|
|||
|
Danger WatersPosted on Jan 12, 2012
By Michael T. Klare, TomDispatch This piece originally appeared at TomDispatch. Welcome to an edgy world where a single incident at an energy “chokepoint” could set a region aflame, provoking bloody encounters, boosting oil prices, and putting the global economy at risk. With energy demand on the rise and sources of supply dwindling, we are, in fact, entering a new epoch—the Geo-Energy Era—in which disputes over vital resources will dominate world affairs. In 2012 and beyond, energy and conflict will be bound ever more tightly together, lending increasing importance to the key geographical flashpoints in our resource-constrained world. Take the Strait of Hormuz, already making headlines and shaking energy markets as 2012 begins. Connecting the Persian Gulf and the Indian Ocean, it lacks imposing geographical features like the Rock of Gibraltar or the Golden Gate Bridge. In an energy-conscious world, however, it may possess greater strategic significance than any passageway on the planet. Every day, according to the U.S. Department of Energy, tankers carrying some 17 million barrels of oil—representing 20% of the world’s daily supply—pass through this vital artery. So last month, when a senior Iranian official threatened to block the strait in response to Washington’s tough new economic sanctions, oil prices instantly soared. While the U.S. military has vowed to keep the strait open, doubts about the safety of future oil shipments and worries about a potentially unending, nerve-jangling crisis involving Washington, Tehran, and Tel Aviv have energy experts predicting high oil prices for months to come, meaning further woes for a slowing global economy. The Strait of Hormuz is, however, only one of several hot spots where energy, politics, and geography are likely to mix in dangerous ways in 2012 and beyond. Keep your eye as well on the East and South China Seas, the Caspian Sea basin, and an energy-rich Arctic that is losing its sea ice. In all of these places, countries are disputing control over the production and transportation of energy, and arguing about national boundaries and/or rights of passage. Advertisement You can already see this in the elaborate Defense Strategic Guidance document, “Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership,” unveiled at the Pentagon on January 5th by President Obama and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta. While envisioning a smaller Army and Marine Corps, it calls for increased emphasis on air and naval capabilities, especially those geared to the protection or control of international energy and trade networks. Though it tepidly reaffirmed historic American ties to Europe and the Middle East, overwhelming emphasis was placed on bolstering U.S. power in “the arc extending from the Western Pacific and East Asia into the Indian Ocean and South Asia.” In the new Geo-Energy Era, the control of energy and of its transport to market will lie at the heart of recurring global crises. This year, keep your eyes on three energy hot spots in particular: the Strait of Hormuz, the South China Sea, and the Caspian Sea basin. The Strait of Hormuz A narrow stretch of water separating Iran from Oman and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the strait is the sole maritime link between the oil-rich Persian Gulf region and the rest of the world. A striking percentage of the oil produced by Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE is carried by tanker through this passageway on a daily basis, making it (in the words of the Department of Energy) “the world’s most important oil chokepoint.” Some analysts believe that any sustained blockage in the strait could trigger a 50% increase in the price of oil and trigger a full-scale global recession or depression.
1
2
3
4
NEXT PAGE >>>
Previous item: There's Hope for Republicans Yet Next item: New Bill Would Put Taxpayer-Funded Science Behind Pay Walls CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By LocalHero, January 15 at 12:05 am Link to this comment
What tripe.
In hundreds of small shops around the world, inventors and tinkerers are already using, for want of a better term, “Zero Point Energy” and over-unity devices that return far more energy than they use. This has been going on for decades and will soon come to the attention of the world. When it does, the conventional oil, gas & nuclear industries will utterly collapse as will all of its support systems like the military.
Of course, the PTB will continue to try to contain and snuff out the truth but, mark my words, it cannot be stopped.
Report thisBy Mark Goldes, January 14 at 8:14 pm Link to this comment
An unrecognized mortal threat from a probable solar storm can cause meltdowns at hundreds of nuclear plants worldwide.
See http://www.aesopinstitute.org for an overview of the problem and some actions that can prevent the worst.
They include 24/7 validation and production of decentralized renewable energy.
See Cheap Green and Moving Beyond Oil on the Aesop website for a few examples.
A wise mobilization, to prevent loss of many millions of lives, also has the potential to open paths to ending our dependency on oil and all fossil fuels - far more rapidly than might be imagined.
Report thisBy prosefights, January 13 at 12:56 pm Link to this comment
Surging prices for oil and natural gas shales, in at least one case rising tenfold in five weeks, are raising concerns of a bubble as valuations of drilling acreage approach the peak that was set before the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Chinese, French and Japanese energy explorers committed more than $8 billion in the past two weeks to shale-rock formations from Pennsylvania to Texas after 2011 set records for international average crude prices and U.S. demand for natural gas.
http://www.tulsaworld.com/site/printerfriendlystory.aspx?articleid=20120110_49_E1_CUTLIN155265
Cramer stated on Mad Money Thursday January 12, 2012 that the Obama administration may limit fracking.
Report thisBy gerard, January 12 at 11:21 am Link to this comment
Sadly—and ridiculously—the psychology showing up throughout this article appears, sooner or later, in the sharpening rivalries between capitalist or communist economic “systems.” Short-sighted, mean-spirited—and totally inadequate to the needs of a rapidly unifying world!
Report thisPlanning together in advance to avoid ruinous competition, sharing based on agreements made in advance based on mutually shared needs, is never allowed to rise to the surface in advance discussion.
(Even articles like this one purporting to be “information” offer no indication of better possibilities than deadly competition!)
Obviously, ordinary people everywhere will need to get together and demand that leaders of all nation-states move toward agreements that habituate fair sharing of the world’s resources. It can be done, but raw capitalism probably has no such leadership. It will take a longer and less competitive view to turn the present worldwide systemic corner.