|
|||
|
Britain’s Modern BridePosted on Nov 18, 2010By Ruth Marcus I’ve been wallowing in exit polls and poring over debt-reduction plans, so perhaps you’ll forgive a brief walk on the low-brow side. No, not Sarah Palin—though her show-a-little-more-presidential-leg interview with Barbara Walters is an awfully tempting topic. No, today’s subject is the royal engagement. Come on. What girl—what middle-aged woman, for that matter—doesn’t secretly love a good princess story? And here’s what I love about this one: the princess-to-be as Modern Bride. Advertisement For one thing, William and Kate actually know each other. Diana was 19 when she was engaged to Prince Charles, 13 years older. They had been dating for a scant six months. She was—or at least, no one was around to claim she wasn’t—a virgin, a status that seemed of particular importance to the royal family. In their first interview, the pair seemed stumped by the opening question: What did they have in common? “Very difficult question,” the prince muttered, before looking to Diana for help. “Sense of humor?” she ventured. “Every outdoor activity—except I don’t ride.” An astute observer might have discerned the notes of future discord in the prince’s answer to whether they were in love: “whatever ‘in love’ means.” William and Kate seem to have a more normal relationship—at least as normal as these things can be when one half of the couple is second in line to the British throne. They’re the same age, 28. They met in college; they’ve been dating—off but mostly on—for nine years. They’ve been living together, and even the queen seems unfazed. Middleton’s been pitied as “Waity Katie,” but waiting means being less likely to having to say you’re sorry but this has all been a dreadful mistake. She seems less like the shy teenager glancing through her bangs at Prince Charming than a comfortable, even sassy, equal, as in this exchange: British interviewer: “There’s a story that goes around that you had a picture of him on your wall.” William: “There wasn’t just one, there was about 20.” Kate: “He wishes. No, I had the Levi’s guy on my wall, not a picture of William, sorry.” William: “It was me in Levi’s, honestly.” He wishes? Levi’s cheesecake? I love this girl! I mean, this woman. © 2010, Washington Post Writers Group New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By firefly, November 23, 2010 at 12:06 pm Link to this comment
Ruth, I don’t care what the others say, I thought this
piece was cute.
Why not have space for a bit of diversion from the
Report thisnever-ending political shenanigans? Ultimately, it is
relevant that royalty has moved into the modern era,
even if they are still royalty. There are a lot of
people in the US who would like to be royalty and many
who have the wealth of royalty and behave with less
decorum.
By de profundis clamavi, November 19, 2010 at 2:22 pm Link to this comment
Judging from the lightweight quality of Ruth’s recent articles and her introductory comment about how analysing exit polls and debt reduction plans just seem to leave her feeling tired, her brief walk into the milieu of the gossip columnist looks like it could be the promising start of a new career direction for her. That being said, why is Truthdig wasting space to give her a column?
Report thisBy tedmurphy41, November 19, 2010 at 9:26 am Link to this comment
If you put it in front of people for long enough, there may be some interest generated.
Report thisHowever, at this moment in time, and with the lack of any real backbone, the British people will just hope to get through their own, individual travails thanks, in no small part, to a UK coalition Government of very limited ability and competence.
By eir, November 19, 2010 at 1:01 am Link to this comment
Years ago, Ruth, you would have been called a Tory. Look it up.
For citizens not ever wanting to become “a loyal subject” there is this:
See “Ireland: Battleground in the Fight for Sovereignty”
http://www.larouchepac.com/node/16526
Report this