|
|
May 24, 2013
|
|
Another Lone Wolf Joins the PackPosted on Feb 1, 2010
When I heard Scott Brown, the newly elected senator from Massachusetts, describe himself as a “Scott Brown Republican,” I groaned. It sounded as if he’s coming to Washington to be part of the problem, not part of the solution. We don’t need another knight in shining armor, don’t want another political messiah come to deliver the nation from evil. We’ve already got one in the White House and one in Alaska ready to ride her snowmobile into town and save the day. Both the Senate and the House are liberally sprinkled with lone wolves who believe the legislative process revolves around them alone. Instead of “E Pluribus Unum”—“Out of Many, One”—our new motto could be “I Did It My Way.” I hope the erstwhile Cosmo centerfold is smart enough to realize there is something more corrosive to our political system than bitter partisanship—and that’s, ahem, naked self-interest. Clearly, though, his status as the Next Big Thing appears to have gone to his head: When asked by ABC’s Barbara Walters whether he had presidential ambitions, he refused to rule out a run for the White House in 2012. He might want to take a long drive in that ancient pickup truck of his until the spell wears off. Actually, a lot of what Brown told Walters in a lengthy interview sounded quite reasonable. On abortion, he supports Roe v. Wade and a woman’s right to choose. On gay marriage, he believes the issue should be left up to the states—and in Massachusetts, which allows gay marriage, he says the question is “settled.” On health care, his record makes more sense than his rhetoric. As a state legislator, he voted for the reform bill that established universal health insurance in Massachusetts. But now he opposes the Senate reform bill, which is modeled on the Massachusetts program. At least he’s not the first senator from his state to be for something before he was against it. Advertisement But the most troubling passage from the interview was the part about his being a “Scott Brown Republican” and intending to “go down there and be accountable, accessible, open and honest ... to bring good government and fairness back to the equation.” It’s impossible to argue with that laundry list of virtues, except to note that he left out motherhood and apple pie. The last thing Washington needs is another politician who refers to himself as his own brand and promises to chart his own lonely path. Look at how the health care reform initiative reached its current parlous state. In the House, legislation had to be tailored so that Rep. Bart Stupak could save us from what he believed was unacceptable language on abortion. At least he was speaking for a number of like-minded colleagues, though. On the other side of the Capitol, Sen. Joe Lieberman stood alone to hold the health care bill hostage and save us from any number of monsters, including one idea—letting 55-year-olds buy into Medicare—that he had actually advocated on the campaign trail. Our political system suffers from many problems and may be bordering on dysfunction. But one thing we don’t have is a shortage of elected officials who see themselves as saviors of all that is good. President Obama was elected to change Washington. If everybody in town tries to sing “My Way,” we get a serenade—but we don’t get the solutions the country so urgently needs. Republicans were amused in watching Democrats get tied into knots on health care by the all-about-me ethos. But what goes around comes around, and now the GOP’s crucial 41st vote in the Senate—the vote that can thwart just about anything the Democrats want to do—belongs to a man who promises only that he will march to his own drummer. Good luck with that. Eugene Robinson’s e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com. © 2009, Washington Post Writers Group Previous item: Rotten Minds, Shriveled Hearts and Human Souls Next item: Who Will Be the New Global King of the Hill? New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By ardee, February 5, 2010 at 2:38 am Link to this comment
altara, February 4 at 6:06 pm
But , at days end, when the campaign is in full swing, the record of accomplishments from this democratic majority will be a short and futile one indeed. This is the goal of the GOP, not decent governance, not addressing the many woes that beset us, not coming to the aid of the suffering citizenry, no, only the shortsighted and selfish one of regaining power for its own sake.
We have an almost perfect storm in today’s Washington. An agendized and out of touch Republican Party, concerned only with advancing its ties to extremism and a Democratic Party so unbelievably incompetent and splintered as to be useless.
Report thisBy altara, February 4, 2010 at 2:06 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
SCOTT BROWN TO BE SWORN IN EARLY
The Republicans are eager to have their 41st Senator take his place. They said privately that seating Brown earlier could help them block Democratic nominees opposed by the GOP, specifically Craig Becker, whom President Obama has nominated to join the five-member National Labor Relations Board. It gives them enough votes to filibuster any nominee—and they’ve shown a willingness to filibuster any nominee.
I say let them filibuster, actually filibuster, Becker’s nomination. Think of the picture - Republicans droning on and on, holding up Senate business, in order to keep a labor representative from serving on the National Labor Relations Board.
homer http://www.altara.blogspot.com
Report thisBy Rick aka PhreedomPhan, February 3, 2010 at 7:19 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
When will we learn? I’m almost 68 and nothing has changed in all those years except to get predictably worse with each administation. We’re constantly being whipsawed between the “two” bogus parties and nothing really changes except the faces. “Both” the Republican and the Democratic Parties (party) are owned and operated by the super rich.
We have what I call a dual form of government. It combines democracy and leadership. When the people can be persuaded to want what the money powers want, inspiring songs are song to the glory of democracy, the people are praised for their ability to understand complex issues, and we get what the money powers want. When the people can’t be so persuaded, inspiring songs are song to the glory of leadership (das Fuehrer Prinzip), politicians are praised for having the courage to make unpopular decisions, and we get what the money powers want.
Wouldn’t it be nice if Brown actually represented the wishes of the people of Massachusetts in the Senate? Wouldn’t it be nice if all we elect to represent us actually did the same? Wouldn’t it be nice if Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny were real?
Rick
Report thishttp://phreedomphan-lostliberty.blogspot.com
By JohannG, February 2, 2010 at 4:17 pm Link to this comment
Good article and analysis. I would add that those that
Report thiswant political power are least likely to use it for the
good of the many. Their first priority is to maintain
power, or, if possible, expand it. Brown affirms that
rule. His agreeable personal view on social issues may
reflect his personal values at this time, but they are
expendable should they become a political liability. In
this sense he is not very different from our current
President. He may well run in 2012.
By samosamo, February 2, 2010 at 4:09 pm Link to this comment
I mean actually if it is such a bother to ‘purchase’ a republican
instead of a democrat to fill kennedy’s vacancy, why did not
those swing voters just go for a 3rd party, well, at least if one
was on the ballot?
And that is another question, how many names were on the
Report thisballot? Wikipedia shows only brown and whatsherface so talking about no choices, good grief.
By Samson, February 2, 2010 at 3:43 pm Link to this comment
In Washington, the only people who are allowed to say “My Way” are the corporations with all the money. Gawd forbid that any politician dare to have the ego and gall usurp that right for themselves.
That will always get the great protectors of corporate power at the WaPo down hard upon them.
Interesting choice for a column topic .... especially with both the recent Supreme Court decision for unlimited corporate money and politics AND the Democrats mass support for returning Bush’s Fed chairman to another term. Quite fascinating as to exactly which outrages get Mr. Robinson so stirred up.
I wish he’d just go home to check on what Mrs. Robinson is doing.
Report thisBy Samson, February 2, 2010 at 3:38 pm Link to this comment
Wow, who could believe that a junior Senator with less than one term in office could even dare to dream of running for President?
Report thisBy Hammond Eggs, February 2, 2010 at 1:01 pm Link to this comment
We don’t need another knight in shining armor, don’t want another political messiah come to deliver the nation from evil.
Don’t worry. Brown is neither of these. He’s just another hustler hustling the hustled.
Report thisBy dobby, February 2, 2010 at 10:32 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It seems those with the strongest self-defined [self-deluded perhaps] commitment to ideological purity are the ones most prone to autocracy. There was alot of projecting onto Obama that characteristic - in the sense that so many ‘progressives’ entertained a more-or-less revolutionary view that the promise of ‘change’ inflames. It turns out [happily] that the ‘change’ was more toward repairs of the neglected collegiality of opposing right-left points of view within the legislative than anything else; a disappointment to the revolutionaries because of its tedium but in reality, necessary to achieve a consensus which does account for the will of ALL citizens. I’m not from MA and don’t give a hoot about Scott Brown really, but, hopefully, the mantle of responsibility will correct and inspire rather than embolden any latent heroics.
Report thisBy GW=MCHammered, February 2, 2010 at 9:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Why do people vote against their own interests?
(excerpt)
The Republicans have learnt how to stoke up resentment against the patronising liberal elite, all those do-gooders who assume they know what poor people ought to be thinking.
Right-wing politics has become a vehicle for channelling this popular anger against intellectual snobs. The result is that many of America’s poorest citizens have a deep emotional attachment to a party that serves the interests of its richest.
.
.
.
“You vote to strike a blow against elitism and you receive a social order in which wealth is more concentrated than ever before in our life times, workers have been stripped of power, and CEOs are rewarded in a manner that is beyond imagining.
“It’s like a French Revolution in reverse in which the workers come pouring down the street screaming more power to the aristocracy.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8474611.stm
Report thisBy Anarcissie, February 2, 2010 at 9:07 am Link to this comment
Brown is interesting. From the Republican point of view, he’s a raging left-winger. And he won, as the raging right-winger they ran in New York’s 23d Congressional district did not. Maybe the Republicans are drifting back in from outer space.
Report thisBy bozh, February 2, 2010 at 8:28 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
We’ve had saviors: ashur,baal,yahweh,god, jesus,ghandi,MLK,BHO but US stays the same. tnx
Report thisBy ardee, February 2, 2010 at 4:18 am Link to this comment
Mr. Robinson’s criticism boils down to one detail; Brown is not a Democrat.
Sorry Eugene, but perhaps better candidates are needed from your party, perhaps better leadership is needed as well. The more obvious it becomes that Democrats are out of ideas, out of ability to produce meaningful legislation and increasingly out of time the further our nation sinks into third world status.
Report thisBy ofersince72, February 2, 2010 at 3:44 am Link to this comment
I get just as amused as Republicans seeing the
Democrats tied in knots.
and we so do need a night in shining armor,
but it sure aint Brown.
nor was it Obama as many thought it would be.
Democrats shoot themselves in the foot time after
Report thistime….I am starting to believe in a consirousy
theory about this. Trouble with that thought is that
they are toooo inept to even do that!!!!!
By Caro, February 2, 2010 at 3:41 am Link to this comment
He could be the next Barack Obama, rocketing from a
state legislature to the presidency in just a few
years.
Carolyn Kay
Report thisMakeThemAccountable.com