Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
May 24, 2017 Disclaimer: Please read.

Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.

Czeslaw Milosz: A Life

Truthdig Bazaar
All the Sad Young Literary Men

All the Sad Young Literary Men

By Keith Gessen

more items

Email this item Print this item

Catholicism and the GOP: An Awkward Tango

Posted on May 1, 2012

By William Pfaff

A novel aspect of the Republican campaign for the party’s presidential nomination has been the importance placed by some candidates, their admirers and some voters on the Catholic religion and certain claims to formal academic certification or endorsement.

Begin with Newt Gingrich, who for a time was a leading figure in the race for the Republican nomination. Like the president himself, Congressman Gingrich possesses academic credentials, his in modern European history from Tulane University. He makes the double-barreled claim that America under a continuing liberal Democratic administration will become “a secular atheist country ... dominated by radical Islamists.”

In Washington, his Ph.D. degree in history earned him—according to his account—$1.6 million as an adviser on historical matters to the government-sponsored Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation—Freddie Mac. As the value of the agency’s possible concerns with European history seemed unlikely to justify such a sum, Washington opinion assumed that his connection with the agency was closer to that of a Washington “fixer.” In this he seemed more successful than in his well-publicized marriage entanglements, although the latter left his religious admirers apparently unperturbed.

The “bunkum” artist is a familiar figure from the folklore of the American 19th century who makes up “facts” as required in the sale of the all-healing snake oil liniment he sells (the vaudevillian and film star W.C. Fields made a career from his impersonation).

Another familiar American figure is the earnest swot who knows less than he thinks he does, but does know more than a lot of voters, and indeed in the following case, and in a sensitive matter, more—apparently—than most of his Republican campaign-trail cohorts, as well as some serious national commentators. He has dazzled them with economics and moral theology as well.


Square, Site wide
The case is that of Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, now, in the view of some, the Republicans’ leader on economic policy. In 2005 he said that the thinker who inspired him to take up politics was the novelist and theorist Ayn Rand, celebrant of the heroic capitalist (a woman who was also a great influence on Alan Greenspan). Paul Ryan studied at Miami University in Ohio and was first elected to Congress as a Republican from Wisconsin’s First District in 1998. He quickly won a reputation as a young conservative, and in 2011 was selected to deliver the Republican response to President Obama’s State of the Union message. At the beginning of March this year, he offered the latest version of a previously offered budget plan for America, which, when put to vote in the House of Representatives, won the support of all but 10 of the Republicans.

The plan would end corporate income tax, estate tax, lower the overall corporate tax rate and eliminate income tax on capital gains, dividends and interest. It would partly privatize Medicaid, eliminate employer tax exclusion on payments for employee health insurance, and of course undo Obamacare. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said his plan disproportionately cuts programs for “poor and vulnerable persons.”

Ryan, a Catholic, represented his budget proposals as reflecting Catholic social thought. In recent years there has been a neoconservative effort to substitute an endorsement of American-style capitalism for the long-established Catholic social doctrine set forth in two famous encyclicals, Rerum Novarum (in 1891, committing the Church to the social struggle of working people) and Quadragesimo Anno (1931, widening that commitment, and rebuking Catholics who support the economic despotism of the few, which it characterized as “a natural outcome of limitless free competition”). Quadragesimo Anno asserted the moral as well as economic principle of a “just wage” for workers.

The popes’ principles clearly are not the capitalism of Ayn Rand, Wall Street and the American Chamber of Commerce, nor for that matter of many American Catholics today who regard the church’s position as sheer socialism, and its close collaboration with American trade unionists in building the modern American trade movement in the 1930s and 1940s as the next thing to communism. The social morality taught by the church is to them thoroughly un-American, as indeed it is, if Americanism is judged by the moral standards of Ryan’s budget plan and the economic views of the present-day Republican Party.

Congressman Ryan has held himself aloof from the criticism of him by the U.S. Bishops and by members of the Georgetown faculty, where he recently delivered an address (Georgetown, of course, is a Jesuit university), and by Catholic academic and intellectual leaders elsewhere.

Ryan’s position, like that of the well-publicized recent convert to Catholicism, Newt Gingrich, is no doubt a case of what the church calls “invincible error” (meaning he doesn’t know what he is talking about), but is wrong whatever the invincibility. (A Jesuit at Georgetown would no doubt happily confess and forgive the two of them—if they promised to renounce their errors.) But then the Republican right would excommunicate both of them, thereby blocking them both from future presidential campaigns. They have both fallen afoul of moral authority’s rebuttal to the claims of political ambition. Their nominal patron saint in this situation is Sir Thomas More, martyr, lord chancellor of England, beheaded on order of King Henry VIII in 1535.

Visit William Pfaff’s website for more on his latest book, “The Irony of Manifest Destiny: The Tragedy of America’s Foreign Policy” (Walker & Co., $25), at

© 2012 Tribune Media Services, Inc.

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Join the conversation

Load Comments

By DornDiego, May 3, 2012 at 8:56 am Link to this comment

How ‘bout The Church of Paul Ryan?  Okay, maybe it’ll be a bit Protestant, but it
will make him a lot of money as long as he’s got that hair and pretty blue eyes.

Report this

By Allan, May 3, 2012 at 6:20 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Thank you William for pointing out what those of us in the Catholic left (and the Catholic middle for that matter) already know - that economic policies like Ryan’s are the polar opposite of the teachings of Jesus and of the social teachings of the Catholic Church. Oh, and for those of you making the usual tired comments about “nazi popes”, please grow up.

Report this
americanme's avatar

By americanme, May 2, 2012 at 5:09 pm Link to this comment

I say it’s a perfect fit:  retrograde relgion and retrograde poltics.

A nazi pope and neo-nazi politicians.


(That last phrase was not advertizing for any native-owned casino.)

Report this

By frecklefever, May 2, 2012 at 3:17 pm Link to this comment


Report this

By MeHere, May 2, 2012 at 1:08 pm Link to this comment

Isn’t this the same old tango between religion and politics?  Many religious institutions adjust their beliefs to fit their political interests, and many politicians adjust their religion to fit their politics.

Report this

By upgradeyourlife, May 2, 2012 at 7:26 am Link to this comment

Modern day conservatism is like a spatula that tries to
lodge itself under anything it can, and then attempt to
flip it. It’s an absolute void of intellectualism.

Report this

By Michael, May 2, 2012 at 7:18 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Ayn Rand benefits from an irony.  Academic philosophy, as I understand it, is fundamentally relativistic, yet it won’t give Any Rand so much as the time of day, but because of its relativism it must, at best, be silent.  I may be completely wrong in this, I am not a philosopher, but as mind exercise I like to read philosophy.

Report this

By balkas, May 2, 2012 at 6:01 am Link to this comment

in view of the fact that it had been religion or a priestly caste who were
the first to proclaim, What is yours is yours and no one has the right to
it, i don’t think catholic church or any church for that matter wld seek an
idyllic or ideal econo-mlitary-monetary-politico-educational equality.
perhaps, churches are merely in repair business and never in roots of
evil that is befalling us.
hopefully, i am wrong in this ‘prediction’, or better said, expectation!
priests lose their eclat in an ideal/idyllic societal structure. so, why shld
they work for own loss of power, hubris, selfimportance, etc???

Report this
kerryrose's avatar

By kerryrose, May 2, 2012 at 2:31 am Link to this comment

The idea of all these grown people lauding Ann Rand is laughable.  To me, and everyone I knew, Rand was read when you were 16 and when you thought you were the King of the World.  So cool.

By eighteen, everyone had wised up to Rand immaturity and egomania. Rand was viewed by older adolescents as juvenile and ‘not real literature.’

Adult people with power?  Never outgrew Ann Rand?  Wow.  So many juvenile, illiterate adults in the room.

Report this
Right Top, Site wide - Care2
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide

Like Truthdig on Facebook