LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 13, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Occupy Draws Strength From the Powerless

White Nationalists Share Spotlight With GOP at CPAC

More About the Man Bankrolling Santorum

A 'Queer History' of Rick Santorum and Proposition 8

Contraception and the Cost of Culture Wars

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Political Divide

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

In Defense of Harry Reid

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Share
Posted on Dec 28, 2009

By E.J. Dionne, Jr.

Punditry in the nation’s capital has its own rhythms, and one common practice involves almost everyone beating up on the same politician at the same time.

Such assaults are rarely about ideology, though I have found that liberals or Democrats are often the object of these sustained attacks, perhaps because journalists are overly sensitive to charges of liberal bias. There’s nothing like hitting a Democrat hard to “prove” impartiality.

For quite a while, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was the target of choice. She was cast as a “San Francisco liberal” out of touch with the “real America.” Everything about her, from her speaking style (fluid in small groups, stilted with larger crowds) to her taste in clothes (female politicians always face this), became the object of analysis and disparagement.

But the beauty of journalism is that reality eventually has to intrude on analysis. It has become quite clear that Pelosi is far less a “San Francisco liberal” than a “Tommy D’Alesandro Democrat.” That would be a reference to her dad, the former mayor of Baltimore, a highly practical local politician more concerned with delivering the goods than with passing ideological litmus tests.

Pelosi turns out to be adept doing whatever needs to be done to produce House majorities for Democratic goals. She is a liberal, of course, but she is the House speaker first. Her standing has risen to the point that Time magazine had her listed as a runner-up for Person of the Year.

Advertisement

With Pelosi off the hook, the Washington press corps needed a new goat, and along came Harry Reid. The Senate majority leader, it should be said, sometimes makes it easy for his critics. He can be irascible and has no qualms about yelling at journalists. (It’s happened to me.) He is not always careful with words. Earlier this month, he at least implied that Republicans were slow on the slavery issue, an odd charge since opposition to slavery was the passion that animated the founding of the GOP. (In those days, most Democrats were, as we might put it now, bad on the slavery issue.)

And, yes, Reid criticized my friend David Broder. It’s true that Reid was hitting back, since David is not wild about Harry. Nonetheless, I dearly love Broder, as does everyone who has ever worked with him.

Still, there is a rote quality to the attacks on Reid that flies in the face of what he’s actually accomplished. The simple truth is that Reid did what much of wise Washington thought was impossible: He united the entire Democratic caucus, from Joe Lieberman to Bernie Sanders, to support a health care bill that is the most far-reaching piece of social legislation since the 1960s.

He confronts an unprecedented form of Republican obstruction—yes, it’s really unprecedented, you can look it up. Even Olympia Snowe, that most moderate of Republicans, refused to negotiate unless Reid postponed action on the bill, a delay that would very likely have led to its death.

You bet he made deals, including the now highly controversial buyout of Nebraska’s extra Medicaid costs to win the 60th vote for the bill from Sen. Ben Nelson.

You should notice this about political analysis: When a writer admires a wheeler-dealer, he or she inevitably compares that politician to Lyndon B. Johnson and typically asks: Why can’t others be more like LBJ? When a writer wants to condemn exactly the same sort of horse-trading, LBJ recedes and some other metaphor—the popular one now is “Chicago-style politics”—is wielded to imply highly unprincipled behavior. With just a few keystrokes, shrewd pragmatism is transformed into terribly sinful activity.

Lord knows, I don’t blame Republicans in the least for being mad at Harry Reid. He beat them at their own game. In our great republic, Republicans are free to call him any name they wish between now and the next election—and they will.

Those who aspire to be nonpartisan, however, need to pause in their excoriations of Reid long enough to note that he pulled off something very big. Sen. Tom Harkin may have been a little over the top when he praised Reid last week for “the patience of Job, the wisdom of Solomon and the endurance of Samson.” But for now, at least, credit him with the toughness of LBJ, the listening skills of Tip O’Neill and the canniness of Sam Rayburn. He deserves that much.
   
E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com.
   
© 2009, Washington Post Writers Group


Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Palmhome, July 25, 2010 at 5:34 am Link to this comment

This author may try all he likes to turn a sows ear into a silk purse, it simply isn’t going to continue to gain traction in the face of the compromising and ineffective legislation this Democratic majority continue to turn out.

warts home remedies

Report this
ardee's avatar

By ardee, December 31, 2009 at 3:08 am Link to this comment

Wanda O’Reilly, December 30 at 10:11 am #

I have not been on this site very long and think I’m going to tip out… last few posts that I’ve read here have been a monumental waste of precious time.
************************

Tata, bye now, please close the door upon exiting the building.

Report this

By Aarky, December 30, 2009 at 7:53 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Senator Reid looks like he eats only milk toast. He certainly proved it by the time this emasculated health reform bill, with all it’s poison pills and give-a-ways, was completed. The Democratic members of the Senate need to fire him and get someone who will kick butt on their own and use legislative 2x4’s on the Republicans. Not once in all the pontificating about health care did he or any member of the Democratic party bother to mention that there are millions of Republicans in this country who don’t have health insurance and will also suffer in silence and die early like the Demoicrats.

Report this

By mandinka, December 30, 2009 at 5:36 pm Link to this comment

The press corp in Dc has given good old hairy a pass for 20+ years. The very fact that he resided in a 5 star hotel in DC paid for by Nevada Indian tribes would have most politicians thrown out of office. But then good old hairy is a dem and with the press corp that’s all that matters

Report this

By Wanda O'Reilly, December 30, 2009 at 5:16 am Link to this comment

Defending the indefensible:

Hairy Reed is a corporate boot likker and a traitor to the american people.  He wouldn’t know a constitutional right if it bitch slapped him.

Report this

By Wanda O'Reilly, December 30, 2009 at 5:11 am Link to this comment

I have not been on this site very long and think I’m going to tip out… last few posts that I’ve read here have been a monumental waste of precious time.

Defending the indefensible.  Harry Reid… puhleeze!!  My opinion of him was formed when he and all the other members of the house and senate (with the exception of maybe six total) voted for Israel’s right to defend itself against unarmed women and babies… incidently -that was a dead giveaway of who is really running the show.  Harry Reid is a sell-out and a corporate boot licker.

Discussions about left/right/democrat/republican are inane mainstream drivel.  Americans get their intelligence insulted all the time.  We don’t need to come to a so-called alternative news site to get more… if you can’t at least bother to be creative, then just f*** off.

We don’t all live in fear and we’re not glued to the televisions and our eyes are wide open.  While there does seem to be a shortage of brave and a whole dearth of freedom (that is not the self-delusional sort), most people are well over the dog and pony show that passes for congress.  And we know how they will vote and the song and dance no longer holds our attention.

Who is really engaging in deluded thinking “Control the information and you control the populace?”  -get over yourselves.

Think critically, prepare and never shut up. 

More worthy topics might be how we might start our own media to replace the mass-murder corporate press… in print and radio and t.v. format.

Report this

By bbuc, December 30, 2009 at 5:02 am Link to this comment

Imagine the national rage (real as opposed to the jinned up Teabaggers) if this
terrible health care bill goes through as written, and bill collectors start dunning
small businesses and individuals for their government mandated insurance
premiums.

I bet Congress plans to somehow scuttle or soften with the mandated premiums,
etc. in conference… in which case the govt just goes ahead and writes yet another
check, and pays off the insurance companies to manage health care for all. 

What a country!

Report this
drbhelthi's avatar

By drbhelthi, December 30, 2009 at 1:10 am Link to this comment

Webster´s Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary defines “gratuitous” as, “given unearned or without recompense,” “costing nothing,” “not involving a return benefit, compensation or consideration.” Those who post comments with Truth Dig pay nothing, and at the expense of Truth Dig.

Since many comments tend to be critical of writers for Truth Dig, one might even conclude that “gratuitous contract” also fits the generosity of Truth Dig. Commenters are benefitted by the option to air their criticisms and general comments, a questionable benefit for Truth Dig.

Sibel Edmonds is quite a lady.  Chalk up another point for the women-folk.

Again, thank you, Truth Dig.

Report this
DieDaily's avatar

By DieDaily, December 29, 2009 at 4:08 pm Link to this comment

drbhelthi, you must mean Sibel Edmonds, not Edwards. Now she’s an incredible hero. There is NOTHING gratuitous about the comment feature at truthdig. It’s incredibly brave of them to have one and to not censor it (as far as I can tell, and I’ve made some fairly controversial posts). If it were not for the comments sections, we could never get at the real truth since some of the reporters are total idiots. Then again, some of the reporters are fantastic and the comments section bears this out. It the supplementary part of the new reporting process and it’s where journalism is headed. It’s also the only way to guage which of their reporters are idiots, in terms of user-feedback. The comments has had a profound impact on the evolution of this site’s content, me thinks. In article like this one, where every single commenter without exception notes what a irredeemably stupid and poorly executed article it is, the may give the editors some ammo when attempting to slip out from under the economic need to print the odd one like this one. Or it may allow the CIA to tune up their mouthpieces over at the Washington Post so at least we can be entertained a little bit during our disinfo reading sessions.

Comment sections: s’all good! Free speech! For that, TruthDig, WE LOVE YOU!

Report this

By bozhidar balkas, vancouver, December 29, 2009 at 11:08 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Dionne’s piece appears a msm piece. As almost all msm pieces, it also contains mass of facts or nonfacts that are of extreme unimportance or unhelpful in obtaining an elucidation.

And, of course, it like so many other msm pieces contains fill-ins such as ad hominem laudation or dysphemism.
In short, the three traits: personalization with its dys- or euphemisms, inclusion of peripheral facts only or mostly, and guesses are always present.

Even an extremely important event such as whether healthcare is a human right or not a human right is not mentioned let alone discussed or examined from what US constitution might say or not say ab it.
Of course, US constitution not saying anything ab healthcare as a right, is as important as saying s’mthing ab it.
MSM collumnists have indeed learned their trade well. Eat ur hearts out all of u unschhooled housepeople, hobos, fishers, miners, and me!tnx

Report this
drbhelthi's avatar

By drbhelthi, December 29, 2009 at 1:27 am Link to this comment

I find it gratuitous that Truth Dig provides comment forums. Each comment is preceded by the notice from Truth Dig:  “Add Your Comment Your name, ________________, will be displayed with this post. Your Comment:”                                                                                Comments do not require documentation.  They are only comments.

For several years, with qualified exceptions, when I read printed “news” or watch “news” on TV, or comments on “forums,” I immediately recall the saying of William Casey during his first open “general assembly” of the CIA in 1981:  “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false,” as recorded by the fastidious jewish lady investigator-historian, Mae Brussell.

The CIA continues to conduct its “Disinformation Program” with a bottomless budget that not even the US congress can access, a violation of US law.  Just as the CIA has turned over much of its operation to “Blackwater,” funded extensively by CIA Black Monies, violating numerous US Laws, with impunity.  Similarly, Mr. Hussein Obama recently awarded prosecution immunity to Interpol agents operating in the US. 

My guess is that most of us who post “comments” to Truth Dig forums have the freedom to choose to post, or not to post.  Also freedom to read posts or not read posts.  Only paid propagandists, whose employment requires them to respond, supporting some posts while scapegoating others while demanding documentation for comments of others, have no freedom of choice. They are puppets; pimps of their string-pullers. They have sold-out their choice.

After reading the chronicles of Chip Tatum, Ted Gunderson, Sibel Edwards and numerous others, it appears to me that choices of Americans have been sold-out.  Question: who established the CIA, and why was GHWBushSr overseeing its operations at the time of the JFK murder?

Thank you, Truth Dig.

Report this
DieDaily's avatar

By DieDaily, December 28, 2009 at 7:55 pm Link to this comment

voiceoftruth, God no! Of course he doesn’t believe anything he writes! Don’t be absurd! As for who pays him to write this drivel…well, one clue: it sure as heck is NOT the newspaper-buying public. Wait, there IS hardly any newspaper-buying public!

(OK, ok, I’ll tell you: it’s the gummint! I don’t believe that truthdig has much of a choice when it comes to publishing the odd schlock-job like this one, it probably covers about 90% of their operating costs and they do turn around and use that cash to some great reporting in some other areas…and notice how they are getting better all the time? Another year of this and they may break out of left cover and become utterly non-partisan…let’s hope so. Let’s really support the writers who tell it like it is.)

Report this

By voice of truth, December 28, 2009 at 7:18 pm Link to this comment

I really don’t understand why someone pays this guy to write.  This is the 3rd time I have seen him here on TD making a point that is 180 degrees from reality.  He goes so out of his way to spin logic into wanting to make these clowns look good he makes himself look like an idiot.  He can’t really believe what he writes, can he?

Report this

By rollzone, December 28, 2009 at 4:41 pm Link to this comment

hello. Pelosi was exhibited and spat out. Reid will be dishonorably discredited, for all his non-involvement; in the undertakings of the administration: to coalesce partisanship. extreme standouts swirling about the beltway always attract scorn and righteous ridicule, and his is coming. the party is struggling for leadership to fill the void of the anointed one. he is falling by the wayside faster than roadkill from a big truck. this joker is one of the best (sic) choices they have. happy year of recovery to all.

Report this

By TAO Walker, December 28, 2009 at 2:43 pm Link to this comment

Incest breeds idiots….though some of ‘em can be lovely to look at, of course.  E.J. Dionne’s dues-paying sop to his fella ‘n’ gal claquers here has all the substance of juvenile “SEXting,” without (unfortunately) the same threat of legal penalties….including being labeled for life as a textual (in this case) “deviant.”

It’s just another nightly episode in The Daily Show’s probably inexhaustible “clusterf**k” series.  Too bad the captive audience remains CONvinced they’ve nothing better to pay their precious attention to.

Just because your tormentors let you laugh at the clowns, tame Sisters and Brothers, don’t think you aren’t yourownselfs the butt of the real “joke.”

Hokahey!

Report this

By Ridin' The Storm Out, December 28, 2009 at 1:55 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This article is a pile of crap…And this is the second ‘puff piece’ glamorizing P-Reid, to somehow find its way on to TDig in as many months…

Please ‘save the rap’ as we know who these nazi’s really are…

Can you feel it?

Report this

By SueG, December 28, 2009 at 1:00 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I have never been impressed by either Harry Reid or E.J.Dionne. Reid is a leader wannabe and Dionne is just the same.  Saying that he loves “working” with David Broder creates the analogy of “just keep sucking up”.  I no longer read the Washington Post because of their position on our disasterous federal government and may soon have to discontinue reading Truthdig.  Articles from a number of the WaPo editorial staff now appear at this site and make me think that this site is just too lazy to provide real news:  More Infotainment.

Report this

By Mary Ann McNeely, December 28, 2009 at 11:53 am Link to this comment

Nonetheless, I dearly love Broder, as does everyone who has ever worked with him.

Phew!  I can smell the stink all the way out here in California!

Report this

By Scotty_Mack, December 28, 2009 at 9:22 am Link to this comment

I am so sick of the washington post’s propaganda artists all over this site.

Report this
DieDaily's avatar

By DieDaily, December 28, 2009 at 4:28 am Link to this comment

This is a really amateur and misleading article. Sometime people are too close to the trees to see the forest.

“perhaps because journalists are overly sensitive to charges of liberal bias”...which planet is this happening on?

“to her taste in clothes (female politicians always face this)”...on account of journalists such as yourself, oh the irony, please kill me before it does.

“But the beauty of journalism is that reality eventually has to intrude on analysis”...funny, I have rarely observed this. Which obscure hitherto unobserved universal law does this derive from?

“And, yes, Reid criticized my friend David Broder. It’s true that Reid was hitting back, since David is not wild about Harry. Nonetheless, I dearly love Broder, as does everyone who has ever worked with him.”...and this matters how? We might possibly care in what way?

“Her standing has risen to the point that Time magazine had [Polosi] listed as a runner-up for Person of the Year”...Great, she could have joined the ranks of Hitler (twice), Stalin (twice), Mao, G. W Bush (twice), Kenneth Starr, Ronald Reagan (twice), Ayatullah Khemeini, Nixon (twice), and let’s not forget G.I. Joe in 1950. Gee, I sure would like to be on the front cover of a globalist snot rag that tends to promote genocidal maniacs and devious filth…speaking of which I forgot Kissinger.

“With just a few keystrokes, shrewd pragmatism is transformed into terribly sinful activity.” OK, you nailed this one. Modern lame-stream journalism in one sentence.

Please consider giving up what you are doing in favour of a career in journalism some day.

Report this
ardee's avatar

By ardee, December 28, 2009 at 3:32 am Link to this comment

Pelosi turns out to be adept doing whatever needs to be done to produce House majorities for Democratic goals.

Pelosi, like Reid, like EJDionne himself, care only for the health of the Democratic Party, a goal that is far from caring about the health of our nation.

This author may try all he likes to turn a sows ear into a silk purse, it simply isn’t going to continue to gain traction in the face of the compromising and ineffective legislation this Democratic majority continue to turn out.

Report this
drbhelthi's avatar

By drbhelthi, December 28, 2009 at 2:48 am Link to this comment

Another example of specious reasoning -

The Social Security Administration is funding twenty-four million dollars for new electronic, medical records processing for US congressmen and senators. “This money will be coming from the savings to be generated from withholding cost of living increases for 2010 & 2011 in SSA benefits for the elderly, and a $2.00 increase on all medicare RX benefit co-pay.”

Since when is the SSA authorized to decrease benefits to qualified Americans in order to fund unnecessary “specialties” for members of the US congress?

Report this
drbhelthi's avatar

By drbhelthi, December 28, 2009 at 2:31 am Link to this comment

Even if Reid pulled together hundreds of antagonists in order to slide a bill through - . 

What is the value of a bill that delivers much less and costs much more?  Is it a matter of New World Order logic ?

Report this

By Shift, December 28, 2009 at 1:31 am Link to this comment

The American People need assistance from their legislators to reform health care.  Washington interprets that as requiring citizens to purchase high priced private health insurance.  Now Dionne tells us that Reid, “He united the entire Democratic caucus, from Joe Lieberman to Bernie Sanders, to support a health care bill that is the most far-reaching piece of social legislation since the 1960s.” 

Only in myopic Washington would a journalist call a Turkey an Eagle.  Reid fathered a turkey.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.