|
|
June 17, 2013
|
|
Charter Schools Are Not the Silver BulletPosted on Mar 23, 2012By David Sirota Talk K-12 education for more than five minutes, and inevitably, the conversation turns to charter schools—those publicly funded, privately administered institutions that now educate more than 2 million American children. Parents wonder if they are better than the neighborhood public school. Politicians tout them as a silver-bullet solution to the education crisis. Education technology companies promote them for their profit potential. Opponents of organized labor like the Walton family embrace them for their ability to crush teachers unions. But amid all the buzz, the single most important question is being ignored: Are charter schools living up to their original mission as experimental schools pioneering better education outcomes and reducing segregation? That was the vision of the late American Federation of Teachers President Albert Shanker when he proposed charters a quarter-century ago—and according to new data, it looks like those objectives are not being realized. In recent years, major studies suggest that, on the whole, charter schools are producing worse educational achievement results than traditional public schools. For example, a landmark study from Stanford University’s Center for Research on Education Outcomes discovered that while 17 percent of charter schools “provide superior education opportunities for their students,” a whopping “37 percent deliver learning results that are significantly worse than their students would have realized had they remained in traditional public schools.” Likewise, the National Center for Education Statistics found that charter school students performed significantly worse on academic assessments than their peers in traditional public schools. These numbers might be a bit less alarming if charters were at least making sure to “not be school(s) where all the advantaged kids or all the white kids or any other group is segregated,” as Shanker envisioned. According to a new report from the National Education Policy Center, however, charters “tend to be more racially segregated than traditional public schools”—and in lots of places, they seem to be openly hostile to children who are poor, who are from minority communities or who have special education needs. A smattering of headlines from across the country tells that story. “Nashville Charter Schools Blasted Over Racial Imbalance,” blared a recent headline in The Tennessean. “Charter Schools Face Discrimination Complaints,” read The Chronicle of Philanthropy. “Colorado Charter Schools Enroll Fewer With Needs,” screamed The Denver Post. “Charter Schools Enrolling Low Number of Poor Students,” reported The Miami Herald. The list goes on and on. Advertisement Does this all mean that charter schools are inherently bad? Of course not—there are some terrific charter schools out there. However, the data do suggest that charter schools are not a systemic answer to America’s education crisis. In many cases, in fact, they make the crisis worse, not only exacerbating inherent inequalities, but also distracting attention from the real ills plaguing the education system—ills rooted in economic inequality and anemic school budgets. Such challenges aren’t sexy, simple or politically convenient—but they are the true problems at the heart of our education system. No matter how many charter schools pop up, and no matter how often education “reform” activists pretend they are a cure-all, those problems will continue harming kids unless they are addressed.
© 2012 Creators.com Previous item: The Million Hoodie March: It’s About a ‘Right-or-Wrong Thing’ Next item: Ode to the Road New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By balkas, March 24, 2012 at 9:19 am Link to this comment
correction! it shld be: who’s gonna stop the 20% to also own schooling
Report thisand the obedience training public schooling?
By balkas, March 24, 2012 at 8:02 am Link to this comment
look, folks?
Report thisisn’t even the governance itself privatized? isn’t army, cia, fbi, banking,
mining, also privatized or totally controlled-owned by the 20% of
americans.
so, who’s gonna stop the 80% to own also schooling and the other
obedience training, aka, schools?
By Outraged, March 23, 2012 at 9:26 pm Link to this comment
Re: Big B
Your comment: “thanks for sharing your anectdotal evidence that flies in the face of nearly all studies. ALL of the children in our area that are homeschooled (not some, ALL) are being homeschooled for RELIGIOUS reasons.”
In this, you are not correct. Because the question to which you refer was to the effect “are you home schooling for religious or moral reasons”. For this reason, many lefties would home school for what they see as “moral reasons”. Ethics is morality simply put another way. Additionally, to assume that our schools have not been infiltrated and attacked by right wing ideologies is to miss the mark. This depends upon where you live.
Re: OM
Your comment: “I would stack my homeschooled kids against your mind-numbed products of Leftist propaganda any day.”
Your assertion is a fools game. There are many, many publicly educated children who very likely could put your children to shame. Best not to “blow smoke” as it were. Additionally, it is not becoming as a parent to pit one CHILD against another CHILD. That is not what home schooling should ever be about. I am a home schooling parent and it is about wanting the best situation for the particular child we have… whatever their strengths or weaknesses and having that opportunity to strengthen both.
As regards the article, charter schools are part of a coordinated attack to undermine public schools. Yes, they are. But charter schools are only one vehicle used to do this. Mandatory testing, ridiculous testing materials, underfunding and suspect teacher assessments are all a part of this concentrated effort to find “problems” where “problems” do not exist. Much like the voter ID laws.
For the record, home schooling is NOT the perpetrator attacking public schools, but they are being used and abused as such.
There are actual problems within our schools and this is what needs to be addressed, without all the vicious rhetoric. America could make it’s public schools the envy of the world were it not for the political quandary that our educational system has become.
That said, a good example of what I’m talking about comes from a public school teacher. She couldn’t have said it better in my opinion.
From CommonDreams:
Report thishttp://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/03/23-8
By Big B, March 23, 2012 at 5:01 pm Link to this comment
Ozark
thanks for sharing your anectdotal evidence that flies in the face of nearly all studies. ALL of the children in our area that are homeschooled (not some, ALL) are being homeschooled for RELIGIOUS reasons. They are learning that the earth is 8 thousand years old and that the laws of physics are part of a massive conspiracy involving every scientist for the last 500 years (its true, i’ve seen the curriculum) How is it that every other western democracy can PUBLICLY educate most of their populations, most through collegate level?
Its all about the money people. The more you spend on a childs education, the smarter the kid. Other than a level financial playing field, the biggest obstacle to our nation having a great public education system is our sense of community in this country, or should I say our lack of it. We have been convinced by our evil oligarchs that a dog eat dog society is the way to go, even when educating our children.
Report thisBy sanda1sculptorNYC, March 23, 2012 at 4:25 pm Link to this comment
Charter schools are the newest bullet in the war on public education, including destroying teachers unions, use of public school buildings for profit (while calling charter schools “public” - another Orwellian language perversion)...see
Report thishttp://www.blackagendareport.com for excellent critique of the new privatization scam using what was a good idea, “charter schools” in a new, heinous way.
By OzarkMichael, March 23, 2012 at 1:26 pm Link to this comment
PatrickHenry… your response was so civil that i am silenced. I thought we was gonna get in a pissing contest. i was wrong.
/hat tip
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, March 23, 2012 at 12:27 pm Link to this comment
OzarkMichael,
Maybe you’re the exception to the rule. Our backward state of Maryland as been down the homeschooling road before with many less than qualified parents so much so that explicit directions and qualifications must be met.
http://www.marylandpublicschools.org/MSDE/divisions/studentschoolsvcs/student_services_alt/home_schooling/docs/homeschool_factsheet.htm
There are pro’s and cons as you well know.
http://www.successful-homeschooling.com/homeschooling-pros-and-cons.html
Report thisBy gerard, March 23, 2012 at 11:36 am Link to this comment
One phrase in American oratory has been particularly
Report thisproblematic, yet is seldom admitted to be a problem:
the words ...“promote the general welfare.”
From the beginning the country has always been class-conscious—elites, middles and poor. As time has passed, under capitalism (admitedly a class-solidifying system) the divisions have become increasingly less changeable, so that after 200 years or so “the general welfare” now means that “we” who are richer and hence more powerful, are taxed with the cumbersome “responsibiity” of “taking care of” you (general welfare) others. And since that is burdensome, we wish to keep it at a minimum, not “promote” it.
Obviously, this kind of “responsibility” comes from the purse, not from the heart, and is therefore less than gratifying to the elites of government and business who tend to provide only the most minimal
resources to the “least deserving”, least “entitled.”
The ultimate result seems to be that the “under-classes” get short shrift even though they are vastly more numerous than “uppers” and “miiddles.”
It is a bitter irony that while this “system” by its very nature provides an ever-increasing number of persons unable to “rise” to a “higher class”, it costs the “higher class” MORE money to provide LESS
“general welfare.”
The entire “public school question” is muddied by our national attempt to try not to even talk about the “general welfare,” let alone do anything to improve it. Seems that millions of us would rather pretend it doesn’t exist.
By BrooklynDame, March 23, 2012 at 11:30 am Link to this comment
Tell it like it is, SurfNow! Teachers are abused and scapegoated and public school
teachers are often fighting battles that have nothing to do with educating
students.
http://borderlessnewsandviews.com/2012/02/we-do-need-an-education/
http://borderlessnewsandviews.com/2012/03/one-teeny-tiny-problem-with-
teacher-evaluations/
http://borderlessnewsandviews.com/2012/02/my-invitation-to-rick-santorum/
http://borderlessnewsandviews.com/2012/03/santorums-missing-link/
Report thisBy OzarkMichael, March 23, 2012 at 11:04 am Link to this comment
PatrickHenry said:
Aint it a shame PatrickHenry, that your all powerful state cant control all us little folks? Aint it even worse how much diversity there is in this country?
Homeschooling… nothing beats it. I would stack my homeschooled kids against your mind-numbed products of Leftist propaganda any day. Pick your subject: History, science, math, civics. We leave you guys in the dust and we never looked back.
Report thisBy Jeff N., March 23, 2012 at 8:02 am Link to this comment
Right on surfnow, the latest wave in the privatization movement.. prisons, healthcare, universities, education, if the private sector can find a way to bid on government spending they’ll do it.
Report thisBy surfnow, March 23, 2012 at 7:35 am Link to this comment
Unless you are very stupid or are completely brainwashed- which most Amerikans are- you understand that poor student performance in public schools has very little to do with the quality of teachers. Most public school teachers are professionals who take teaching very seriously. Student performance is directly attributable to eroding socio-econoic conditions and culture. Charter schools are just about privatization of all public sector jobs- which has been a conservative agenda for decades. Governors like Christie and the others don’t give a rat’s ass about student’s learning- it’s all about taking public money and funneling it into the hands of greedy CEOs.
Report thisBy Big B, March 23, 2012 at 5:49 am Link to this comment
Its always been the selling point of the charter school movement, that they will be just like private schools, only for poor kids. I, like so many others, call bullshit.
Private schools in the US are attended by our best and brightest from the upper crust and upper middle class. For the most part, our most stabile homes. With top shelf facilities and acedemic connections second to none, a kid from a private school has a distinct advantage over every other child.
Charter schools are what poor rural and bankrupt urban schools tried to try and keep the smart kids parents from tranferring their kids some where else. Charter schools are no different than a regular public school if but for 2 distinct differences. First, urban charter schols try to keep the “good” kids away from the “bad” kids. And last, a charter school teacher is usually some underpaid kid freash out of college, or some schlub that washed out of teaching years before and now needs a paycheck.
Charter schools are only interested in one thing, making money.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, March 23, 2012 at 3:47 am Link to this comment
A step above home schooling with history tailored to your particular religion, race or culture’s belief.
Report this