Top Banner, Site wide
Apr 24, 2014
Don’t Believe Everything You Read About the Nexus 5
Posted on Nov 15, 2013
The Nexus 5 is Google’s new flagship phone. Despite being superior in some ways to the iPhone, and costing only half the price, the Nexus has taken a bit of a beating in reviews.
The main complaint is that both the battery and camera on the device are lacking. This is odd, especially since Google’s first Nexus 5 commercial touted the capabilities of the camera as its hero feature.
Having lived with the Nexus 5 since it became available at the beginning of November, I think I understand the criticisms and in what way they are perhaps misleading.
But first let’s address the issue of price. This is something that is primarily of concern to phone buyers not imprisoned by the draconian two-year-contract system that prevails in the United States—that would be T-Mobile subscribers, people who live almost anywhere else in the world and those looking for a second or off-contract device. Verizon, ATT&T and Sprint all charge a secret monthly phone tax, whether you sign a contract or not. The result is that customers get a new top-end device every two years for the disguised price of $200 or so. The real cost of a 16GB iPhone is $649.99. Compare that to the Nexus 5, at $349. The Nexus has a much bigger screen (that’s a matter of taste) with a higher resolution of 445 pixels per inch, compared with the iPhone’s 326 ppi. The Nexus 5 has a top-notch processor and graphics chip to boot, making it competitive when it comes to productivity and games, and it runs the latest version of Google’s unparalleled mobile operating system, which is something no other device as of this posting can boast.
Let’s not get carried away. The iPhone 5s, if not the 5c, is in many respects a better smartphone, as are the other high-end Android phones—mainly the Samsung Galaxy S4 and the HTC One. Whether because they have better cameras, battery life or just build quality, those devices deserve higher marks than the Nexus, but they all cost significantly more. It’s a testament to the Nexus 5 that it is so often compared to phones that are $300 more. The fairer comparison is to the Moto X, which is also made by Google, albeit indirectly, and costs $499 off-contract (you can get it for as low as $299, but you have to sign up for Republic Wireless). The Moto X isn’t as powerful as the Nexus, but it has unique features that make it compelling (wild customizability, assembled to order in the United States, “active” power-saving notifications) and, for those stuck in contract purgatory, a no-brainer price point of $99.
Square, Site wide
And here is where I must come to the Nexus 5’s defense, because many people will be making that decision on the basis of camera quality and battery life, and that’s where Google’s phone is a bit of an odd duck that may challenge conventional thinking.
First, the camera. To say it’s bad is, to make a mess of the scientific method, both accurate and imprecise. Compared with last year’s iPhone, the Nexus 5 is slow, noisy and inconsistent in terms of photography. It generally takes serviceable photos, though the app is slow to focus and, sometimes, even to load. Google has promised an update to fix the camera, but until then we have to judge what we have.
The camera on the Nexus 5, despite its problems, is capable of taking very beautiful photos, particularly when there is a lot of light available. Even at night, however, I’ve gotten great shots out of the Nexus. The trick is to use the built-in HDR+ mode exclusively. Unfortunately it takes even longer to snap a photo, because it’s taking multiple images and combining them. But if you have patience, you will be rewarded.
1 2 NEXT PAGE >>>
Previous item: Why Republicans Suddenly Care About Canceled Health Policies
Next item: The Kennedy Myth? The Kennedy Legacy?
New and Improved Comments