|
|
May 22, 2013
|
|
Goldman Plays, We PayPosted on Apr 20, 2010
The story of the financial debacle will end the way it began, with the super-hustlers from Goldman Sachs at the center of the action and profiting wildly. Never in U.S. history has one company wielded such destructive power over our political economy, irrespective of whether a Republican or a Democrat happened to be president. At least the robber barons of old built railroads and steel mills, whereas Goldman Sachs makes its money placing bets on people losing their homes. On Tuesday, Goldman announced a 91 percent jump in profit to $3.46 billion for the quarter, while the dreams of millions of families continue to be foreclosed and unemployment hovers at 10 percent because of a crisis that that very company did much to cause. It was Goldman-Vice-Chairman-turned-Treasury-Secretary Robert Rubin who pushed through the radical financial deregulation during the Clinton presidency that made the derivatives madness possible. When Bill Clinton was asked on ABC’s Sunday show “This Week” if he now regretted the advice he received back then from Rubin and his protégé Lawrence Summers, now a top Obama adviser, he responded: “On derivatives, yeah, I think they were wrong and I was wrong to take it. …” Thanks to that bad advice, Clinton signed off on the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which categorically exempted those derivatives from any existing law or regulatory body. It was that exemption that freed Goldman Sachs and others on Wall Street to run wild in packaging collateralized debt obligations, and their attendant swaps, which turned people’s home into nothing more than gambling chips. The more suckers to be conned into those mortgage obligations, the better for the financial casino—until it had to be saved by taxpayers from spiraling completely out of control. And it was Goldman-Chairman-turned-Treasury-Secretary Henry Paulson who engineered the Bush-era bailout that left Goldman holding the high cards. The corporation was allowed to suddenly become a bank holding company, a privilege denied Lehman Brothers, and hence eligible for TARP funding and a sharp discount in the cost of borrowing money. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, then head of the New York Fed, worked with Paulson to give Goldman the federally protected status of a commercial bank and also worked on the deal that passed taxpayer money through AIG to Goldman. Advertisement The test for serious financial reform could well be that if it’s good for Goldman Sachs, it’s bad for the country. But with scores of Goldman alums as well placed in the Obama administration as they were under Clinton and George W. Bush, it is a test the government is likely to fail as far as taxpayers are concerned. Or should we simply trust Mark Patterson, who is chief of staff to Geithner and a Goldman lobbyist for three years before he entered the Obama administration, to do the right thing for the rest of us? Maybe he will. After all, Gary Gensler, a former Goldman partner who now heads the critically important Commodity Futures Trading Commission, does seem to have had a change of heart from his days in the Clinton administration, when he thought that bringing “legal certainty” to the trade in what turned out to be “toxic derivatives” was a great thing. The SEC civil suit is also a sign of progress. There are other positive stirrings, as in President Barack Obama’s most recent speeches, but what is needed now is a profound populist commitment among those who elected Obama to demand he throw the money-changers out of the temple of democratic governance. Instead they are crowding in. The New York Times reported: “With so much money at stake, it is not surprising that more than 1,500 lobbyists, executives, bankers and others have made their way to the Senate committee that on Wednesday will take up legislation to rein in derivatives.” That’s the committee that Sen. Lincoln heads, and she needs the president’s support rather than Geithner’s opposition to her plan to ban banks like Goldman from trading in derivatives. It is insulting to the spirit of populist revolt, which has been fundamental to the success of America’s grand experiment in democracy, that a fat-cat Republican-funded tea party revolt is now the vessel of popular anti-Wall Street discontent. That vessel ought to be our president, who campaigned as a champion of the common people.
Previous item: Cochabamba, the Water Wars and Climate Change Next item: 4.5 Steps to Building a Better Filibuster New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Boyd, April 25, 2010 at 1:19 pm Link to this comment
“For this revolution is not, in fact, concerned with
liberating us from our poverty and misery, but rather
from our wealth and our totally excessive prosperity.
It is not a liberation from what we lack, but from
our consumerism in which we are ultimately consuming
our very selves. It is not a liberation from our
state of oppression, but from the untransformed
praxis of our own wishes and desires. It is not a
liberation from our powerlessness, but from our own
form of predominance. It frees us, not from the state
of being dominated, but from that of dominating; not
from our suffering, but from our apathy; not from our
guilt, but from our innocence, or rather from that
delusion of innocence which the life of domination
has long since spread out in our souls.” - Johann
Baptist Metz, “Christians and Jews After Auschwitz”
The disease that Matt Taibbi diagnoses in “Will
Goldman Sachs Prove Greed is God?” is far deeper than
he imagines. It is a sickness in the social soul
which all of us share and which can only be healed
through the revolution which Metz envisions for us.
The “prosperity” which is the unquestioned goal of
virtually every conscious decision made is precisely
the sickness that is destroying us, beginning with
the corruption of reason into a pure instrument of
acquisition. Mother Earth cries out in compassion for
her lost children who are unable to understand the
sacrifices required for life to flourish. We have
turned ourselves into machines fueled by other men’s
greed and only by embracing poverty of spirit can we
be saved.
Our false wishes and desires cry out for
transformation. In some secret room in our soul, we
know that the current direction of our society is an
evolutionary and spiritual dead end, yet we cannot
bear to pull the emergency cord on this train
hurtling into the abyss. Instead, we heighten the
illusions that nourish our decay and demand miracles
of the God of our imagination. In doing this, we
continually contribute to the true catastrophe, the
one “which consists in the fact that everything goes
on as before” - Walter Benjamin.
The word that best characterizes this revolution is
conversion, but not the purely privatized conversion
presented by Christianity Incorporated, that wholly
owned subsidiary of the transnational corporations. A
private conversion that has no social ramifications
is a pure fiction for those who inhabit an
inescapably political landscape of domination and
subjugation. Such is the delusion of innocence that
rots our souls with idealistic fetishes presented as
true salvation in the mega-churchs, those mega-malls
of spiritual consumerism. Jesus should once more to
overturn the stalls of these buyers and sellers of
spiritual fraud. The prayer that God will gladly hear
is the one that crucifies our false prosperity built
on the exploitation of those little ones whose deaths
we casually encompass for the sake of our SUVs.
We can embrace this conversion only when we are able
to break the chain of immediate self-interest, the
chain which Goldman Sachs gleefully wraps around
itself and the government it pretends to obey. This
sickness eats into our reason to the point that
Goldman Sachs executives declare that, “The
injunction of Jesus to love others as ourselves is an
endorsement of self-interest.” - Matt Taibbi. This
was said in the context of defrauding an entire
country of its budget and plunging it into social
chaos.
God calls to us to shed this false wealth that makes
Report thisus lackeys of financial domination, of that world of
“greed without limit” that is casting its shadow over
us and to which we must succumb if we cannot change
our hearts and the heart of our society.
By Lawrence Baker, April 23, 2010 at 10:31 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
An “octopus on the face of humanity” as one journalist put it; the New World Banking Order has arrived. In 2009 speculative, uncontrolled derivatives were the Worlds largest market at an estimated 600 Trillion. The Worlds total economic output was an estimated 58.07 Trillion and the total World bond market was an estimated 82.2 Trillion. Yet, there is no “crime” that the bankers can be charged with as they bankrupt citizens and Nations into the New World Order?
Report thisThe appropriate criminal charge should be Treason to the American People and our Democratic Republic and Constitution. The members of the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group in government and banking who conspired to overthrow our soverenity as an independent nation, who conspired to bankrupt our Treasury with unjust War and multinational corporate bailouts, conspired and manipulated “financial crisis” for their own gain and who have conspired to enslave American citizens with National and personal debt. Deserve the death sentence by firing squad for Treason.
Obama, your New World Order is Totalitarian and we Patriots, American free citizens, will fight for our Democracy, Independence and Freedom.
By Jon, April 23, 2010 at 1:27 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Obama got 940,000+ dollars from Goldman Sachs during his campaign, so we truly believe he will seek to discipline them? Call me cynical, but I don’t think he will. More and more, Obama reminds me of W with a vocabulary, but nothing more. What I find more than interesting is that his tried and true (e.g., they put their fingers in their ears and go ‘la la la la’ rather than recognizing the truth) are just totally fine with Obama’s W-like behavior, whether it be regarding the Patriot Act, telecom immunity, treating the unemployed like dirt, or, truly seeking health care reform and regulation of the banks. I hate to say it, but I’ve watched this president, and he’s intellectually dishonest, and as bad, dishonest with the American citizens. For this, he and his party will deserve what they get this November and in 2012. Obama cannot possibly expect thinking progressives and Democrats to just blindly vote Democratic. Clinton got this ‘believing is seeing support,’ and in return we got NAFTA, banking deregulation, no derivative regulation, and deregulation of broadcasting.
If Democrats and progressives vote to allow this Obama teleprompter Goldman Sachs presidency to continue, then well, they will deserve the ultimate result. I personally think Dems and progressives will deliver us unto Goldman Sachs in Nov. and in 2012. They lack the guts to do what needs to be done.
Report thisBy thebeerdoctor, April 23, 2010 at 7:34 am Link to this comment
Watching President Obama give his Wall Street speech yesterday I was reminded of that scene in the movie Mephisto, where the actor tries to get the Nazi official to change a policy, and the officer replies: “Who do you think you are? You are only an actor, we can have you crushed like a beetle.”
Report thisSadly, the President appears to be a very silly man indeed. Only weeks ago he praised Dimon and Blankfein as “savvy businessmen” who did not begrudge their monetary appetites, because, as the President said “That’s how our system works”.
And now President Obama’s call for Wall Street cooperation is not only silly, but downright pathetic.
By Joe g, April 22, 2010 at 11:39 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The picture here says it all for me. These people have been programed to chase their next trophy for some time now. Someone asks “who built that thing” answer: “Let’s hope they were desperate enough to do it for a minimum wage because I am expecting a bonus and if my kids don’t get into one of our schools they might be one of them (yuck)”
Report thisBy bala, April 22, 2010 at 7:12 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
greed not need is the main reason. prudent management with ethics necessary.
Report thisBy AT, April 22, 2010 at 4:50 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The republicans are grinning. Dont you worry a thing, we’ll fix it. Starting with a scandal brewing in Orange County about deceptive and illegal methods used by Republican in registering voters, to the final nails in the coffin: fixing the votes. Afterall Karl Rove is still around.
Report thisBy Timestyx, April 22, 2010 at 2:42 am Link to this comment
What troubles me most are the fates of thousands of people who lost their homes and their savings accounts when it all came crashing down. Regulations on derivatives needs to come in and it needs to come in fast, that or its to seperate the industry into banking and gambling. Anyone involved in the savings of millions of hardworking americans should be regulated and prevented from diving into casino like banking ventures.
Report thisBy Suzannedk, April 22, 2010 at 2:22 am Link to this comment
The government financial ministers of the U.K., France, Netherland, Germany,
Belgium, Russia all are recommending that their countries no longer deal with
Goldman Saks. It is becoming increasingly clear that the financial crisis was set
up in the U.S. deliberately and that the U.S. will only seem to do something
about their culture of wholesale theft setting up another round of the same
thing unless the E.U. forces real change
The Polish plane crash may have been set up with this in mind. The U.S has
been colonizing Poland through it’s NATO for many years. They profess to be
protectors. Why did they allow the old President to control the plane trip plans
from beginning to end? Why did no-one step in and say, “No! Split up the
party of 96 into several new planes, or, even better, all get on trains. Differing
trains, not one.
Many across the world will be wondering this.
Report thisBy ofersince72, April 21, 2010 at 9:53 pm Link to this comment
We can forget that then..
Common Cause tried for at least thirty years to get
Report thissome meaningful campaign finance reform through, at
times had a lot of punch and funds, still couldn’t
penitrate Capitol Hill. What we got is what we are stuck
with, we voted them in, we can’t get them out.
It should be illegal to take any contributions out of
district, most representatives get more money outside
their district.
By LarSim, April 21, 2010 at 9:23 pm Link to this comment
Say what you want about “Goldman-Sacks-the-people-every-chance-they-get” but the bottom line is money in politics. Aggressive regulation would leash that dog.
Everything else, given the current system, is just fluff and speculation. MONEY TALKS. LOUDLY!
It seems to me that it is relative easy to devise a scheme to mitigate the effect of money in our political system. After all, we are a fairly mature democracy with a pretty intelligent population. But don’t expect the mainstream media to beat that drum. Most of the political money spent on elections goes into their pockets.
Too bad. But one step at a time can accomplish wonders. Public financing of elections would probably save us more money then we would have to spend on them.
Report thisBy OldUncleDave, April 21, 2010 at 8:52 pm Link to this comment
I hope I’m wrong, but I expect the SEC will offer them one of those “we don’t admit we did it and we won’t do it again” settlements. Goldman will pay a fine (that hurts them less than a traffic violation hurts a working man) and go back to business as usual.
Report thisBy ofersince72, April 21, 2010 at 8:01 pm Link to this comment
Ardee did you intentionally leave out the last sentence?
“That vessel ought to be our president, who campaigned
as the champion of the common people.”
That sentence is funny and the most telling of the article
p.s. turn off Bill Mayer, Colbert, and Sterart!!!!!!!!!
Report thisI believe the tea bag thingy is a media made up
scare tactic using a bunch of campaign money left
over from O’s election to keep the minorities scared of
the repubs and vote democrat instead of McKinney.
By jack, April 21, 2010 at 3:20 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
La Place de la Concord redux! It’s a gentle down-hill route from Wall Street to Battery Park - perfect staging - can handle a good crowd - the carts would roll smoothly enough - resurrect Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous for international TV coverage - would be more pupular than Bay Watch - post-modern in every way: a solicitous host like Robin Leech getting a few choice last words from Pandit the Bandit or Jamie Diamond, seconds before their heads roll!
Report thisBy LocalHero, April 21, 2010 at 2:40 pm Link to this comment
@richardf “Anger at this point is a waste of time (agreed!)…Rome is burning and we need to form a bucket brigade.”
But why? Better to throw gasoline on it & Let It Burn, Baby!
Report thisBy BBFmail, April 21, 2010 at 2:18 pm Link to this comment
Will Obama Return $994,795 In Goldman Sachs Campaign Contributions?
http://www.OpenSecrets.org
April 20, 2010
This table lists the top donors to this candidate in the 2008 election
cycle. The organizations themselves did not donate , rather the money
came from the organization’s PAC, its individual members or employees or
owners, and those individuals’ immediate families. Organization totals
include subsidiaries and affiliates.
Because of contribution limits, organizations that bundle together many
individual contributions are often among the top donors to presidential
candidates. These contributions can come from the organization’s members
or employees (and their families). The organization may support one
candidate, or hedge its bets by supporting multiple candidates. Groups
with national networks of donors – like EMILY’s List and Club for Growth
– make for particularly big bundlers.
University of California $1,591,395
Report thisGoldman Sachs $994,795
Harvard University $854,747
Microsoft Corp $833,617
Google Inc $803,436
Citigroup Inc $701,290
JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132
Time Warner $590,084
Sidley Austin LLP $588,598
Stanford University $586,557
National Amusements Inc $551,683
UBS AG $543,219
Wilmerhale Llp $542,618
Skadden, Arps et al $530,839
IBM Corp $528,822
Columbia University $528,302
Morgan Stanley $514,881
General Electric $499,130
US Government $494,820
Latham & Watkins $493,835
By usedtobesupermom, April 21, 2010 at 1:57 pm Link to this comment
Thank you FreeWill
Report thisBy richardf, April 21, 2010 at 11:58 am Link to this comment
When Bill Clinton was asked on ABC’s Sunday show “This Week” if he now regretted the advice he received back then from Rubin and his protégé Lawrence Summers, now a top Obama adviser, he responded: “On derivatives, yeah, I think they were wrong and I was wrong to take it. …”
Mr Clinton, a democrat mind you, took the Reagan deregulation agenda into overdrive and presided over 8 years of a false economy hallmarked by overheating of values in all investment sectors. He helped put the term “leveraged” on the map as the new business model for a country shedding companies and jobs across many “industry sectors” and replacing them with service sector jobs and alot of fly by night IPO driven companies long since gone to the cyber “bad idea” afterlife.
Along the way, he recast the democratic ideal as “centrist” which is code for cow-tow to the right and get the vote at any cost…even at the expense of shedding your values and leaving the most vulnerable in our “great society” permanently out in the rain.
Now we have Mr Blankfein coming to Washington to tell his side of the story. You can rail against his kind and hold him up as the arch villain but know this…he is a favorite son of modern American society. He was begat and nurtured in a corporate culture that rewards those that step on the throats of the competition and squeeze every last profit margin until they implode.
I have one recommendation for our elected officials that will hold court with Mr Blankfein. Simply ask him to bring the Goldman Sachs policies and procedures manual to DC and read / explain the sections covering their “derivatives” investment division. Provide him a white board and let him (along with his “best and brightest” that hatched it) write out the algorithm for this profit making venture and process map the division’s workings…step by step by step.
When they say they can’t explain or produce what the panel is asking for…don’t get angry…take a breath and look into the face of the spawn of capitalism and deregulation then start thinking about the future of this country and what is truly sustainable.
Anger at this point is a waste of time…Rome is burning and we need to form a bucket brigade.
Report thisBy FreeWill, April 21, 2010 at 10:16 am Link to this comment
The RICO act was Formed just to handle this type of mass corruption, fraud, and theft. But who is there to enforce it, when it is the government itself and the judicial system who are in collusion with the perpetrators? No, we will not see justice or resolution to these crimes until things deteriorate to the point where people fill the streets in protest. So far the largely complacent, uninformed (brainwashed by the media) populace can barely muster enough coalescence to form a misguided out lash of rage to have a “Tea Party event”. We need to stop expecting the government, or some one else to do the right thing and save us from this evil. We have been deluded, well fed, fat and asleep, while the big financial interests have stolen our frail democracy. Only action of the people, by the people, for the people, will get it back.
Report thisBy Lawrence Baker, April 21, 2010 at 9:52 am Link to this comment
Excellent report Robert, you are a great Patriot to our Democratic Republic and our Constitution. We can not let Democracy fall to Fascism, followed by Totalitarianism. The real shadow government (the government in our government) is the Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg members who are on their New World Order agenda; a Totalitarian agenda of World banking control and power. By World banker design, the destiny of Greece will soon be our own fate.
Report thisBy usedtobesupermom, April 21, 2010 at 8:57 am Link to this comment
Goldman Sachs has engineered EVERY MAJOR market manipulation since the Great Depression! They WERE A MAJOR CAUSE OF THE STOCK MARKET CRASH of October 1929! How? By doing pretty much what they do now!
They ALL NEED TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE!
I KNEW after Enron it was just a matter of time before Wall St. ‘misdeeds’ rather, CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES would hit the fan!
They SHOULD be indicted under the RICO Act Laws: FRAUD, EMBEZZLEMENT, MONEY LAUNDERING, EXTORTION, BLACK MAIL, ETC.
see: http://www.ricoact.com/ricoact/nutshell.asp
See: Goldman Sachs: “Engineering Every Major Market Manipulation Since The Great Depression”
by Tyler Durden on 06/27/2009 16:51 -0500
The Great American Bubble Machine: By Matt Taibbi
Report thisApr 05, 2010 3:58 PM EDT @ Rollingstone.com
By Aren't You Sick of This Yet?, April 21, 2010 at 7:38 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Brooksley E. Born is my hero. She should get her job back and be given back pay with interest, and Greenspan should be where he belongs for copying Michael Milken - IN JAIL.
The Wall Street Emperor Has No Clothes, and the so-called “reform” will do less than nothing to prevent another crisis.
If the Left are so smart, so educated, so knowledgable? Why are we/they not OUTRAGED by this?
Turn OFF Bill Maher and Comedy Central. Now.
Four words, people:
MARCH ON WALL STREET.
Report thisBy yrscrewed, April 21, 2010 at 6:17 am Link to this comment
Commodity Futures Modernization Act was rammed in the budget bill and voted by the Democrats and Republicans except Ron Paul.
The Hero and my Person of the Decade was shoved under the rug Brooksley E. Born and the same idiots who shove her out of office are still in the Obama’s Admin.
“Brooksley E. Born” is an American attorney and former public official who, from August 26, 1996 to June 1, 1999, was chairperson of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the federal agency which oversees the futures and commodity options markets. During her tenure on the CFTC, Born lobbied Congress and the President to give the CFTC oversight of off-exchange markets for derivatives in addition to its role with respect to exchange-traded derivatives,but her warnings were opposed by other regulators.
Greenspan, Ben B current Fed Chairperson, Summers, Tres. Sec Rubin, Tres. Sec Paulson, Freddy and Fanny
“Government Run or Controlled companies that were ruin by the government themselves.
However Goldman Sachs and all the other partipants should all be put in jail. And Free Bernie Maddoff let us make him Federal Reserve Chairman because he can run the best sham company.
Report thisPeace
By farmertx, April 21, 2010 at 5:50 am Link to this comment
Yes, our Nation’s History is one of Corporate control ... to a point. It wasn’t until the late 1800’s and early 1900’s that a need to regulate those Corporations became necessary.
Report thisBusinesses have to have some leeway and even some protections in order to survive and generate jobs, products/services and dividends.
All we see any more is Greed. Plain and simple.
What CEO is worth multi-millions in salary with bonuses and perks on top of that? I’m not talking about a CEO who founded a company and guided it to profitability. I’m talking about the guy who was hired to run an existing firm.
The Wall Street ‘bandits’ traded on their past reputation and put out ‘offerings’ that most didn’t understand. Offerings that were designed to fail so someone else could reap profits.
The Party of No sees nothing wrong with that. They don’t understand how to make money the old fashioned way ... by earning it. They want to make money using smoke and mirrors.
The teabaggers want lower taxes. They can’t see that fraud and waste are the real problems, along with Congress Critters who are more interested in their offshore secret accounts than doing what is best for the Country.
While the teabaggers are seen as being against the Democrat’s, some Republicans, notably in Ohio, are realizing that they too are under the gun. As they should be.
It will be interesting to see how many Incumbents survive the Midterm Elections. Very few should.
By Mike789, April 21, 2010 at 5:49 am Link to this comment
It is contrary to good prudence that there be even larger and fewer financial corporations. If they mess up again it’ll be even more likely that a bailout will ensue. There will be no redundancy to fall back upon.
Goldman and the other mega(s) are eyeing a scenario where the EU regulates derivatives and the U.S. does nothing. What an apple!
Sen. McConnell want to stay the status quo while touting a “no more bailout” platform. I’ve got an island to sell him. These mega-banks or whatever they are, have to be broken up.
It took Teddy Roosevelt 10 years to break up Standard Oil. We should lay the ground work now.
Report thisBy Steve Hunt, April 21, 2010 at 5:47 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I agree with ardee. Good column, but that last paragraph kind of left me scratching my head. Best to just lay off the Tea Party in my opinion, unless you are addressing their legitimate concerns.
Report thisBy hidflect, April 21, 2010 at 4:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
American politics seems to be mirroring Thailand. Which do you want? The Corrupt, The Elitists, or the Mob?
Report thisBy ardee, April 21, 2010 at 2:54 am Link to this comment
It is insulting to the spirit of populist revolt, which has been fundamental to the success of America’s grand experiment in democracy, that a fat-cat Republican-funded tea party revolt is now the vessel of popular anti-Wall Street discontent.
I truly wonder if this is a true assessment of our nation’s historical beginnings. Certainly a few colonials threw some tea overboard to protest taxes that were not benefiting the colonies, and certainly both Jefferson and Madison repeatedly warned about the dangers of unfettered corporate entities controlling an infant democracy. But, on balance, this nations history is one of corporate control rather than control of corporations.
I would also question the thrust of the Tea Party movement as a protest against Wall Street, more accurately I think it an unfocused assault on a Democratic Party controlled Washington DC.
Report this