Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
June 22, 2017 Disclaimer: Please read.

Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.

Truthdig Bazaar
Why the Middle Ages Matter: Medieval Light on Modern Injustice

Why the Middle Ages Matter: Medieval Light on Modern Injustice

By Celia Chazelle (Editor), Simon Doubleday (Editor), Felice Lifshitz (Editor), Amy G. Remensnyder (Editor)

more items

Email this item Print this item

Britain’s Modern Bride

Posted on Nov 18, 2010

By Ruth Marcus

I’ve been wallowing in exit polls and poring over debt-reduction plans, so perhaps you’ll forgive a brief walk on the low-brow side.

Square, Story page, 2nd paragraph, mobile
No, not Sarah Palin—though her show-a-little-more-presidential-leg interview with Barbara Walters is an awfully tempting topic.

No, today’s subject is the royal engagement.

Come on. What girl—what middle-aged woman, for that matter—doesn’t secretly love a good princess story?

And here’s what I love about this one: the princess-to-be as Modern Bride. 


Square, Site wide, Desktop


Square, Site wide, Mobile
Kate Middleton might be wearing Diana’s engagement ring, but this is not his mother’s engagement.

For one thing, William and Kate actually know each other.

Diana was 19 when she was engaged to Prince Charles, 13 years older. They had been dating for a scant six months. She was—or at least, no one was around to claim she wasn’t—a virgin, a status that seemed of particular importance to the royal family.

In their first interview, the pair seemed stumped by the opening question: What did they have in common? “Very difficult question,” the prince muttered, before looking to Diana for help. “Sense of humor?” she ventured. “Every outdoor activity—except I don’t ride.” An astute observer might have discerned the notes of future discord in the prince’s answer to whether they were in love: “whatever ‘in love’ means.”

William and Kate seem to have a more normal relationship—at least as normal as these things can be when one half of the couple is second in line to the British throne. They’re the same age, 28. They met in college; they’ve been dating—off but mostly on—for nine years. They’ve been living together, and even the queen seems unfazed.

Middleton’s been pitied as “Waity Katie,” but waiting means being less likely to having to say you’re sorry but this has all been a dreadful mistake. She seems less like the shy teenager glancing through her bangs at Prince Charming than a comfortable, even sassy, equal, as in this exchange:

British interviewer: “There’s a story that goes around that you had a picture of him on your wall.”

William: “There wasn’t just one, there was about 20.”

Kate: “He wishes. No, I had the Levi’s guy on my wall, not a picture of William, sorry.”

William: “It was me in Levi’s, honestly.”

He wishes? Levi’s cheesecake? I love this girl! I mean, this woman.
Ruth Marcus’ e-mail address is marcusr(at symbol)

© 2010, Washington Post Writers Group

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Join the conversation

Load Comments

By firefly, November 23, 2010 at 1:06 pm Link to this comment

Ruth, I don’t care what the others say, I thought this
piece was cute.

Why not have space for a bit of diversion from the
never-ending political shenanigans? Ultimately, it is
relevant that royalty has moved into the modern era,
even if they are still royalty. There are a lot of
people in the US who would like to be royalty and many
who have the wealth of royalty and behave with less

Report this
de profundis clamavi's avatar

By de profundis clamavi, November 19, 2010 at 3:22 pm Link to this comment

Judging from the lightweight quality of Ruth’s recent articles and her introductory comment about how analysing exit polls and debt reduction plans just seem to leave her feeling tired, her brief walk into the milieu of the gossip columnist looks like it could be the promising start of a new career direction for her. That being said, why is Truthdig wasting space to give her a column?

Report this

By tedmurphy41, November 19, 2010 at 10:26 am Link to this comment

If you put it in front of people for long enough, there may be some interest generated.
However, at this moment in time, and with the lack of any real backbone, the British people will just hope to get through their own, individual travails thanks, in no small part, to a UK coalition Government of very limited ability and competence.

Report this

By eir, November 19, 2010 at 2:01 am Link to this comment

Years ago, Ruth, you would have been called a Tory.  Look it up.

For citizens not ever wanting to become “a loyal subject” there is this:

See “Ireland: Battleground in the Fight for Sovereignty”

Report this
Right Top, Site wide - Care2
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide

Like Truthdig on Facebook