LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 3, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Iran: Only Half the Story

The Democrats Who Unleashed Wall Street and Got Away With It

Four Reasons to Watch the Super Bowl

Romney's Indifference to the Poor

Kim Jong Un, This One’s for You

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Hungering for a True Thanksgiving

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Share
Posted on Nov 17, 2009

By Amy Goodman

“In the next 60 seconds, 10 children will die of hunger,” says a United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) online video. It continues, “For the first time in humanity, over 1 billion people are chronically hungry.”

The WFP launched the Billion for a Billion campaign this week, urging the 1 billion people who use the Internet to help the billion who are hungry. But if you think that hunger is far from our shores, here is some food for thought ... and action: The U.S. Department of Agriculture released a report Monday stating that in 2008 one in six households in the U.S. was “food insecure,” the highest number since the figures were first gathered in 1995.

Economist Raj Patel, author of “Stuffed and Starved: Markets, Power and the Hidden Battle for the World’s Food System,” told me he was “gobsmacked” by the U.S. hunger numbers, which he finds appalling: “The reason that we have this huge increase in hunger in the United States, as around the world, isn’t because there isn’t enough food around. Actually, we produced a pretty reliable solid crop last year. ... The reason people go hungry is because of poverty.”

In addition to the online campaign, the United Nations is hosting the World Summit on Food Security in Rome this week, hoping to unite world leaders on the cause of eliminating hunger. Patel remarked on the U.N. summit, “They’re making all the right sounds about hunger around the world, but as some of the activists outside that summit are saying, poor people can’t eat promises.”

Almost 700 people from 93 countries, many of whom are small-scale food producers, have gathered outside the U.N. summit. They are there in behalf of the People’s Food Sovereignty Forum, and they are pushing for small-scale, organic, sustainable food-sovereignty and food-security programs, as opposed to large-scale agribusiness with its dependence on genetically modified organisms and chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Michelle Obama said last March when planting the White House’s organic kitchen garden, “It is so important for them [children] to get regular fruits and vegetables in their diets, because it does have nutrients, it does make you strong, it is all brain food.” The first lady of the U.S. made the point that a homegrown, organic garden is a sustainable and affordable way to strengthen family food security.

Advertisement

This has led some to wonder, then, why her husband has appointed Islam Siddiqui to be the U.S. chief agricultural negotiator. Siddiqui is currently vice president for science and regulatory affairs for CropLife America, the main pesticide industry trade association. According to the Pesticide Action Network of North America, “This position will enable him to keep pushing chemical pesticides, inappropriate biotechnologies, and unfair trade arrangements on nations that do not want and can least afford them.” It was CropLife’s mid-America division that circulated an e-mail to industry members after Michelle Obama’s garden announcement, saying, “While a garden is a great idea, the thought of it being organic made Janet Braun, CropLife Ambassador Coordinator, and I shudder.”

Jacques Diouf, director-general of the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization, engaged in a 24-hour hunger strike over the weekend, before the food security summit kicked off. He said in a statement, “We have the technical means and the resources to eradicate hunger from the world so it is now a matter of political will, and political will is influenced by public opinion.” Diouf has estimated that it would take $44 billion per year to end hunger globally, compared with the less than $8 billion pledged recently to that goal. Juxtapose those numbers with the amount being spent by the United States in Iraq and Afghanistan.

According to the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, the U.S. has spent on average about $265 million per day in Afghanistan since the invasion of that country in 2001 (which is a much lower estimate than that provided by Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz and others). Even at that rate, five months of military spending by the U.S. would meet Diouf’s goal, and that would be if the U.S. were the sole contributor.

Consider pausing this Thanksgiving, which for many in the U.S. is a major feast, to reflect on the 10 children who die of hunger every minute, and how your elected officials are spending hundreds of billions in public funds on war.
 
Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.
 
Amy Goodman is the host of “Democracy Now!,” a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 800 stations in North America. She is the author of “Breaking the Sound Barrier,” recently released in paperback.

© 2009 Amy Goodman

Distributed by King Features Syndicate


Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Kevin, January 26, 2011 at 5:10 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Even if we are living in the speed century our major problem remain the redistribution of our resources. Many children die of starvation in Africa meanwhile people from America or rich European countries waste considerable quantities of food.

Report this

By Doorlopend Krediet, November 11, 2010 at 6:39 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

1 Billion children are hungry? Oh my god, this is a
serieus problem. We people are so busy with our own
problems while there are so many worse problems.

Report this

By texas elk hunting, August 5, 2010 at 12:53 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

this is also the main problem here in our place due to poverty.. i cant imagine the future of our children nowadays, hope that government will take action with this one.

Report this

By Criar site, June 14, 2010 at 6:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

There’s only so much agar on our planetary petrie dish and we the bacteria just can’t stop our feed/reproduce cycle. Great post!

Report this

By Freestyle Medela, May 29, 2010 at 6:56 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I would step up to you and say those two words that I generally do not say so easily “Thank you”.

Report this

By fsebet, May 17, 2010 at 3:40 pm Link to this comment

Africa stopped in development. Unfortunately, this situation suits Europe and the U.S. Thanks from crazy taxi.

Report this

By mahjong, May 4, 2010 at 5:29 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Hunger will always be. Africa does not develop.

Report this

By Criação de Sites, April 25, 2010 at 6:45 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

There’s only so much agar on our planetary petrie dish and we the bacteria just can’t stop our feed/reproduce cycle.

Report this

By nicolas, March 6, 2010 at 7:59 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I think there is just to much desire for power on this world. Hungry people can’t really attack anybody so don’t feed them and beat everybody else. I think this view is so wrong but for sure in some heads.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, November 24, 2009 at 5:46 pm Link to this comment

Andy—Food Not Bombs does not do handouts or charity.  Share International is mentioned in the Wikipedia article on Maitreya, although in orthodox Buddhist thought he is not due to come around for a few millennia yet.  Since FNB is already sharing food, perhaps he is secretly active in their midst.  However, most of the Food Not Bombers I know seem to be atheists or agnostics.

Report this

By Andy, November 24, 2009 at 10:57 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Hi Anarcissie,

The teacher I’m referring to is not a “leader” like you might be thinking.  He’ll be around for the next 2,000+ years.

He is concerned with the entire re-structuring of our currently unjust and inefficient economic system.

Sharing, on an international scale, is much different than handouts and charity.  It’s the only true way to address the global imbalances in a lasting manner.

Maitreya is here to inspire US to act.  He will not enforce anything whatsoever.  His loving energy will galvanize hundreds of more millions of people to join the movement for change.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, November 23, 2009 at 9:46 pm Link to this comment

Stephen, November 23 at 5:11 pm:
‘There is an extraodinary man who is about to step forward publicly.

His solution is this:  Nations sharing the world’s food, creating true justice, is the only real way to end hunger forever, to ease the tension between nations, and to end war. ...’

When people become conscious enough to share the world’s food, they won’t need a great leader.  Some of them have already begun—see http://www.foodnotbombs.net/

Report this

By Stephen, November 23, 2009 at 12:11 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

There is an extraodinary man who is about to step forward publicly.

His solution is this:  Nations sharing the world’s food, creating true justice, is the only real way to end hunger forever, to ease the tension between nations, and to end war.

Sharing the excess, after pooling together everything and finding out what each nation has and needs.  This may sound unlikely, even utopian to some.  But actually there are blueprints already made.  High-minded leaders, selflessly concerned with such wide-scale crises like food distribution and ecological balance, are available.  The world is about to change for the better, once we learn to share.

Charity will not work.  Justice, through sharing, is the real answer.

http://www.Justice4Peace.org

Report this

By Andy, November 23, 2009 at 11:53 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Shift,

Per your debasing comments, which radio show do you host that is having a far-reaching effect on potentially millions of people in the world?

When’s the last time you spoke about positive things, and keep a high-minded approach.

Bashing hard working people, who are working for the common good, is no way to earn credibility.  It’s unfortunate if you think trashing Amy makes your message stand out more.  It doesn’t.

Let’s build on ideas like Justice, Sharing, Freedom for all, Human Rights.  Go forward and change what we can right now.  There’s a whole world in need.  Negative comments toward our comrades only erode the movement for peace and justice.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, November 23, 2009 at 8:22 am Link to this comment

Free trade?  Is there anything left in Africa that hasn’t been stolen?

Report this

By LemuelG, November 22, 2009 at 1:26 pm Link to this comment

Ironically, a cash injection is not required to relieve millions of their hunger - in fact, it can be done while SAVING billions of taxpayer dollars…

What is this miracle solution you ask? Just end the American and Western European subsidies for no-profitable agrarian projects (which ensure that world food-prices remain artificially high)... pretty damn simple really… save yourself some money (all the more to hand over to crooked banks) and at the same take the greatest single step toward reviving the greater African economy - the Western world owes them this, the practice of sending millions of aid-dollars directly into the private bank-accounts of the world’s most awful dictators is passe.

Fat Americans are disgusting, but not the problem - (genuine) free-trade is the answer, always was.

Report this

By samosamo, November 21, 2009 at 1:33 pm Link to this comment

There maybe thousands or even millions dying everyday from hunger but that
has been as it is for a long long time or since the beginning of the agricultural age because with people starving to death it basically isn’t about the lack of food, it is what the ‘big food conglomerate businesses’ want to do with that supposedly surplus of food to maximize profits and minimize costs as the british so diligently demonstrated in the late victorian years, money rules over all including the feeding of those sacred cows, the people, where it is acceptable behavior to starve people to death in the pursuit of profits.

But this article fails me in that there is NO mention of the issues of trying to
keep feeding almost 7,000,000,000 people as if there just needs a few more
forests to be knocked down and turned into fields and pastures to feed this
over abundance of humanity who are nothing more than the planetary cancer
that will without some kind of control have serious and dire consequences for
the whole of the human population, because like blackmail, this will require radical treatment if humane ways can’t or won’t do it.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, November 21, 2009 at 11:26 am Link to this comment

Obese people are often poorly nourished.

Report this

By melpol, November 21, 2009 at 10:56 am Link to this comment

An obese woman standing in front of me with a food stamp benefit card had two
wagons full of goodies. I asked her why she needed so much food and she replied
that she was HUNGRY.  This took place in the US, but there are millions around
the world that truly need more food.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, November 21, 2009 at 6:58 am Link to this comment

I thought the world, or some of it, was angry at “us” for dropping bombs on them; it’s news to me that anyone abroad is angry at “us” for throwing “our” funny money at moribund corporations.  Well, maybe Chinese bankers—but they encouraged “us” in the first place, so they have no one to blame but themselves.

Also, maybe they’re annoyed with “us” for sending them trashy movies which they snap up as fast as “we” put them out. Let them eat DVDs.

Report this

By DB, November 20, 2009 at 11:05 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

And we wonder why the world is angry at us for giving
billions to corporations that are “Too big to fail.”
Apparently, over one billion people is not too big to
fail.

Report this

By berniem, November 20, 2009 at 10:14 am Link to this comment

to melpol: Have you seen the condition of Calif. lately? Oh, and look what we’ve got in Okla. now. Inhoufe & Coburn. Boy, are we making progress!

Report this

By melpol, November 20, 2009 at 6:06 am Link to this comment

Stories of the drought in Oklahoma which took place in the early part of the 20th
century and its victims should serve as an inspiration to the unemployed and
dispossessed. A hundred thousand unemployed farm workers hitched a ride or
walked to California where they got jobs harvesting grapes. Many of them are now
the land owners of the state.

Report this

By J, November 19, 2009 at 2:07 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

If there was a god, surely he would not let innocent people starve to death.
In the unlikely case there is a god and he/she allows people to starve to death, then I want no part of him/her. Why would you worship someone so cruel?

Report this

By berniem, November 19, 2009 at 1:13 pm Link to this comment

to anarcissie: god is love; love is blind; Stevie Wonder is blind; Stevie Wonder is…...?

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, November 19, 2009 at 10:59 am Link to this comment

God is love.

Report this

By Hossein Sadeghi Marasht, November 18, 2009 at 10:02 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Hi - Thursday November 19, 2009
It is most hateful to GOD that you should say that which you do not do.

Report this

By gerard, November 18, 2009 at 6:18 pm Link to this comment

To say that problems like world hunger, war, cruelty and disease are unsolvable is to cause people who don’t know the facts to feel helpless, to sign off and do nothing.  That’s why the cliches like “powerless,” inevitable,” “out of control,” “humans have always ... this or that” and “you can’t change human nature” are so beloved by people who are either ignorant or unkind. It lets them off the hook of responsibility and guilt.  If there’s nothing worth doing, they need not do it. It’s not their fault if kids die of hunger. 

Well, years ago it dawned on a lot of people that they could do something, and they did it.  They began by writing down words like:  “Do unto others as you would want others to do unto you.”  And “Do not ask for whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee.”  And “So long as one person has less than he needs and I have more than I need, I am a theif.”  And “You get what you give.” And “It is harder for a rich man to get into Heaven than for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle.” The idea caught on.

Besides, we in the U.S. use at least 4 times more of the world’s resources as ..(I forget the rest of the comparison, but it doesn’t matter anyhow.  The first 15 words ought to be enough to make a stone bring forth water).  We owe them.

Report this

By berniem, November 18, 2009 at 2:00 pm Link to this comment

anarcrissie: your final paragraph speaks directly to the insolubility of the problem. Be fruitful and multiply for the lord has given you dominion over the Earth!

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, November 18, 2009 at 1:13 pm Link to this comment

I offered a fact which directly contradicts the popular cliché that present hunger and starvation are due to excess population.  I am surprised I have to spell that out.

The next move will probably someone writing that the Earth cannot support an infinitely large population, the script decorated with various apocalyptic images and dire predictions.  However, as I have not said that the Earth can support an infinitely large population, it will be irrelevant.  In fact, I have not said that the Earth can sustain even the present population.  I have merely noted an interesting fact which I will forbear to repeat.

The reason I make note of this fact is that the idea that hunger and starvation are due to population means the problem is insoluble.  You just can’t stop all those people from having a lot of children, and even if you started exterminating them now, it would take a long time and they would probably grow back.

However, if hunger and starvation are due to politics, maybe something can be done about them.

I also encourage people to reject natalism, but this requires most of them to reject their favorite religion or superstition, so it isn’t going to be easy to bring about.

Report this

By AmericanDream, November 18, 2009 at 1:08 pm Link to this comment

Travesty.

Report this

By berniem, November 18, 2009 at 12:47 pm Link to this comment

To Anarcissie: AND YOUR POINT?

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, November 18, 2009 at 11:56 am Link to this comment

Actually, there was more hunger, more starvation, more famines, when the world’s population was much smaller.

Report this

By berniem, November 18, 2009 at 11:18 am Link to this comment

There’s only so much agar on our planetary petrie dish and we the bacteria just can’t stop our feed/reproduce cycle.

Report this

By James, November 18, 2009 at 9:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The underlying problem is overpopulation and people
produce more people and more quickly than any world
economy can provide for decent lives. The likely end of
this is that when the environment is stripped of every
option for supporting human life the population of the
world will truly collapse in an ultimate catastrophe.

Report this

By Shift, November 18, 2009 at 9:35 am Link to this comment

Why is Amy Goodman so completely insensitive to Thanksgiving being a day of genocide celebration?  Is it because she is a Jew?  Perhaps!  Jew’s have a news blackout on any genocide other than the Jewish Holocaust.  So, it is not just zionists who practice genocide exclusivity. 

The American Indian genocide killed over one hundred million Natives, either by killing or the purposeful spreading of disease.  The early invaders celebrated Thanksgiving each time they wasted an American Indian village.  Thanksgiving was a celebration of death and genocide. 

I have grown sick of Jews walking on American Indians.  Goodman should be condemned for her careless writing and intellectual dishonesty. 

Apologists need not respond.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, November 18, 2009 at 9:30 am Link to this comment

There’s also Food Not Bombs if you’d like to actually give people actual food instead of write a check to some organization.  http://www.foodnotbombs.net/

Let me say, though, that hungry people don’t always smile when you give them food; they are often depressed or angry and handing them a can of beans doesn’t make it all instantly all right.

That hunger, malnutrition and starvation are not caused by lack of food or an abstraction like poverty but by politics is demonstrated by the fact that there are so many hungry people in the U.S., a country with agricultural surpluses and a major exporter of food.  The fact is, some people profit from the deprivation of others—that’s the kind of system we live under—and you can do something about it if you don’t like it.

Report this

By grousefeather, November 18, 2009 at 8:49 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Only 44 billion! Heck, California alone could do that. 44 billion is almost a million, right?

Report this

By grumpynyker, November 18, 2009 at 7:38 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Add to that Heifer.org.  I credit Jimmy Breslin for
mentioning this charity.

Report this
Paul_GA's avatar

By Paul_GA, November 18, 2009 at 4:57 am Link to this comment

War, to your average politician, is so much more exciting and lucrative compared to fighting famine.

Report this

By Howie Bledsoe, November 18, 2009 at 3:27 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

There is another, far more obvious reason for global hunger, here and abroad. It is called math.
Exponentially, we are growing at a rate which can no longer sustain itself. 1 billion hungry today means 2 billion hungry tommorow, and 4 billion hungry the day after that, then 8 billion, etc. But nature will sort this out for us.

Report this
Ouroborus's avatar

By Ouroborus, November 18, 2009 at 1:29 am Link to this comment

Raj Patel;
“The reason that we have this huge increase in hunger
in the United States, as around the world, isn’t
because there isn’t enough food around. Actually, we
produced a pretty reliable solid crop last year. ...
The reason people go hungry is because of poverty.”
=============================================
This isn’t new knowledge for me, but I only heard
this for the first time just over a year ago,
probably on Democracy Now. MSM would have us believe
there is a world food shortage and it’s the opposite;
there is a surplus. Poverty is the most violent form
of terrorism.

Report this

By gerard, November 17, 2009 at 7:50 pm Link to this comment

Places to donate and help feed hungry children:
  Oxfam International, Goodwill, Salvation Army, United Nations World Food Program, Mercy Corps, NetAid.com, Stop Hunger Now, Freedom from Hunger, Care, Mennonite Service Committee. Friends Service Committee.
  Look any of them up via Google, or find others.
  Imagine the smiles, and do it again next week, or next month. And after that, again.  And again.
Think what just one million x $10.00 would do, especially if it came in regularly, like kids need to eat regularly.  And ... STOP THE WARS and redirect that money.  So much can be done—if people like us will do it.  Thanks, Amy.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.