|
|
June 19, 2013
|
|
Dave Broder: A Reporter at HeartPosted on Mar 9, 2011By Ruth Marcus Editor’s note: Washington Post columnist David Broder died at the age of 81 on Wednesday. He is remembered below by his colleague Ruth Marcus. WASHINGTON — When Fred Hiatt, the editor of The Washington Post editorial page, offered me the chance to write a weekly column, the first person I turned to for advice was Dave Broder. I headed to Dave’s glassed-in cubicle in the midst of the newsroom. Back in the days when I used to lead tours of The Post for my kids’ preschool classes, this site was always the biggest hit with the moms—not because Broder was such a journalistic mega-star, which he was, but because the office was so astonishingly, dangerously piled with books and papers it cried out for “clean-up time.” As always, sitting amid the chaos, Dave had a minute. As always, Dave demurred at the thought that he had any wisdom to offer. As always, he did. “I can’t tell you how to write a column, but I can tell you what works for me,” he said. First, he said, you can only have one big thought per 750-word column. Second, he said, he couldn’t simply sit in his office and conjure up Big Thoughts. He had to go out and report. That was classic Broder, indeed a reporter at heart. Advertisement To be out on the campaign trail with Dave was to receive a lesson in modesty. He was a celebrity; people would line up to shake his hand and take his picture. And his response was always gracious and self-effacing: Where are you from? Tell me something about yourself. To sit at the table in the Post cafeteria with Dave was to receive a different lesson in modesty. What do you think is going to happen about X, someone would ask. In an era of instant pontificators on every subject imaginable, Broder was willing to say, “I have no clue.” When Dave did allow as to how he had a clue, you quickly learned that it paid to listen. In the age of the Internet, Broder became a favorite target for left-wing bloggers who disdained his willingness to see both sides’ point of view, his aversion to invective and his instinct for moderation. “High Broderism” was their term of derision. Over the years, a few snarky bloggers applied it to me, intending insult. It could not have been a higher, if undeserved, compliment. Ruth Marcus’ e-mail address is marcusr(at symbol)washpost.com. © 2011, Washington Post Writers Group New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By GoyToy, March 13, 2011 at 5:11 pm Link to this comment
What planet does Ruth Marcus live on? Broder was totally right wing.
Report thisBy TrishaJ, March 11, 2011 at 4:32 pm Link to this comment
Good heavens, Ms. Marcus, take your blinders off.
Perhaps your views on Broder are colored by your personal relationship with him. But surely someone as bright as you are is capable of making a more objective judgment based on the reality of his performance as a journalist rather than the warmth of his personality. If you want to praise the man for the later, do so. But please don’t confuse being a nice person with being a good journalist.
To quote Robert Parry,Consortiumnews.com: “Broder personified the cult of centrism, a faith in ‘The System’ that ignored how hollowed out its institutions had become, at least in terms of any moral or democratic values.”
A good journalist is one who seeks the truth and provides the public with a fair and comprehensive view of events and issues. That is certainly not a description of David Broder’s reporting.
Report thisBy joell, March 10, 2011 at 8:32 pm Link to this comment
@skmacksk….good article from your 1st link.
Dave Broder…....the usual inside the beltway scum.
Report thisBy Amon Drool, March 10, 2011 at 12:48 pm Link to this comment
hey…ruthie’s a woman and she supports a woman’s right
Report thisto abortion. those 2 facts seem to be enough to
qualify her for a regular column in the eyes of the
powers that be at at TD.
By Henry, March 10, 2011 at 10:51 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
My condolences to his family.
Report thisBut if we are judging of his column good riddance. To me it is amazing how Washington pundits get away with murder. How can someone be so wrong about a preemptive war that cost hundreds of thousands of lives and will still end worse because of the instilled puppet corruption and get praised at every turn. Washington insiders act with the imperial impunity that ingratiate each other choosing mindless privilege over any meaningful reporting. Why do you think Blogs are so popular?
By thebeerdoctor, March 10, 2011 at 7:59 am Link to this comment
Thanks to skmacksk for linking to Broder’s fountain of wisdom. A fountain alas, upon careful examination, appears to be more like a lawn sprinkler.
Report this“To the dead, one owes only the truth.”
Voltaire
By jrundin, March 10, 2011 at 1:06 am Link to this comment
David Broder was a right-wing apologist for the rich people who are driving this country into ruin, just as you are, Ruth Marcus.
Report thisBy skmacksk, March 9, 2011 at 10:59 pm Link to this comment
The Political Wisdom Of David Broder:
http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/10/31/what_was_david_broder_smoking
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/04/horton-20070423rdyu
Report thisBy expat, March 9, 2011 at 8:10 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
good riddance
hell is too welcoming a place for your kind
heck… you’ll feel right at home.
Report this