The Republican EXTREMISTS are preparing to live in China, just ask Rupert Murdoch.

The last thing President Obama needs is DLC President Clinton telling him how to be Republican Lite.  It would be good for the populace of the nation if President Clinton would bow completely out of politics.

Wait a minute,  I didn’t know he was a docter!!
He is everything the Dems want him to be at any time.

I can guarantee you that there are no tricks in Mr. Clinton’s bag that Obama can’t learn in any sleazy titty bar along the backroads of America. Maybe he can learn how to screw Americans out of $100 million when he leaves office. How these degenerates receive the acclaim they do from the Demo-losers is almost as funny as how right wing losers think they are doing the right thing in castigating Obama.  What a worthless lot the whole Congress brings.

Great post Samson.

  Obama apologists are also inclined to blame those who elected Obama for not “making him do it” as FDR famously instructed, but I wonder how constantly denying or apologizing for Obama “makes him do it”.

Do you notice that for all the ranting, the Dem propagandists like Inherit the Wind manage to never give any big areas where Obama and Clinton are really any different from Bush, Bush and Reagan?

Maybe its the wars?  Nope, Iraq war is still going strong.  Obama has Bush’s policy of promising a pull out at some vague future date in place, along with the same 130,000 or thousand troops that were there all along.  And if you listen closely, you can hear that now they are saying that the magical Iraqi elections, which look suspiciously like Chicago elections, may not be the great milestone/turning point that they are supposed to me, and that this might effect the promises of future withdrawals.

Of course, we’ve escalated the Afghan war by some 50,000 thousand new troops there.  And we’ve expanded that war into Pakistan with our drone strikes and using the Pak government as a proxy army.

Of course we are still saber-rattling towards Iran, and threatening a new war there.  And we are still grand supporters of every Israeli war-crime, and promising to raise the tax-payer dollars we give them to pay for these crimes.

Of course, Gitmo isn’t closed, and the US still runs an extensive overseas prison system. 

We did make a minor technical change in how we torture.  We went back to the Clinton policy of torture where he ‘rendition’ someone to another country and let them torture them.

We’ve had a coup to overthrow a democratically elected President in Honduras.  With Obama threatening more of the same and attacking the legit democracies that have emerged in the region.

And of course,the Pentagon budget, the ‘intelligence’ budget, and the ‘homeland security’ budgets all just keep going up.

Obama’s jobs program is the classic Reagan program of giving tax breaks to businesses.  Although, I guess we should be happy that he doesn’t just hand over the entire treasury to all businesses the way he does for his wall street buddies.

Obama’s health care plan is the health care enrichment act of 2010.  Entirely focuses on guaranteed profits for all the ‘leaders’ who got the private meeting in the White House to map all of this out. 

So ... why is it that when I start thinking about it, I can go on and on and on about all the ways in which Obama and Bush are the same, yet, the Democrats amongst us only want to criticize us for daring to point this out ... and seem incapable of providing any similarly extensive list of the great improvements and changes we’ve seen because we elected Obama and the Democrats?

The hillarious part is that someone thinks Clinton is a progressive.  Did this guy sleep through the whole Clinton presidency?

Clinton and Obama are both very similar in that both regularly lied to the left and to the American people, then did nothing but service their big campaign contributors once the con-job worked and they got elected.
——————————
The people have to realize that whenever you vote for candidates that have millions of corporate dollars in their accounts, then those politicians are already bought off.  They will not be on your side if elected. Instead, they use the millions of corporate dollars to lie their rears off to con people into voting for them.

This ends when people start voting for politicians who actually will represent their interests instead of the interests of their contributors.  There’s usually one or more on every ballot.  Just gotta look past the crooked D’s and the crooked R’s to find them.

We can solve this problem this fall.  All we have to do is to want to.

As for this article, I almost wish I’d paid for the paper. Then I could at least use it to wrap fish.  Bout all its worth.  Actually, considering what a giant pile of doo-doo this article is, that’s probably cruel to the fish.

I agree with most of the posts below, especially by tres. They are all tools used by the power/elite. The talk may be different but they walk the same walk.
Obama has proven that there is no difference.

After viewing these posts is it any WONDER the Democrats can’t get anything done.  Give the Re-thugs credit: They got over THEIR circular firing squad some time between the election of 2008 and the inauguration in 2009—Dims keep adding more and more guns to their circle.

It’s tunnel-vision dogmatics like all these posters that think ReaganBushClintonBushObama are all one president.  I guess if there were extra-terrestrial beings they couldn’t tell Scarlett Johansson or Johnny Depp from an orangutan!  All they’d see are primates—if that.

But Clinton remains one of the most talented politicians in our history, and it’s not simply because he feels people’s pain or speaks so well that you sit in your driveway to hear the rest of his speech when he’s on the car radio.

Above all, he understands how hard it is to be a progressive politician . . .

Here is a perfectly beautiful encapsulation of the rotten, fetid sewer called the MSM.  E.J. Dionne, of the Dionne Quintuplets, all five being E.J. Dionne himself, can still say with a straight face that Clinton felt our pain.  The only pain Clinton felt originated in the area of his crotch.  John F. Kennedy named his penis “J.J.”  I wonder what Clinton called his.  And there was never anything remotely “progressive” about Clinton.  Ditto Obama.  A well paid hacky-hack like Dionne naturally still believes this.  This article is simply another salvo in the Democrats’ desperate Goebbels-blitz to keep you voting for the D’s.

Are you daft? I hoped the son-of-a-bitch would die after a lingering illness. Clinton was a husker, a cheat to the Amerikan public. Who cared about his failings as a human, it was the severity of crippling the people he was to lead. His sleight of hand tricks are the same as Obamas, another double dealing shill for Wall street. These two crooks prove how badly we need a 2,3,4, party system and how the repugs and dimmos are so entwined with big business and the people are no more than pawns.
E.J. Dionne, I wish you would find a different line of work.

I’m not sure if E.J. is still on the same drugs as usual, we keep hoping for a change in prescription.  Clinton and Obama both drink from the same fountain, but it is not a progressive fountain. Unless one considers anti-union progressive, or taking the corporate line when it comes to compromise. Obama walks the same road as Clinton, both sold principle to the highest bidder and lowest common denominator. We still have NAFTA and CAFTA and now SHAFTA.  Obama, like Clinton is willing to kill innocent people in order to look tough, that’s not progressive. Obama freezes spending on services for the people, but increases spending on the war machine, that is not progressive. No E.J.  I think Obama would be better trying to learn from true men of conviction, not the corporatist like Clinton or those he has chosen as handlers.