Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
June 22, 2017 Disclaimer: Please read.

Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.

What’s Next for the Bill Cosby Sex-Assault Case?

Truthdig Bazaar
Resentment: A Comedy

Resentment: A Comedy

Gary Indiana

more items

Email this item Print this item

Cancun, Climate Change and WikiLeaks

Posted on Dec 7, 2010

By Amy Goodman

CANCUN, Mexico—Critical negotiations are under way here in Cancun, under the auspices of the United Nations, to reverse human-induced global warming. This is the first major meeting since the failed Copenhagen summit last year, and it is happening at the end of the hottest decade on record. While the stakes are high, expectations are low, and, as we have just learned with the release of classified diplomatic cables from WikiLeaks, the United States, the largest polluter in the history of the planet, is engaged in what one journalist here called “a very, very dirty business.”

Square, Story page, 2nd paragraph, mobile
Dirty business, indeed. In Copenhagen last year, President Barack Obama swept into town and sequestered a select, invite-only group of nations to hammer out what became known as “The Copenhagen Accord.” It outlined a plan for nations to make a public “pledge” to reduce carbon emissions, and to submit to some kind of verification process. In addition, wealthy, developed nations would, under the accord, pay billions of dollars to help poor, developing nations adapt to climate change and to pursue green-energy economies as they develop. That might sound nice, but the accord was designed, in effect, to supplant the Kyoto Protocol, a legally binding global treaty that more than 190 countries have signed. The United States, notably, has never signed Kyoto.

The WikiLeaks cables help explain what happened. One of the most outspoken critics of developed countries in the lead-up to Copenhagen, President Mohamed Nasheed of the Republic of Maldives, a nation of small islands in the Indian Ocean, ultimately signed on to the Copenhagen Accord. A secret U.S. State Department memo leaked via WikiLeaks, dated Feb. 10, 2010, summarized the consultations of the newly appointed Maldives ambassador to the U.S., Abdul Ghafoor Mohamed. The memo reports that the ambassador said, when meeting with U.S. deputy special envoy for climate change Jonathan Pershing, “Maldives would like to see that small countries, like Maldives, that are at the forefront of the climate debate, receive tangible assistance from the larger economies. Other nations would then come to realize that there are advantages to be gained by compliance.” He asked for $50 million, for projects to protect the Maldives from rising sea levels.

Pershing appears in a related memo, dated a week after the Maldives memo, regarding a meeting he had with Connie Hedegaard, the European commissioner for climate action, who played a key role in Copenhagen, as she does in Cancun. According to the memo, “Hedegaard suggested the AOSIS (Alliance of Small Island States) countries ‘could be our best allies’ given their need for financing.” Another memo from Feb. 17, 2010, reported, “Hedegaard responded that we will need to work around unhelpful countries such as Venezuela or Bolivia.” That was from a meeting with deputy national security adviser for international economic affairs Michael Froman. The memo went on, “Froman agreed that we will need to neutralize, co-opt or marginalize these and others such as Nicaragua, Cuba, Ecuador.”

The message is clear: Play along with the U.S., and the aid will flow. Oppose, and be punished.


Square, Site wide, Desktop


Square, Site wide, Mobile
Here in Cancun, I asked Pershing and the lead U.S. negotiator, special envoy for climate change Todd Stern, about the memos, and whether the U.S. role amounted to bribery or democracy. Stern wouldn’t comment on the WikiLeaks cables, and said nations “can’t ... ask for ... climate assistance and then ... turn around and accuse us of bribery.” I followed up by asking about countries that had U.S. aid money for climate stripped, like Ecuador and Bolivia, for opposing the Copenhagen Accord. He and Pershing ignored the question.

Pablo Solon, Bolivia’s ambassador to the United Nations, did have an answer. He said the facts speak for themselves: “One thing that I can say for sure is they cut aid to Bolivia and to Ecuador. That is a fact. And they said it very clearly: ‘We’re going to cut it, because you don’t support the Copenhagen Accord.’ And that is blackmail.” Solon is not optimistic about what can come from the Cancun negotiations. He told me: “The current pledges on the table will raise up the temperature by four degrees Celsius [7.2 degrees Fahrenheit]. That is catastrophic for human life and for Mother Earth.”

Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.

Amy Goodman is the host of “Democracy Now!,” a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 800 stations in North America. She is the author of “Breaking the Sound Barrier,” recently released in paperback and now a New York Times best-seller.

© 2010 Amy Goodman

Distributed by King Features Syndicate

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Join the conversation

Load Comments
LocalHero's avatar

By LocalHero, December 24, 2010 at 4:52 am Link to this comment

Whatcha smokin’ patriot10101? Can you hook me up?

Good grief.

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, December 11, 2010 at 12:05 pm Link to this comment

The Maldives puts the arm on the US for $50 million for its cooperation in Copenhagen, and it’s the US that’s accused of blackmail and bribery. The US fails to pay bribes to Ecuador and Bolivia and is accused of treachery.


Where’s the hookah smoking caterpillar, Alice?

Report this
markulyseas's avatar

By markulyseas, December 9, 2010 at 2:28 am Link to this comment

Climate change is another word for skulduggery and insidious negotiations.

Report this

By weq, December 8, 2010 at 7:45 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Ummm this has been happpen for years in the drug war. comply with our regeime, let us occupy your country or have funding cut.

how is this any different?

Report this

By Jim, December 8, 2010 at 3:47 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

safe to say that this piece is not “journalism”, yes?

Report this

By ray keith, December 8, 2010 at 2:49 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Ever wonder why so many are turning to religion lately?
Hope is no longer on the table with our democracy.

Report this

By Mr. Muhammad Zamiluddin Khan,'92,HSPH, a.k. a. Zam, December 8, 2010 at 8:24 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Cancun does argue the arguments that would be in the public domain for considerable period to come ,but do we really in stressing the Global alliance too much are in the business of pushing the “Natioanl Responsibility’ in coming forwardf aganist ‘Environmental Impairment”  a bit distant in our “Global Agenda”-I wonder.Muhammad Zamiluddin Khan’92,HSPH, a. k. a. Zamil Khan

Report this
Peter Knopfler's avatar

By Peter Knopfler, December 7, 2010 at 11:46 pm Link to this comment

I live downtown Cancun, small parades,a few gatherings,
nothing like copenhagen, this one is rather boring,
buildings empty out quickly.

Report this

By ejreed, December 7, 2010 at 9:00 pm Link to this comment

Cancun Conference Highlights Ironies of Modernity  
Environment ministers have convened at a luxurious convention center in sunny Cancun, Mexico, for an international climate conference. Meanwhile, locals are eking out a subsistence living in garbage-choked slums bordering a ever-shrinking rainforest.

Report this
Right Top, Site wide - Care2
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide

Like Truthdig on Facebook