|
|
May 20, 2013
|
|
How Santorum Boxed in RomneyPosted on Apr 11, 2012
Rick Santorum’s departure from the presidential race could not come soon enough for Mitt Romney. In proving himself more tenacious than anyone predicted, Santorum dramatized one of Romney’s major problems, created another, and forced the now inevitable Republican nominee into a strategic dilemma. Republicans may condemn class warfare, but their primaries turned into a class struggle. Romney performed best among voters with high incomes, and was consistently weaker with the white working class, even in the late primaries where he put Santorum away. And Romney cannot win without rolling up very large margins among less well-off whites. At the same time, Santorum’s strength among evangelical Christians pressured Romney to toughen his positions even as the Republican Party as a whole, at both the state and national levels, has pushed policies on contraception and abortion that have alienated many women, particularly the college educated. This is Romney’s other problem: Among college-educated white men, Romney had a healthy 57 percent to 39 percent lead over President Obama in the latest Washington Post/ABC News poll. But among college-educated white women, Obama led Romney by 60 percent to 40 percent. This netted to a rather astounding 38-point gender gap, compared with a net 27-point gap among all white voters. (Thanks to Peyton Craighill of The Washington Post’s polling staff for extracting these numbers, which are based on registered voters.) Overall, the poll taken before Santorum left the race showed Obama leading Romney by 51 percent to 44 percent. Thus the box the primaries built for Romney: He must simultaneously court evangelical Christians and working-class voters who have eluded him so far, but also reassure socially moderate women higher up the class ladder who, for now, are providing Obama with decisive margins. It’s not easy to do both. Advertisement Romney’s predicament is Obama’s opportunity. The president is moving aggressively to take advantage of the class opening afforded him by the candidate of “a couple of Cadillacs,” “I like being able to fire people” and “corporations are people, my friend.” In a series of speeches in Florida the day Santorum withdrew, Obama hit repeatedly on the twin themes of fairness and opportunity. He called for a nation in which “everybody gets a fair shot, and everybody does a fair share, and everybody plays by the same set of rules,” while eviscerating Rep. Paul Ryan’s fiscal plan, which Romney supports, as a budget “that showers the wealthiest Americans with even more tax cuts.” Most conservatives seem oblivious to the party’s working-class problem, but not all. Henry Olsen, a vice president at the American Enterprise Institute, says Republicans need to understand that the GOP’s success in the 2010 House races was built in less affluent districts at a moment when Obama’s approval rating among white working-class men was so low “that it was only a few points higher than Richard Nixon’s was at the time of his resignation.” Olsen sees Obama’s echoes of Bill Clinton’s pledges to help those who “work hard and play by the rules” as shrewd politics aimed at rehabilitating his standing with such Americans. And in Romney, Obama faces a candidate whose “troubles in the primary electorate demonstrated his trouble in connecting with the white working class.” Romney, Olsen says, “has difficulties with his background, difficulties with his manner, some difficulties Obama shares.” Romney isn’t losing downscale whites. The Post/ABC poll showed him leading Obama by 19 points among white voters without a college education. The problem: That’s roughly the lead John McCain had in this group in 2008, and we know who won that election. Obama, Olsen said, can lose the white working class “by a substantial margin” and still win because of his strength among African-Americans, Latinos and well-educated women. Yes, it’s still early. Renewed economic jitters in Europe could spoil a fragile American recovery. But for now, Romney finds himself in a political maze with no obvious path out. He’s there partly because of his own mistakes, but he was also led to this point because of the unlikely strength of Rick Santorum’s challenge.
Previous item: The Afghan Syndrome Next item: What’s in a Name? George W. Regrets Dubbing Those ‘Bush Tax Cuts’ New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By ted whitney, April 12, 2012 at 8:48 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I smell bacon
Report thisBy samg, April 12, 2012 at 8:30 pm Link to this comment
I wish EJ were correct but I think he’s wrong here. You can’t compare the Republican primary choices with those upcoming in November. Given the choice between Santorum and Romney, white working class men and evangelicals picked Santorum. Between Obama and Romney, they’re going to choose Romney, partly for racial reasons partly because of the economy, partly because they’re too dumb to understand their own economic interest. As for the women, hopefully, they’ll continue to stick with Obama by wide margins. But if we have many more stupidities by the likes of Hilary Rosen, the president can’t count on them either.
Report thisBy DornDiego, April 12, 2012 at 8:54 am Link to this comment
Truthdig pussyfoots around a reality made apparent by the comments chains that
Report thisroutinely mass around attacks on Obama; that is, he’s going to have to come up
with some big new mojo to get out the vote. Some of the faux revolutionaries
who use these columns to call for all out war against an authoritarian state, or a
dash to nameless third partyers who’ll end wars and restore decent wage scales, or
to Ron Paul, no doubt are just nasty paid wackos from KochLand and ALEC trying
to divide and conquer, but surely some are sincerely pissed off at Obama for going
along with the fraudsters and austerity merchants. Writers and political observers
should be appraising likely turnouts for signs of a population divided against
itself, demoralized, dispirited and confused. People in that condition don’t vote.
By DornDiego, April 12, 2012 at 8:54 am Link to this comment
Truthdig pussyfoots around a reality made apparent by the comments chains that
Report thisroutinely mass around attacks on Obama; that is, he’s going to have to come up
with some big new mojo to get out the vote. Some of the faux revolutionaries
who use these columns to call for all out war against an authoritarian state, or a
dash to nameless third partyers who’ll end wars and restore decent wage scales, or
to Ron Paul, no doubt are just nasty paid wackos from KochLand and ALEC trying
to divide and conquer, but surely some are sincerely pissed off at Obama for going
along with the fraudsters and austerity merchants. Writers and political observers
should be appraising likely turnouts for signs of a population divided against
itself, demoralized, dispirited and confused. People in that condition don’t vote.
By DornDiego, April 12, 2012 at 8:52 am Link to this comment
Truthdig pussyfoots around a reality made apparent by the comments chains that
Report thisroutinely mass around attacks on Obama; that is, he’s going to have to come up
with some big new mojo to get out the. Some of the faux revolutionaries who use
these columns to call for all out war against an authoritarian state, or a dash to
nameless third partyers who’ll end wars and restore decent wage scales, or to Ron
Paul, no doubt are just nasty paid wackos from KochLand and ALEC trying to
divide and conquer, but surely some are sincerely pissed off at Obama for going
along with the fraudsters and austerity merchants. Writers and political observers
should be appraising likely turnouts for signs of a population divided against
itself, demoralized, dispirited and confused. People in that condition don’t vote.
By Big B, April 12, 2012 at 4:57 am Link to this comment
Queenie, if you believe the good christians of our hillbilly nation, hell is where MIttens is already headed.
He will be forced by the GOP “party animals” to take on a veep that represents the christian wacko right. And like McCain/Palin, it will cost him the white house.
Report thisBy bigchin, April 12, 2012 at 4:07 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Romney might be “this” and Romney might be “that” blah blah blah blah.
Well, we know what Obama is…
Obama is a complete fraud.
Report thisBy Queenie, April 11, 2012 at 5:45 pm Link to this comment
Never forget Seamus! Sick and terrified, forced to ride in a gerry-rigged carrier on top of the “family” wagon.
Report thisSeamus! Who, after getting the outhouse trots down the side of the “family” wagon, getting water-hosed (torture) and forced to ride the rest of the 100 mile trip back on top of the “family” wagon to freeze in the 65 plus mile per hour wind.
Seamus! Wet, sick, tortured, driven insane by the lying piece of shite who drove the “family” wagon.
Seamus! Did you live out your days on the “family” farm? That lying turd said you did. Or did you run away the minute the cage door was opened? The boys said you did. Was this such a non issue that they couldn’t even get their stories straight? Was your fate so immaterial to them that they thought no one would question such a nice upstanding “family”?
Seamus! Is all of our fates to be at the hands of such a dimwit? A man with no morality. A man who cares nothing for those he deems lesser than himself?
Seamus! May your death be not in vain. And may your ghost hang around the neck of Romney and bring him down to hell where he belongs.