LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     robert scheer     barack obama     gay marriage     ndaa     chris hedges
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Say 'Hi-Ho!' as They Strip-Search You

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Children Slaughtered in Government Attack on Syrian Town

I Can't Hear Myself Think

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Classics for Pleasure

Classics for Pleasure

By Michael Dirda
$10.20

The Terror Dream

The Terror Dream

By Susan Faludi
$17.16

more items

 
Reports

Michele Bachmann Makes Dubya Look Good

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Jun 16, 2011

By E.J. Dionne, Jr.

Perhaps I should thank the current crop of Republican presidential candidates for providing me with an experience I never, ever expected to have: During this week’s debate in New Hampshire, I had a moment of nostalgia for George W. Bush.

Let me say quickly that this was tempered by another response to Bush that I’ll get to. Yet compared with the New Hampshire Seven—and with today’s Republican majority in the House of Representatives—Bush was the reincarnation of Theodore Roosevelt.

The 2012 GOP presidential field on display Monday offered not one idea about how to solve a problem facing our country that didn’t boil down to cutting taxes, slashing regulation or eliminating large swaths of government.

The big winner of the debate was Rep. Michele Bachmann, partly because she went in with a strategy and executed it, partly because she had a stage presence honed by hundreds of television appearances, and partly because she didn’t seem crazily extreme, which is what you would conclude from her many outrageous statements in the past.

But she looked almost conventional only because the rest of the Republican Party has veered so far right that it has caught up with her. In the current GOP, she is the mainstream—and that ought to petrify more reasonable Republicans. Even Bachmann’s astonishing call to get rid of the Environmental Protection Agency (created under the Republican administration of Richard M. Nixon) passed without a challenge from her rivals.

Advertisement

That’s why I felt nostalgia for Bush, especially the guy who was a candidate for president in 2000. Unlike this crowd of Republicans, Bush acknowledged that the federal government can ease injustices and get useful things done.

Say what you will about his No Child Left Behind education reform program. It accepted, correctly, that the federal government has to play an important part in reforming our public schools and held them accountable to a set of standards.

To get it passed, Bush worked with two of the most progressive Democrats in Congress, the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy and Rep. George Miller of California. The reform now needs to be reformed, of course, but it was a serious initiative.

And while there are many problems with the way Bush chose to provide prescription drugs under Medicare, he was quite right to believe it had to be done. Any health insurance plan worthy of being called comprehensive needs to provide prescription coverage. Bush didn’t pay for this benefit, and its structure is more complicated and more expensive than it has to be. But Bush did address a real need.

Oh, yes, and I really do miss some of Bush’s early rhetoric. I cannot imagine a Republican today giving Bush’s 1999 speech in Indianapolis titled—shades of Barack Obama?—“The Duty of Hope.”

Bush criticized the view “that if government would only get out of our way, all our problems would be solved” as a “destructive mindset.” He scorned this as an approach having “no higher goal, no nobler purpose, than ‘Leave us alone.’”

On the contrary, Bush declared: “We have always found our better selves in sympathy and generosity, both in our lives and in our laws.” Amen, and a Republican who expressed such sentiments today would be pummeled mercilessly by Fox News.

Now, there are limits to my Bush nostalgia. In brief: He sent troops to battle in two wars and cut taxes, largely on the wealthy, leaving us in deep fiscal and foreign policy holes.

The budget disaster he stuck us with requires little elaboration. But notice all the stories in the wake of the debate about Republicans moving back toward isolationism. The lesson here is that reckless interventionism inevitably produces a backlash into potentially reckless non-interventionism.

In particular, the war in Iraq was undertaken before we had settled the war in Afghanistan. Bush and his advisers did not think through the costs or the consequences of running two wars simultaneously. We are living with the terrible aftermath of these choices now, and Americans of all political stripes are understandably exhausted.

That’s why Bush nostalgia only takes you so far. The 43rd president, who might have given life to a constructive sort of moderate conservatism, instead unleashed the tea party furies that now engulf the Republican Party and threaten to turn Michele Bachmann, of all people, into a political giant.

E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com.
   
© 2011, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

Go Right Young Man's avatar

By Go Right Young Man, June 21, 2011 at 5:24 am Link to this comment

I don’t care for Bachmann.  I don’t desire her as the U.S. President.  It remains sad to see the overwhelming, overly-emotion, political bigotry which lives and thrives on this Web space.

Where would Progressives be if not complaining about their status amongst the miniscule minority.

Report this
anaman51's avatar

By anaman51, June 18, 2011 at 3:29 pm Link to this comment

For what it’s worth, it pleases me greatly to see the Republican Party’s presidential candidacy pool turn into a production of “Send In The Clowns.” It will be a pure pleasure to see them try to find a viable candidate among this bunch of overdressed turnips. There isn’t a single one of them we can trust to run a used car lot, let alone a country.

Report this
LocalHero's avatar

By LocalHero, June 18, 2011 at 7:50 am Link to this comment

The Republican debate is a dog-and-pony show matched only by the author of this article who is as delusional as they are.

Report this
JDmysticDJ's avatar

By JDmysticDJ, June 18, 2011 at 4:14 am Link to this comment

I agree wth Billy Pilgrim, billtmore, and Vin Diesel.

Report this

By billtmore, June 17, 2011 at 4:22 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I agree with Billy Pilgrim Part of me hopes for a Republican landslide in 2012 just so we can quickly reach rock bottom because it may as well be fast and furious versus slow and painful

Report this

By mc.murphy, June 17, 2011 at 3:24 pm Link to this comment

Michelle Bachman only registered within the establishment MSM. All online polls
showed Ron Paul wining the debate with 73% on average.

E.J. is a hack for the establishment. A very dangerous and contemptible twerp.

Report this
JDmysticDJ's avatar

By JDmysticDJ, June 17, 2011 at 2:08 pm Link to this comment

Inherit The Wind


42 is the answer to the questions regarding man the Universe and everything, many believe that there is no explanation for the meaning of 42, but they are wrong. 

Zaphod Beeblebrox has been residing at area 51 since the shortly after the conclusion of the Second World War. After much study and contemplation the best minds were able to decipher the meaning of 42, thus the creation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 42.

“United Nations Security Council Resolution 42, adopted on March 5, 1948, called upon the permanent members of the Council to consult and inform it regarding the situation in Palestine and to make recommendations to the United Nations Palestine Commission. The Resolution also appealed to all governments and peoples, particularly those around Palestine to aid the situation in any way possible.”

Michelle Bachman was, without an in depth explanation, quite rightly warning the people of the U.S. and the world regarding a rejection of Israel. If we reject Israel, Israel will nuke us, with the approval of God.

It’s an abstract concept, very hush hush and top secret, and I don’t expect you to understand, you’ll have to take my word on this one.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, June 17, 2011 at 11:05 am Link to this comment

No, this does:

42

Report this

By NZDoug, June 16, 2011 at 9:49 pm Link to this comment

This explains everything.
http://minnesotaindependent.com/55061/bachmann-america-cursed-by-god-if-
we-reject-israel

Report this

By Light, June 16, 2011 at 5:16 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

There is political resistance to the grating status quo, but there is not resistance on a mass scale. I believe the best tool we have is the boycott. If we would shut down our machine for just 48 hours… no working, no driving, no eating, no nothing… I believe we would experience a remarkable political revolution. Will you dedicate 48 hours to the flash revolution?

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, June 16, 2011 at 4:56 pm Link to this comment

Had Poppy Bush known that Rummy, Darth Cheney and the rest of the gang had gone insane when he wasn’t around to keep them on the straight and narrow, he never would have put them in Sonny Boy’s cabinet and we MIGHT have come out of those 8 years in far better shape (albeit, not great shape).  But once they were in it was too late….

I blame Poppy for two unforgivable sins:
1) Not realizing those ass-clowns were 8 years beyond his more measured foreign and domestic policies.
2) Clarence Thomas.

Report this

By TDoff, June 16, 2011 at 1:12 pm Link to this comment

Michele Bachmann even makes Trig and Sarah Palin look good. Compared to her, each of them is relatively intelligent, competent, knowledgeable, and qualified for the presiduncey.

Certainly, each of the three is the equal of ‘W’.

Report this

By CenterOfMass, June 16, 2011 at 12:12 pm Link to this comment

“...it is entirely possible that Americans will come out, once again, by the truck load for practicable reform of America…” -Layfayette

Wait, wait.  Didn’t we try that in 2008?

Report this
JDmysticDJ's avatar

By JDmysticDJ, June 16, 2011 at 12:08 pm Link to this comment

There’s good news and bad news; the good news is that Bachman is only preferred by 3% of Republicans. The bad news is that Republicans still darken the halls of Congress. Without Republicans there would be no serious deliberation about additional tax cuts that would add nearly 10 trillion dollars to the deficit over the next ten years. Without Republicans there would be no serious deliberation about ending the social safety net for the old and the sick. Without Republicans there would be more support for ending these insane wars. Without Republicans the Left – Right political paradigm would consist of an authentic Left and a Lieberman type group of reactionary morons, instead of the complete idiots that currently make up the Right.

I’ll confess to being naïve at some point regarding the intelligence of politicians. When I lost this naiveté’ is not clear to me, but do I remember thinking that politicians were educated professionals and people of some intelligence, but I don’t remember ever thinking that politicians had any real connection with the people, and that politicians were not corrupted and corruptible, or that many politicians were not wrong headed about militarism and foreign policy, I’ve always thought that our Representatives in government lacked sufficient understanding of, and empathy for, the people they represent and for the peoples of the world, but I do remember, at some point, in thinking that they had some semblance of intelligence, though a superficial kind of intelligence. Looking at the current crop of politicians, I can only deduce that most are educated fools. It was recently revealed that a significant percentage of our politicians lack even a basic superficial education.

I recently heard an interview with a well known national politician with much longevity in the federal government; the man could not complete a sentence without pausing to collect his thoughts, and he was months if not years behind the curve on political insight, and current issues. I’m certain that he thought he was being very informative and insightful, but the entire interview was a complete and total waste of the airwaves. There are other politicians who are proficient jabberers, who fluently attempt to advance their insane ideological objectives and others who are loud mouthed interrupters during political debate very skilled at obfuscating and ignoring indisputable truths. I heard recently that the Republicans specifically chose one of their members to be the spokesman on an issue because he was very good at obfuscating. How accurate this assertion about Republicans choosing their best obfuscators to be spokesman on certain issues is unknown to me, but it is clear to me, if to no one else, that obfuscation is an absolute necessity in order to advance Republican ideology.

Current Republican policies will decimate the American people and our government, continuing current Neo-liberal policies will destroy the middle class, further impoverish the poor, stifle any recovery from the recession, if not cause the global economy to collapse. It’s quite possible that the damage has already been done and that there is no escaping economic catastrophe. All political discussion today is concerned with austerity for the masses, prosperity, for all but the most wealthy, is off the table. Rational and humane foreign policy initiatives are filed neatly away and not a subject for serious discussion.

The proof of errant economic policies is evident in nations great and small. The recent historical record chronicles those failures, and only fools would perpetuate them. Even that bumbling, Ayn Randian, ideologue Alan Greenspan has admitted that his economic policies were “fundamentally flawed” and those who silenced Brooksley Born: Rubins, Summers, and members of Congress have admitted that they were wrong, but the Republicans want to push forward, full steam ahead with the same errant economic policies.

Intelligent?

Report this

By ocjim, June 16, 2011 at 11:12 am Link to this comment

“turn Michele Bachmann, of all people, into a political giant.”

Your article is much ado about nothing. The current state of our media and our nation has seen us descending into the pit of idiocy with a media whose only goal is profit and entertainment and a society allowing itself to be dumbed-down to our current blathering state.

We shouldn’t even waste time and energy on the “Michele Bachmanns, George Bushes or any other empty-headed cipher in a serious society, but we see it every day.

Report this

By rend it, June 16, 2011 at 10:53 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“cutting taxes, slashing regulation or eliminating large swaths of government.” really,, bush
wasn’t completely committed to this? His education plan was about giving a boost to the
charter school system and was primarily about vouchers and other incentives to take apart
and or weaken the public school system. His drug programs were designed by Big Parma
lobbyist. E.J. Dionne, Jr. needs to come up with better material. Truthdig needs to not print
everything that he produces, if we want to read foolishness, we can point our browsers at
the Post.

Report this

By felicity, June 16, 2011 at 8:01 am Link to this comment

Unless it’s taken a quantum leap in the last two hours,
Bachmann’s poll numbers are still at 3%.  The media’s
take on her recent performance, and I mean
performance,is only further evidence that the media are
addicted to performers.

As far as the rats racing to win the Republican
nomination, even if he/she wins, he/she will still be a
rat.

Report this

By Chris Herz, June 16, 2011 at 6:39 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Michelle Bachmann:  The perfect president for a dying empire.
Our once-Great Republic is long dead, lying with its draftee army in the rice paddies of Vietnam.  It was replaced by this now moribund corporate, militarized empire.  The likely replacement for this entity, in turn, is some new faith-based state, wherein market fundamentalism is allied to Christian Dominionism.
As leader of such a state Bachmann answers all requirements.
With any luck she will preside over state bankruptcy and disunion, a la USSR.

Report this

By ChrisG, June 16, 2011 at 6:32 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Was hoping to find something - anything - related to Bachmann here. Disappointed. You know you have crap when, after reading an article, the reader can re-read the headline and still legitimately ask: “Why do you say that?”

Report this

By Jim Yell, June 16, 2011 at 6:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I can understand where Dionne was trying to make a point, but using George Bush as a counter to the current Republican Crazies is a bit optimistic. Perhaps George may have said some almost reasonable things, but at this point we have a President who said some very constructive things about a return to lawfulness and then became President and did the exact opposite of what he promised.

The true problem is the Democrat Party and the Republican Party are now in collusion with each other and dismiss the welfare of Labor and the General Public to service the greed and nasty behavior of the super rich. If the rich paid their taxes, if the old standard of taxes and regulations were still in place, if the fines that should have been paid for the deliberate corruption of the government by Corporations and Banks, if the miltary spending were reduced to what we really need for safety—there would be no need to talk about cutting back or destroy the constructive responsbilities of government action in a populated and developed country.

Report this

By TT, June 16, 2011 at 6:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It is a sad time we are in when Michelle Bachmann makes GW Bush look good.

Good article, thanks.

Report this
Lafayette's avatar

By Lafayette, June 16, 2011 at 6:13 am Link to this comment

ED: But she looked almost conventional only because the rest of the Republican Party has veered so far right that it has caught up with her. In the current GOP, she is the mainstream—and that ought to petrify more reasonable Republicans.

Perhaps, but that will work to the Dems favor next year.

In the mid-terms Americans wanted to punish BO & Co because, as (supposedly) promised, their leader could not walk-on-water.

This time around, that hurt is still there but it is entirely possible that Americans will come out, once again, by the truck load for practicable reform of America - which it needs so badly to correct Income Inequality and rein in the Plutocracy influencing Congress.

Just maybe ...

Report this

By omop, June 16, 2011 at 5:41 am Link to this comment

E. J. Dionne needs to get out more often and mingle with “real folks”. Ms. Bachmann sounds exactly like Mike Huckabee and his followers.

His claim that Ms. Bachmann is turning into a political giant is pure
fantasy. Since according to past reported comments by the
Congresswoman she is quoted as saying:-


” I am convinced in my heart and in my mind that if the United States
fails to stand with Israel, that is the end of the United States . . . [W]e
have to show that we are inextricably entwined, that as a nation we
have been blessed because of our relationship with Israel, and if we
reject Israel, then there is a curse that comes into play.

” And my husband and I are both Christians, and we believe very
strongly the verse from Genesis [Genesis 12:3], we believe very strongly
that nations also receive blessings as they bless Israel. It is a strong and
beautiful principle.”

Report this

By camustranger, June 16, 2011 at 4:43 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

‘Bush acknowledged that the federal government can ease injustices and get useful things done,’ and this made Ej feel good then and nostalgic now. words and deeds are indeed one and the same. Ej, i must congratulate you on yet another stellar, cogent, powerful, courageous piece of rigorous analysis. you are indispensable.

Report this

By FRTothus, June 16, 2011 at 4:38 am Link to this comment

>>Say what you will about his No Child Left Behind
education reform program. It accepted, correctly,
that the federal government has to play an important
part in reforming our public schools and held them
accountable to a set of standards.<<

Say what we will? Though it is minor next to the
felonies and international crimes (war) Bush
committed, and Obama carries on, this presumes facts
not in evidence, and affirms what is yet another
example of Federal criminal behavior.  The Federal
government has no authority or jurisdiction in such
things.  These are matters that are left to the
States.  Read the Constitution, Dionne, before
offering legal opinion.  The Federal government has
no jurisdiction in state and local schools.  Ron Paul
is absolutely correct on this issue.

Report this
Billy Pilgrim's avatar

By Billy Pilgrim, June 16, 2011 at 4:13 am Link to this comment

The current gaggle of reactionaries are loyal to
their ideology, unlike the phony dems who cave at the
slightest provocation. Part of me hopes for a
Republican landslide next year, so we can see the
unfettered right in action, destroying what little
decency remains in order for the people to finally
wake up and forever banish these neo-fascists from
our nation’s political discourse. Lenin was ecstatic
when the Tsar mobilized the Russian military in
August, 1914, which gave the Kaiser the perfect
excuse to declare war against the Russian Empire. The
Bolshevik gangster knew that the corrupt,
incompetent, decadent, Romanov dynasty would be no
match against Germany, and that the collapse of
Russia would increase the prospects for revolution.

Report this

By rbrooks, June 16, 2011 at 3:04 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I’ve been having nostalgia for George Bush ever since First Grifter of the United States Obama appointed Rahm Emanuel acting president, and Stage Two of the Big Con began.

I’m just saying, there’s something to be said for being out front about being a corporate stooge. At least you don’t have to deal with cognitive dissonance.

Report this
Mike789's avatar

By Mike789, June 16, 2011 at 2:56 am Link to this comment

Ya know E.J., my only explanation for your adulation of the the Minnesota representative, (name withheld deliberately ~ I’ll refrain from adding anything to the circus MSM is perpetuating),and MSNBC’c Matthews is there with you, is a “please don’t throw me in the briar patch” scenario that you must acknowledge somewhere in your dithering pate, will never come to fruition. You’re not going to get your wish.

It’s an “Easy Street” rant. Do some research and give me the straight and skinny on Huntsman.

Report this

By JJW, June 16, 2011 at 2:55 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Nothing can be gained by watching these dog & pony shows.  You really need to look at their records which journalists today are too lazy to do.

Report this

By H.Finn, June 16, 2011 at 2:51 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

A bloodless coup, an entitlement program for snotty
rich kids, a direct action of upper-class aggression,
warfare & and fiscal procurement of general
funds…call it and Bush/co. what you want, but the
bottom line is the oligarchs had their way, and
continue to do so through the ‘Hope to Change’ fake
Left, run to the right guy. People like Bachmann, no
matter how long she keeps her mouth shut at the
debates, or how serious teabaggers take her
(especially herself), she is just the average modern
political distraction of the day…no different then
Newt, Sarah etc. etal.

Report this
kerryrose's avatar

By kerryrose, June 16, 2011 at 1:23 am Link to this comment

What a pile of crap.

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.