LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 24, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

Obama Heckled During Speech, Warren Lands a Book Deal, and More

A Call to Action

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * New York City’s Summers May Heat Up
A Mission on Climate Change

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
Mogul: A Novel

Mogul: A Novel

By Terrance Dean
$10.20

Cover

Playing President

By Robert Scheer
Paperback $13.16

more items

 
Reports

Dispatches From Cairo: Revolution One Year Later

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jan 31, 2012
AP / Amr Nabil

An Egyptian waves the national flag as he and others watch thousands of people gather in Tahrir Square to mark the first anniversary of the popular uprising that unseated President Hosni Mubarak.

By Lauren Unger-Geoffroy

We asked Lauren Unger-Geoffroy, an international artist who lives in Cairo, to share her perspective of life in Egypt after the revolution. In this entry, she writes about a subdued Egypt marking the first anniversary of the revolution.

CAIRO—Sunday was the first day of voting for the upper house of the Egyptian parliament. Only 2 percent of those eligible voted, very different from the enthusiastic post-revolutionary 70 percent voter turnout for the lower house, a December election that gave a landslide majority to Islamist parties. Friends of mine said they were the only ones in the voting station.

People in my neighborhood who voted for the first time in the last round told me they did not even know what the upper house of parliament was. They had never heard of any of the candidates, and they had done it once, that’s enough, they didn’t care, it didn’t matter.

Jan. 25 was the anniversary of the revolution and was officially declared National Day or Revolution Day, replacing the previous National Revolution Day, July 23. The celebration brought hundreds of thousands from all walks of life to Tahrir Square. Many arrived as part of marches from all areas of Cairo, crowds so vast they seemed without end. I and some friends took the metro, in which a group of young people entertained the crowded car with revolutionary rap; all the passengers joined in on the refrains. We arrived to a mass of people so densely packed we could barely advance toward the square. There was a predominance of bearded Salafi men and covered women, many with small children on their shoulders.

As the newly elected parliament met for the first time, in the square Quranic verses were recited from stages and religious music was played between confident, self-praising affirmations of Muslim Brotherhood and Salafi members who now dominated the platforms of Tahrir as well as the parliamentary meeting itself. In fact the overall tone of Tahrir Square on Jan. 25 was religious, calm and … somehow disappointingly … passive.

Advertisement

Sure, in the crunching pack there were protesters with banners and signs about the revolution’s martyrs, and some held placards alleging collaboration between the Muslim Brotherhood and the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF). There was an obelisk bearing the martyrs’ names, Guy Fawkes masks were worn on the backs of some heads, and there was sporadic anti-military chanting, but all this was overshadowed by the enthusiasm-calming sermons of Islamic positivity. Faces generally were happy, though not infused with revolutionary fervor, and the pushing and joggling caused visible signs of irritation among the good people here. Many had not been here last year when the jostling was a bubbling of potential, and uniting purpose, when all faces were filled with light and amazement and brotherhood. Last week, it was as if the people had accepted that the revolution’s goal had been achieved and that they could once again relinquish the responsibility for their existence to the care of Allah through the auspices of the Islamic political parties. The voices crying “This is not a celebration—we are mourning our dead!” and “MB [Muslim Brotherhood] sold us to the SCAF!” were no match for the superior sound systems of the self-congratulatory MB and Salafi speakers.

We left with a feeling of disappointment.

One of the few disturbing stories of the day concerned a girl who revealed her blond hair—like a beacon to moths in the night crowd of hundreds of thousands of sexually frustrated Egyptian men, some of them exposed to sexual images only through foreign movies and Western porn. She was attacked, and several men reportedly were hurt in saving her from the worst of the groping swarm.

U.S. and European embassies all have sent out warnings to foreign visitors, and the newspapers have reported earlier incidents of this sort, but some Western women still fail to do what is necessary to protect themselves in Egypt.

Sexual assault is a big problem for women here. The Egyptian people are horrified by the abuse that some men inflict, but there are divisions over how to deal with the issue. The Salafi [fundamentalist] idea is to restrict the behavior, clothing and activities of all domestic and foreign women, as in Saudi Arabia, where women are obligated to cover themselves almost completely so as not to excite the sexual urge in men. Pornography and other images of uncovered women are illegal, as is alcohol. All stores, restaurants, schools and cafes have separate areas for men and women. Bathing suits cover from neck to wrist to ankle, and beaches for men and women are separate, with high walls between.

Tourism, a major source of revenue for Egypt, floundering since the revolution, would collapse further if the Saudi approach was implemented in this nation. Also, the majority of the population, even if they do generally observe Shariah law, would not like to have their personal lives patrolled by the “morality police.”

One proposal for easing the problem is to make the financial requirements for marriage less onerous, so that young people can marry and legitimately engage in connubial relations, thus eliminating a good part of the sexual frustration.

Outcries against isolated crimes since the beginning of the revolution have created the illusion of post-revolutionary anarchy, which is not the case. Crime has not increased. Public crowds are greater now, and as the opportunity for sexual harassment presents itself, these crimes will happen in larger numbers.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By gerard, February 1, 2012 at 4:55 pm Link to this comment

Robespierre:  Once more with feeling:  Please look around on the net and find out some of the really beneficial things Occupiers are accomplishing. You won’t find them in the general press, but they are there. Images of the violence (mostly police) in Oakland get all the attention, at the expense of quite moving social justice issues that are being faced locally and of course non-violently, but largely without support from government agencies.The picture is very complex, and people of your intelligencee need particularly to get a more nuanced view of what is going on, its potential and the dangers that it may be brought down.

Report this

By gerard, February 1, 2012 at 10:54 am Link to this comment

Robespierre:  Thanks for your comments and venting. We all do it, and no wonder!  NOBODY knows what to do—least of all the 1%.  Millions of the 99% are struggling toward something new and different—something strange and scarey and unpredictable—something far outside their previous education and indoctrination.  It’s vague.  It’s being defined minute by minute, made of intimations, partial successes, partial failures, misunderstandings, hopes, fears. Only the geneneral principles seem to offer a way out of mass murder, and there’s no Gandhi or Mandela or Havel Merton or Berrigan or King in the immediate vicinity. 
  Sorry to be so explicitly vague, but—it’s a stage everybody has to go through.  Better to point in the direction of life than to advocate for death. (Think Bill McKibben. Think Chris Hedges. Think Bill Moyers. Think of millions of people who believe in “peaceful tomorrows”.
  OWS is not doing so bad, considering. Even the police are wondering about what’s happening. The rules don’t seem quite right, somehow, and more people are vaguely aware of problems and possibilities.  That’s pretty good, considering the ponderous distracting media influences, exposiong everything except what reallly needs attention.
  Old processes are inadequate to the need. New processes are not going to be born complete and explicit, unfortunately.

Report this

By truedigger3, February 1, 2012 at 10:37 am Link to this comment

The writer of this article ignores Egypt’s biggest problem which is its extremely high birth rate. There is no way under any economic or political system that the Egyptian economy can provide a decent life for so many people and counting. So the discontent and anger will continue, no matter who is governing and under what system.
The writer says Egypt is a wealthy country which is false. Egypt is a very poor country.
Birth control is badly needed in Egypt.
The military council, regardless of its current incompetence and spinelessness, is the glue that is holding the country together. If the military is removed from power, the Muslim Brotherhood will take complete control and the country will descend into complete anarchy and chaos with very dire calamatous consequences for Egypt.

Report this

By kradek, January 31, 2012 at 11:20 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The political movements that called for the protests
or participated in them–various youth coalitions, the
April 6 Youth Movement, Kefaya, supporters of the
liberal politician Mohamed ElBaradei, and petty-
bourgeois “left” groups such as the Revolutionary
Socialists (RS)–initially supported the junta. They
claimed that it was the “protector of the nation” (in
the words of ElBaradei), or that it could be
pressured for more social and democratic reforms (the
position of the RS).

After one year of bitter revolutionary struggles
between the junta and the working class, these lies
are exposed; the political establishment is now
desperately trying to cover up its initial support
for the junta and prevent the outbreak of renewed
revolutionary struggles.

One the one hand, millions of protesters, driven by
worsening social conditions and demands for social
equality and genuine democracy, are renewing their
calls for the downfall of the regime and demanding a
“true second revolution.” On the other hand, the
existing political parties are working to prepare the
next trap for revolutionary workers and youth. The
latest is a call for a handover of power to a
civilian regime based on the parliamentary election
recently held under martial law.
http://wsws.org/articles/2012/jan2012/egyp-j26.shtml

Report this
Robespierre115's avatar

By Robespierre115, January 31, 2012 at 8:36 pm Link to this comment

@gerard, for months now you’ve only been offering a vague, general set of comments. Nobody is advocating violence, but sorry, whenever you take on a dominant system or government there will be confrontation whether politically or on the streets, that’s just life and history my friend. We are not at the level of Syria or Egypt in terms of the kind of government we are facing, so we don’t need armed guerrillas roaming around Los Angeles or New York, in those countries they HAVE NO CHOICE, even Gandhi extensively wrote about the inevitability of violent confrontation when the situation reaches a breaking point. Here we can still overturn the system through democratic, electoral methods if the people organize new movements and organs of power as seen in Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador, Argentina etc.

If all you offer is some vague set of slogans where you sit around plazas or try to take over abandoned buildings, people will support you morally and find it cute that you’re “taking on the man,” but the average worker, the average joe who gets up early every morning to slave to feed himself and the family wants concrete, clear alternatives to then take the plunge. This is why you were whining a few months ago over NY residents not “housing” or “sheltering” the OWS protesters. In the eyes of the proletariat, I’m sorry if that term offends the postmodernists who use bullshit slogans to hide their centrist weaknesses, Occupy is admirable and the right start, but for now it’s just VENTING. Nobody gives a fuck unless Rosa Luxemburg and the Spartacists finally appear with some serious plans. You cited Oakland, Oakland is a perfect example of why SERIOUS THINKING and ORGANIZING is needed, because the state will not tolerate rebellion, which is why it’s laughable to see Occupy leaders boasting about “having good relations with local authorities,” please grow the fuck up and wake up. What will it take? War with Iran for people to finally start TAKING SIDES and demanding actual, serious, momentous changes?

As for your final comment on “business as usual,” yes, you are absolutely correct, the oligarchy continues to bask in its decadence because it knows you don’t have any idea of how to overthrow them, you just dance around with bullshit hippie peace signs babbling about being apolitical, aidealistic and aanything.

Report this

By gerard, January 31, 2012 at 5:41 pm Link to this comment

Robespierre:  Everyone in OWS is not “sitting around” in occupied plazas, and it is unfair to say so.  Somewhere on an firedoglake list yesterday I found about 200 communities undergoing various kinds of change due to the actions of local “occupiers.”
The national press is of course deliberatellly over-
looking them, but they are there nonetheless. They are not bloody.  Some are more confrontational than others.  The Oakland event shown here in video was among the most violent and oppressive. In many places, law enforcement is restrained and not oppressive, hence no press interest.
  Viewing complications in Egypt and viciousness in Syria, it is doubtful that wisdom is on the side of violence.
  Of interest to me is what you mean by “running things in a business-like way.” Repression as usual? Failure to face problems? Farcical elections? Persistent economic deterioration? Encouragement of unendurable class differences? Pretenses of business as usual? Drinking cocktails on balconies?

Report this
Robespierre115's avatar

By Robespierre115, January 31, 2012 at 3:14 pm Link to this comment

The big problem for young people in Egypt (and around the world) is the postmodern attitudes that keep them from forming any serious, revolutionary alternatives to challenge the old guard. It’s as if everyone’s too afraid of being wrong or confrontational. Instead of learning from history or the current changes happening in Latin America, young people’s idea of learning about revolution is watching “V For Vendetta.” In the US a lot of kids involved in OWS ramble on about “anarchy” without ever having read serious Anarchist philosophy. It’s ridiculous and those in power know this, which is why they keep running things in a business as usual way while everyone sits around in “occupied” plazas.

Report this

By Morpheus, January 31, 2012 at 1:03 pm Link to this comment

We need a real revolution. The false promise of a democratic republic doesn’t work.

“WAKE UP AMERICA!” - SAVE YOURSELF. Stop waiting for democrats and republicans to save you.

Read “Common Sense 3.1” at ( http://www.revolution2.osixs.org )

Report this

By gerard, January 31, 2012 at 11:17 am Link to this comment

Again, a most valuable piece of work. Truthdig, please notify us if and when these essays are assembled and published as a unit. In my estimation the work is invaluable—accurate, intimate and emotionally and intellectually stirring. Contains the very essence of soulful truth.

Report this

By balkas, January 31, 2012 at 9:30 am Link to this comment

with islamic cult and/or islamic leadership against timocratic
governance/interdependent daily living; without tanks, secret police, and politics,
it was easy of me to expect that the protest [unless it involved all the 99%] in egypt
bahrain, morocco would fail.
in libya the protest against its govt was accompanied with militarism which was
also helped by most arab and european lands.
the armed rebellion did bring down libyan govt. it is now replaced by a mullahic
govt; similar to that of many other muslim lands.
and they make very good allies of the world’s onepercent.
syrian and libyan govts have not supported or allied selves with world
supremacists; thus end of libyan govt and soon also syrian govt. so, it is indeed
regime change: from a disobedient to a obedient govt. thanks

Report this

By Rehmat, January 31, 2012 at 9:15 am Link to this comment

Recently, Obama have sent several of his Zionists staffers to court Muslim Brotherhood. They have met MB leaders and told them the US $1.3 billion annual aid depends on maintaining Egypt-Israel peace treaty when MB comes in power in future. The latest one is deputy secretary of state, William Burns, a Zionist Jew. Burns’ meeting with Mohammed Morsi, head of MB’s Freedom and Justice Party (FJP) in Cairo was applauded by State Department’s Jewish spokeswoman Victoria Nuland. She claimed Burns reinforced Washington’s desire that Egypt’s parties will “support human rights, women rights and religious tolerance“. None of which exists in the US if one listens to the speeches of all GOP presidential hopefulls and Obama’s cheerleaders.

Interestingly, in the meatime, the US installed military junta has called off the annual Abu Hassira annual mulid (birthday) festival. The festival draws thousands of Jew pilgrims from Israel and around the world every year to the tomb of Jewish holy man Abu Hassira.

On Wednesday, Cairo informed Tel Aviv that it would not ‘appropriate’ for pilgrims to make the annual visit to Demitiouh village in the northern province of Beheira. The week-long festival is held on January 15 each year.

The Abu Hassira festival, which was made possible after Egypt signed the 1979 Camp David Accord with the Zionist entity, has repeatedly drawn angry reactions from residents of the village.

The Los Angeles-based Simon Wiesenthal Centre on Wednesday slammed the decision, which it said was influenced by Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, which has just claimed the lead in the landmark post-Mubarak parliamentary elections.

Abu Hassirs (1807-1880) was born as Yaccov Aharon in Morocco. According to Jewish legend – Yaccov on a trip from his homeland to Jerusalem, crossed the Mediterranean riding on a hassira (mat) until he reached Alexandria. He settled in Dimitouh village some 150 kilimeter north of Cairo.

Abu Hassira, a cobbler, is believed to have been a miracle-worker aka Messiah. Jerry Rabow in his book ’50 Jewish Messiahs’ (published in 2002) has documented the stories of 50 Jewish religious leaders who claimed to be the “Promised Jewish Messiah” since the crufication of Jesus of Nazreth. Most prominents among them was the 17th century Jewish Messiah, Shabbatai Tzvi, whose followers, the ‘Crypto-Jews’ are still found among Turkish secular elites faking as ‘Christians’ or ‘Muslims’.

“Here lies a good man who came from Morocco and went back to the dust” is engraved in Hebrew on his gravestone. Pieces of paper listing the wishes of the previous year’s pilgrims can be found near the memorial. Photo on top right.

Emad El-Gilda, the ruling National Democratic Party’s MP for Beheira, recently asked Prime Minister Atef Ebeid at a People’s Assembly session to order the immediate halt of “Israeli celebrations on Egyptian soil, especially since they include rituals that violate Egyptian customs and traditions.” El-Gilda cautioned that this year’s celebrations “are bound to have negative psychological consequences for Egyptians, who view them as a political demonstration.”

“The mulid of Abu Hassira turns the quiet, placid life of Demitiouh into hell because of the tight security measures taken to protect participants,” Mukhtar El-Sweifi wrote in a letter to Al-Ahram. “It is an opportunity for Israelis to mock and ridicule Egyptians in their own homeland every year.”

http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2012/01/12/israel-jews-are-not-welcome-in-egypt/

Report this
OzarkMichael's avatar

By OzarkMichael, January 31, 2012 at 7:00 am Link to this comment

The people have rediscovered their nationalistic pride…

                  —-Lauren Unger-Geoffroy

Strange to see a positive statement about nationalism on Truthdig.

This article takes the long view, summarizing the disconnect between the Left and the common people, tracing some historical causes. This article also shows(indirectly and unintentionally) that there are differences between the cultures that arise from different religions. This article also shows that Revolution does not necessarily lead to Freedom. Its going to be a long road for Egypt.

Overall it was very well written. I am glad Truthdig publishes these dispatches.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.