organically nonsensical.

The conventional responses to various troubling issues, recommended
regularly by such sincerely concerned participants here as “gerard” and others,
even in the unlikely event of their realization, can do no more than further
distort (even if in temporarily somewhat less-disturbing fashion) the already
severely-warped (by the effects of the “individual”-ity disease) images of their
“selfs” reflected back to them by the trick mirrors set all around the “global”
fun-house where they are trapped more than anything else by their own (by-
now effectively inbred) inability to make those vital organic distinctions so
essential to Human health and well-being.  Absolutely nothing on-offer within
the smothering confines of this carnival-of-destruction will ever serve to free
its captives from the thrall of its seductive illusions.

Is it time to look to some free wild Native Guidance, instead, for a Way back
into the great Song ‘n’ Dance of Life Herownself?  Our tame Sisters and
Brothers could sure do (are in-fact doing daily) a hell-of-a-lot worse

Report this

By gerard, August 6, 2010 at 5:36 pm Link to this comment

Whether or not we “should” talk about race relies on whether or not we want racial discrimination to cease or to continue.  If we want it to change, the conversations will aim in that direction.  If we want it to reamin the conversations will aim in that direction.
  An example is the recent article on the dropping of the Abomb on Hiroshima and Nagazaki.  Comments on Truthdig regaring this matter for the most part (with some exceptions) exhibited the same 65-year-old prejudices, misjudgments, lack of knowledge and refusal to admit any need for change.  It was discouraging to read comments that sounded exactly like comments made 65 years ago, and consistently since, every time the subject comes up.
  Conversations about problems can change people’s attitudes only if there is a recognition that change is necessary, would be advantageous to everybody concerned, and can be achieved.
The fact is that there are many people in this country who do not want to give up the special privileges of whites; in fact, they do not even admit that whites have privileges.
  Of course this is not the only place where some people, based on some historical “reason” have precedence over others, but in America we have long had the goal of equality for all, regardless of differences, so we are obligated to admit and do what can be done to change racial discrimination in the U.S.—if we are to live up to our promises and our Constitution. Anything short of equality is a betrayal of both promises and laws.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.