Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
Top Banner, Site wide
Apr 17, 2014

 Choose a size
Text Size

Top Leaderboard, Site wide

Star-Spangled Baggage
Science Finds New Routes to Energy

Paul Robeson: A Life

Truthdig Bazaar
Losing the News

Losing the News

By Alex Jones

more items


Homo Nest Raided, Queen Bees Stinging Mad

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jun 27, 2011
Flickr / David CC-BY-NC-ND

By Larry Gross

This article is a companion to another report on New York’s historic legalization of gay marriage.

Among the many landmarks of the turbulent decade of the 1960s, few have achieved the fame and symbolic resonance of events that began as a fairly routine example of police harassment on a hot June night in 1969. Police raids on gay bars were neither new nor unusual, though they had become less frequent by the late 1960s. When the police raided the Stonewall bar in Greenwich Village on June 28 they did not expect to set off a riot—and they certainly did not expect to ignite the explosion of a militant gay rights movement. But when many bar patrons, soon joined by allies on the streets, fought back, the incident sparked several nights of rioting—and the Stonewall riots set off a flurry of organizing that soon turned into a firestorm of activism across the country.

Stonewall wasn’t the first bar whose patrons fought the police—that honor probably goes to The Patch in Los Angeles. Many theories have been put forward to explain why the Stonewall raid erupted in violence—among them that Judy Garland’s funeral took place earlier that day. It might also be asked why this particular riot sparked a firestorm. The symbolic importance that Stonewall assumed may have resulted in part from the fortuitous name of the bar that the police chose to invade that June night. Had the riots taken place at the Sewer or The Snake Pit, to name two other contemporary Village bars, there would hardly have been the militant resonance of Stonewall.

Related interview from Truthdig Radio:

On the night of the Stonewall riots the media were unaware of the historic significance of the events in the Village. Even though the editor on night duty at The New York Times realized that “these guys are fighting the cops for the first time” and dispatched a reporter to the scene, he also knew that the topic of homosexuality was not popular with the top brass. The Times’ brief account of the event was buried on Page 33 and told from the police’s perspective. As the riots continued, the Times ran a second story the next day, also on Page 33, one that again focused on the official point of view: “Police Again Rout ‘Village’ Youths.”


Square, Site wide
Other New York media were less subtle than the Times, even if no more sympathetic to the Stonewall rioters. The New York Daily News waited until July 6 to cover the story, but its reporter was at least aware that something significant had occurred. This did not prevent him from treating the riots as an occasion for heavy-handed humor. The story was headlined “Homo Nest Raided, Queen Bees Are Stinging Mad,” and it continued in that vein: 

She sat there with her legs crossed, the lashes of her mascara-coated eyes beating like the wings of a humming-bird. She was angry. She was so upset she hadn’t bothered to shave. A day-old stubble was beginning to push through the pancake makeup. She was a he. A queen of Christopher Street. Last weekend the queens had turned commandos and stood bra strap to bra strap against the invasion of helmeted Tactical Patrol Force. The elite police squad had shut down one of their private gay clubs. … Queen power reared its bleached blonde head in revolt. New York City experienced its first homosexual riot.

The Village Voice, Greenwich Village’s local, countercultural paper, was no more delicate in the choice of language to describe the momentous events happening in its own backyard. Voice reporter Lucian Truscott IV, who came upon the riot as he walked through the Village that night, wrote an account that referred to “the sudden specter of ‘gay Power’ [that] erected its brazen head and spat out a fairy tale the like of which the area has never seen” when “the forces of faggotry” rallied in protest against the raid. Truscott did capture some of the significance of the riots, however, in the words of gay poet Allen Ginsberg, whom he quoted near the end of his article: “You know, the guys out there were so beautiful—they’ve lost that wounded look that fags all had 10 years ago.”

The Village Voice was soon to learn that the “forces of faggotry” were willing to fight the media as well as the police. In the wake of the Stonewall riots a group of gay activists quickly organized a rally that led to the formation of the Gay Liberation Front (GLF) and the birth of a new, radical, gay liberation movement modeled on such ’60s groups as Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) and the Black Panther Party. Writing in their column in the underground newspaper SCREW, Jack Nichols and Lige Clarke said, “The revolution in Sheridan Square must step beyond its present boundaries. The homosexual revolution is only a part of a larger revolution sweeping through all segments of society.”

The name Gay Liberation Front was an obvious reference to the Vietnamese National Liberation Front, reflecting the activists’ engagement in the anti-war movement. Karla Jay and Allen Young’s 1972 collection “Out of the Closets: The Voices of Gay Liberation” included a listing of lesbian and gay organizations in 36 states, the District of Columbia and 10 other countries. California alone was represented by 74 organizations, 16 of them called Gay Liberation Front.

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By doublestandards/glasshouses, June 29, 2011 at 11:40 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

In the 60’s people demanded; today they beg (weather permitting).

Report this

By agnesinla, June 28, 2011 at 12:52 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I am very glad for the human rights advancements that gays have gained. Keep fighting, because it is not enough. The day when a gay person can dream about their wedding day freely like any heterosexual, is the day when the struggle will be over. The travesty, that gays cannot have a civil ceremony like everyone else is unforgivable. We should all have the right to choose the one we love. Love is hard to find anywhere as it is.
Thank you for this article, I learned a lot about the historical struggle I wasn’t even aware of.

Report this

By Arouete, June 27, 2011 at 3:40 pm Link to this comment

Mr. Gross: 

Thanks for the superb companion piece. I really enjoyed it.

Frankly, if today’s advocates and activists had the cajones of the Stonewall drag queens we might be a lot farther along than we are. See e.g., “Mr. President: Just say ‘No!’ to Gay Jim Crow.” at

Report this

By amsron, June 27, 2011 at 2:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Anyone know any writers on the “Madmen” staff?  This story could really affect some of their cast’s stories.

Report this

sign up to get updates

Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.

Like Truthdig on Facebook