|
|
May 18, 2013
|
|
Meltdown on the Launch PadPosted on May 19, 2011“I want to make sure every House Republican is protected from some kind of dishonest Democratic ad. So let me say on the record, any ad which quotes what I said on Sunday is a falsehood, because I have publicly said those words were inaccurate and unfortunate.” A grateful nation thanks you, Newt Gingrich. The presidential campaign is just starting, and already you’ve given us a passage that will live in infamy—forever—in the annals of American political speech. Your delightful quotation shall be filed under “fiascos” and flagged with a cross-reference to “utter nonsense.” I can’t remember when we’ve heard a politician plead so desperately to take back something he said. Then again, naked desperation is clearly in order. The favorite parlor game in Washington this week has been trying to remember a more disastrous campaign launch than the one Gingrich is having. Many candidates have stumbled coming out of the gate, but few have taken off like a shot in the wrong direction. The great irony, of course, is that Gingrich’s grievous error was to speak the truth. Appearing on “Meet the Press” last Sunday, he referred to the proposal by Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., to convert Medicare into a voucher program—endorsed by all but four members of the GOP majority in the House—as “right-wing social engineering.” He went on, “I think that that is too big a jump. I think that what you want to have is a system where people voluntarily migrate to better outcomes, better solutions, better options.” He said he considered President Obama’s health care reform law to be “radical change” and added that “I would be against a conservative imposing radical change.” Advertisement First he tried to claim that host David Gregory had somehow bamboozled him with a trick question; this “babe in the woods” defense was laughable, given that Gingrich had been on the show 34 times before Sunday’s self-immolation. Then he claimed he actually supported the Ryan plan but believed the groundwork, in terms of public opinion, hadn’t been properly laid. Finally, he just gave up and demanded to take it all back. But by then, video was already circulating of an encounter Gingrich had with an Iowa voter who told him that “what you just did to Paul Ryan is unforgivable.” When Gingrich mildly protested, the man persisted: “Yes, you did. You undercut him and his allies in the House. You’re an embarrassment to our party. ... Why don’t you get out before you make a bigger fool of yourself?” Gingrich’s week just couldn’t get any worse. But then it did. While he and his wife Callista were at a book signing in Minnesota on Tuesday, a gay-rights activist showered the candidate with colorful glitter. That same day, it was reported that Callista Gingrich, in disclosure reports she was required to file when she worked for the House Agriculture Committee, stated that at one point the couple owed between $250,000 and $500,000 to Tiffany’s. So much for understanding the struggles of everyday Americans. To cap it all off, Gingrich’s press secretary, Rick Tyler, was asked by the Huffington Post to comment on media coverage of his candidate. Tyler’s response suggests that the next time he sends someone out for coffee, he might ask for decaf. “The literati sent out their minions to do their bidding,” it begins, before going on to describe an epic “firefight” that somehow involves sheep, cocktail parties and bylines. “A lesser person could not have survived the first few minutes of the onslaught,” Tyler wrote. “But out of the billowing smoke and dust of tweets and trivia emerged Gingrich, once again ready to lead those who won’t be intimidated by the political elite.” I must note that Gingrich, a former House speaker, has been a card-carrying member of the political elite for years. But don’t you dare quote me. Eugene Robinson’s e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com. New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By SteveL, May 20, 2011 at 9:40 pm Link to this comment
Members of Congress will start taking vouchers for their medical care about when?
Report thisBy DigThis, May 20, 2011 at 9:14 pm Link to this comment
RESTATED MORE STRONGLY:
If the uber right-wing attacks Newt for criticizing their positions, why the hell are we joining in with them?
Gingrich criticized extremist GOP legislation in favor of something merely ultra-conservative.
This may be good for a few laughs in the short run, but the next time we see Newt or anyone else on the Republican ticket, they’ll be wearing a brown shirt.
If we want to slow down the Weimarization of America, its time to engage ANYONE who publicly criticizes uber-right extremism, no matter how you may feel about them personally.
Report thisBy DigThis, May 20, 2011 at 8:17 pm Link to this comment
Should have supported Newt after this intermittant blurb of truth.
Report thisBy Charley Barcelo, May 20, 2011 at 6:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This for Newt. Don’t wprry about it. You are not paranoid. People genuinely think you are a total idiot.
Report thisCharley B.
By gharlane, May 20, 2011 at 5:20 pm Link to this comment
Apothegms —right on.
As the inimitable Tina Fey, back in her Palin persona, said the other night when channeling the Sarah:
“.... and I just hope that tonight the lame-stream media won’t twist my words by repeatin’ ‘em verbatim.”
Report thisBy mamadoc, May 20, 2011 at 12:36 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
You missed the ‘one more thing’ when he was talking to the press and his mobile rang and the ring was the tune Dancing Queen by Abba.
Report thisBy Apothegms, May 20, 2011 at 9:33 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Let’s revisit Rick Warren’s question to John McCain: “On taxes, define rich. . . . At what point – give me a number, give me a specific number – where do you move from middle class to rich?” McCain’s answer, after some hemming and hawing: “So I think if you’re just talking about income, how about five million? So – but seriously, I don’t think you can – I don’t think, seriously that – the point is that I’m trying to make here seriously – and I’m sure that comment will be distorted, but the point is – the point is – the point is that we want to keep people’s taxes low and increase revenues.”
That’s five million dollars per year INCOME, not total assets. A few days later, Obama quoted McCain exactly: “He was in a panel the other day with Rick Warren, some of you may have seen it – and Rick Warren asked him, ‘How do you define rich?’ He said – maybe he was joking – he said, ‘Five million dollars.’ I guess if you’re making three million a year, you’re middle class.”
Right on cue, Tucker Bounds, a McCain campaign spokesperson, jumped on the “distortion”: “As was immediately predicted by John McCain after he made the remark, Barack Obama is already distorting his comment about the definition of ‘rich’ in America.”
So it’s a tradition among Republican candidates: you libel them when you tell the truth about them; you are dishonest and inaccurate when you quote their exact words; you distort their positions when you state their positions. Hello, Alice, what’s it like in Wonderland?
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, May 20, 2011 at 3:27 am Link to this comment
So…he attacks Ryan’s plan as “social engineering”, which is a VERY nice way to describe the Biggest Screw of the People since the banks were allowed to sink the world’s economy in 1929 and, for once in his worthless life, is right. The ditto-heads attack, and…The Newt tries to slime out of it.
The beauty of Ron Paul is that he would tell them to fuck off, maybe not in those words. Paul won’t get the nomination—he’s too truly libertarian, and I’m not sure he’d be any damn good as President, but he certainly is head and shoulders above the weasely lying self-promoting scum that make up the rest of the field of GOP Presidential wannabees.
Report thisBy Virginia777, May 19, 2011 at 10:58 pm Link to this comment
poonckie:
“I feel sorry for the slimy amphibians that bear his name.”
You make a very good point.
Report thisBy poonckie, May 19, 2011 at 10:45 pm Link to this comment
I feel sorry for the slimy amphibians that bear his name.
Report thisBy TDoff, May 19, 2011 at 8:10 pm Link to this comment
And many of us thought The Donald was going to be the weirdest, wildest, whackiest comic relief on the GOPer ticket. Boy, were we wrong. Do you suppose that’s why Trump backed out? He knew he could never outdo The Newt?
Report this