Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
April 29, 2017 Disclaimer: Please read.

Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.

Rebel Mother

Truthdig Bazaar more items

Email this item Print this item

Meet the Obscure Federal Regulator Who’s Not Helping Homeowners

Posted on Feb 8, 2012
AP / Manuel Balce Ceneta

Federal Housing Finance Agency Acting Director Edward DeMarco testifies before the Senate Banking Committee in December 2010.

By Cora Currier, ProPublica

This article originally appeared at ProPublica.

Last week, ProPublica and NPR raised questions about a risky investment strategy at Freddie Mac that would pay off if homeowners stayed trapped in expensive mortgages. It’s just the latest example of how government-owned Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae have frustrated many by not putting homeowners first.

Fannie and Freddie are required to help homeowners while earning profits so they can pay back the taxpayers who bailed them out. Here is our guide to the little-known federal regulator, Edward DeMarco, ultimately in charge of the two companies. You may have never heard of him, but as The Washington Post put it, he’s “the most powerful man in housing policy.”

The basics

In the summer of 2008, as part of a larger economic stimulus bill amid the subprime mortgage crisis, President George W. Bush created the Federal Housing Finance Agency, combining several agencies overseeing housing policy, and increasing regulation of government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie and Freddie. When the government bailed out Fannie and Freddie a few months later, the FHFA took charge of them.


Square, Site wide
DeMarco, a lifelong regulator, was named the acting head of the FHFA roughly a year after the bailout when his Bush-appointed predecessor stepped down. Obama nominated a consumer-friendly replacement for DeMarco in October 2010, but Republicans blocked him. (Republican opposition to Obama’s nominee for DeMarco’s successor stemmed in part from concerns that he would push banks and others too far to help homeowners, unfairly rewarding reckless borrowers.)

As head of the FHFA, DeMarco has a three-part mission: to promote the soundness of Fannie and Freddie, and to support affordable housing and a stable and liquid mortgage market (in other words, to expand access to home ownership loans and make it easier to buy and sell mortgages).

The last two goals, though, can clash with the fact that under the bailout, DeMarco is the “conservator” of Freddie and Fannie, meaning he has to protect their finances for the benefit of their shareholders. (And the majority shareholder is now the federal government.) According to The Washington Post’s Brad Plumer and Ezra Klein, there is “a conflict tucked deep into DeMarco’s job description: The head of the FHFA is stuck between the narrow needs of Fannie and Freddie and the broader needs of the housing market.”

DeMarco has focused almost solely on that first goal, telling Congress many times that “as conservator, FHFA has a statutory responsibility to preserve and conserve the enterprises’ assets.” In plainer terms, he told NPR last week that his role is to “make sure Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac undertake activities that don’t cause further losses for the American taxpayers.”

DeMarco has strongly asserted his independence, insisting that he is promoting needed fiscal discipline. (He did not respond to our latest requests for comment on his role with the FHFA).

Clashes with Congress and Obama

Democrats and Obama administration officials have been frustrated with DeMarco, saying the FHFA’s narrow focus on Fannie and Freddie’s health has hurt the housing market.

The Obama administration has repeatedly tried to push principal reduction 2014 reducing the size of a borrower’s mortgage 2014 as a way to help homeowners, especially those with homes worth less than their mortgages. But as ProPublica and others have reported, time and again, Fannie and Freddie wouldn’t participate: a crippling problem, since the two companies own or guarantee about half of the country’s mortgages.

Last month, the administration unveiled yet another plan to encourage principal reduction, but a former administration adviser called DeMarco “the boulder” in the way of making it happen.

DeMarco says principal reduction could cost taxpayers $100 billion. Some economists counter that while principal reductions might lead to a short-term hit for Fannie and Freddie, it would ultimately result in fewer underwater mortgages, fewer foreclosures and a healthier housing market 2014 all good for Fannie and Freddie’s bottom line.

On another administration plan, to allow more borrowers to refinance at lower rates, DeMarco shifted somewhat toward the White House’s position. He agreed to lift some fees on refinancing and make it easier to qualify. Freddie Mac told ProPublica in a statement that it has helped more than 830,000 families refinance, but as we noted, critics say that the refinancing effort could be helping millions more.

As DeMarco told Politico, he’s been no “particular friend” of banks. He brought a massive lawsuit against 17 banks, alleging fraud over $200 billion in toxic mortgages sold to Fannie and Freddie. The case is ongoing.

DeMarco is also charged with helping Fannie and Freddie go gently into the night. As part of their bailout, the two companies are supposed to wind down their operations. And just as DeMarco has resisted Democratic calls for more aggressive help for homeowners, he’s also pushed back against Republican calls to spin off the companies more quickly. He’s also rejected GOP plans to cap executive pay at Fannie and Freddie.

Why he’s still there

Last week, DeMarco described his job as a “balancing act.” It’s certainly thankless. While Democrats have called for DeMarco’s head, the FHFA is an independent agency, meaning the Obama administration can’t just get rid of him over policy disputes such as his stance on refinancing or principal reduction. He could also be replaced if Obama decides to offer another nominee and the Senate confirms the choice. Barring that, DeMarco will likely remain where he is for some time, walking his own line on Fannie and Freddie’s contradictory mission.

Lockerdome Below Article
Get a book from one of our contributors in the Truthdig Bazaar.

Related Entries

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every day.

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Join the conversation

Load Comments

By John Poole, February 10, 2012 at 6:53 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Licensed appraisers can be hired by prospective buyers, realtors and the lending
institution. Guess which appraisal number comes in lower than the other two? I
was there in the early 80s trying to buy a house when prices were sky rocketing
Yes, the appraiser has a set fee but pleasing the lenders insures he’ll get plenty of
work. We’ve left out the inspection report which could influence the asking and
final price. Appraisers and realtors often became very chummy and money
exchanged hands for “favors”.

Report this

By Gary Killcoyne, February 9, 2012 at 3:58 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Mr Poole- Appraisers in cohoots? Really? The Agents involved in the sal collect 7%, mortgage brokerage & bank fees 2-4% more. The broker called for the appraiser( & assigned the work) at that time.The appraiser? $350.00. Comparable sales kept going up, the agents & brokers didn’t get paid if there was no closing, so if the appraiser didn’t see the value, he didn’t see any more work.The banks & brokers wanted that value & were willing to pay for it.They should have just been honest & said we don’t need an appraisal,we’ll just take last years value & add 6%. They could have saved 350.00.

Report this

By michael8000, February 9, 2012 at 10:49 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Let’s blame the interim federal stiff instead of the ill-conceived process that spawned the FHFA, that ought to make about 25,000,000 Americans in foreclosure feel better.

Report this

By John Poole, February 8, 2012 at 2:35 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Come on folks- nothing here to ponder. the vile banking and investment elites
decided back in the early 80s to scam anyone who held a mortgage. They
magically elevated home values in cahoots with the appraisers to convince
mortgage holders that their “assets” had magically grown hoping the mortgage
holders would rush to the bank to borrow money.  Fairy dust gold had been
sprinkled over their rooftops. The scam worked and engendered a twenty year
faux prosperity built on asset counterfeiting. It might take another twenty years for
the original scammers to transfer that seven trillion asset collapse on to someone
else. It sure won’t be them.

Report this
Right Top, Site wide - Care2
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide

Like Truthdig on Facebook