Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 19, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Reporter Who Brought Down the 'Runaway General' Dead at 33

The Terror Con

The U.S. Military and the Unraveling of Africa

Greenland's Great Melt Is Pinned on Climate Change

Nate Silver vs. Politico: It's on Again

Most Comments
Most Emailed

 * NEW! * Greenland’s Great Melt Is Pinned on Climate Change



The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Newt’s Venom Is Mitt’s Medicine

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jan 15, 2012
AP / Paul Sancya

Newt Gingrich, left, shares a laugh with Mitt Romney during a Republican debate in November.

By Peter Z. Scheer

Newt Gingrich has made it clear that if he can’t be president, he’s going to try to take Mitt Romney down with him. But the former House speaker’s endless stream of attack ads could, perversely, end up strengthening the “Massachusetts Moderate,” who seems likely to survive the onslaught.

Consider the 2008 presidential campaign, in which Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama fought a bloody, six-month trench war for the Democratic nomination. As time ran out, Clinton launched a “kitchen sink” offensive, so named for her campaign’s willingness to stop at nothing to win. Even as Obama took an insurmountable lead in the delegate count, Clinton and her strategists clawed at his weak spots, openly questioning his ability to protect the country’s national security and publicizing his association with former Weather Underground member William Ayers and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Eugene Robinson, who would win a Pulitzer for his columns that year, compared Clinton to “a homicidal cyborg from the future,” and the liberal journalist worried that “the longer this slugfest continues, the more the eventual nominee is tarnished in the eyes of independents who are looking for bipartisan solutions to the nation’s problems.” We all know what happened next.

Gingrich does not seem to share any concerns about tarnishing Romney, the chosen one. Following the Iowa caucuses, which Romney blasted out of Newt’s clutches with several kilotons of negative advertising, Gingrich said: “We are not going to go out and run nasty ads. We’re not going to run 30-second gotchas. But I do reserve the right to tell the truth, and if the truth seems negative, that may be more a comment on his [Romney’s] record than it is on politics.”

Whether they give the truth or not, Gingrich’s acerbic ads could strip the porcelain off the sink that Hillary tossed at her rival four years ago. A super PAC acting on behalf of Gingrich has gone so far as to release a 28-minute commercial, one that inspired Internet pundit Andrew Sullivan to write a post titled “Yes, Romney Could Lose.”

Gingrich’s teardown seems to be having an effect, with Romney’s numbers in the South Carolina primary campaign dipping in the last few days. Similarly, in the 2008 Democratic race Clinton’s broadsides did some damage to Obama, but in the end he emerged from the primary process a stronger candidate, mostly inoculated against his political imperfections.

Advertisement

Whatever line of attack Republican nominee John McCain was considering against Obama, Clinton had beaten him to it. Her sorties drilled Obama’s campaign into shape, and everyone from the candidate to his volunteers knew how to respond to virtually any criticism. As an added bonus, by the time the Democratic convention was over, the press and public had seen Obama pounded endlessly on his principal vulnerabilities and were ready to move on. McCain’s self-portrayal as a seasoned national security expert going up against a neophyte who worshiped in the Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s pews was like the second volcano movie to come out in a single year. Voters exposed to previous eruptions gave it a yawn.

(Also, Obama benefited greatly from his ability to eventually bury the hatchet with Clinton and unite his party. His successful conciliation supported the claim that he had a talent for bringing people together and could work with his enemies.)

And now we find ourselves in a very different primary campaign, although this coronation also has turned surprisingly ugly.

President Obama’s campaign team has been preparing for a showdown with Mitt Romney for years. They know Romney’s weaknesses as well as any Republican, and they have access to the same video clips that Newt Gingrich and the political action committees backing him are now dumping into the South Carolina air. (Gingrich made a show of asking one of his PACs to rein it in, but Winning Our Future says it will not comply.)

If word is going to get out that Mitt Romney is a rich flip-flopper who likes to fire people—and it will—it is not to Romney’s benefit, nor the GOP’s, to wait until October to confront such charges. Whether his opponent is Ron Paul or Barack Obama, Romney isn’t going anywhere but down if he can’t dodge the most obvious swings. And the quicker CNN’s warehouse of on-air personalities sucks the marrow out of a particular Romney weakness, the less interested they’ll be months from now when Obama media operatives are pushing the same tired story.

All this assumes Romney will make it to the general election, and it’s hard to imagine a scenario in which he is not the Republican nominee. Sullivan writes that the Republican establishment may panic when it wakes up to the political downside of Romney’s hedge fund résumé. The candidate “didn’t just fire thousands of working class people in restructuring and in closing companies,” the reformed Republican blogger explains. “He made a fucking unimaginable fortune doing it.” Sullivan has a point, but why should we expect the Republican establishment to be concerned about Romney’s pro-corporate, Wall Street leanings when that’s precisely what it likes about him?

Romney will win the GOP nomination for the same reason he was always going to win: Who else? For all their newfound populism, the other Republican candidates are pure fringe and they rarely make any sense. (How is it possible that a man who used to hang out at something called “Niggerhead Ranch” was not shouted out of the race?)

Make no mistake, the 2012 Republican primaries, as long as they remain contentious, hostile and odd, are the fun part. The general election is shaping up as a match between two well-funded, highly trained overachievers who will undoubtedly bore us to death over the next 10 months. However much Republicans hate the Obama presidency and Democrats fear a return to the Bush years, a Romney-Obama contest will have as much excitement as a spelling bee.

And all the advertising in the world isn’t going to change that.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Shenonymous's avatar

By Shenonymous, January 19, 2012 at 3:21 pm Link to this comment

BrooklynDame,  Jan.18 12:52 pm - Maybe with all that venom he’s
splashing around he will poison himself!  Oh…maybe he’s already
done that and we are just watching the end of days, his days?  I don’t
know why but he reminds of the ancient mythological snake that the
Greek, Egyptian, Celtic, and the Aztecs all have that, that is eating its
own tail, the Ouroboros.  In a self-regenerating act of paradoxical and
unending autophagy (that which sustains itself on its own tissue), the
beast cannot help but draw meanings in the receptive mind of “self-
fecundation; disintegration and re-integration and things fearsomely
serpentine.  Also seeming to also symbolize something that begets,
weds, impregnates, and slays itself.  Gingrich seems to teeter
neurotically on the double edged psychology of utter cleverness or
madness.

Report this
BrooklynDame's avatar

By BrooklynDame, January 18, 2012 at 1:52 pm Link to this comment

I bring out a bag of popcorn every time I hear any of the GOP clown show
candidates speak. Newt isn’t dishing out venom to Mitt, per se. Newt is venomous
to everyone. Period. The more the candidates implode, the better it is for the
Democrats and, better yet, the American people who will see the level of toxicity in
that party and within their agenda.

http://borderlessnewsandviews.com/2012/01/false-narrative-the-gop-
primaries/

Report this

By Dave Martin, January 17, 2012 at 9:30 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Romney’s real enemy in this election is not Gingrich or
Obama, but himself. Just about every time he speaks off
the cuff, he’s shown himself to be arrogant, entitled
and tone-deaf. It is sad that the best the Republicans
have is this guy, but they have nobody to blame but
themselves…

Report this
oddsox's avatar

By oddsox, January 17, 2012 at 3:52 am Link to this comment

Leefeller, you write:
“Flying kitchen sinks do teach one if capable of learning to (duck)!”

That’s PScheer’s point and he’s right. 
The $10,000 bet, Bain Capital and “Like to Fire” stories are becoming old news already.

But we have a lo-o-o-o-o-ong way yet to go.

Romney plods ahead like the Tortoise.
Paul fights on, keeping the fires of passion lit.
Gingrich and the Tea Party, locked in their echo chamber, continue to delude each other and themselves.
Santorum and Perry are window dressing.
Greens and Justices struggle to gain notice.
Obama is wise to keep his $1B worth of powder dry.

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, January 17, 2012 at 2:19 am Link to this comment

Whiteness and money may have more power towards Mittens success than all the voter rights tampering, birther begotting, touting Obama as a Moslum and Republican induced kitchen sinks combined!

By the way I recall a few kitchen sinks being thrown in Clinton’s direction and she didn’t win, Peter Sheers argument seems a tad weak in his kitchen sink memories?

Flying kitchen sinks do teach one if capable of learning to dunk!

Report this
James M. Martin's avatar

By James M. Martin, January 16, 2012 at 5:16 pm Link to this comment

Both of these candidates, as well as the rest of the GOP field, are objectionable to freethinking people who do not follow a religion but believe in science and reason rather than myth and superstition.  Mormonism was founded by a notorious liar and con man—imagine early America visited by an angel called Boney Maroni—and the evangelicals, certainly no better, insist that Mormonism is not Christianity. As if to make matters worse, Newtie is a lobbyist for the Conference of Catholic Bishops which really makes policy for faithful Catholics in America and peddles a hardcore social conservative agenda.  The choice is Scylla or Charybdis.  Both are illogical and without basis in anything real, only in fantasy and wish fulfillment.  Both, also, follow similar dogma and presentist views, trying, as did Gomer Shuckabee, to make our laws conform to Christian principles.

Report this

By MollyJ, January 16, 2012 at 4:19 pm Link to this comment

I know it’s a re-run but Romney and Obama are nothing more than Thing 1 and THing 2 from _The Cat in the Hat_.  Whichever gets elected, the Cat’s in charge.  And the Cat is the Corporatist influences.

Is it just habit that we have to get in line and pretend interest in the Primaries?  It’s a big charade, a dance, an elaborate ritual.  In the end, whether it’s Romney or Obama or Newt (outside chance on that one—but almost hilariously he’s painting himself as the outsider being threatened by big money influences), the net impacts are the same.  WE lose; Big Money interests win.

Report this

By Arouete, January 16, 2012 at 2:48 pm Link to this comment

See Your God is My God By Sam Harris on wWhat Mitt Romney Could Say to Win the Republican Nomination
http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/your-god-is-my-god
And do not miss Hold Out No Hope for the Republican GOP. http://open.salon.com/blog/f_arouete/2012/01/12/hold_out_no_hope_for_the_republican_gop

Report this
oddsox's avatar

By oddsox, January 16, 2012 at 2:24 pm Link to this comment

“a Romney-Obama contest will have as much excitement as a spelling bee.”
—PZ Scheer

everybody knows spelling bees are boring UNLESS your kid is in it.

Report this

By Fearless, January 16, 2012 at 11:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Why waste your time writing about Romney & Gingrich? We all know they’re full of shit. Frankly, I’m tired of seeing their ugly, degenerate faces every time I come to truthdig.com.

Report this

By Skeeter Sanders, January 16, 2012 at 7:10 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Your comparison of the current slugfest in South
Carolina between Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich to the 2008 primary battle between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton ignores two very important factors: Race and religion.

In the 2008 contest, Clinton’s attacks on Obama
alienated the Democratic Party’s most loyal
constituency: African-American voters—who figure as prominently in Democratic primaries in the Deep South as conservative white Christian evangelicals do in the Republican primaries in that region.

In South Carolina alone, 50 percent of state’s
Democrats are black. On the GOP side, 60 percent of Palmetto State Republicans are white Christian
evangelicals.

As I write this comment, the latest polls show
Romney’s lead in South Carolina has shrunk to the
point where he and Newt Gingrich are now in a
statistical dead heat.

And that was before a gathering of top conservative Christian evangelical leaders endorsed Rick Santorum and before Jon Huntsman’s decision to drop out of the race.

Rick Perry is toast. His poll numbers have fallen to rock bottom after his disastrous gaffe in a GOP
debate.

While the jury is still out on Santorum,  his
campaign is hobbled by a lack of sufficient money—which he’ll need very badly in very-expensive
Florida.

Gingrich is hell-bent and determined to stop Romney by any means necessary. So also is his chief backer, billionaire Sheldon Adelson, who’s likely to further bankroll the
pro-Gingrich “Super PAC.”

Then there is the religion factor. Romney LOST EVERY SINGLE GOP PRIMARY IN THE SOUTH IN 2008, largely due to deep misgivings among conservative white Christian evangelicals toward Romney’s Mormonism.

Given the deep theological gulf between Christian
evangelicals—particularly Southern Baptists—and Mormons, I’m still not convinced that Romney can win the South—and no Republican candidate for president has won his party’s nomination without winning the southern primaries since Gerald Ford in
1976.

There’s also regional bias: When was the last time
southern Republicans voted for a candidate from the Northeast—especially a candidate who hails from Massachusetts, one of the most solidly liberal, deep-blue Democratic states in the country?

Report this
Shenonymous's avatar

By Shenonymous, January 16, 2012 at 5:58 am Link to this comment

The American people are being set up, isn’t it obvious, by the
power hungry Republicans?  Apparently Mr. Sheer has missed it. 
Or perhaps pretending to be omniscient, he is part of what is to
be a national catharsis.  Everybody knows Mitt Romney will be
their candidate, all of the contenders, Huntsman the latest planned
casualty, Santorum, Paul, and Gingrich will all fall into the political
toilet, very soon.  The last several months has been the best strategy
to get out all the Romney warts that have existed in the people’s
mental furniture to try to “cleanse” them, baptize them, and raise
him from his grave before he faces the intellect and cunning of
Barack Obama.  The contention, hostility, and oddness has been a
clever satire.  Sheer thinks it is going to be a ho hum political year. 
Don’t bank on it, he… and you will go broke and will have to borrow
money to save the farm.  You don’t think for a second the Republicans
will let anything as important to them as the election up to chance, do
you?

The onslaught of the Republican candidates, the literal aggression and
invasion by all of them has merely been to ferret out, to dig as deep as
possible every and any verruga peruviana, every vestige of his political
vulnerability in order to give Romney practice sessions hoping he will be
able to withstand everything with which Obama and the Democrats (call
it a machine if you want) will bombard him.

Incongruity is a characteristic of theatrical comedy, which, in staging
politics, is the way politicians pretend to be opposed to the way they
really are.  Romney’s pretenses are his weak spots.  Using the devices
of both high and low comedy, it has been an incredible burlesque of
breaking the proscenium by each of the candidates, meaning their
peculiar asides to the audience (who are thought to be the gullible
American people) that exposes hazard Romney could face.  I mean
just look at the parade of clowns.  They have all attended the
Republican School for Scoundrels.  Their comedy of situations where
character and ideas are made to appear as “minor” hidden identities,
oh yeah, with egregious (allegedly surprising) discoveries, definitely
reversals used as a tactic, and so forth, that farcical devices, but to
those who are conscious these funny men and women are a whole lot
less unrealistic, they are… menacing.  It is in reality a malignant fate
we in middle America face should the Republican’s hoodwink us into
another regime of misfortune.

No, it is not going to be a mere dull domestic comedy, this is going to be
serious drama, and a serious tragedy if Romney, or just on the outside
chance it is another Republican, gets any nationwide traction at all.  But
we are being set us up for it.  Aren’t we?

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.