June 20, 2013
McCain’s Magic Carpet Ride
Posted on Apr 5, 2007
By Joe Conason
Both Iraqis and Americans were stunned by the audacity of Sen. John McCain’s heavily publicized (and heavily armed) excursion through Baghdad’s Shorja market last weekend. There was the leading proponent of the war on Capitol Hill, setting out to confirm his recent claim that the escalation of U.S. forces is greatly improving conditions on the ground, accompanied by a handful of congressional colleagues. He seemed to think nobody would notice that their little shopping trip included a platoon of soldiers, three Black Hawk choppers and two Apache gunships.
Neither the Iraqi merchants used as props in this strange exercise nor the American voters who were its intended targets could have been deceived by such a charade. So the question that inevitably arises is whether McCain and company are still attempting to dupe us—or whether they have finally duped themselves.
Consider the happy talk from Rep. Mike Pence, an Indiana Republican who has visited Iraq on several occasions. At the press conference that inevitably followed the Shorja photo op, Pence said he had been inspired by the opportunity to “mix and mingle unfettered among ordinary Iraqis,” drinking tea and haggling over carpets. To him, the Baghdad shops were “like a normal outdoor market in Indiana in the summertime.” Sen. Lindsey Graham, McCain sidekick and Republican of South Carolina, boasted of buying “five rugs for five bucks,” marveling that “just a few weeks ago, hundreds of people, dozens of people were killed in the same place.”
Aside from the theatrics of the Shorja excursion, however, the message delivered by McCain, Graham and Pence was scarcely different from what each of them usually says after visiting Iraq. In February 2005, for instance, when McCain made a famous trip with Sen. Hillary Clinton, he claimed that “the dynamic [of the war] has changed from Iraqi insurgents versus the U.S. and its ... troops to Iraqi insurgents versus the Iraqi government.” He declared himself “far more optimistic” than he had previously felt, adding: “I think we have an opportunity to succeed.”
According to McCain, there is always an opportunity to succeed, provided that we are willing to sacrifice thousands more young Americans and hundreds of billions more dollars. But then again, he thinks we didn’t expend enough lives and dollars in Vietnam, either.
On this trip, as they climbed back into the armored Humvee that had safely carried them all to the marketplace, none of the jolly politicians mentioned the rise in killings across Iraq during the past month. None of them even seemed aware that the temporary reduction of violence in Baghdad appears to have driven even greater carnage outside the capital—such as the bombing in Kirkuk that slaughtered a group of schoolgirls the same day that Graham and Pence got their bargain carpets.
Even if the “surge” succeeds in suppressing violence in Baghdad for a few weeks or months by pouring in tens of thousands of American troops, what would that mean? Do McCain and his colleagues actually believe that we can somehow provide enough soldiers and Marines to achieve the pacification of every city and town in Iraq? If so, how long would our troops be expected to police the terrorist incidents and revenge attacks that now occur every day in this civil war?
Congressional hawks like McCain echo President Bush’s complaint that the Democrats are undermining the war by seeking to set a date for an American withdrawal. They insist that the war’s critics should simply shut up and send more money and more soldiers, while we see whether this “plan” works better than the previously discarded plans.
But the truth is that the president and his echoes are merely playing for time with American lives. They have no plan, because there is no military solution to this war. The war propaganda doesn’t work any better than the war plan—which is why the Democrats have been emboldened, and why McCain’s presidential prospects are rapidly declining.
Joe Conason writes for the New York Observer
© 2007 Creators Syndicate Inc.
New and Improved Comments