LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 18, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

The History That Birthed the Tsarnaev Boys

This Is Water: Fishy Advice From David Foster Wallace

Jerry Brown: California's Mystery Man

'The Daily Show': Stewart Slams Hypocrites Cheney and Rumsfeld

Chris Hedges: The 'Terrifying' State Assault on Press Freedom

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * How the IRS’ Nonprofit Division Got So Dysfunctional
 * NEW! * Recurring Nightmares? Wake Up and Take Action

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

It’s Repeal That’s Ailing

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jan 21, 2011

By Eugene Robinson

This whole health care thing isn’t quite working out the way Republicans planned. My guess is that they’ll soon try to change the subject—but I’m afraid they’re already in too deep.

Wednesday’s vote to repeal President Obama’s health insurance reform law was supposed to be a crowning triumph. We heard confident GOP predictions that cowed Democrats would defect in droves, generating unstoppable momentum that forced the Senate to obey “the will of the people” and follow suit. The Democrats’ biggest domestic accomplishment would be in ruins and Obama’s political standing would be damaged, perhaps irreparably.

What actually happened, though, is that the Republican majority managed to win the votes of just three Democrats—all of them Blue Dogs who have been consistent opponents of the reform package anyway. In terms of actual defectors, meaning Democrats who changed sides on the issue, there were none. This is momentum?

The unimpressive vote came at a moment when “the will of the people” on health care is coming into sharper focus. Most polls that offer a simple binary choice—do you like the “Obamacare” law or not—show that the reforms remain narrowly unpopular. Yet a significant fraction of those who are unhappy complain not that the reform law went too far but that it didn’t go far enough. I think of these people as the “public option” crowd.

A recent Associated Press poll found that 41 percent of those surveyed opposed the reform law and 40 percent supported it. But when asked what Congress should do, 43 percent said the law should be modified so that it does more to change the health care system. Another 19 percent said it should be left as it is.

Advertisement

More troubling for the GOP, the AP poll found that just 26 percent of respondents wanted Congress to repeal the reform law completely. A recent Washington Post poll found support for outright repeal at 18 percent; a Marist poll pegged it at 30 percent.

In other words, what House Republicans just voted to do may be the will of the tea party but it’s not “the will of the people.”

“The test of a first-rate intelligence,” F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote, “is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function.” By this standard, House Republicans are geniuses. To pass the “Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act,” they had to believe that the work of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office is both authoritative and worthless.

The CBO, which “scores” the impact of proposed legislation, calculated that the health reform law will reduce federal deficits by at least $143 billion through 2019. Confronted with the fact that repeal would deepen the nation’s fiscal woe, Republicans simply claimed the CBO estimate to be rubbish. Who cares what the CBO says, anyway?

Er, um, Republicans care, at least when it’s convenient. Delving into the CBO’s analysis, they unearthed a finding that they proclaimed as definitive: The reform law would eliminate 650,000 jobs. Hence “Job-Killing” in the repeal bill’s title.

One problem, though: The CBO analysis contains no such figure. It’s an extrapolation of a rough estimate of an anticipated effect that no reasonable person would describe as “job-killing.” What the budget office actually said is that there are people who would like to withdraw from the work force—sometimes because of a chronic medical condition—but feel compelled to continue working in order to keep their health insurance. Once the reforms take effect, these individuals will have new options. That’s where the “lost” jobs supposedly come from.

The exercise in intellectual contortion that was necessary for the House to pass the repeal bill will be an excellent tune-up for what’s supposed to come next. “Repeal and replace” was the promise—get rid of the Democrats’ reform plan and design one of their own. This is going to be fun.

It turns out that voters look forward to the day when no one can be denied insurance coverage because of pre-existing conditions. They like the fact that young adults, until they are 26, can be kept on their parents’ policies. They like not having yearly or lifetime limits on benefits. The GOP is going to have to design something that looks a lot like Obamacare.

Meanwhile, Obama’s approval ratings climb higher every week. Somebody change the subject. Quick!

Eugene Robinson’s e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com.
   
© 2011, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By purplewolf, January 22, 2011 at 2:01 am Link to this comment

valkitti: the anti abortion noise has already begun yet again. Besides, health care is only for the unborn, once you are here, the GOP and their crowd don’t give a damn if you survive. After all they are the party who yelled that health care is not a right.

Report this

By Byard Pidgeon, January 21, 2011 at 11:45 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Robinson is optimistic, but only because he’s ignoring the greater Republican
strategy.
They don’t expect to accomplish any of their silly agenda…this year, or next.
All they really need and want is to show how hard they’ve tried, but have been
thwarted by the Democrats in the Senate.
This agenda that’s being passed is part of next year’s elections, not serious
legislation.

Report this

By Chelsea, January 21, 2011 at 9:11 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Health care reform?

What a joke. This is a corporate giveaway to Big Pharma and the insurance cartel.
What some posters here don’t understand is that this IS A REPUBLICAN health care bill. This was Nixon’s dream to force people to buy into the insurance cartel to further enrich them.
Republican Mitt Romney passed this type of bill in Mass.It’s not working out so well for the citizens of Mass but have worked out brilliantly for the cartel.

This is what REAL reform looks like:
http://www.pnhp.org/

You Dems have been HAD—you’re getting snowed.
I left the Democratic Party as I see that they are every bit as corrupt as the Republicans—corporations come before We The People.
Wise up to what the Democratic Party really is—just like the Repugs, they’re the party of war , Wall St. greed and, pollution and corporations.
Wake up—go Independent—go Green but don’t vote for Dems or Pugs (they are one party, really)  these corporatized corrupt parties.

Report this

By gstoddard, January 21, 2011 at 7:44 pm Link to this comment

The Republicans have had at least 12 years to offer an alternative to this law and
they haven’t come even close to suggesting how we can cover the millions of
uninsured or inadequately insured. Even now they seem to have forgotten the
replace part of their campaign pledge.

Until they can address the fundamental moral issue of how this the wealthiest
nation in the world can allow middle class families to be bankrupted by high
medical costs or worse to allow those denied reasonable coverage to die
prematurely, their efforts at just repeal cannot be rationally justified.

During the recent debate on the repeal proposal all they offered were the stale
nostrums and irrelevant political rhetoric left over from the campaign.

Report this

By tdbach, January 21, 2011 at 5:04 pm Link to this comment

Good point, Catherine, about insurance stifling entrepreneurialism. ‘Tis true.

Report this

By vlakitti, January 21, 2011 at 4:15 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I think it’s likely that the change of topic issue will be antiabortion, and we will have another year or two of rightwing/bircher caterwauling on this.

The Repubs can’t win on healthcare since they don’t even understand what a horror the old system was…

Report this

By Michael Shaw, January 21, 2011 at 3:33 pm Link to this comment

I am one of those majority people who believe this health care bill needs to be made better, that is provide a public option, which will generate competition with the insurance companies and in affect lower overall health care costs for all, whether they choose the public option or not. For the average citizen, the Obama bill was a better than nothing proposition and nothing is what the GOP is offering in return. That said, if the president decides to cut Social Security and Medicare, that approval rating of his will drop drastically. He may believe by pulling a Clinton-gaining approval from the corporations who generally support the opposition- he will win a second term, but he should remember that for Clinton that second term led to disgrace and distrust leading to two terms with George W Bush. In Obama’s case it will mean no second term. Instead it will see tens of millions of Social Security and Medicare recipients voting for Ralph Nader, which in my view and at this stage would be the best thing that could happen to this corporately corrupted political system we’ve been under the thumb of for more than three decades.

Report this

By David, January 21, 2011 at 3:14 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I think the Republicans can actually pull off a repeal.  Obama and Reid as such sissies they’ll cave the minute the first threat is made to not raise the debt ceiling.  I mean they all work for Wall St. anyway, right?

Report this

By Jim Yell, January 21, 2011 at 12:42 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Look as far as I understand this so called health care reform bill doesn’t keep the insurance companies from raising the rates until their victim withdraw from the plan. Is this true or is this false?

As far as I know no mechanism is in place to allow price controls or even competitive bidding for services and meds. Right, or Wrong?

Those who continue to look for relief from the so called reform are counting on the law being improved after it passes? True, or False?

What has the past taught us about the present abilities of our elected officials? We had good regulation of business and banking and starting even before Clinton and thru all administrations the ability of the government to regulate has been either activily ignored or amended until it is meaningless. Bush/Cheney appointed regulators dedicated to not regulating and then the Republicans would say see government can’t do the regulating. They created the failure and then blame the regulation. What we need to ask is “if they can’t follow the regulations we once had and many still on the books, why would we expect an improvement?

Report this

By Tobysgirl, January 21, 2011 at 11:02 am Link to this comment

I don’t think anyone can accuse the Republicans—or perhaps anyone else in Washington, DC—of grasping paradox, which is the crux of the quote Robinson chose to use from F Scott Fitzgerald.

Quoting for example the Bible to support one’s prejudices is a popular pastime, but usually requires that one simultaneously ignore opposing lessons and all the other rules and regulations listed alongside the quotation. This is not grasping paradox, this is picking and choosing whatever you think will support your own point of view.

Paradox is, in my opinion, the heart and soul of deep religious feeling, but paradox frightens people who think along conformist lines, and I include in that group liberals as well as fundamentalists, conservatives, etc. The most brilliant outline of paradoxical thinking is from James Baldwin, “Notes of a Native Son”:

“It began to seem that one would have to hold in the mind forever two ideas which seemed to be in opposition. The first idea was acceptance, the acceptance, totally without rancor, of life as it is, and men as they are: in the light of this idea, it goes without saying that injustice is a commonplace. But this does not mean that one could be complacent, for the second idea was of equal power: that one must never, in one’s own life, accept these injustices as commonplace but must fight them with all one’s strength.”

I fully comprehend that such ideas are incomprehensible to most people, therefore the misuse of the Fitzgerald quote.

Report this

By Catherine Trost-Steffen, January 21, 2011 at 10:54 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I have an example of a person who would quit if she could.  She is working as a school secretary and her husband farms.  Her salary is very small and they do not need it to live.  Her son’s wife didn’t survive child birth but their granddaughter did.  I talked with this grandmother (who is in retirement age) and she desperately wanted to stay home and help her son but couldn’t because she didn’t feel comfortable being on the individual market for health insurance (if they could have gotten it at all). I also think many more people would be inclined to start their own businesses (which would be great for our economy) if they were not terrified of being on the individual health insurance market.

Report this
RayLan's avatar

By RayLan, January 21, 2011 at 8:35 am Link to this comment

I don’t care about this so-called Health Care bill. The disease is unregulated Wall Street money-market speculation - The bill won’t cure that and it looks like Obama has bent over and rolled over to finance industry corruption. I makes me sick.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.