LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 27, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     robert scheer     barack obama     gay marriage     ndaa     chris hedges
Most Read

Say 'Hi-Ho!' as They Strip-Search You

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Children Slaughtered in Government Attack on Syrian Town

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Climate Apartheid

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Dec 13, 2011

By Amy Goodman

“You’ve been negotiating all my life,” Anjali Appadurai told the plenary session of the U.N.‘s 17th “Conference of Parties,” or COP 17, the official title of the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Durban, South Africa. Appadurai, a student at the ecologically focused College of the Atlantic in Bar Harbor, Maine, addressed the plenary as part of the youth delegation. She continued: “In that time, you’ve failed to meet pledges, you’ve missed targets, and you’ve broken promises. But you’ve heard this all before.”

After she finished her address, she moved to the side of the podium, off microphone, and in a manner familiar to anyone who has attended an Occupy protest, shouted into the vast hall of staid diplomats, “Mic check!” A crowd of young people stood up, and the call-and-response began:

Appadurai: “Equity now!”

Crowd: “Equity now!”

Appadurai: “You’ve run out of excuses!”

Advertisement

Crowd: “You’ve run out of excuses!”

Appadurai: “We’re running out of time!”

Crowd: “We’re running out of time!”

Appadurai: “Get it done!”

Crowd: “Get it done!”

That was Friday, at the official closing plenary session of COP 17. The negotiations were extended, virtually nonstop, through Sunday, in hopes of avoiding complete failure. At issue were arguments over words and phrases—for instance, the replacement of “legal agreement” with “an agreed outcome with legal force,” which is said to have won over India to the Durban Platform.

The countries in attendance agreed to a schedule that would lead to an agreement by 2015, which would commit all countries to reduce emissions starting no sooner than 2020, eight years into the future.

“Eight years from now is a death sentence on Africa,” Nigerian environmentalist Nnimmo Bassey, chairperson of Friends of the Earth International, told me. “For every one-degree Celsius change in temperature, Africa is impacted at a heightened level.” He lays out the extent of the immediate threats in his new book about Africa, “To Cook a Continent.”

Bassey is one among many concerned with the profound lack of ambition embodied in the Durban Platform, which delays actual, legally binding reductions in emissions until 2020 at the earliest, whereas scientists globally are in overwhelming agreement: The stated goal of limiting average global temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) will soon be impossible to achieve. The International Energy Agency, in its annual World Energy Outlook released in November, predicted “cumulative CO2 [carbon dioxide] emissions over the next 25 years amount to three-quarters of the total from the past 110 years, leading to a long-term average temperature rise of 3.5 [degrees] C.”

Despite optimistic pronouncements to the contrary, many believe the Kyoto Protocol died in Durban. Pablo Solon, the former Bolivian ambassador to the United Nations and former chief climate negotiator for that poor country, now calls Kyoto a “zombie agreement,” staggering forward for another five or seven years, but without force or impact. On the day after the talks concluded, Canadian Environment Minister Peter Kent announced that Canada was formally withdrawing from the Kyoto Protocol. Expected to follow are Russia and Japan, the very nation where the 1997 meeting was held that gives the Kyoto Protocol its name.

The largest polluter in world history, the United States, never ratified the Kyoto Protocol and remains defiant. Both Bassey and Solon refer to the outcome of Durban as a form of “climate apartheid.”

Despite the pledges by President Barack Obama to restore the United States to a position of leadership on the issue of climate change, the trajectory from Copenhagen in 2009, to Cancun in 2010, and, now, to Durban reinforces the statement made by then-President George H.W. Bush prior to the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, the forerunner to the Kyoto Protocol, when he said, “The American way of life is not up for negotiation.”

The “American way of life” can be measured in per capita emissions of carbon. In the U.S., on average, about 20 metric tons of CO2 is released into the atmosphere annually, one of the top 10 on the planet. Hence, a popular sticker in Durban read “Stop CO2lonialism.”

By comparison, China, the country that is the largest emitter currently, has per capita emissions closer to 5 metric tons, ranking it about 80th.  India’s population emits a meager 1.5 tons per capita, a fraction of the U.S. level.

So it seems U.S. intransigence, its unwillingness to get off its fossil-fuel addiction, effectively killed Kyoto in Durban, a key city in South Africa’s fight against apartheid. That is why Anjali Appadurai’s closing words were imbued with a sense of hope brought by this new generation of climate activists:

“[Nelson] Mandela said, ‘It always seems impossible, until it’s done.’ So, distinguished delegates and governments around the world, governments of the developed world, deep cuts now. Get it done.”


Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.

Amy Goodman is the host of “Democracy Now!,” a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 900 stations in North America. She is the author of “Breaking the Sound Barrier,” recently released in paperback and now a New York Times best-seller.

© 2011 Amy Goodman

Distributed by King Features Syndicate


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By George, March 16 at 9:53 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Well, we’ve been fooled by this hoax for too long so no more. As a person from a developing country that is challenging the economies of the developed world, I can understand exactly why they want to impose these restrictions out of a hoax which has crossed tipping point many times over.

Report this

By Simon Davis-Cohen, February 1 at 2:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Big Coal is currently working hard to make the Pacific Northwest its export terminal to China. To fight this, as well as the negative climate impacts this would have, is a solution of small governance that both conservatives and environmentalist can agree on. Read the link below to see how Bellingham, WA is following the lead of such cities as Pittsburgh, PA in this movement:

http://readthedirt.org/2012/01/27/bellingham-rights-based-ordinance-proposed-to-stop-coal-trains/

Report this

By Truthdiggetydog, December 16, 2011 at 9:40 am Link to this comment

@Emile Z Obviously rich nations should take the lead in combating global warming. There’s cowardice and craven self-interest enough on all sides, especially the United States. My bottom line point is that the Malthusian nightmare of overpopulation (and the US too is overpopulated) is at the root of many of the world’s problems. We all need to take responsibility for limiting population, including the third world, where laissez faire population growth (especially in India) has ruled for far too long.

Report this
EmileZ's avatar

By EmileZ, December 15, 2011 at 6:53 pm Link to this comment

@ Truthdiggety…

As long as “they” take the lead and do it first right???

Also… the U.S. (and other “developed” nations) is raping the hell out of much of the developing world and has been doing so for a little long while.

Report this

By Truthdiggetydog, December 15, 2011 at 6:44 pm Link to this comment

China emits 5 metric tons per person, and yet has 1.3 billion people, and thus emits more than the US, where per person emissions are 20 metric tons. Also, India, with 1.2 billion people, emits 1.5 metric tons per person, which is also a substantial sum. My point is that not just emissions but overpopulation is the problem, and the developing countries trying to evade responsibility because they’re still “developing”  is absurd and hypocritical. We all need to take responsiblity, both for overpopulation (attention Bangladesh!) and global warming.

Report this
EmileZ's avatar

By EmileZ, December 15, 2011 at 6:28 pm Link to this comment

@ Ozark Michael

I don’t know if you are serious, but some countries emit more greenhouse gasses and some countries bear the catastrophic effects sooner and to a much greater extent.

I hope that helps.

Report this
OzarkMichael's avatar

By OzarkMichael, December 14, 2011 at 5:06 pm Link to this comment

Is there a climate apartheid?

I know its a catchy Leftist article title, and it makes the cause seem more rightious, but dont we all live on the same earth?

Report this

By objective observer, December 14, 2011 at 4:30 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“will soon to be impossible to achieve”, how many times will we hear “past the tipping point”, “too late to save the planet”, all of the other cry wolf noise that the “experts” feed the masses.  we’ve past the point of no return for years, since high priest Gore pronouced the end of the world.  no wonder fewer and fewer are paying attention.

Report this

By balkas, December 14, 2011 at 8:47 am Link to this comment

nothing lasts forever. end of life on earth is, in infinity of time, an
ergodic event [having a zero chance of not ending]
global warming is ‘god’s, ‘goddevil’s’, or god-nature’s tool/weapon to
finish us—hopefully all of us and not just about 6 bln+— off for all
times.
and we deserve it! tnx

Report this

By MaxFrisson, December 14, 2011 at 4:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

American citizens do not agree with the concept that the 3rd world countries are going to try to punish the US for historical CO2 production. There will be no support for punitive payments to a Green Fund. Per capita comparisons are used to weight the argument to developing nations, agreeing to current schemes that allow the BASIC nations increased output while drastically handicapping America and Canada will not pass Congress.

Why are we in the UN anyway, time to resign and evict them from Manhattan.

Report this
Jack Phast's avatar

By Jack Phast, December 13, 2011 at 9:56 pm Link to this comment

“At issue were arguments over words and phrases—for
instance, the replacement of “legal agreement” with “an
agreed outcome with legal force,” which is said to have
won over India to the Durban Platform.”

The delegates arguing over this phrasing are clearly
not the people who should have been negotiating. They
were far more worried about wheter or not they legally
wiggle their way out of a real commitment than they
were about the actual science or climate change and
process of reducing carbon emissions. Shameful.

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.