LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 21, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Rise Up or Die

Revenge of the Bear: Russia Strikes Back in Syria

Tumblr Is Worth $1.1 Billion to Yahoo for One Reason: You

Real American Boy: How Our Byzantine Immigration System and Failed Economy May Have Made a Terrorist

DOJ Allegedly Spied on Fox News Correspondent, the FBI Investigates Bachmann, and More

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Too Soon to Tell: The Case for Hope, Continued
 * NEW! * Warming Climate Endangers U.K. Farming

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
While America Aged

While America Aged

By Roger Lowenstein
$17.13

Van Gogh: The Life

Van Gogh: The Life

By Steven Naifeh (Author), Gregory White Smith (Author)

more items

 
Reports

Canada’s Olympic Crackdown

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Dec 1, 2009

By Amy Goodman

Going to Canada? You may be detained at the border and interrogated. I was, last week. I was heading from Seattle to give a talk at the Vancouver Public Library. My detention provoked outrage across Canada, making national news. It has serious implications for the freedom of the press in North America.

I drove to the border with two colleagues. We showed our passports to the Canadian guard and answered standard questions about our purpose for entering Canada. No visas are necessary for U.S. citizens to enter.

The guard promptly told us to pull over, leave the car and enter the border crossing building.

What followed was a flagrant violation of freedom of the press and freedom of speech. A guard first demanded the notes for my talk. I was shocked. I explained that I speak extemporaneously. He would not back off. He demanded notes. I went out to the car and brought in a copy of my new book, a collection of my weekly columns called “Breaking the Sound Barrier.” I handed him a copy and said I start with the last column in it.

“I begin each talk with the story of Tommy Douglas,” I explained, “the late premier of Saskatchewan, father of Canada’s universal health care system.” Considered the greatest Canadian, Douglas happens to be actor Kiefer Sutherland’s grandfather, but I didn’t get that far.

Advertisement

“What else?” the armed guard demanded as we stood in the Douglas border facility.

“I’ll be talking about global warming and the Copenhagen climate summit.”

“What else?”

“I’ll address the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.”

“What else?” The interrogator was hand-writing notes, while another guard was typing at a computer terminal.

“Well, that’s about it.”

He looked at me skeptically. “Are you going to talk about the Olympics?” he asked.

I was puzzled. “Do you mean how President Obama recently traveled to Copenhagen to lobby for the Olympic Games to be held in Chicago?”

He shot back, “You didn’t get those. I am talking about the Vancouver 2010 Olympics.” Again, stunned, I said I wasn’t planning to.

The guard looked incredulous. “Are you telling me you aren’t going to be talking about the Olympics?” I repeatedly asserted that I was not.

Clearly not believing me, the guard and others combed through our car.

When I went out to check, he was on my colleague’s computer, poring through it.

Afterward, they pulled me in a back room and took my photo, then called in the others, one by one. Then they handed us back our passports with “control documents” stapled inside. The forms said we had to leave Canada within two days and had to check in with their border agency upon leaving. We went to the car—and discovered that they had rifled through our belongings and our papers and had gone into at least two of our three laptops. We raced to the event, where people had been told about our detention. We were 90 minutes late, but the room remained packed, the crowd incensed at their government.

It was then that I started learning about what was going on. The crackdown is widespread, it turns out. David Eby, executive director of the B.C. Civil Liberties Association, told me, “We have a billion dollars being spent on security here; protesters and activists have been identified as the No. 1 security threat to the Olympic Games ... we have new city bylaws that restrict the content of people’s signs.” According to critics, the police can raid your home if you place an anti-Olympic sign in your window. There are concerns that homeless people may be swept from Vancouver, about how much public funding the Games are receiving while vital social services are financially starved. Anti-Olympic activists—and their family and friends—are being followed, detained and questioned.

Our detention and interrogation were not only a violation of freedom of the press but also a violation of the public’s right to know. Because if journalists feel there are things they can’t report on, that they’ll be detained, that they’ll be arrested or interrogated; this is a threat to the free flow of information. And that’s the public’s loss, an Olympic loss for democracy.
 
Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.
 
Amy Goodman is the host of “Democracy Now!,” a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 800 stations in North America. She is the author of “Breaking the Sound Barrier,” recently released in paperback and now a New York Times bestseller.

 
© 2009 Amy Goodman

Distributed by King Features Syndicate


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Vancouver DUI, February 1, 2010 at 11:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Canada is still based on Monarchy and that has nothing to do with democratic principles.

Report this

By river, December 31, 2009 at 6:47 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Not to dismiss the problems in Vancouver surrounding the Olympics, but a
“famous” speaker who might be paid a large honorarium to lecture might not
qualify as a “tourist” for border-crossing purposes, and thus require a visa in
order to “work,” i.e. speak for compensation over and above their normal salaried
employment, even if they are a US citizen who normally can enter as a tourist
without a visa.

With the tightening of visa restrictions around the world, gone are the days when
one can count on travelling for work on a tourist visa in any country.

Report this

By DCambly, December 29, 2009 at 5:44 pm Link to this comment

Please tell Maher Arar and his family that we live in a country that still practices rights and freedoms.

Gullible Canadians still believe we are “a leader in civil liberties and human rights”.

Canada voted NO to allowing any humanitarian aid into Gaza in February. The Harper government tried again to destroy the rights and liberties of gay men and lesbians in this country. Canada is now pretending that it has nothing to do with “torture” in Afghanistan. The “Parties” in office use a loophole again by handing them over to people that do torture.

You have pointed to 2 articles that show our stupidity by following the Bush administrations draconian lawlessness. We now have in place ten spy agencies in Canada.

Canada is still based on Monarchy and that has nothing to do with democratic principles. Tell a lie enough times it can become the truth.

Report this

By Linda Solomon, December 28, 2009 at 3:57 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I’m the publisher of The Vancouver Observer and we covered this incident in the story posted on the front page of DemocracyNow’s website.  We just published another story today that is related: 
http://www.vancouverobserver.com/blogs/editorsdesk/2009/12/28/olympic-protesters-guide-legal-implications-civil-disobedience-british

And some time ago, I wrote yet another story about a Canadian who was refused entry to the US, the other side of the coin and an equally if not more outrageous incident involving the Department of Homeland Security. http://www.vancouverobserver.com/politics/investigations/2007/10/05/acid-free-america

I’m the publisher of the Vancouver Observer and a very grateful Canadian immigrant.  AS hapless as the border guards were in questioning Amy Goodman about the Olympics, Canada remains a leader in civil liberties and human rights.  These are complicated times and we have to fight harder than ever all over the world to protect democratic principles.  Nowhere is the commitment to these principles stronger than in Canada—-even if they sometimes fail miserably to hit the mark.

Report this

By jstern24, December 22, 2009 at 12:28 am Link to this comment

It’s not just the press. My girlfriend was just uninvited from canada at the Vancouver airport. We planned on spending 5 days in the country, but because of a D.U.I. (reduced to a wet and reckless) 9 years ago, she was told that she had to leave the country. Apparently it takes 10 years to be rehabilitated.

I fully believe this is because of the tightening of security measures leading up to the Olympics.

Report this

By Clovis, December 15, 2009 at 12:54 pm Link to this comment

I think `awakinea’ has it down succinctly. There is definitely a dilution in cause
and explosion in effect for any movement. In the sixties, it was war and
destruction and a police state in the offal office, and there were massive
marches and campuses were closed and there were bombings in the night and
there were dead left in the streets, and you know what is the cause célèbre of
the liberal arts school in our town today?

High tuition. I’m not kidding. They’re occupying buildings and leaving
destruction and threatening violence because California is broke and must
make mommy pay more for them to remain out of work.

And we have, by report of the protestors, twenty thousand instances of police
brutality in our town which features a law force of which Gandhi would be
proud. You dilute your message when you screech about trifles.

Report this

By awakinea, December 15, 2009 at 2:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

i’m an unabashed pragmatist and liberal. that said, i
listen to democracy now on npr in the states. find the
format more flair than substance and prone to
hyperbole. this article strikes that same note. my 2
cents

Report this

By Jambug, December 14, 2009 at 4:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Perhaps (and this is just a suggestion), we should all, oh, I dunno’, just shelve the Olympics until such a time as we can all pull our heads out of our collective asses.

Seems to me - and I could be completely wrong in thinking so - but until such a time comes when people stop allowing corporations to dictate how governments respond to those they govern, there’s really not much point in having “International Competitive Sporting Events” where the only real winners are Coca-Cola, RBC, GM, Petro-Canada, Panasonic and Ronald McDonald.

If you can’t stomach corporate interests over public rights, well, I mean, they’re YOUR dollars until you give them away.

Report this

By John Anderson, December 10, 2009 at 7:08 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Wow, after reading all of the comments posted here, I
don’t know what to think.  Maybe I should just stay
home and watch the Olympics on TV and then visit BC and
Alberta at a later time when it’s easier to
travel without being harassed.  I still love the
beauty found in Canada’s natural world, though. 
There’s nothing quite like the Canadian Rockies and its
lakes and streams and wildlife and botanical wonders. 
It is truly an amazing place.  Canadians are greatly
blessed in this respect! GREATLY blessed!

Report this

By Mathew "RennDawg" Renner, December 7, 2009 at 3:12 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Is anyone really suprised. Canada is a country where they have no free speech or freedom of religous expression. If you are a preacher who, like me, believes that the Bible is the literal Word of God and you preach that homosexuality is a sin you can go to prison. There are preachers is prison for saying that homosexuality is a sin, that men should be leaders of the household and wives should submit to there husbands authority. Weither you agree with that or not the right to believe and preach should be absolute. In Canada you go to jail. So I am not suprised about Amy being detained at the Canadian Border.

Report this

By Clovis, December 4, 2009 at 3:08 pm Link to this comment

I see: “Oh, come now. I fail to see how your civil liberties are being crushed. You
show up to tell us how hip you are by letting everyone know how useless the
article is and how bored you are by it. That’s hardly a dissenting point of view.”

I have always held that the great communication break is not with the writing
but the reading. For instance, where this side of standard issue strawman-
generation did I even suggest my “civil liberties are being crushed” or how
“useless the article is” or how “bored” I am by it. I remark that the claim that
this individual is a cause célèbre throughout North America because she was
harassed at the border is a bit of overkill. Also, rather than bored, I am amused
at the Don Quixote who has appointed himself as her inept defender.

Again, I say, the so-called harassment of Amy Goodman at the border differs
not much from the standard I remember from my trips to Mexico, and it is
much fairer than my only attempt to enter the great nation to the north, for I
was not allowed in at all. And I think no one has made good on this seemingly
preposterous statement: “My detention provoked outrage across Canada,
making national news. It has serious implications for the freedom of the press
in North America.”

Report this

By DCambly, December 4, 2009 at 1:18 pm Link to this comment

“2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
... (b) Freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication..”

Expression is not interpreted as freedom of speech. The term “expression” was added into the Charter to ensure that the “arts” community was protected. The Supreme Court of Canada came to the conclusion.

As to the media the head of the CBC is appointed by the government in office. 95% of all other media is owned by 2 corporations in Canada. The CRTC which governs the media is also appointed by the government of Canada.

Amy came to Canada to speak to a group about the continued development of an independent media. The number of listeners to College and University radio in Canada is very low and fractured. (Thank you Amy for your thoughts). If you want to hear opposing views give them your support and one day there may be freedom of speech in colonial Canada.

Until then be happy with the “rip and read” stories from Reuters and Media Corp. You can read them on their websites in the morning, and then have them read to you on CBC, Global and CTV later that night.

As a few mentioned Campbell along with Harper are behind the border harassment. Campbell has done everything in his power to cover up the true costs of the winter Olympics. Is there any media in Canada digging into that story and telling Canadians the truth?

That story would be freedom of speech and we will not be hearing about that ... will we?

Report this

By CROFT, December 4, 2009 at 11:31 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I so agree with the paranoia created by the Games.  Not only the gvt is freaking out but all of this is orchestrated by the actual organizers VANOC who are spreading fear to everyone.  Come on last week the police is Vancouver was proudly announcing that they had infiltrated the protesters group! Wow, how democratic.. and doesn’t the police have anything better to do?? Please lets get back to reality , we are talking about a sports event.  I live in Vancouver and i think the police, the city (which has lost all its powers on this mater) and VANOC are behaving like dictators. I wish no one comes to the games and I really hope there won’t be any snow. I am sorry Ms Goodman had to witness such behaviors.  Remember what happened two years ago with the deadly tasering of a Polish immigrant!

Report this

By FWIW, December 4, 2009 at 10:57 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Just to reply to Clovis:
Ms. Goodman does have “First Amendment” rights in Canada, they’re just not called that.  Up here they’re referred to as Charter Rights.  Specifically, from section 2 b of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms:
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
... (b) Freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;

FWIW

Report this
Peetawonkus's avatar

By Peetawonkus, December 4, 2009 at 10:32 am Link to this comment

Clovis,
Oh, come now. I fail to see how your civil liberties are being crushed. You show up to tell us how hip you are by letting everyone know how useless the article is and how bored you are by it. That’s hardly a dissenting point of view.

Report this

By Clovis, December 4, 2009 at 10:11 am Link to this comment

Peetawonkus says: “So…having learned nothing, we can expect to not hear from
you again?”

Let me see where I’ve heard this before. One who offers an unpleasant comment
(one in which another disagrees) should disappear. And this appended to a
column on an overblown reaction to just such perceived suppression of speech.

Cute.

Report this

By r4i karte, December 4, 2009 at 12:01 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Well what to say the entire issue has taken a very dramatic and horrifying turn. Anti-Olympic organizers in Vancouver scored a hat trick over the last seven days. She was held interrogated for 90 minutes and the Immigration Gestapo searched her car. They also demanded to know what she’d be talking about in Vancouver and Victoria and insisted she leave the country within 48 hours.

Report this

By Lalo Espejo, December 3, 2009 at 6:50 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Canada’s Olympic Paranoia is explained here:
http://www.vancouverobserver.com/politics/2009/12/03/vancouvers-olympic-paranoia-explained

Report this
Peetawonkus's avatar

By Peetawonkus, December 3, 2009 at 2:26 pm Link to this comment

Clovis,
So…having learned nothing, we can expect to not hear from you again?

Report this

By Clovis, December 3, 2009 at 1:58 pm Link to this comment

Here’s what I have learned so far.

1) Ms Goodman had her First Amendment rights violated ...
2) in Canada, where they don’t exist ...
3) although she was a speaker, and not per se a reporter ...
4) anyway, this sparked outrage somewhere (I can’t find it outside underground
blogs) and has serious Free Press implications (loop back to 1) above).

Thanks to all who contributed to my circular learning file.

Report this

By Skookum1, December 3, 2009 at 1:35 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Canada’s government is not Liberal, it is big-Conservative (=GOP clones).  And it’s not so much the CANADIAN government that’s behind Olympic paranoia, it’s the BRITISH COLUMBIA government, with the federal Tory government backing them up (the BC governing party goes by the name Liberal, but they are arch-neoconservative and very much distanced from the national Liberal Party).  The operations of the Integrated Security Unit, which was created for the Olympics, include the BC division of the Canadian Border Services.  It’s the BC government whose attitudes/views were reflected in the nasty behavioiur of the border guards.

As someone above noted, criticisms of our governments by no are near impossible to air/reach print, unless safely sanitized or twisted; in some ways it’s a miracle that Ms. Goodman’s detention at the border was even covered by the CBC; I haven’t looked for coverage in any Canwest Global newspapers or broadcast media (our equivalent to Fox News, with Izzy Asper in the role of Rupert Murdoch).  This has meant a proliferation of independent media, including blogs, trying to pick up the slack on political and economic news the major media won’t cover, not honestly anyway.

The Olympics and the hype/paranoia surrounding the games are in many ways a smokescreen for huge changes to the province’s governing structure and a sell-off (more like a giveaway) of the province’s resources to US investors.  In relation to this, a number of current court cases implicating the governing party and its politicians - including the Premier (equiv to a US governor) - are underway, with barely any coverage in the major media - except articles helping to cover them up or downplay their import.  I hope Ms Goodman is reading this, or another earnest investigative repoerter from the US, who wants to take on t he involvement of Us corporations in corrupt practices with the BC government, and that not only the Olympics comes under external scrutiny (though there’s plenty to do with the Olympics alone worth a whole book full of columns/reports).

I would also suggest that alternative media from the US intending on covering the Games establish a newsdesk in Whatcom County, which adjoins Greater Vancouver.  This would, theoretically, avoid any overt interference by the Integrated Security Unit; though reporters crossing the line regularly would probably be similarly harrassed (unless because of the embarrassment re Ms Goodman a new directive of “hands off” is given to the border guards).

Report this
Peetawonkus's avatar

By Peetawonkus, December 3, 2009 at 1:29 pm Link to this comment

Larry Geiger
You’re absolutely wrong. It is exactly a freedom of the press/freedom of speech issue. No, she didn’t go to Canada to talk about the Olympics. But they specifically singled that issue out—and refused to believe her when she denied it was her reason to come to Canada. The entire detention was exactly about intimidating or denying entry to people perceived as journalists who might give unfavorable coverage to the Olympics. It is not only about squashing dissent, it is about even speaking or writing about dissent.

Report this

By anne bitburg, December 3, 2009 at 11:58 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

On a calmer note, what is happening at the border between Canada and the US, and happening by members of each countries’ border patrol units, is manifestation of President Bush and VP Dick Cheney’s foreign policy. A policy based on Machiavellian psychological pathologies. The bombing of symbolic buildings in America (military, political (attempted that is), and economic might and form of economics),  had leaders of other nations, including Canada, join the sick bandwagon.

Americans voted president Bush into power twice. They did not questions the storyline about the high jacking of planes. They did not question their media corporate owned media (truth to power, remember this?). Instead, they chose to go back and shop and continue to be drones, not engaged citizens. It is no wonder that democracy is all but dead in America.

It would be lazy thinking, however, to only blame Americans and America Empire for this border patrol fall out. Where are the citizens of the countries that contributed to the Reditions, that had other nations do America’s and other Western nations’ alleged necessary dirty work of torture - while saying through their foreign affair secetaries and ministers that the West is about democracy?

The UK, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Ireland, Canada and a few other Bush followers decided to go along with making the ‘terrorist’ the replacement for the Cold War ideology.  There is money to be made in paranoia.

And, there is power to embrace for a wee, wee, bored and disillusioned with one’s life border patrol.  A moment of being a Big Man/Woman, but not facing up that you are mere fodder for the Power Elite. So he or she grabs power when they can.

Read the Swiss psychiatrist Erik Fromm’s books. He wrote about the human condition and violence, our being so easy to succumb to dominating others: parent to child, teacher to student, big military to those with small ones, men and their muscular strength using it against their womenfolk and girlfolks. So there you go. Dominance is primitive behavior and those with weak egos, are the most vulnerable to doing harm to others when in a place of power.

I would strongly suggest that all clean up their own countries’ glass houses, because there is a lot to clean. While President Bush and VP Cheney may not be in the White House, the politik operatives and the multinationals who ask the political leaders to do their bidding (with the help of passive and inactive citizens), are still running the show. The only way to stop this is to be informed, share information about such incidents referenced in this article with others and to organize and globalize in standing up to and speaking truth to power. More focus should be directed at multinationals - politicians always have their pockets open, seeking crumbs just so they can have a dinner moment with the overly paid CEOs of Wall Street (and their wannabes). So, while America is our Era’s Roman Empire (without building beautiful fountains and viaducts), many pols, CEOs and the Power Elite apparatus is making money from it - only by average people keeping eyes wide open and sharing information about misdeeds to humans, economic systems, the environment, etc., will this change.

I myself think that we are in the last chapter of the Dutch-given global capitalism turned British Empire industrialization (that took the heart out of community and a closer relationship to hearth and work), and America’s thinking technological progress solves all problems. All of human experiences are but chapters, paragraphs and pages. Like other Eras, this one will pass. This time, however, like Mary Shelly’s monster, our self built Dr Frankenstein’s monster may be the thing that does human nature in - a hubris, created from our own human nature.

Nothing says the world, trees, plants, fish and warm blooded creatures would miss the greedy and overextended human animal. Nothing.

Report this

By Larry Geiger, December 3, 2009 at 8:03 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It’s not a freedom of the press issue.  You didn’t go there as a reporter.  You went as a speaker and commentator.  You are no longer a reporter.  You are the same as any other citizen, celebrity, rabble rouser or public official.  Let’s not confuse this with freedom of the press.

Report this

By Clovis, December 2, 2009 at 5:26 pm Link to this comment

In Germany you cannot deny the Holocaust. In the UK, speaking ill of public
personalities can be severely punished, whether true or not. Once in Canada
there was the sort of sensational sex and multiple murder case, with an
attractive defendent, as to send Nancy Grace into ecstatic conniptions. And yet
not a word was allowed in the Canadian press. The object was an unprejudiced
jury, but there is another salubrious serendipity in the absence of
sensationalizing the despicable: the mindless clones are not aroused. Think if
Columbine - or, going back to the first epic publicly celebrated serial murderer,
Starkweather - were not published nor broadcast. How exactly would we be
hurt by not bathing in the blood and gore?

Some murders were committed, and the perps are also dead, and it is a sad
commentary on humanity, the end.

Report this

By D.B. Delapenha, December 2, 2009 at 2:47 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Try not to judge the situation by the actions of just a few people. Border crossings have become a target for complaints but we must realize that those appointed to protect have a serious responsibility and in these days (after 9/11) extreme measures have become the order of the day for the flimsiest of reasons. Few will appreciate that we have been probably saved many times from the actions of people who would cause us harm because of the seemingly ‘extreme’ actions of Border Guards, on both sides.

Report this

By DCambly, December 2, 2009 at 10:57 am Link to this comment

I was actually wondering if Amy would get into Canada. The government and border guards would not allow British MP George Galloway into our country to speak last spring.

The “fact” is that freedom of speech is not protected in Canada. Before anyone strikes back at my comment read Canada’s Constitution and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. You will not find freedom of speech listed in either documents.

There is a loop hole on “freedom to speak” in Canada. Our MPs in Ottawa and MLAs in every Province must give their oath of allegiance to the Queen of England otherwise they cannot speak while in office.

Over the years Canadians have freedom of speech by proxy from the United States Constitution. We hear it all the time on television from the US. Go ahead and write critical articles in Canada against any government policy. First thing you will notice is that nobody will print or air the articles in any form. You can blog your brains out and know that nobody will ever publish your words in Canada.

The mention of “freedom of expression” has never been challenged by the Supreme Court of Canada. I came face to face with freedom of speech in 2003 and it does not exist for us Canadians.

No I will not give an oath of allegiance to our feudal master the Queen of England. Amy was very wise to leave the Olympics in Vancouver out of her discourse with border security.

Report this

By Clovis, December 2, 2009 at 9:43 am Link to this comment

We were interrogated quite rigorously near Vancouver. It was 1969, and I was
scouting locations for the next few years, choosing between Canada and Ft
Polk, LA. With me were three others, one of us a Vietnam vet with a steel plate
protecting what had been exposed by a recoilless rifle round. We were denied
entry due to insufficient funds and general raffish appearance.

When returning from Mexico on any border crossing, we just pulled into
secondary, realizing we would have a more extensive review than the average
turista. The return was always the worse, but my friend once had to shave his
beard to enter La Republica, which he promptly did. They had their quota of
hippies that season, I guess.

When I read “My detention provoked outrage across Canada, making national
news. It has serious implications for the freedom of the press in North
America.”-  I cringe. I wonder if by chance the writer is not bitten with the
grandiosity bug any degree of celebrity seems to bring. I think of Oprah, who
felt slighted because Herrod’s closing time interfered with her shopping plans
and hauled the president of the company onto her show to kiss her ring.

This tremendous threat to freedom and democracy reminds me of a writer who
was offered condolences when his father, a naturalist, passed away.

“What a blow to science!”

“Science took it very well.”

Now let’s see if this Truth be Dug.

Report this
Peetawonkus's avatar

By Peetawonkus, December 2, 2009 at 6:44 am Link to this comment

The point of this article is not how border crossings are uncomfortable affairs. Some of the posters here seem to feel if it gets a little rocky for a U.S. visitor going into Canada, well, it’s simply tit-for-tat. The point of the article is that Canadian government paranoia over the B.C. Olympics is playing havoc with freedom of the press, both inside Canada and with international visitors. If I were Canadian, I would be concerned about that.

If governments, including supposedly Liberal, tolerant and humane governments like Canada, can ride roughshod over freedom of the press for political reasons then Canada might not be as free as it fancies itself.

Part of the outrage over this, both Canadian and American, stems from the belief that Canada ought to be better than this.

Report this

By P. Stevens, December 2, 2009 at 5:16 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

American customs agents have been belligerent, aggressive, unfriendly, and
ornery since the election of G. Bush and Co.  The passport thing was the brain
child of American, not Canada.  Do Americans resent being treated in the same
way Canadians are routinely treated entering your country?  Gee, that’s too bad.

Report this

By camnai, December 2, 2009 at 3:30 am Link to this comment

The Olympics are a fascist sublimation anyway, so this sort of thuggishness goes
with the territory. As a Tokyo resident, I am really happy we didn’t get the 2016
games, as is just about everybody I know here. Too bad for Vancouver that they
have them now.

As Canadians we are subject to enormous influence from U.S. media, and I
suppose it is only to be expected that the functionaires we pay to monitor
smuggling would jump at the chance to carry guns and play homeland hero, just
as their American counterparts have done. It’s ironic that the massive failure of
security services that led to 9/11 resulted in those same security services being
given more power.

May Amy Goodman sell a whole bunch of books because of this.

Report this

By dave, December 1, 2009 at 10:33 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The myth of the enlightened Canadian is just that, a myth. We have lots of people with all kinds of political views, including extremes. A couple of the comments above reflect the extreme anti-Americanism some people harbour. While the American border guards are usually not friendly, neither are the Canadian guards. And I’ve not heard of any respected Canadian journalists held up at the U.S. border in recent years or questioned about their views on particular issues. In fact, busloads of Canadian protesters were allowed across the border to attend those demonstrations in Seattle about ten years ago that turned violent.

Report this

By realityseeker, December 1, 2009 at 9:17 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

What a joke.  I’m a Canadian who used to visit the US twice a month for shopping.  Now I don’t go because of the hostility of the US border people.  You Americans dish out much more to visitors than seems to be described here.  I’ll probably not spend another dollar in the US ever again.  Canada trying to protect the Olympics is nothing compared to the daily harrassment happening in reverse.

Report this

By Strop, December 1, 2009 at 7:50 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Is this a US citizen complaining about how another nation operates border control? Talk about pot calling kettle names. An Aussie, has to give up fingerprints and a photograph to visit the US, just because they come from Australia. Perhaps all countries should treat American visitors the way they treat everyone else. Onya Canada!

Report this

By Andrey, December 1, 2009 at 6:06 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I cannot believe that the barbaric and wholly fascistic ferocity evidenced by some of these replies actually emanates from the supposedly enlightened citizenry of Canada who, at least in the long-dead past, were often held up as shining examples to the world of a charmingly good-hearted and fair-minded people.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.