|
|||
|
Deficit DovesPosted on Jul 20, 2010
By Amy Goodman Getting out of the red is the new black. Deficit hawks have swooped down on the U.S. budget. This week, they attacked unemployment benefits. Ultimately, they are going after Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid, the venerable programs once considered untouchable “third rails” of U.S. politics. These have been replaced by a new third rail, the defense budget. To really deal with annual deficits and a surging national debt, we are going to need to cut military spending. We need some deficit doves. First, let’s call it what it is: the war budget. The government formed the Department of War in 1789, and only in 1949 renamed it the Department of Defense. The war budget President Barack Obama recently sent to Congress, for fiscal year 2011, is $548.9 billion, with an additional $33 billion, which is the 2010 supplemental that is currently being debated in Congress, and $159.3 billion more “to support ongoing overseas contingency operations, including funds to execute the President’s new strategy in Afghanistan and Pakistan.” Recall, “overseas contingency operations” is how the Obama administration rebranded the “global war on terror.” This is just the publicly available war budget. There is also a “black budget,” kept secret, for clandestine operations that former Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair revealed was about $75 billion. As The Washington Post exposed this week, the post-9/11 security state has grown into a massive, unmanageable and largely privatized “enterprise.” Advertisement Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Fla., has submitted a bill, H.R. 5353, called “The War Is Making You Poor Act.” Grayson, with a few Republicans and a number of progressive Democratic co-sponsors, wants to force Commander in Chief Obama to run his two wars with “only” the $548.9 billion base budget. The $159.3 billion saved would be turned into a tax break, making the first $35,000 of income tax-free, and anything left over would be directed to paying down the national debt. The bill is in committee now and may generate genuine bipartisan support. Grayson, when introducing the bill, highlighted a fact worth repeating: The U.S. war budget is greater than the military spending of every other nation on Earth, combined. Meanwhile, at the National Peace Conference to be held in Albany, N.Y., this weekend, people are targeting the military budget. Students are organizing around the connection between war expenditures and education budgets that are being slashed, sparking protests at campuses nationwide. Another effort, called “Bring Our War Dollars Home,” promotes action at the city council and statehouse level, along with grass-roots campaigns to pressure members of Congress to stop funding war. The cost of the Iraq war was estimated by Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, with his colleague Linda Bilmes, at $3 trillion, calculating not only hard, current costs, but also the cost to society of caring for wounded veterans, and the long-term costs of having so many families disrupted by caring for their injured loved ones, or having a breadwinner killed in action. And that’s just Iraq. As of May, the monthly cost of the war in Afghanistan surpassed, for the first time, the cost of war in Iraq. Stiglitz was one of the many economists who said the economic stimulus package (at $787 billion) was too small. He argues that deficit spending, when done wisely, creates long-term returns for an economy. Conversely, he wrote recently, “Deficits to finance wars or give-aways to the financial sector ... impos[e] a burden on future generations.” Economist Dean Baker of the Center for Economic and Policy Research says President Obama’s Deficit Commission, formally the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, is a major cause for concern. The co-chairs are former Republican Sen. Alan Simpson and Democrat Erskine Bowles, who is on the board of Morgan Stanley, one of the bailed-out Wall Street firms. Baker told me: “Both are on record saying they want to cut Social Security. This should have people very, very worried. That isn’t a balanced commission.” Cutting Social Security isn’t the answer. Cutting war spending, and bringing the troops home, is. This is the job for the deficit doves. Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column. Amy Goodman is the host of “Democracy Now!,” a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 800 stations in North America. She is the author of “Breaking the Sound Barrier,” recently released in paperback and now a New York Times best-seller. © 2010 Amy Goodman Distributed by King Features Syndicate CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By kulu, July 22, 2010 at 9:02 pm Link to this comment
The inevitable collapse of the American Empire is being prolonged by the two factors. One, as already noted by a previous commentator is that the US dollar is the world’s reserve currency and the other is that China and the other savings nations are (more or less involuntarily) financing the US’s deficit spending that enable it to continue with its military and interfering ventures all over the world.
An additional thought… The “poverterization” of America that has been building up due to the loss of much of its manufacturing capacity and the redistribution of income and wealth from the bottom to the top earners together with the curtailment of the ability to borrow and thus spend by the poor and middle class will probably mean that the US consumer imports that provided the savings that China etc then lends back to the US will dry up. If the US can no longer borrow from abroad how then will it continue to be able to finance its empire building activities?
For the sake of America and the rest of the world I hope the collapse doesn’t drag out too long and there is enough time left for the world to deal with the ecological problems like climate change that threaten our civilization.
Report thisBy LocalHero, July 21, 2010 at 12:20 pm Link to this comment
Lucky we control the drug trade in Afghanistan or we’d never be able to afford all those snazzy black-ops programs. Yes sir, those poppies are a gold mine.
Report thisBy felicity, July 21, 2010 at 11:44 am Link to this comment
The expansion of debt and speculation that
characterized the US economy (and advanced capitalism
as a whole) since the 1960’s represented the main means
by which the system managed to avoid sinking into a
deep slump, while not enabling it to overcome the
stagnation of the ‘real’ economy.
Nothing has really change, and it won’t until we accept
Report thisthe supporting truth of capitalism, we create wealth by
making things.
By bogi666, July 21, 2010 at 10:30 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Just as it took a Republican, Nixon, to go to China it will take a Democrat President “‘BushBombya” to destroy Social Security and Medicare. The Commission is stacked against Social Security, Alan Simpson a most despicable, disgusting, ingrate, cretin, vile man. The proceeds from the deficit fund the National Security Police State, 10,000 locations, nation wide with private contractors whose only interests are to create imagined fears to increase funding, who know what? That this doesn’t even attempt to make sense is no mystery because the only sense the USG has is nonsense.
Report thisBy FTG, July 21, 2010 at 7:54 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Amy,
Report thisThe only problem with this article is that it needs to realize that the American deficit isn’t a problem at all, because the Dollar is the international currency. That means that the US can spend whatever they want and will have no problems. So, to spend more on welfare, you don’t need to cut down the war budget. Of course, it is better to spend on welfare than in defense, but, if the US cuts down on defense and doesn’t increase it’s expenditure on other things, it will be even worse, because right now the defense spending keeps the economy growing and jobs being created (at least before the crisis and after the crisis is over). So, I would suggest to stop worrying about the deficit and just make more political pressure on the increase of welfare spending.
Best Regards from Brazil
By Hulk2008, July 21, 2010 at 7:35 am Link to this comment
The “problems” with any established programs like Soc Sec or Medicare are that people AND businesses have planned entire lifetimes on their expected continuation.
The business world successfully has transitioned an entire generation of workers from classic pensions over to 401(k) funds and the like - it was great for business to spend less on retirees. Business is counting on the retirees to be relatively healthy with Medicare to keep them that way.
Businesses WANTED and WORKED toward the current set-up - they got exactly what they asked for. If they now decry the situation, let them blame themselves.
To the chagrine of younger workers, the elderly will only survive on what is available. Take Soc Sec and Medicare away or cut them to the quick and suddenly there will be a generation of subsistence-level old timers clamoring the government for relief.
And don’t forget: For a while, the Boomers will be outnumbering younger voters - that makes it unlikely Boomers will cut their own throats in such programs.
Rep. Grayson’s bill to bring down the funds for war is at least a reasonable first step. Heaven knows neither way has netted us much payback.
(Still waiting for the bouquets of flowere ..... still waiting for the oil bennies to come in.)
Picture this:
Report thisW and OJ are out golfing on a pristine course. W is still looking for WMDs and OJ is still looking for his wife’s murderer.
By Anarcissie, July 21, 2010 at 5:38 am Link to this comment
Deficit spending will work if the system as a whole has a basically healthy economic base. I think it is questionable whether it will work in the case of the U.S., because the U.S. has been deindustrialized and has been living on savings and credit for decades. I am afraid that today, deficit spending is another case of fighting the last war, as they say generals are prone to do. After the next wave of cheap goods from China, what?
Happy days are not here again.
Report thisBy bogi666, July 21, 2010 at 4:55 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
FOLLOW THE MONEY, the DEFICIT FUNDS the Pentagons and the spy agencies. The Repubican votes to fund the National Security Police state 100% and never voted to deny Bush an increase of the deficit. The still vote 100% for the Police State but now whine about the deficit, the proceeds of which fund their Police State agenda. Reagan initiated the huge deficits to fund the Pentagon and spy agencies. 400 lobbyists in 1980, 45,000 lobbyists today all creating and chasing the deficit proceeds from the Treasury bonds. The witless American public is forged into mindlessness by the government propaganda, business ads, pretend christian preachers with false doctines which legitimizes mindlessness, the inability and/or not knowing to discern thoughts, including the thoughts of others, from truth or facts. The “no child left behind” agenda teaches mindlessness.
Report thisBy G.Anderson, July 20, 2010 at 9:46 pm Link to this comment
I wonder, if there is anyone with half brain left in our government?
At some point, someone in the military is going to realize, that economic warfare, is just as deadly as as bombing your enemy silly.
And that the United States has lost our economic war.
Do we have the industrial base to even make bulletts here, tanks? Or do they have to be imported from Turkey?
Do we have a healthy population of people from whom to draw on in time of war, people who aren’t drug addicted, or suffering from all sorts of mental illness needing to be on meds just to get through the day? All victims of grinding poverty and debt slavery, to the ruling class.
Do we have an educated population that can, think well enough to use advanced weapons sytems?
And do we have a population that has enough income to support a military through taxes? Or will further economic burdens result in decay, and loss of financial where-with-all, result in a populace that will eventually disintegrate, into homelessness and chaos.
Will, that population be completely overwhelmed by immigrants who don’t have a national identity yet, but owe allegience instead to dozens of other primarily third world countries?
We can no longer support our military through taxes, we just don’t have the money. Cutting the safety net further will only make the situation dire. It would amount to a complete and total surrender, and turn large segments of our country into a no mans land.
As I said, if the economy was war, we lost.
When you lose a big war, you don’t get to call the shots anymore.
Report thisBy bogemin, July 20, 2010 at 6:43 pm Link to this comment
Linda Bilmes and Joseph Stiglitz provide updated information on war costs on their blog: http://threetrilliondollarwar.org/
Report thisBy Fewkes, July 20, 2010 at 5:40 pm Link to this comment
The Federal government spends millions of dollars for a budget process that
includes the President, both houses of Congress, the Congressional Budget
Office and the Office of Management and Budget. There are several Federal
Laws that govern the budget process.
Why don’t they use the system that we have spent a lot of money to create?????
Having a bunch of EX Congress persons just provides political cover so that
Congress can say they HAD to vote for those cuts that adversely affect millions
of everyday Americans on Social Security and Medicare.
Everyone knows that the REAL waste, fraud and corruption is in the Defense
Dept, the Homeland Security Dept, the Agricultural Dept, the Commerce Dept
and the others where the big money donors have made an investment in
government that makes SUPER returns at our expense.
It should be a crime to violate the Federal laws that mandate the budget
Report thisprocess and the members of the Deficit Commission are guilty of breaking
them. When the lowly break laws they go to jail.
By Naz, July 20, 2010 at 4:00 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Haven’t we all long suffered these old fools in Washington, District of Corruption? You can count on one hand the few who have a semblance of virtue left in themselves. Greyson is the only one who has the backbone to speak out about the injustices taking place in America which all three branches of government have perpetrated on its citizens. All I can say is that they had better not screw with my Social Security and Medicare.
Report thisBy eir, July 20, 2010 at 3:59 pm Link to this comment
President Obama’s Cat Food Commission has been lauded by the lofty likes of Billionaire Hedge Fund Manager, and arch foe of social security, Pete Peterson.
That ought to tell you something.
The commission is actually re-visiting the idea of “investing” social security funds in the stock market. What a pretty sight that would be when the market crashes as it will inevitably do due to the fact that there is no there there when it comes to production that is supposed to underwrite the whole ponzi scheme.
What remains of the New Deal is under intense assault by the people who sold us on a candidate they thought an angry populace could believe in, largely based on the shiny wrapper. Well, we’re starting to eat the shit, and it’s not so tasty.
Hold on folks, more cat food’s on it’s way….Who knows? eventually, they may not even have to worry about feeding the “lesser people” Cat Food Commission Co-Chair, and former Republic Sen. Alan Simpson referred to.
Maybe they can figure out some military unit for 80 year olds. Get your K-rations, and when you’re starting to look like the end is near they’ll strap a suicide belt to your walker.
Report this