LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     robert scheer     barack obama     gay marriage     ndaa     chris hedges
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Say 'Hi-Ho!' as They Strip-Search You

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Children Slaughtered in Government Attack on Syrian Town

I Can't Hear Myself Think

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Churchill

Churchill

By Paul Johnson
$14.97

While America Aged

While America Aged

By Roger Lowenstein
$17.13

more items

 
Reports

Media Marvel at Obama’s Move to the Right

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Jan 27, 2011

By FAIR

This article was published by Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting.

With increasing vehemence since the midterm elections, pundits and journalists have recommended Barack Obama move to the right--and now are citing recent polling to suggest that the president has benefited from following their advice. But there is little evidence that Obama's current approval ratings have anything to do with a rightward shift, and the entire conversation rests on the premise that Obama was governing from the left in the first place.

This is nothing new; there is a long corporate media tradition of urging Democratic presidents to move to the right in order to capture the "center." After the midterm elections, many pundits were encouraging Obama to "pull a Clinton"--based on the dubious notion that a liberal Bill Clinton, chastened by defeat in 1994, moved to the right and found success (Extra!, 1/11).

Obama's selection of conservative Democrat William Daley as his new chief of staff was seen as representative of some sort of political shift. The Washington Post (1/7/11) offered this somewhat confused explanation:

His moderate views and Wall Street credentials make him an unexpected choice for a president who has railed against corporate irresponsibility and tried, with limited success, to appease restive liberals who think he has not been tough enough on bankers.


Why would it be surprising for someone known for not being "tough enough on bankers" to appoint someone with Wall Street credentials? Daley's center-right views--not all that different from those of his predecessor, Rahm Emanuel--should mesh easily with the many members of Obama's economic team who also have Wall Street credentials.

A USA Today piece (1/7/11) was headlined "Daley Choice Puts a Moderate in Play"--as if there weren't many "moderates" around to begin with. (Emanuel, Daley's predecessor, got similar praise from corporate media for holding views that were not "popular with the Democratic Party's liberal base"--Time, 11/13/08; FAIR Media Advisory, 11/26/08.) An L.A. Times (1/7/11) assessment, "Obama Chooses Former Clinton Staffers in a Move to the Center," sent a similar message.

Soon enough, the press began touting Obama's rise in the polls as evidence that the public wanted "centrism" as much as the media did. As the L.A. Times explained (1/24/11), Obama "retooled his West Wing to include more moderate voices....and made new overtures to the business community. His polls have rebounded on the eve of his second State of the Union address, passing the 50 percent threshold in a series of major surveys."

On World News (1/23/11), reporter David Kerley declared:

President Obama is much higher in the polls than he was just weeks ago. His charm offensive with business, appointments of business-friendly staff and a productive lame duck session have put him on a roll.... Moving to the center, talking about cutting spending, creating jobs is working.


In the run-up to the State of the Union, CNN's Wolf Blitzer declared (1/25/11), "A lot of people say the best advice he got was to move back to the center and start compromising with Republicans." If by "a lot of people," Blitzer means the reporters and pundits who were giving that advice, he's absolutely correct. But he went further:

It's helping him in the polls. There's no doubt about that. You can see, in our most recent job approval number, 55 percent. It was in the 40s, low 40s, not that long ago. So this move to the center, it certainly seems to be helping him with the American public.


Blitzer's guest, comedian Bill Maher, suggested that there was little reason to assume this explains Obama's apparent bump in the polls. Looking at some of the overall trends, it would not appear that Obama's approval ratings have shifted dramatically; Talking Points Memo (1/26/11) finds his approval rating in a wide range of polls now averages 50.1 percent, and that average has never been below 44 percent during his entire presidency. The end of the election season, which produced a torrent of negative advertising directed at Obama and the Democratic Congress, could explain some of the modest shift in the recent numbers, as could Obama's December 22 signing of a bill repealing the unpopular Don't Ask Don't Tell policy.

Polling bump or not, the media lesson is remarkably consistent. After the State of the Union speech, "Obama Adjusts Course Toward the Center" was the headline at USA Today (1/26/11). Reporter Susan Page declared the night "marked the culmination of a three-month transformation that has rebooted Barack Obama's presidency." The new Obama "proposed more centrist policies in a less combative tone" and was "following the Clinton comeback playbook."

The corporate media know that playbook well by now--indeed, they largely wrote it--and they are heartened to see Obama taking their advice.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons license.

New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By Gil, January 30, 2011 at 9:32 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

If anyone was paying any attention to our politics they would have recognized
Obama demonstrated his desertion of all his campaign promises and pretended
mainstream Democratic philosophy on his election night in 2008 when he
announced that he was going to ask Rahm Emanuel to consider being his chief-
of-staff.  You know damned well that no presidential victor would have talked
like that unless the contact and decision had already been made.  Emanuel, at
the time, was the leader of the so-called Democratic Leadership Council, 
Emanuel tried unsuccessfully to bully Howard Dean in the distribution of
campaign funds when Dean was chairman of the Democratic National
Committee, and we know the DLC is so “central” that it’s to the right of the real
Democratic Party.  No, Obama hasn’t changed at all, he’s only been exposed for
the opportunist that he has always been, and now he’s using every opportunity
to return to the grand orator-campaigner for the 2012 election.  “Fool me
once…”  There will be no shame on this voter.

Report this

By REDHORSE, January 29, 2011 at 2:07 pm Link to this comment

I enjoy COUNTERSPIN on NPR and hope TRUTHDIG continues articles contributed by FAIR. Still, I agree that there wasn’t a lot of new info. in this piece. Most here recognize the propagandist nature of “so called” Corporate News. In reality “labels” like Left/Right/Center are laughable. Open Fascism vs. a disintegrating “We the people” is the actual story.

      Interestingly, I’ve some times (pardon my paranoia) speculated about the possibility of Obama being somehow compromised. But gee, it’s a lot easier to particpate in make believe conspiracy than accept our Presidents betrayal of the greatest political mandate for change ever given by the American people.

Report this
oldog's avatar

By oldog, January 29, 2011 at 10:05 am Link to this comment

Like I said before: “Obama is the best president the
Republicans ever had.”

My theory is that, like Clarence Thomas, he suffers
from “Stockholm Syndrome”. Traumatized by bigoted,
greed-driven, Wall Street financiers, Clarence and
Barrack ape their policies, and self-justifications
(even their mannerisms) in hopes of pleasing the
economic terrorists in charge of big business. It’s so pitiful, if it wasn’t my nation they’re beggaring, it
would probably make me laugh.

Report this
prisnersdilema's avatar

By prisnersdilema, January 29, 2011 at 12:40 am Link to this comment

Lets see, the plutocratic controlled media says move right.

Obama moves right.

The plutocratic controlled media, says it’s polls show an increase in popularity.

Obama’s popularity increases. Gee Whiz…

Actually, I don’t really believe there is anything to the birther, movement.

That being said, I’ve decided to support it anyway.

Because, it could be a good way to get, Obama out, without having to impeach him, which is not likely to happen, unless it turns out he is a CIA mole. (Obama’s mother worked for Timothy Geitners father.)

Hopefully, we could also remove, that dangerous fool Biden at the same time.

Report this

By Devon J. Noll, MPA, January 28, 2011 at 7:27 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I find myself marveling as I listen to the pundits and journalists dissect the SOTU.  I listened to that speech and I saw no shift to the center - what I heard was a sellout of his base completely and a pandering to the liberals in ways that were unattainable or realistic in the hopes he would not be noticed selling us out.  A bump in the polls?  Of course, presidents get that after the SOTU, no matter what they say.  This president sold us out and will continue to stick his tail between his legs as long as Bill Clinton and the DNC bankers tell him to do so.  He made a deal with the Devil in 2008 to keep the DNC together, and he sealed the deal with the SOTU.  The president forgot that it is not the DNC that votes - it is Americans, and now we will not be voting for him, and we are all in trouble.

Report this
Peetawonkus's avatar

By Peetawonkus, January 28, 2011 at 2:16 pm Link to this comment

Come the 2012 elections, I’m sure Obama can count on all those mythical “centrist” voters to vote him back into office.

Report this
tropicgirl's avatar

By tropicgirl, January 28, 2011 at 10:27 am Link to this comment

You BET someone has the goods on him. I think it is the citizenship issue, but there may be something else on the birth certificate…

At any rate, ANY BUMP BASED UPON A SPEECH IS NOT A BUMP.

Has ANYONE learned a lesson about this empty speech stuff?  Apparently not.

Obama is a globalist, who will do nothing but the globalist bidding. And he is happy to do the dirty work, normally attributed to dirty, rotten, republicans, throwing his party under the bus, so that the republicans can come after him and further build upon his, and their, globalist agenda, without Obama-poo on them.

Report this

By par4, January 28, 2011 at 8:09 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Corporate control of the State under Mussolini= Fascism. Corporate control of the State under Republicans/Democrats= “center right”. Go figure.

Report this

By FiftyGigs, January 27, 2011 at 9:56 pm Link to this comment

When it comes to babble like this—oh, he’s moving this way, drifting that way, shifting to the center, flipping upside down—I can safely say I’ve never seen any analyst get any part of his analysis anywhere even remotely close to correct. Ever.

This article is useless at best.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, January 27, 2011 at 9:11 pm Link to this comment

Someone has the goods on him.

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.