LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 19, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Letter From Birmingham Jail

Chilling: Arctic Tundra ‘Will Turn to Forest’

Truthdigger of the Week: Sen. Angus King

'The Daily Show': Stewart Slams Hypocrites Cheney and Rumsfeld

'Left, Right & Center': The White House Scandal Trifecta

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Chilling: Arctic Tundra ‘Will Turn to Forest’
How the IRS’ Nonprofit Division Got So Dysfunctional

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
Goat Song

Goat Song

By Brad Kessler
$16.32

The Case for Big Government

The Case for Big Government

By Jeff Madrick
$15.61

more items

 
Reports

Class Warfare: Bring It On!

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Sep 28, 2011
David Nallah (CC-BY)

By Richard Reeves

LOS ANGELES—President Obama came out here last Tuesday to proclaim himself a "warrior for the middle class." Would that it were true.

In a similar situation to what we have today—that is the rich get richer and the poor (and middle class) get poorer—President Franklin Roosevelt said of what used to be called plutocrats: "I welcome their hatred."

I’m not sure that Obama, the rationalist beloved, is capable of talking that way or acting that way. Evidence be damned, he has acted as if we are in a time of rational discourse about class, job creation, incentives, and all the rest of modern populism. He seems to accept Republican and conservative blather about "job creators." Where the hell have the job creators—rich investors and their banks—been these last few years of heartbreaking struggle for the middle and lower classes?

Well, they have been "creating wealth," piled up in banks, profits and their own accounts. The "investing class," as President George H.W. Bush called them, has been creating jobs—in China and other points east maybe, but not here.

In The Guardian in England, economist Richard Wolff has written:

Advertisement

"The charge of class war is particularly obtuse. Consider simply these two facts. First, at the end of the Second World War, for every dollar Washington raised in taxes on individuals, it raised $1.50 in taxes on business profits. Today, that ratio is very different: For every dollar Washington gets in taxes on individuals, it takes 25 cents in taxes on business. In short, the last half-century has seen a massive shift of the burden of federal taxation off business and onto individuals.

"Second, across those 50 years, the actual shift that occurred was the opposite of the much more modest reversal proposed this week by President Obama; over the same period, the federal income tax rate on the richest individuals fell from 91 percent to the current 35 percent. Yet, Republicans and conservatives use the term ‘class war’ for what Obama proposes—and never for what the last five decades have accomplished in shifting the tax burden from the rich and corporations to the working class.

"The tax structure imposed by Washington on the U.S. over the last half-century has seen a massive double shift of the burden of taxation: from corporations to individuals and from the richest individuals to everyone else. If the national debate wants seriously to use a term like ‘class war’ to describe Washington’s tax policies, then the reality is that the class war’s winners have been corporations and the rich. Its losers—the rest of us—now want to reduce our losses modestly by small increases in taxes on the super-rich (but not, or not yet, on corporations.)"

In the interest of fairness and balance, this is part of the counterargument, as articulated by the conservative provocateur Gary Bauer, writing in Human Events, the iconic publication of America’s right wing:

"In three years, Barack Obama has morphed from the Herald of Hope to the Envoy of Envy.

"The president has always been an eager class warrior. But he has now taken things to a new level, making the politics of envy and resentment the signature theme of his re-election campaign. ...

"Obama’s plan wouldn’t hit just the oft-targeted ‘millionaires and billionaires,’ of course. It includes letting the Bush tax cuts expire for people earning as little as $200,000 a year. And it is not the rich but the middle class and poor who will suffer most when Obama’s taxes on high-earners prompt small businesses to stop hiring and cause the wealthy to reduce their charitable giving."

Ah! Noblesse oblige!

Where is all this going? This is something Warren Buffett and Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York, along with lefties like Wolff and Michael Moore, have begun to talk about, violent class warfare—in the streets—if the wealth inequity continues to drive the economy. As Wolff wrote: "Then Washington might learn what class war really is."

© 2011 Universal Uclick


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

David J. Cyr's avatar

By David J. Cyr, October 6, 2011 at 5:14 am Link to this comment

Back in early 2005, 3 years before the collapse, I started referring to the worker cohort pridefully labeling themselves “middle class” as actually being the Indentured Class — indentured servants of the banks that owned all the stuff the “middle class” consumers were multiple mortgaging in a frenzy of over consumption, spending far beyond their means in an irrational and irresponsible effort to appear to be rich.

http://www.chenangogreens.org

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, October 5, 2011 at 10:51 pm Link to this comment

In Marxist terminology, ‘middle class’ refers not to ‘everybody’ but the sub-elite who serve the ruling class as managers and professionals.  As capitalism degenerates, it’s difficult to say if this class exists any more, although many people have illusions about it and their relation to it.

Report this
David J. Cyr's avatar

By David J. Cyr, October 5, 2011 at 9:23 pm Link to this comment

Nothing upset flatulent “middle class” Democrats more than being exposed for the ruling class enablers in the class wars that they are.

There is a class war, and everyone who has voted for the corporate party’s Republicans and Democrats has waged class war against the working class, with every (R) or (D) vote they cast.

http://www.chenangogreens.org

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, October 5, 2011 at 8:34 pm Link to this comment

David J. Cyr, October 3 at 12:52 am Link to this comment

QUOTE, Richard Reeves:

“President Obama came out here last Tuesday to proclaim himself a “warrior for the middle class.” Would that it were true.”
____________________

A “middle class” person rejects “working class” identification and aspires to be a ruling class person, and therefore dedicates themselves politically to the ruling class (e.g. regularly and reliably “nonviolently” supporting the corporate (R) & (D) party candidates’ continuation of the corporate-state’s foreign and domestic violence — perpetual war and ruthless neoliberal economic exploitation).

The ruling class keeps winning the class war because so few Americans are willing to think of themselves as being in the working class, and politically act accordingly.
*****************

It’s time to STFU!

The “working class” as jurassic Marxists define it differing from the “middle class” is a 19th century concept that has no place in the modern technical world.  “Middle Class” and “Working Class” have been the same thing since unions were able to force decent wages in America’s industrial plants.  That, of course was shattered by Reagan using our tax dollars to pay those industries to set up shop overseas.

But if the “Middle Class” falls, there won’t be a “Working Class” either because they are the same!  I built houses and later wore a suit and a tie.  Yeah, I didn’t get sweaty but I was just as much a worker, even when I was a manager, as when I was swinging a hammer and a saw.

Cyr, you are simply full of Marxist theoretical shit and don’t have any connection to the real world.  So stop wasting bandwidth and STFU already!

Report this

By traynorjf, October 3, 2011 at 2:04 pm Link to this comment

Unemployment was virtually zero in the Third Reich. Jobs alone are not the answer.Why did those jobs evaporate? It began with Ronald Reagen and ended with the demise of Glass-Steagall and the passing of NAFTA without adequate labor and environmental protection during the Clinton administration. It has been class warfare and we lost.

Report this
David J. Cyr's avatar

By David J. Cyr, October 3, 2011 at 12:52 am Link to this comment

QUOTE, Richard Reeves:

“President Obama came out here last Tuesday to proclaim himself a “warrior for the middle class.” Would that it were true.”
____________________

A “middle class” person rejects “working class” identification and aspires to be a ruling class person, and therefore dedicates themselves politically to the ruling class (e.g. regularly and reliably “nonviolently” supporting the corporate (R) & (D) party candidates’ continuation of the corporate-state’s foreign and domestic violence — perpetual war and ruthless neoliberal economic exploitation).

The ruling class keeps winning the class war because so few Americans are willing to think of themselves as being in the working class, and politically act accordingly.

http://www.chenangogreens.org

Report this

By Ulyanov, October 2, 2011 at 11:31 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Vous avez raison Robespierre, je suis d’accord!!!!

It is not light that we need, but fire; it is not the gentle shower, but thunder. We need the storm, the whirlwind, and the earthquake.

- Frederick Douglass

Report this

By the worm, October 1, 2011 at 10:09 am Link to this comment

Dear Mindy,

Thank and I too think Robert is probably right.

Best
The Worm

Report this

By MINDY, October 1, 2011 at 7:13 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

GOD BLESS YOU WORM!!! You have got the whole entire horrible thing in a nutshell! I think even Chris Hedges could learn from you!! I wish you would write a book. Thank you so much for your thoughtful and thorough analysis, especially the list of all the wretchedness Obama has left us with. I am another fool who voted for him, and now he is truly the “lesser of the two evils” candidate and so he can easily be re-elected, not on his good record but on the fact that the other side is SO much worse!! Or are they? As Robert Scheer wrote earlier this week, “Whoever wins, we lose”.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, September 30, 2011 at 4:02 pm Link to this comment

gerard—Good that you pointed out how Reeves’s language gives away his establishment-shill role.  The whole lot of them seem to talk like that.  Meanwhile, their political system has frozen up, even considering it on its own terms, in its own framework.

Report this

By gerard, September 30, 2011 at 11:05 am Link to this comment

Language:  (last paragraph of Reeves)—“Where is all this going? This is something Warren Buffett and Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York, along with lefties like Wolff and Michael Moore, have begun to talk about, violent class warfare—in the streets—if the wealth inequity continues to drive the economy. As Wolff wrote: ‘Then Washington might learn what class war really is.’ (All this aimed at whom? Not at the participants, but at the uncommitted, fearful majority of bystanding readers.)
  “Where ... all this ... going?”  (Raising question about implied danger ahead, fear of unknown ends, and implying that the participants don’t know what they are doing.)
  Mention big names (Buffett,Bloomberg and “lefties”
connected to fear-inspiring phrase “violent class warfare in the streets”
  Raising threat level “If .... such and such”
  “wealth inequity continues to drive the economy”
(does “wealth inequity” drive the economy or destroy it?)
  Raising fear level again—“Washington might learn ...” (as if they don’t already know).
  Raising fear to higher level with “violent class warfare in the streets” as if that is the only
possibility and non-violent peaceable methods are not even worth considering, therefore omitted.
  Please, people. Take note of the details of language which work on your psyche if you remain unconscious of these (more or less subtle) twists
of tongues and minds.
  Language like this is a kind of class warfare in itself, conscious, semi-conscious or unconscious. It is the life-blood of propaganda.  Don’t be a victim of it. People meeting on Wall Street to “petition their government for a redress of grievances” is not “class warfare” and in fact is trying to prevent and avoid “class warfare.”  Besides, that’s what their Constitution tells them they should do and are legally permitted to do.  Police, on the other hand, are not legally entitled by the Constitution to terrorize them, stimulate fear and violence, club them, kick them, pepper spray them and put them in jail. The language of the Constitution is aimed directly at preventing that.

Report this

By the worm, September 30, 2011 at 5:20 am Link to this comment

“A warrior for the middle class” would not have left us with these things:

1.  An insurance company subsidy passed off as ‘health care reform’,

2.  The six biggest banks to be re-enforce­d & now are bigger than ever,

3.  The “Volker Rule” to be downgraded and “postponed”,

4.  Immigration reform tabled, 

5.  EPAs more reasonable standards discarded,

6.  Pension oversight delayed (past 2012),

7.  “War on terror” perpetuated, expanded and escalated,

8.  Gitmo retained,

9.  School scores continue their precipitance decline with more ‘charter schools’
chatter as ‘the answer’,

10.  Tax cuts for the wealthy extended three times in less than three years (twice
with Democratic majorities in both houses),

11. Bonuses for bankrupt companies’ CEOs paid with taxpayer dollars,

12. Cuts proposed for both Social Security and Medicare,

13. Carried interest (no tax) and capital gains (15% tax) remain un-touched and
not discussed for 2 and a half years (80% of the income of America’s richest 400
comes in the form of capital gains),

14. Nuclear energy, “clean coal” blasting, fracking and deep-sea drilling – full
speed ahead,

15. Free- but no Fair-Trade agreements to continue to drive down wages and put
people out of jobs,

16. GE given taxpayer money during a year in which it paid no taxes, then its CEO
appointed head of Obama’s Jobs Council ( % of GEs workforce has been moved
off-shore and it’s profits are hiding there to avoid US taxes),

17. Persistent and un-addressed unemployment,

18. Persistent and un-addressed poverty (highest in 54 years),

19. Persistent and un-addressed loss of middle class assets in the form of housing
and pensions,

20 Bonuses for CEOs of bankrupt companies protected while mortgage holders
abused.

Is Obama a shill? A con man? Simply ignorant? A naif?

Everyone is exhausted trying to figure out Obama’s psyche, but the thing we don’t
have to figure out is Obama’s disastrous aftermath.

Obama is no ‘warrior for the middle class’. Obama has simply ‘gone-along-to-get-
along’.

When Obama ran in 2008, he had the advantage that we didn’t know him and
could project whatever we wanted (our wishes, hopes, etc). Now, we’ve seen him in
action and he is a disaster for the middle class.

Report this
jayman's avatar

By jayman, September 29, 2011 at 7:26 pm Link to this comment

Obama is NOT that deep. His class-warfare rhetoric is simply the instinct of a community organizer. Look up “community organizer”—see what they do - they don’t organize communities.

Race baiting, class warfare, polarization and fear mongering are the tools of an activist or community organizer. There is no great depth of thinking here, or any desire to solve revenue problems, in fact the “Laffer Curve” proves exactly the opposite occurs.

It’s a pitiful attempt to convince people by using “Pathos’ or emotional arguments to think in ways that are irrational, when there is no logic or reasoning to support your policies and of course to maintain power.

Obama used it to get the “cult” to follow him in 2008, and was successful even beyond his wildest expectations, remember Hope & Change, no even bothered to ask what kind of change, or hope for what, who when, where, how ?

It’s failing him now because he has record - He had one in 2008 too, but it was so bad the Kool Aid crowd chose to ignore it.

Nothing deep here, just down and dirty street fighting for power - Clear as it gets.

Report this

By oddsox, September 29, 2011 at 6:05 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Jobs.  It’s about Jobs.
We just want to go back to work.
That’s all that’s missing in America right now, we’ve got the rest covered. 
Even the poorest Americans live like kings of centuries past or compared to today’s REAL poor in Ghana or Kenya or Rwanda.

Get the unemployment rate back down in the 6’s and all this Class Warfare talk will fade. 

For those who want to gin it up anyway, consider this:
If Class Warefare goes global, every single American becomes a “Have”: rich, poor & middle-class alike.

Report this

By Alejandro, September 29, 2011 at 5:11 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Un-fortunatly as the ex Governor from Texas the dearly departed Ann Richards, famously once said about George Bush Jr.,“This Cowboy’s All Hat And No Cattle” is apprapo to this Prez. to a tee.

Sorry Mr. Prezdent, Nice try but no cigar… Change is coming, but it won’t be because of you. It’s because we the people have had it with all of the coruption and cronyism that is Washington encluding you Mr. Prezdent. And it is my belief that your mission for Wall Street was to slow it down.

What did GW once say; “uhhh, Fool me once, uhhh, yur fault, uhhh, kaint get fooled again, hehehehe”

Report this

By berniem, September 29, 2011 at 1:11 pm Link to this comment

Other than the gullible and the blindly partisan does Obama really think that true progressives who see this nation mired in the clutches of an overarching corporatocracy which owns both faces of our Janus-like duopoly will vote for him again? He is as much a reactionary, verging on fascism, as any of those claiming to be repubs, conservatives, baggers, or what have you! The only reason he is reviled by the “other side” is because of its inherent bigotry and racial hatred! I for one don’t care if he or one of those occupying the “Tiajuana Taxi” gets elected POTUS. The empire is on the skids and the whole world knows it except for all of those benighted believers in the myth of “Amerikan Exceptionalism”.

Report this
david451's avatar

By david451, September 29, 2011 at 12:06 pm Link to this comment

The tax issue raised by Buffet and Obama is a misdirection - the real issue is the elites’ desire to return to the natural order of things, where wealth is the mechanism that distinguishes the few from the many, and which then maintains that separation. From Plato to Alexander Hamilton to the conservative thinkers of today, rule by the elite remains, in their view, the natural order—money and power in the service of money and power.

“All communities divide themselves into the few and the many. The first are the rich and the well born, the others the mass of the people…The people are turbulent and changing; they seldom judge and determine right. Give therefore to the first class a distinct, permanent share of government. They will check the
unsteadiness of the second.” Alexander Hamilton.

Viewed in this context, the elites consider liberal democracy and the New Deal to be the aberrations of history, not the norm.  And since the term “democracy” does not even appear in the US Constitution, it is the views of Limbaugh, Phillips, Williams and Buchanan that truly animate the them. The monied class has chafed at what they view to be the unnatural imbalance created by FDR, and is poised to reclaim its natural right.

The furor over class warfare based on statements by Obama and Warren Buffett on the tax issue is a misdirection. True, the rich believe in meritocracy, and have managed to shed the burdens of the social contract (the rich will always find ways to shed the burden of the social contract). The real prize is the power that their money has secured, a return to the natural order of things, and their self-proclaimed right to a permanent share of government.

Direct action and public dissent is what is urgently needed. The recent XL Pipeline protests and the ongoing action on Wall Street are a good start, but only a start.

For more, go to: http://corporateconstraint.blogspot.com .

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, September 29, 2011 at 11:02 am Link to this comment

Class is war.

Report this
Rigor's avatar

By Rigor, September 29, 2011 at 10:37 am Link to this comment

Bring it on? Really Mr. Reeves? Let us know when & where you plan to lead this “revolution”. Now I don’t know you, and don’t want to insinuate your a coward, but I’d be surprised if you wanted to put your life on the line, as you so ardently want others to do.
Barry the Liar called for everybody, (with the CBC), to hit the trail and march, but to where, & when? Just like so many other so-called leaders, He calls for class warfare, put stops short of actually doing anything, because NOBODY wants to be responsible for pulling that particular pin.
Now for those of you who want war, you obviously never experienced it. Add to this the cold truth that any class war would instantly morph into race war - think it through.
This whole class warfare bs is literally a baby playing with a loaded gun, and very few people would be ready for the aftermath.

Report this

By shenebraskan, September 29, 2011 at 9:51 am Link to this comment

What has happened to the font/spacing on these recent articles? They are unreadable.

Report this
mrfreeze's avatar

By mrfreeze, September 29, 2011 at 9:16 am Link to this comment

Revolution and class warfare are nice “concepts” here in the U.S.. Here’s the problem:

Even if FDR himself was resurrected today and he had all his wisdom, political weight and power…...my dear friends, there would be no revolution, there would be no fighting in the streets….the reason?

Because Americans themselves are not populists, or revolutionaries, nor do they embody any sort of “anti-establishment” attitudes. Americans are, almost to the person, institutionalized (corporate-created) sheep. They get more worked-up over the prices of ipods vs other tablets than they do about the illegal wars we’ve been waging. They complain that their neighbors are making a good living (via all those mythical over-paid government jobs).

No, there isn’t going to be any class warfare or even a gentle wimper from Americans…..they’re too full of high-fructose corn syrup and Fox news propaganda to even get off the couch.

Report this

By Wishingforsanity, September 29, 2011 at 8:02 am Link to this comment

OCCUPY EVERY STREET.  They are OUR streets.  let the Revolution begin and let us
not backdown until we have sent a clear and concise message to the Plutocrats,
Oligarchs and Facists running this country into a collision course with uprisings across
the country that WE THE PEOPLE still have the voice of power no matter how much
we’ve been kowtowed into believing otherwise.The time is NOW.  Occupy
EVERYTHING.

Report this

By jaylindberg@hotmail.com, September 29, 2011 at 6:48 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The more I learn about this POS government, the more I
learn about the French Revolution.

In the Spirit of Abbie the Great (Hoffman).  F this
fascist state.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, September 29, 2011 at 3:40 am Link to this comment

“You’re killing the engine of small business!”

Small businesses account for 7% of jobs growth.  It’s yet again another Republican lie.

Report this

By Druthers, September 28, 2011 at 11:49 pm Link to this comment

Such statements would have sent the enthusiasm meter though the ceiling in 2008, but now?
Now it is just an indication that he is in campaign mode and we saw how he can step from that to presidential mode with ease, leaving the voters in the gutter.

Report this

By El_Pinguino, September 28, 2011 at 10:21 pm Link to this comment

My father always said *you can’t judge a person by what they say, but you can judge a person by what they do*

Obama’s actions are nowhere near FDR’s *And I welcome their hatred*

If you look hard enough you’ll see a gathering storm. And, if you don’t look at all you might get struck by lightning.

Report this

By Bobi6, September 28, 2011 at 9:52 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It is enormous relief that Americans of influence are now talking about
this. It is a relief that while the corporate media has completely ignored
the truth others are now pursuing this line. Now the public can be
informed and perhaps it’s not too late to elect either an idiot or a low
intelligence cowboy or someone worse. I wondered how bad things
would get before someone said it out loud. I know some of these things
have been going on but now Americans have joined the world in
demanding equal time and better treatment. I just hope it continues. We
can’t go back to the fifties but we can go forward to working towards a
more equal society and a fair chance for most or all.

Report this
Robespierre115's avatar

By Robespierre115, September 28, 2011 at 9:37 pm Link to this comment

REAL Class Warfare is personified by what the Greeks are doing: Rioting, burning down the fucking banks, organizing and forming popular committees and making the oligarchs tremble behind their high walls.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.