|
|||
|
Did Privilege Play a Role in Lacrosse Killing?Posted on May 6, 2010By Ruth Marcus The question has to be asked: Is it something about athletes? Something about entitled college athletes? Something about lacrosse? George Huguely V, a 22-year-old University of Virginia lacrosse player, is charged with murdering his onetime girlfriend, Yeardley Love, herself a lacrosse player. Huguely, according to a police report, confessed to kicking in Love’s bedroom door, shaking her, and hitting her head against the wall. I don’t think for a moment that lacrosse made him do it. But it’s fair to ask whether the special benefits accorded a star athlete on the nation’s No. 1-ranked team contributed to an eyes-averted attitude toward this young man’s problems. Because for all his charmed existence, Huguely seems to have had a wild, even dangerous, side that went unaddressed until too late. A 2006 Washington Post story, referring to the elite, all-boy’s private high school that Huguely then attended, praised him as “Landon’s Top Prankster.” It quoted Huguely bragging about how he had filched the coach’s car keys, driven up to the practice and sat chatting in the driver’s seat until the coach realized what was up. Another time, Huguely bet an assistant coach that the assistant’s fiancee would kiss him if he made a big play. “He walked off the field and said to the team, ‘What’s (her) number?’” the head coach recalled. Advertisement Most troubling, Huguely was arrested near a fraternity house at Washington & Lee University in Lexington, Va., in 2008 for public swearing, intoxication and resisting arrest. After being detained, Huguely “used colorful statements such as: ‘I’ll kill all you ... I am not doing a damn thing you say ... I want to talk to your supervisor now,’” according to a statement by the Lexington Police Department. The arresting officer, R.L. Moss, said she had to use her Taser to subdue Huguely—although he did not remember that afterward. “He was by far the most rude, most hateful and most combative college kid I ever dealt with,” Moss told The New York Times. Huguely received a 60-day suspended sentence, six months’ probation and a fine, and was required to perform community service and attend substance abuse education. You have to wonder: Would a poor dropout without access to a pricey lawyer have gotten a tougher sentence? Would a few weeks—a few days even—behind bars have done Huguely some good? Did someone ask: Is this a kid with an anger problem? University officials say they never learned about the incident. And just a few months ago, The Washington Post reports, University of North Carolina lacrosse players intervened to separate Huguely from Love at a party on the Charlottesville campus. Where were Huguely’s teammates during all of this? Where was his family? College students drink, sometimes to excess. They act wild and do dumb things, athletes or not. They have tortured romances. Almost none of them kill their girlfriends. Those who do aren’t necessarily star athletes. When I was in college, a fellow student, Bonnie Garland, was murdered by her estranged boyfriend, a recent Yale graduate who smashed her skull with a claw hammer in the bedroom of her Scarsdale, N.Y., home. The narrative in that tragedy was nearly the opposite of the Love murder: not privilege versus privilege but a boy from the barrio of Los Angeles who found himself out of place in the Ivy League. There are many routes to doing crazy, terrible things. It would be facile to blame Huguely’s conduct on lacrosse, but it’s legitimate to wonder whether an atmosphere of entitlement and immunity from ordinary rules were contributing factors. It’s impossible to read the Huguely story without thinking back to the Duke lacrosse case, where the rape charges seemed shoddy from the start—but the glimpse of boorish, alcohol-fueled lacrosse culture seems instructive. At Virginia, eight of 41 players on the lacrosse team have been charged with alcohol-related offenses. As I wrote at the time of the Duke arrests, “These don’t sound like young men you’d want your daughter to date.” New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By rico, suave, May 11, 2010 at 2:29 pm Link to this comment
Hapless:
You busted me to the webmaster!???
You’re pathetic.
Report thisBy G.Anderson, May 11, 2010 at 5:12 am Link to this comment
And so what is the life of a young man in America?
Either to be used, or to be useless?
If he is used, then he will at some point be used up..
If he is usless, then endless rounds of journeys, to doctors, and rehabs, medications, and ultimately sanctions, are unlikely to make him well adjusted, and useful once more.
Until one day, his family no longer has any hope, then they will distance themselves from him in a show of feckless disdain.
What is the life of a young man in America, to be blamed, but to not understand what went wrong.
The only answer he can give is, I don’t know.
Report thisBy anaman51, May 8, 2010 at 10:54 am Link to this comment
One more thing: This is for Steel Toe. Yeah, I was thinking about all the wonderful aspects of being a young man in America while I was getting off the ship at Da Naang. I was thinking it was wonderful to be able to be conscripted and sent to a foreign war I didn’t want to be in. Those days are gone, but I’m here to tell you that life for the American male is no bed of roses. It all depends on your choice of parents, it seems.
Report thisBy anaman51, May 8, 2010 at 10:47 am Link to this comment
The boy was raised in a climate in which his wrongdoings were bought off by rich parents until he decided he was entitled to do certain things. This brought about a feeling of superiority that engendered further feelings of entitlement. When the young lady said “no,” it’s likely his feelings of entitlement caused him to say “oh, yes you will!” And what do you want to bet Mommy and Daddy are shoveling money as hard as they can right now in an effort to get him off this rap, too. It’s time to pull the money plug on this little puke, and let him wallow in his own mess. Forty years in the slam might help him turn that corner.
Report thisBy samosamo, May 8, 2010 at 7:06 am Link to this comment
***************
Parents spoiling their children create rotten children and rotten
Report thischildren turn into rotten adults. Of course it always helps to have
contracted a unusually hubristic ego on the road to growing up
and substance abuse, particularly alcohol, pretty much adds to the
recipe as does muscle enhancing steroids that just seem to never
get the press when what seems a normal life turns bad wrong
when ‘athletes’ are involved. A form of cheating that is picked up
around peers but not without the some sort of part of the parents
whose own behavior could very well be a factor.
By Steel Toe, May 7, 2010 at 6:38 pm Link to this comment
Life for males in America gives me blisters between my legs.
Report thisBy TheHaplessCapitalist, May 7, 2010 at 5:52 pm Link to this comment
photoshock, you write:
“Not just the over-privileged whites who use their positions to influence the masses. But it is the African-American football, basketball and baseball player also. Theirs is the world for the picking, not the student who can do the best academically…”
Are you really meaning to tell us that African-American athletes enjoy unadulterated freedoms by virtue of their athletic status? You’ve got to be kidding. The rate at which African American NBA and NFL players(not to mention AA college athletes) are prosecuted is alarming. Your suggestion is that there is no intersection between athletes and their race in our society. You’re commentary is insightful only insofar as it describes the sport cult in general. However, an African American athlete does not shed his or her race, class, gender or sexuality when they step into the lime light.
Report thisBy Steel Toe, May 7, 2010 at 4:54 pm Link to this comment
The young, American male lives in a featureless, vapid, Martian landscape where all the oxygen is reserved for the women.
Report thisBy REDHORSE, May 7, 2010 at 4:28 pm Link to this comment
CAP’N: “—-wellll uhhhhh, all right theun—-”
Enjoy your posts—-keep it rockin’—-LOL———-!!
Report thisBy CaptRon, May 7, 2010 at 1:59 pm Link to this comment
It’s certainly not the skin color or gender of the people, but the color of the money that everyone feels the need to pursue. Greed is the scar left on the loss of humanity in people. It is not a person but the money which is the subject of hero-worship most everywhere I see. It is what these children have learned from us and those before us, the rite to entitlement to a better life than others before them. The one truth from this lies in the Beatles song “Money can’t buy you love”, at least this time for sure. These are the times when one finds just how expendable they truly are. It is a shame the lesson needs learned this way. Maybe the biggest new challenge for this and future generations. Reverse the trend and reap the love, the correct way. Make sense REDHORSE? Not horses this time.
Report thisBy REDHORSE, May 7, 2010 at 10:48 am Link to this comment
—-OOPS—PLEASE PARDON THE TYPO’S AND PUNCTUATION—-
Report thisBy REDHORSE, May 7, 2010 at 10:40 am Link to this comment
Distrust of personal individual power by corrupt government,the war of the feminist press on the healty generative masculine, the legal removal of paternal authority, the destruction of the economy and the home by corporate thugs, and an amoral war machine result in a violent masculine. Mr.Shahzad and Mr.Huguely V are two sides of the same coin.
Report thisBy REDHORSE, May 7, 2010 at 10:15 am Link to this comment
Decades ago American men attempted to open a dialogue about mentorship, soul and violence in young males. This was twisted by the press and attacked by feminist as dangerous. Now, when America is top heavy in gang and prison culture, and the military-industrial complex spends a fortune on wargame centers to urge young men to “be all that they can be”,the author uses a tragedy to attack white privilege.
American violence in youth is color, class and gender blind. The “material girls” , with the help of the legal system, have done a great job in the reduction of the American male to the status of a wallet. Take the mixed messages about gender spun by advertising. Add the failure of our education system. Pour in a young male with no idea who he is and under the influence in conflict with a young woman who in many unstances has never had a relationship with a healthy adult male and—-well—there it is.
American youth lives in a futureless narcissistic violent landscape. We all deserve better journalism.
Report thisBy mrfreeze, May 7, 2010 at 9:42 am Link to this comment
photoshock - You are dead-on accurate regarding the hero/sports-figure worship in this country. It’s all about the money. Period.
Report thisBy P. T., May 7, 2010 at 8:35 am Link to this comment
As I [Ruth Marcus] wrote at the time of the Duke arrests, “These don’t sound like young men you’d want your daughter to date.”
Report thisPerhaps some you wouldn’t mind her dating, and some you would. In any event, that’s up to her to decide.
By photoshock, May 7, 2010 at 5:40 am Link to this comment
So sorry, ‘the hapless capitalist,’ but it is not just white over-privileged sports figures that get a pass from the administrations, coaches and parents of sports figures.
Report thisWe live in a cult of personality, the person who can perform the best, make the most touchdowns and score the most points for the team, gets a pass for everything that they do wrong. Not just the over-privileged whites who use their positions to influence the masses. But it is the African-American football, basketball and baseball player also. Theirs is the world for the picking, not the student who can do the best academically, but the sports star
that is the most adept and able to pull in more money
for the university that they attend and the professional sports team that can earn more money based upon the performance of that person.
Frankly, I don’t give a tinker’s damn about sports teams and their concomitant sales of sports accoutrement. I would rather have an academically sound and morally ethical university to attend, but those are few and far between. There is a dearth of academic scholarships due to the overabundance of sports scholarships that are given to those who can perform and earn the most money for the university.
Full tenured professors are being laid off due to economic cutbacks, yet every one of the sports teams that are thriving economically have the best of everything. What is the disconnect between these two divergent points of view? MONEY! LOTS and LOTS of MONEY for the universities.
From now on, I will certainly make my disdain for and lack of enthusiasm know for the men and women who
get paid millions and millions of dollars to play a child’s game. No one should be paid 50,60 and up to 100 Million U.S. dollars to play a game that is nothing more than a child’s game.
Also, we the people are supposed to be entertained and support these people with our cash, what little of it we have if any, give ourselves over to ‘hero worship’ of these so-called ‘superstars.’ Not on your
life ‘fella.’ I am not into hero worship whether it be a sports figure or a G-d.
When I need a hero to worship, then I will be dead and buried, for I will not give myself to the cult of personality for any person, place or thing that wants that much of my attention and mind.
Given the circumstances of this latest abomination of
murder and mayhem, let us not look only at the ‘white
over-privileged sports,’ but all of the cult of personality figures that supposedly exist in the realm of sports and other areas, with an eye towards gaining self-respect and self-worth, not the worth of
some team that we have nothing to do with and cannot influence the outcome of any game.
By Steel Toe, May 6, 2010 at 7:50 pm Link to this comment
What was it that set Huguely off?..
Yeardly said, “no sex tonight.”
Yeardly flushed his beer.
Yeardly looked at him wrong.
Yeardly mentioned her old boyfriend’s name.
Yeardly told Huguely that he didn’t satisfy her.
Yeardly broke up with Huguely and he wanted to make sure she would never be with another man.
Yeardly fought back.
Report thisBy TheHaplessCapitalist, May 6, 2010 at 5:28 pm Link to this comment
I live in a college community over-run with same sort of douche bags as Huguely. Mark my words: Entitled white kids are fucking dangerous to society. It’s the same concept as white collar crime; by far the most dangerous individuals in America are the greedy bankers on wall street. Despite the overwhelming damages these (white) folks incur, very few of them face life-threatening repercussions for their actions—even when the system collapses. Similarly, these entitled (white) kids walk around America’s college campuses like they’re little gods. Many of the them (yes, bear with me) grab ass and rape girls like it’s no thing. On these very same campuses, however, non-whites are being viciously targeted by law enforcement and school officials. This is not some abstract tirade against white folks—this is the reality. Visit your local college campus and check out the scene. Huguely is representative of so many entitled (white) kids I know—and it’s so fucking unfair that they get to go on until something like this happens. Maybe Huguely should have been put away (like his non-white counterparts surely would have been) after the second or third violation..
Report thisBy Anon, May 6, 2010 at 4:21 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
what’s with these comments? are they the rantings of people close to the story? seems odd to have such strong opinions.
Report thisBy chilcotin, May 6, 2010 at 2:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This is one of the dumbest opinion pieces I’ve read on Truthdig. Marcus repeats the following inanity over and over: I’m not suggesting that there is any direct link between behaviour/circumstance A and behaviour B, but the question needs to be raised. Behaviour/circumstance X,Y,Z might also be directly linked to B, but even though A is no more likely to be linked to B than are W,X,Z, I’m still going to babble on about the possible relationship between A and B. Please…
Report thisBy Me, May 6, 2010 at 1:45 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Ruth Marcus writes: As I wrote at the time of the Duke arrests, “These don’t sound like young men you’d want your daughter to date.”
And then we discovered that the Duke students were completely innocent and had done nothing wrong, that their accuser was a liar, that the prosecutor violated law and procedure so egregiously that he was disbarred, and that the media mob (including Ruth Marcus) smearing the accused students didn’t give a damn whether anything they reported was true or not.
Gee, I wonder how Ruth Marcus forgot about all that.
Report this