LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 27, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     robert scheer     barack obama     gay marriage     ndaa     chris hedges
Most Read

Say 'Hi-Ho!' as They Strip-Search You

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Children Slaughtered in Government Attack on Syrian Town

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
The New Old World

The New Old World

By Perry Anderson
$26.37

more items

 
Reports

Don’t Man Up, Grow Up

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Oct 19, 2010

By Ruth Marcus

In this, the year of the Mama Grizzly, let’s stop stirring the moose chili for a moment to ponder three words—man up and whore—and what they have to tell us about the muddled state of gender politics.

Man up as in “man up, Harry Reid,” from Nevada Republican Senate candidate Sharron Angle on Reid’s downplaying of Social Security financial woes. And, though it got less attention, from Missouri Democrat Robin Carnahan to Republican Roy Blunt at a Senate debate the very same night, on health care: If Blunt wants to do away with health care for others, Carnahan told him, “then you ought to repeal your own first. And man up.”

Whore as in the accidentally recorded suggestion by an unidentified aide to California Democrat Jerry Brown about a potential line of attack against Meg Whitman, his GOP rival for governor.

The man up phrase is part of a series of supposedly tougher-than-thou statements from female politicians. During the primary campaign, Delaware Republican Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell told Mike Castle he was being “unmanly,” adding, “Mike, this is not a bake-off—get your man-pants on.” In the Colorado GOP Senate primary, Jane Norton assailed Ken Buck for not being “man enough” to run attack ads himself.

The queen of such discourse is Sarah Palin. Praising Arizona’s immigration law and the state’s female governor, Palin said that Jan Brewer had “the cojones” to take on illegal immigration that President Barack Obama “does not have.” Then, Palin blasted “impotent, limp and gutless reporters.” And Palin got in on the “man up” action the other day—turning the phrase on her own side. “Hey, politicians who are in office today,” she said, “you, some of you, need to man up and spend some political capital to support the tea party candidates.”

Advertisement

Ladies! If we’re so tough, so confident in our toughness and so comfortable with it, what do testicles have to do with it? The breakthrough appeal of the Mama Grizzly is that she combines the ultimate feminine act—motherhood—with fierceness. Have we really come a long way if cojones equals good, and lack thereof equals wimpy?

I’m sure to some extent Angle and Carnahan were just being cheeky. There is space to acknowledge gender differences in politics, and not every reference with gender overtones—remember John Edwards’ comment on Hillary Clinton’s pink jacket?—is sexist or demeaning.

But some references are, and whore, used about a female candidate, is one of them. More outrageous than the comment itself was Brown’s get-a-life reaction to it. In a debate with Whitman last week, he grunted out an infuriatingly insincere sounding apology wrapped in excuses.

Saying whore is not equivalent to using the N-word. (OK, but not the point.) It was a “five-week-old private conversation picked up on a cell phone.” (Ditto.) “I’m not even sure it’s legal” to have released the tape. (As I said.)

More Brown: “Have you chastised your chairman, Pete Wilson, who called Congress whores to the public sector unions?” Whoa. Context matters. To take it back to the N-word, when one African-American says it to another, that’s different from a white person saying it to or about a black one. When I use the word ladies, it’s less fraught, and more obviously ironic, than it would be coming from a male columnist.

And Brown’s concluding justification: “I’m sorry it happened.” (I bet.) “That does not represent anything other than things that happen in a campaign.”

Jerry, did I hear you say, “Man up, Meg Whitman”? Because it sure sounded like “If you can’t stand the heat, get back in the kitchen.” Brown did about everything except tell Whitman to stop crying about it, little girl.

Folks, navigating the modern lines of gender and politics may seem like picking through a minefield, but the rules for safe passage don’t seem all that complicated:

Don’t equate typically female characteristics or activities (baking, wearing high heels) with weakness.

Don’t—even, or maybe especially, if you’re a woman—equate toughness with manliness. At least not unless you think it’s acceptable for your opponent to tell you to behave like a lady.

Don’t use terms with sexist or racist overtones. If you, or someone in your campaign does, groveling works better than quibbling.

Politicians of both genders don’t need to man up—they need to grow up. Judging by the campaign so far, that might be harder to pull off.

Ruth Marcus’ e-mail address is marcusr(at symbol)washpost.com.

© 2010, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By Sarah, May 12 at 1:27 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

guys. Man Down!! :D

Report this

By TheBrix57, October 23, 2010 at 10:44 am Link to this comment

Euphemisms are the age old start of the politically correct nonsense. We all learn at an early age that certain words or phrases are just not acceptable in polite society. In years past, the vast majority of those in political office were men, still rather true today. With the influx of more women, everyone has to be much more careful of what they say. The soundbites that in years past would have not raised an eyebrow are today an earth shattering display of not being politically correct.

Balls and cojones are the age old slang terms when men are talking to other men meaning bold, brazen behavior. Having a penis or a slang term hasn’t really caught on, yet. Applying it with women will always bring a sexual connotation and the conversation stops.

The phrase “Man Up” or “Be A Man” are simply again phrases that men use with other men to show responsibility for the actions that they do. Somehow, “Woman Up” or “Be A Woman” just don’t have the same forceful meaning.
Likewise “whore” is mainly used outside of public speaking as “some” may feel insulted by the introduction of slang into the proper language. Even though it may fit precisely.

Quite silly when someone looks at it, but the politically correct language and the enforcement of it are only the beginning signs of decline of conversation. When the conversation stops, so do we.

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, October 21, 2010 at 5:20 pm Link to this comment

Ruth Marcus lecturing on manning up. That’s rich.

The NFL is considering a new ban on hitting too hard. And all this month the players are wearing pink to raise awareness of breat cancer- a big problem in the NFL apparently. Next year the new name will be the Nancy Football League.

Marcus’ article is a primer on political correctness; when it’s ok to say “lady”, “nigger”, “whore”, etc. Who does she think she is?

Report this

By cat, October 21, 2010 at 2:23 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This election let us vote to TERMINATE WASHINGTON. We can’t afford Washington any more. For WE THE PEOPLE know how to shrink Washington. And pay our own deficit to China off. We have already a House and Senate and supreme court in each state. On 02 November 2010 let us all vote to Terminate Capital hill. Only the President and his or her staff should be located in DC, We are finish paying for them to rule us. Congress and the senate and all their staff are ALL FIRED. Why do we need them? We sure can not afford them. Can you imagine all the billions that they take from us? We would be able to pay to China back at least a Trillion. We cant afford them and we already have Repersentives located in our states, We pay them the Taxes and they will pay the Federal Government from those taxes. And Federal Government will then provide to us our Hospitals, and stores, or roads and buildings. They have been bilking We The People for generations now, while they sit up in your chair with your feet up on the desk and rule us. Let us We The people shrink our own government and get back our money because it does not trickle down, It has trickled out of the country or invested in paper but nothing comes back down to the people because we have a whole branch of government that we don’t need and their whole staff we cant afford. People we are paying for 2 governments. And They are both broken and corrupt, WE THE PEOPLE have always had the power we where unable to figure out how to use it with out causing chaos, Until now.  If we can get that change into the ballot at this time TO TERMINATE that whole branch of government. THIS WILL BE THE CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN Then afterward another unannounced election with the option to terminate anyone elected on 02 November 2010 which will result in a pink slip. Because we have no more capital hill Congress or Senate Offices to rule us. Each state will rule itself as part of the union with DC our government which WE THE PEOPLE CONTROL.

Report this
Fat Freddy's avatar

By Fat Freddy, October 21, 2010 at 10:23 am Link to this comment

Here’s a word; Mammoni. There almost as many fucking Mammoni here, as there are in Italy.

Report this

By gerard, October 20, 2010 at 12:48 pm Link to this comment

What else are the wars but an attempt to prove that the U.S. (Christians?) have bigger cajones than the Taliban (Muslims?).  Boys will be boys—till they wake up dead!

Report this

By wildflower, October 20, 2010 at 10:17 am Link to this comment

Re Marcus: “Politicians of both genders don’t need to man up—they need to grow up. Judging by the campaign so far, that might be harder to pull off.”

All things considered, I’d say it’s impossible for U.S. politicians to pull it off.

Report this

By SarcastiCanuck, October 20, 2010 at 9:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Ruth,good attempt at addressing an argument that probably should be conducted in a pre-school sandbox.This culmination of our raging,long standing gender war has now reached the levels of our alleged elite of society.If Sarah Palin has such big cajones then why doesn’t she grab an M-16 and go fight some Taliban,like the male and female heroes of the Armed Forces.They’re the ones with the real cajones.Does she think that she’s a tough guy because she can pull the trigger on a poor defenseless Moose or because she can verbally eviscerate someone from her self proclaimed pulpit.Why doesn’t she take her big cajones onto John Stewart or Stephan Colbert’s show and see how fast they shrivel and go limp.Remember the Katie Couric interview?Does America really want to trust someone like her with the nuclear launch codes?I’m crapping yellow just imagining it…
  On the other side of the hormonal coin, is the whore comment.Isn’t a whore someone(male or female)who sells themselves for money?Jeez Ruth,doesn’t that describe a large percentage of the politicians out there these days.If you take the gender conotations out of it,I’d say its a pretty fitting label,wouldn’t you?Maybe we should take a poll from the Washington lobbyists and see if they would agree.Oh yeah,they’re whores too.
  It seems to me that the election choices aren’t between a male or female,secular humanist or believer,even democrat or republican…Its between dumb and dumber.Who needs Saturday Night Live,we have politicians to make us laugh.Think I’ll go man up now…

Report this

By Gordy, October 20, 2010 at 4:14 am Link to this comment

Politicians learn to use Freudian symbolism in order to appear ‘virile’ and ‘alpha’.  They will take time to adapt to the idea of females having inherent non-penis-derived power because the roots of psychology (and hence, PR) are sexist.

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.