LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 25, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Marching in Chicago: Resisting Rahm Emanuel’s Neoliberal Savagery

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

Corporate Tax Cheats by the Numbers

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * A Cooler Century? Wait and See
New York City’s Summers May Heat Up

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Can Democrats ‘Up Their Game’?

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Dec 6, 2010

By E.J. Dionne, Jr.

From Ohio, Rep. Mary Jo Kilroy describes “the worry, the anguish and sometimes despair” among her constituents and urges President Barack Obama to spend more time with people who don’t make “six-figure incomes.”

From Pennsylvania, Rep. Joe Sestak says Americans are angry at a government that failed to guard them against economic catastrophe.

And from Virginia, Rep. Tom Perriello suggests that voters are less interested in “bipartisanship” than “postpartisanship.” He explains: “What they’re looking for is someone who solves the problem, not for a solution that happens to be half way between the two parties.”

Last week, I sat down with these Democrats, who were defeated in November, to get their sense of what the election means for the future and how the president should respond. Their observations were more revealing than the abstractions that conventional punditry typically invokes to explain what “the people” supposedly said.

They spoke just off the floor of the House shortly after it approved an extension of the Bush tax cuts only for families earning under $250,000 a year. This vote of principle was unfairly dismissed as “symbolic,” but Perriello said something that pointed to the opportunity Obama and the Democrats had kicked away.

Advertisement

“Why not up the game,” he asked, “instead of playing the same old game?” Perriello was in no mood to criticize his already beleaguered party. But his comment pointed to how it might have avoided a debilitating tax cut endgame. 

Rather than allow the debate to focus on an old tax measure from the beginning of the decade, Obama and the Democrats should early on have sought to replace the Bush tax cut. Their proposal could have shifted the tax burden away from middle-income taxpayers toward the wealthy while providing strong incentives for job creation and innovation along lines suggested by Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va.

Being the party of “new and improved” surely beats getting trapped in a fight whose terms were set entirely by Republicans.

Improvement is what Kilroy’s constituents, bludgeoned by long-term economic difficulties, are desperately seeking. The party’s heavy losses this year among white working-class voters, she said, should not have come as a shock.

“I watched them in the last four years go from being anxious about the future to being worried, but also hopeful during the 2008 campaign, to being very angry.” To explain, she invoked the world as seen by a person “who worked at Siemens for 25 years.”

“You have a son who is a high school basketball player and wants to go to college—and then your factory goes off to Mexico,” she says, “And you’re a man of a certain age and another factory or another employer won’t give you a second look. Think of the despair felt by that person.”

Such voters see Washington as “a place where their interests get sold out.” What they want, she says, is “to feel they’re being treated as well as the bankers who get bailed out.”

Sestak, who narrowly lost a race for U.S. Senate, argues that the electorate was moved less by a generalized hatred of government than by fury over its failure to prevent the financial crisis. “Government hadn’t protected them from this calamity—and they hadn’t done anything wrong,” he says.

The election outcome, he said, “was a vote to neutralize government because no one has been making a case for what government can do or should do.” A starting point might be fleshing out Sestak’s vision of American society—“a nation of individual opportunity allied with the common enterprise”—that is a rather inspired alternative to both collectivism and social indifference.

For his part, Perriello sees an opening for politicians who set their minds to offering answers to the dejected Americans Kilroy describes. “There’s a great opportunity here,” he says. “Somebody has to come up with an agenda to make and build and grow things in this country. We have to say to that person that we haven’t broken faith with you.”

Democrats, he says, need to see the quest for social justice “as an entrepreneurial challenge as opposed to a compassion challenge,” the idea being that government and business need to be inventive enough to create a new economy that fulfills the promises of the old.

Yes, and there’s a certain president who got elected by sketching such a vision, wrapped in the words hope and change. Kilroy, Sestak and Perriello are all telling him that’s what the voters are still looking for.

E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com.
   
© 2010, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Peetawonkus's avatar

By Peetawonkus, December 7, 2010 at 3:35 pm Link to this comment

JDmysticDJ,
“Radicals, fire-brands, and renegades demand the impossible from Democrats, and consider anything less than the impossible to be a treacherous betrayal. Such stupidity only serves to discredit Democrats, advance the interests of Corporatists, destroy any hope of a coalition to oppose Corporatist agendas, and push us farther to the right on the political spectrum.”

Generally speaking, it’s never a good idea to label people who reserve the right to criticize the President and his policies as indulging in “stupidity.”

Indeed, there are some who would argue that continuing to expect Democrats to be the Party of the People is a little on the “thick” side.

Report this
JDmysticDJ's avatar

By JDmysticDJ, December 7, 2010 at 7:35 am Link to this comment

The Stock Market crashed in 1929; by the time Roosevelt took office in 1933 25% of the American people were unemployed. There was no significant Social Safety Net in 1933. Roosevelt had over 60% Democratic Majorities in both houses of Congress.

The Emergency Banking Act was put together by officials in the Hoover Administration and received bi-partisan support. Only the far left, who wanted to nationalize the Banks, (Good for them), objected to the bill.

Wikipedia

“March 10, 1933: The Economy Act of 1933. Roosevelt, in sending this act to Congress, warned that if it did not pass, the country faced a billion dollar deficit. The act balanced the federal budget by cutting the salaries of government employees and cutting pensions to veterans by as much as 15 percent. It intended to reassure the deficit hawks that the new president was fiscally conservative. Although the act was heavily protested by left-leaning members of congress, it passed by an overwhelming margin”

Roosevelt was not the left-wing ideologue he is portrayed to be, he reacted to the circumstances of his day, and helped people to deal with the suffering of the Republican Great Depression.

The Reforestation Relief Act, Senate Bill S. 598 was introduced on March 27, passed both houses of Congress and was on the President’s desk to be signed on March 31, 1933. Apparently this act was not obstructed (Blocked) by Republicans in the Senate.

Only ten Senators voted against the may 12, 1933 Farm Legislation.

And on and on. It should be clear that Roosevelt and the Democrats did not face the lock step ideological obstruction so evident in our political life today. One might conclude that there is more opposition to New Deal Programs today, than there was when the programs were enacted.

Opposition to New Deal Programs came from what Roosevelt referred to as “Economic Royalists.” They were Free Market Capitalists, anti-Left Nazi sympathizers, and reactionaries.

Again, it all comes down to political realities, and, “The Art of the Possible.” Every proposal, initiative, and piece of Legislation put forth by Democrats to advance the interests of the people, against corporate interests, is opposed, weakened, obstructed, or blocked, by right-wing, corporate sycophants in the Senate.

Radicals, fire-brands, and renegades demand the impossible from Democrats, and consider anything less than the impossible to be a treacherous betrayal. Such stupidity only serves to discredit Democrats, advance the interests of Corporatists, destroy any hope of a coalition to oppose Corporatist agendas, and push us farther to the right on the political spectrum.

Report this

By jonathonk99, December 6, 2010 at 11:49 pm Link to this comment

Wasn’t the National Recovery Act (NIRA)  a conspiracy against small business?  It
allowed for nothing but a bunch of corporate leaders to get together and form a
cartel in order to control prices & beat out competition.  At least that’s my take
from what I’ve read.

Report this

By eir, December 6, 2010 at 9:35 pm Link to this comment

The Republicans are not bluffing, nor will this be anything other than the beginning of harsher and harsher demands. 

Wall Street’s investment in the Democratic party, and notably, in this faux populist, traitor of a president has made big returns for them (that’s the way they roll).

Imagine if we had had a real “hope and change” president:


1933

March 4  Inauguration Day. Franklin Delano Roosevelt becomes President of the United States.

March 5  The President proclaims four-day Bank Holiday with the suspension of banking transactions and gold and currency exports.

March 9  Hundred Days Congressional session begins. Congress passes the Emergency Banking Act.

March 15  Congress passes the Economy Act

March 31  Congress passes the Reforestation Relief Act, (establishing the Civilian Conservation Corps).

April 19  The President announces US departure from the gold standard.

May 12  Congress passes the Emergency Farm Mortgage Act. Congress passes the Federal Emergency Relief Act. The President signs the Agricultural Adjustment Act.

May 18 Congress establishes the Tennessee Valley Authority.

May 27  Congress passes the Federal Securities Act.

June 6  Congress passes the National Employment System Act.

June 13  Congress passes the Home Owners Refinancing Act.

June 16 The end of the Hundred Days session. Congress passes the National Industrial Recovery Act, (setting up the National Recovery Administration), the Farm Credit Act, and the Banking Act of 1933.


We can see why Wall Street was so interested in and contributed the most to our little sock puppet presidentThey did not want a repeat of FDR’s 1932 Victory Over Wall Street again.

Concede and die. The time to be figuring this out for patriots is past.

Report this

By the worm, December 6, 2010 at 9:06 pm Link to this comment

For Obama to attempt to characterize this ‘compromise’ as ‘solving problems’ is to
an insult to every citizen in America.

There is no spin cycle that can convince any voter of the wisdom of this action.

Obama keeps losing voters, but more importantly voters keep losing.

And the President seems to be at the forefront of the give away to the wealthy.

Report this

By the worm, December 6, 2010 at 9:00 pm Link to this comment

The author asks:

Can Democrats ‘Up Their Game’?

My response is only by voting against the nominally Democratic President.

I cannot convey the absolute dismay with which independents, liberals and
sensible Republicans face the President’s actions.

The vote coming in the House will tell us how many Democrats there are left in
Congress.

We can scratch off the President, many in the Senate. Let’s see how many
Democrats are left in the House.

But, be prepared to wash your hands of the Democratic Party. It has almost
ceased to exist. Farewell.

Report this
JDmysticDJ's avatar

By JDmysticDJ, December 6, 2010 at 7:41 pm Link to this comment

According to CNN Radio News, the compromise calls for extending the tax rates for another two years, and extending unemployment compensation for 13 months. Without extending the current tax rates, there will be no extension of unemployment compensation. Hard choices are unavoidable. Are you willing to deny unemployment benefits to the truly needy, in order to deny the Republicans their filthy tax breaks?

That’s the political reality. You can condemn the Democrat’s spinelessness if it gets you off, but realize that in this case, Democrats developing the spine you wish them to have may break the backs of the truly needy. Are the Republicans bluffing? Do you want the Democrats to call this bluff (?)?

Most “Middle Class” Americans are over extended, or underwater, allowing the tax cuts for the “Middle class” to expire will be a hardship on the “Middle class” and decrease demand in the economy. That, and possibly denying an income for the most needy, will be the outcome of calling the Republican bluff(?).

Do you believe that both Political Parties, the media, and the American people have bought into Austerity, and that policies to promote Prosperity are no longer on the table? Not that it maters, the Right, the media, you, and the American People will condemn the Democrats i.e. government, regardless of how this dilemma is concluded. The Republicans will ride this tidal wave of anti-government sentiment into a total Corporatist takeover.

Many prophesy a coming inflation; I lack the economic prognostication skills to know if these prophesies are prescient, but if the Fed keeps pulling money out of thin air in order to finance their financial institutions, it would seem that inflation is inevitable. Currency wars may also occur. Under the current economic crisis, wages will not increase, working people, and people on a fixed income, will be further impoverished, the value of the dollar will decrease, and cost of living increases will be frozen.

Cheney told Treasury secretary Paul O’Neil, “Reagan proved deficits don’t matter.” Paul O’Neil was looking for a job a month later, and Paulson joined the no tax and spend Bush team. If the tax increases for the richest Americans are enacted, our deficit will be decreased by 700 Billion (One trillion when factoring in interest,) over the next ten years, about the same amount for one year of military spending. Few if any of our politicians, least of all the Republicans, are willing to subject our military to Austerity Measures.

Wikipedia

“In October 2007, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that additional war costs over the next 10 years would range between $570 billion and $1.1 trillion, depending on troop levels, with overall costs for the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and the “global war on terror” reaching $1.2 trillion to $1.7 trillion by 2017.”

USA Today

“Going into the 2010 fiscal year, which began Oct. 1, more than $900 billion had been budgeted for military and diplomatic operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and other regions in the war on terrorism. Even before Obama’s latest plan, the administration had requested about $140 billion for fiscal 2010, which would bring the total above $1 trillion.”

10 times $140 billion is 1.4 trillion.

Washington Post

The Iraq War Will Cost Us $3 Trillion, and Much More

By Linda J. Bilmes and Joseph E. Stiglitz
Sunday, March 9, 2008
There is no such thing as a free lunch, and there is no such thing as a free war. The Iraq adventure has seriously weakened the U.S. economy, whose woes now go far beyond loose mortgage lending. You can’t spend $3 trillion—yes, $3 trillion—on a failed war abroad and not feel the pain at home.

“Welcome to the New American Century.” Hopefully you’ll be able to leave a few bucks to your kids, they’ll need it.

Report this

By ardee, December 6, 2010 at 6:29 pm Link to this comment

Shenonymous, December 6 at 2:25 pm Link to this comment

ardee you speak well about the reality of politics in America today. As a life-long Democrat in the classic liberal camp, I have reserved my opinion of Obama and Democrats for two years thinking the rabbit would be pulled out of the hat, and strong voices for the
people would prevail but it is time to face the real world. 

Blind pigs find acorns every so often, I guess I found one here. But thanks and thanks for climbing on board, better late than never. Next step is to chart a path for political reform extant of the Democratic Party methinks…..

Do not minimize your importance, every vote counts, every mind that turns from the fraud of our two party system is a step forward ( or left), every citizen who stands up and says no more to the Duopoly helps to halt, ever so slightly perhaps but halts nevertheless, the creeping fascism that envelops us.

The wars continue, war on drugs, war on terrorism and the war on working families, children and seniors rage unabated. The money migrates ever faster to those who really run this nation, and for their own benefit. Thus every voice raised in opposition to this trending is an important addition.

We should discuss third party politics , and soon. Perhaps after Obama’s next betrayal?

Report this
Shenonymous's avatar

By Shenonymous, December 6, 2010 at 2:26 pm Link to this comment

Right, and they can’t beat the Republicans at their snakeoil
game! That is why the 49%ers have to regroup and do something
by 2012.  Also force the Democrat senate and house reps to throw
wrenches into the “game” at every turn.  They have to be the ones to
obstruct now. 

Tit for tat is the only way to even the sides.  All strategists say TFT
is the best game plan to win any conflict.  It won’t even take every
Democrat in Congress:  Only a handful of thinking responsible
Democrats to shove Republicanism up Republican tight self-serving padoopas and neutralize the bend-over Democrats.  That is now my new name for them.  The Bend-Overs.

Report this
moonraven's avatar

By moonraven, December 6, 2010 at 2:11 pm Link to this comment

What game?

Those chickenshits couldn’t beat their way out of a paper sack!

Report this

By Michael Cavlan RN, December 6, 2010 at 1:42 pm Link to this comment

Can Democrats “up their game?”

What, have they not supported enough wars, torture, ripping Bill of Rights to
shreds, supported corporate healthcare etc etc?

Who in the hell wants more of that?

Oh yeah. Democrats. Along with their partners in crimes, Republicans.

Please carry on with the Kabuki Theatre of pseudo opposition.. We need the
entertainment.

Sigh

Report this
Peetawonkus's avatar

By Peetawonkus, December 6, 2010 at 12:40 pm Link to this comment

Can Democrats “up their game?” No. If they did, they wouldn’t be Democrats anymore.

Report this
Shenonymous's avatar

By Shenonymous, December 6, 2010 at 12:26 pm Link to this comment

This nation will see just how much clout Pelosi has. The compromise
of keeping the tax cuts for two years is absurd.  It is exactly what the
drooling Republicans are hoping since January 1, 2011 they take over
the House and will work their asses off in getting the George Bush tax
cuts for the wealthy permanently installed.  After the two-year fiasco
just suffered, it cannot possibly be imagined in anyone’s wildest
dreams the Democratic politicians of the Senate will do anything to
stop it.  If all the tax cuts sunset, so be it.  The world will know it was
because the Republicans held the country prisoner to their fealty and
devotion to the wealthy.

It is wondered, to nudge a bit farther as ITW says, if Obama and Reid
just don’t pervertedly revel being rolled over and over and over.  There
really ain’t no clover and I think the 49% of Americans who did
not vote Republican ought to unite and reclaim America for all of the
people.  The Republicans seem to think this country is just for them
and that they represent the majority of the people.  That simply is not
true.  They had a simple majority of simpletons. I think that if a strong
movement for liberal interests gets started, it would be an incredible
surprise just how strong it would be.  The people need a strong and
charismatic leader.  Look at what Obama pretended to be!  Only this
time a tried and true liberal is needed, one who has shown their
political brawn.  There are a few:  Chuck Schumer, Howard Dean,
Anthony Weiner and there are a few others.  We now have two years
to get that snowball going.  By November 2012, it should be gigantic!

Report this
mrfreeze's avatar

By mrfreeze, December 6, 2010 at 12:24 pm Link to this comment

E.J. - The answer is NO. A big fat whopping NO.

Report this
RayLan's avatar

By RayLan, December 6, 2010 at 12:19 pm Link to this comment

I doesn’t seem that Obama knows which way is up unless it’s his rear end as the Reps stick it to him and he takes it like the compromising bitch he is.
Obama’s timing is atrocious. The job issue should have been addressed right after Wall Street was slammed with stiff regulations and many CEOs were prosecuted and jailed for financial crimes. But Obama is too scared, poor little change-maker.

Report this

By stephen geller, December 6, 2010 at 12:12 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Watch Obama in 2012 as he loses: having been chewed up and spit out by the
forces that he held out to, he’ll have the rest of his life, at a million dollars a talk,
to say that “he’d rather be right and a one-term president,” than wrong and a
two-term president.

And he’s right.

And he was: both to the right, and a one-term president.

And our progressive and liberal histories got him elected, and we proved to be the
one thing we never thought we could be: socially sentimental. Friends of Irving
Berlin.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, December 6, 2010 at 12:05 pm Link to this comment

I guess they want to be rolled, eh?  They certainly seem to take to it readily.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, December 6, 2010 at 11:44 am Link to this comment

There is a movement among left-liberals and progressives in the house that Nancy Pelosi is desperately trying to quash, to refuse to allow this travesty to get to reconciliation.  IOW, if the Senate doesn’t pass basically the House version, it dies and ALL the tax increases go through.

It is illogical: If there’s no money (a/c to re-thugs) to pay for unemployment, how can there be money for the tax cuts for the top 5%?

It gets worse: How can, in this “compromise”, be money to NOW pay for both?

“Temporary” extension of two years?  The GOP is COUNTING on having the WH and the Senate back by then so it’s no compromise at all.

Yeah, Obama and Reid have been rolled, yet again (and again, and again)

Report this

By Edward S., December 6, 2010 at 11:26 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

To bad he will never deliver on those promises of hope and change. He sold us out and lost our support.

Report this

By art guerrilla, December 6, 2010 at 11:26 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

1. short answer: theoretically, ‘yes’; realistically,
‘hell, no’...

2. i could not give one teeny, tiny little turdlet if
even one dim’rat had -you know- ‘misgivings’, and ‘moral
reservations’, or ‘personal regrets’; the WHOLE THING IS,
they didn’t do shit, they won’t do shit, and they will
NEVER do shit under the present korporatocracy…

AND -this is the important part- AND they WANT the
korporatocracy in general, they just have -you know- a
couple vague complaints about a few of the results; but
not enough to challenge korporate domination of our
society…

our democracy is mostly ineffectual window-dressing for
keeping the will of the people from thwarting the
korporate agenda…

90-99% of us at the bottom of the food chain have NOTHING
to offer ‘our’ (sic) representatives in this pay-for-play
political system…

3. of course, when 40-50% of ‘our’ (sic) representatives
are millionaires, that tells us which side they are on:
the side (korporatocracy) which got them all their ill-
gotten gains, of course…
how could it be any different…

rethugs / dem’rats: the ‘bad cop / stupid cop’ routine of
the one Korporate Money Party…

Constitutional Convention Or Bust ! ! !

art guerrilla
aka ann archy
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
eof

Report this
de profundis clamavi's avatar

By de profundis clamavi, December 6, 2010 at 10:40 am Link to this comment

Obama is ready to cave in to the Republicans on extending the Bush tax cuts on marginal income over $250,000. He’s going cave in AGAIN. Republicans call Obama a “socialist”. Progressives, who are thinking of themselves less and less as Democrats these days and more as independents (of the left, not the mythical center - hey oracular pundits who presume to speak with the voice of “the American People”, are you listening?), are starting to call Obama a “Republican”. When are the Republicans going to figure out that Obama is really batting for their team? Answer: they’ve always known that, but they will never say so publicly, because that would destroy the whole theatrical illusion of American politics. There is no more reality to the public display of heated partisan controversy in American politics than there is in the coreographed fake violence and scripted ringside bellowing of professional wrestlers. The Republican Party is a rich pig. The Democratic Party is a rich pig with lipstick and a smiley face. American two-party politics is a puppet show put on to keep you mesmerized by its coporate sponsors, the Wall Street banks. You, the disenfranchised masses, should stop calling each other names and start supporting independent candidates, or run for office yourself.

Report this
enorceht's avatar

By enorceht, December 6, 2010 at 10:38 am Link to this comment

“Can Democrats ‘Up Their Game’?”

it’s not like it would take much for them to up their game ... all they’d have to do would be to stay standing instead of bending over

Report this
Shenonymous's avatar

By Shenonymous, December 6, 2010 at 9:25 am Link to this comment

ardee you speak well about the reality of politics in America today. 
As a life-long Democrat in the classic liberal camp, I have reserved
my opinion of Obama and Democrats for two years thinking the
rabbit would be pulled out of the hat, and strong voices for the
people would prevail but it is time to face the real world. 

With Obama’s surrender to Republican thumbscrews, nearly kissing
their feet, and Democrat politicians turning to thumbsucking instead
of standing strong, we are down the rabbit hole rather than standing
in the magician’s shoes.  You are right that there are only a few lonely
voices who speaks to the obvious, but who aren’t shouting loud enough
or giving better arguments why acquiescing to Republican power is
asking for further ruination of this country.  The ten years of Bush
policies has nearly done us in.  Even Joe Scarborough on his right
leaning TV program stunningly admitted it this morning.  Even he is
incredulous at Obama’s concessional behavior. 

The Democrats will lose deeply and long if they fritter away the revenue
from the rich taxes that would help this country out of its deficits that
Republicans put it in.  Every news program had “experts” say what we
have been saying all along that tax cuts for the rich will not put one
cent into the jobs disaster.  That it is repairing the jobs market that will
regenerate the economy. 

I know this much, if they do not hold the line about ending the George
Bush tax cuts for the rich, I will not vote for Obama again.  Not that
there are other important issues, and maybe my one vote won’t count
for much, but that is my line in the sand. They have 25 days to
straighten their backbone.

Report this

By ardee, December 6, 2010 at 7:12 am Link to this comment

That there are a few lonely voices within the Democratic Party speaking to obvious directions and positions fails to sway my poor opinion of the party and its leadership.

It would seem inevitable that the tax cuts for the wealthiest will be extended, despite the rather rational understanding that they are both unfair to all of us and keeps money from the govt that is sorely needed, while the cuts themselves are no hardship at all to the wealthiest.

After the Democrats cave on this issue they will move along to cave on the others as well. But they will ensure the continuation of campaign checks from the wealthy and the corporations. That, after all, is the real goal of both parties.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.