LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 24, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

Obama Heckled During Speech, Warren Lands a Book Deal, and More

A Call to Action

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * New York City’s Summers May Heat Up

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Blaming Obama’s America First

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Nov 29, 2010

By E.J. Dionne, Jr.

Can we govern ourselves in the next two years? Do Republicans have any interest in accomplishments that might even indirectly benefit President Barack Obama?

These questions hang over this week’s meeting between the president and congressional leaders, an encounter that could set the tone for the next two years.

Grounds for optimism are thin. The most striking aspect of Republican behavior since the party’s electoral triumph is a haughty assumption that the voters rejected everything Obama represents and that he ought to capitulate on all fronts right now. Anyone who fails to see things this way just doesn’t “get” it.

So certain are the president’s opponents that they and only they represent the will of the nation that they feel empowered to undercut Obama even on issues related to our nation’s security.

Take the effort of Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., to block ratification of the strategic arms reduction treaty in the lame-duck session. In doing so, he is playing Russian roulette with our nation’s interests.

Advertisement

The New START treaty shouldn’t be controversial. It is supported by conservatives as varied in their views as Robert Kagan, a neoconservative interventionist, and Pat Buchanan, a paleo-conservative isolationist, not to mention such establishment Republican luminaries as James A. Baker III, Henry Kissinger and Sen. Richard Lugar.

If this treaty is not ratified, the only winner will be Vladimir Putin. Is Kyl really willing to risk giving Putin and anti-American forces in Russia a leg up?

You don’t have to believe me on this. As Kagan wrote in a column for The Washington Post, defeat of the treaty would “strengthen Vladimir Putin,” who would use its demise “to stir more anti-Western nationalism, further weakening an already weak (President Dmitry) Medvedev and anyone else who stands for a more pro-Western approach.” It’s not my habit to agree with Buchanan, but he’s right in saying: “Killing the treaty would morally disarm those Russians who see their future with the West.”

And The Financial Times, hardly a left-wing newspaper, noted that Kyl’s core arguments against the treaty are “so weak as to call into question Mr. Kyl’s good faith.” We don’t need more time to consider it; the treaty has been debated for months. And the Obama administration has made a slew of concessions to Kyl to modernize our nuclear program. What, besides the identity of our current president, justifies this obstruction?

Then there’s the uproar against intrusive security screening at our nation’s airports, a controversy so evidently rooted in rants rather than reason that the central rallying cry of the critics has become: “Don’t touch my junk.”

There’s nothing wrong with a sensible debate over the best ways to prevent another terrorist attack and exactly how to balance liberty and security. But there’s plenty wrong with the double standard that (1) blames Obama for violating the rights of airline passengers, and (2) would blame Obama for not taking sufficient steps to protect us if another attack happened. Compare the response of conservatives to this controversy with their fury at anyone who raised questions about former President George W. Bush’s anti-terror policies. 

In pondering the GOP’s current posture, I was reminded of the famous speech that the late Jeane Kirkpatrick gave to the 1984 Republican National Convention in which she condemned the “San Francisco Democrats,” naming them after the very liberal and tolerant city in which they had just held their convention. Kirkpatrick’s refrain about the opposition, which brought uproarious approval from the crowd, went this way: “They always blame America first.”

I am afraid that we are about to enter a two-year period in which the Beltway Republicans will always blame Obama’s America first—you know, the America that is not the “real” America, the America that happens to disagree with much of the conservative agenda, the America from which they want to “take back” the country, as if the rest of us represent an alien force. If Obama and his America are for something, even if that something is in the nation’s interest, it will be rejected out of hand.

In her speech, Kirkpatrick also noted: “The American people know that it’s dangerous to blame ourselves for terrible problems that we did not cause.” Yes, and it’s also dangerous to blame a man and an administration for terrible problems they did not cause.

And what will Obama do about all this? Ronald Reagan, Kirkpatrick’s hero, found a way to stand strong, to fight back and to win. We will soon know whether our current president has this in him.

E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com.
   
© 2010, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By sophrosyne, December 2, 2010 at 9:55 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Dionne is right of course.  But you can also believe that the average Tea Partier is as duped by the reigning plutocrats as Americans generally are.  Much that passes for serious rhetoric is nonsnese made possible by careful manipulation by those who benefit from ignorance and more shelling over of money to the few.

Report this
who'syourdebs's avatar

By who'syourdebs, December 1, 2010 at 2:12 pm Link to this comment

The eight-hundred-pound gorilla in the room is the sleeping American electorate, many of whom woke up long enough to help Obama win the US Presidency in 2008. Unfortunately, they have been pummelled with disappointments ever since from Obama, who has failed to “fight the good fight” for the significant social changes he promised, and they have apparently gone back to sleep. Of course, this plays perfectly into the hands of Republicans, as they prop up the facade of populism that the Tea Party movement feigns to represent, even though this group is composed mainly of college-grad Republicans making over 50 thousand a year. Maybe the ‘bipartisanship” thing was just a scam anyway, a shadow play for gullible liberals. You have to wonder when Obama scales back his “change you can believe in” before negotiations even begin with the opposition. Demos offer the carrot, Repubs use the stick. Perhaps we should be happy with the few crumbs our President has thrown us, but still I cringe to think that the Congress is going to stiff the unemployed and lavish even more welfare on the rich. Now I go days without watching the news, because it causes me to careen between despair and anger. Reading is somewhat more manageable. I don’t think the left is dead; it’s just submerged under the weight of the corporate media and millions of individuals struggling to make a living. But Americans aren’t as dumb as both major parties seem to think—that’s why they don’t vote—they believe it’s useless and would rather stay under the radar of the emerging plutocracy. Sadly, they may be right—without meaningful campaign finance reform, that gorilla may just die in his sleep.

Report this

By Paco, November 30, 2010 at 8:32 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

How attitudes have changed.

Why it seems only yesterday when all of the Republicans I know (and I know quite a few) were so quick to jump on anything remotely resembling a criticism of OUR PRESIDENT as being anti-American.  The rote response was “how could you criticize our President in this time of war?  Why are you so quick to blame America? Are you a Communist?”.

It’s funny, I hear both the right and much of the left heaping criticism on Obama, but I’ve not heard a hint about how un-American such criticism is.  Now I’m not saying it is un-American, I’m just saying there is a curious imbalance and a curious flip-flop of attitudes.

Report this

By Westcoastliberal, November 30, 2010 at 8:28 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Mr. Dionne, I enjoy reading your articles and appreciate your point of view, but seriously, this farce of DC politics has become toxic to us Americans who CAN see the forest for the trees.  The constant “GOP vs Dems” theater as in some “sports” analogy has run its course and is no longer viable.
What we’re down to now is the majority in Congress who represent corporate interests, and the handful who represent the people’s interests. Party affiliation doesn’t matter much anymore. These are dangerous and difficult times.  The action or inaction of our elected representatives now has a direct effect upon people’s lives (i.e. extending unemployment benefits; a “WPA” style jobs program; currency devaluation and the specter of hyperinflation).
Those of us who follow the news and dig beneath it see the drama being played out before the cameras for the charade it has become.
We will no longer stand idly by waiting for our “elected” leaders to act on our behalf.  While Americans are a docile, patient lot, I predict this patience is nearing its end, because many Americans are at the end of their resources.  With nothing further to lose, they WILL take action.

Report this

By Jimnp72, November 30, 2010 at 1:33 pm Link to this comment

the repugs have been at this nonsense for years-blocking everything dems try to
accomplish and then blaming them for not accomplishing anything. I sent an email
to Obama today urging him to stand up to their self centered interests and not
back down anymore. so what is he isnt reeclected, we need a Russ Feingold or
Dennis Kucinich to fight the reupg assholes and their destructive, regressive
corporate centered agenda.

Report this

By Michael Cavlan RN, November 29, 2010 at 8:04 pm Link to this comment

Funny thing that..

Right above this is Chris Hedges article.

He seems to be blaming Obama’s America as well. Wait, so am I and many other
progressives.

I know. Quick, they (we) must all be tea baggers. After all, it is only right wing fruit
loops like Rico Suave and other Palin supporters that have problems, real serious
problems with Obama and the Dems.

Right?

Report this
JDmysticDJ's avatar

By JDmysticDJ, November 29, 2010 at 3:46 pm Link to this comment

Go Right Young Man is starting to drift to the Left, maybe the truth will become evident, even to him. Or maybe, it’s just a disengenuous attempt to ingratiate himself. I’d mention his hatred for Eugene Robinson, but I don’t want to start him up again.

Report this
Sabagio's avatar

By Sabagio, November 29, 2010 at 2:14 pm Link to this comment

I’m a member of a minority group so I’m probably ultra sensitive when it comes to criticisms leveled on President Obama.  This being said, and being from the South, I find the current news media coverage at all levels and venues less than objective and appears vulnerable to manipulation and management by the current crop of “Squeaking Wheels” who seem to be getting all the grease they’re asking for and more so. These media darlings are so often so shrill in their commentaries they seem intent on destroying Obama’s presidency regardless of what it costs the country and our people. In earlier times, I’d call it reflections of racist intent. I mean the economy is still putrid, health care will go in the tank without some kinds of reforms, school dropout rates for kids in Georgia is over 30%, the poverty population is growing, black and Hispanic males continue to lead lives of quiet desperation while filling overcrowded jails, the middle class feels marginalized and discouraged and expressing a sense of hopelessness and despair of ever doing better; education continues to be dumb-downed by school boards and administrators intent on pursuing personal and ideological agendas regardless of the needs of children.  Even a conservative Nixon economist like Ben Stein thinks that there’s a lot of scary stuff going on in the US of A that needs to stop, and soon.  Surely, some common ground for finding solutions to these problems can be found by the current batch of politicians, if for no other reason than their own survival. Replacing Obama with someone from the current crop of Presidential office seekers won’t solve anything.  When the public no longer retains status respect for its government’s institutions and its leaders, social revolution invariably follows. I read where the new Congress is being called “the best that money can buy.”  Marie Antoinette got the message, but not soon enough.

Sabagio Mauraeno

Report this
G.Anderson's avatar

By G.Anderson, November 29, 2010 at 1:53 pm Link to this comment

A potpourri of pointlessness.  Or another two years of blaming republicans, for your
own weakness.  And another 2 years of an advancing plutocratic agenda, starting with
the elimination of employer paid for health insurance benefits.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, November 29, 2010 at 12:17 pm Link to this comment

We can govern ourselves, but that has nothing to do with Republicans or Democrats or the state.

Report this
Go Right Young Man's avatar

By Go Right Young Man, November 29, 2010 at 12:06 pm Link to this comment

Blame America First has been the liberal/progressive mantra for decades.  Mr. Dionne is now acting as a petulant child to complain about “others” doing this to “his beloved president”.

I write all this knowing full well that I too like President Obama on a personal level.  I can disagree with the president, his party and the republicans without the incessant whining about how really really mean the other side is.

Grow up Jr..

Report this

By Pam Green, November 29, 2010 at 10:50 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I think E. J. Dionne has missed the word play intended by Kirkpatrick’s “America First” line, and the use that has since been made of it.  “America First” is the name of a right-wing, even pro-Nazi, political movement popular during World War II.  People identified themselves as “America Firsters”.  I doubt it is an accident that this name is being revived, mass-marketed, spoken knowingly by those who “get” it.  And Dionne did their bidding, by helping to disseminate it more widely, to progressives no less! I’m a bit suspicious, particularly because his own, lame explanation of the term, “America First”, is guaranteed to piss progressives off.  We are not “Obama’s America”.  We haven’t been since the morning after he took office.  It’s been a long morning after, but we’re not so hung over that we can swallow the line, “it’s dangerous to blame a man and an administration for terrible problems they did not cause.”  Dangerous?  Problems they did not cause?  What’s dangerous is having Dionne published on this site, conferring or seeming to confer truthdig’s approval.

Report this

By Diana T Brooks, November 29, 2010 at 10:45 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

SURPRISE ME! please surprise me….

Report this
JDmysticDJ's avatar

By JDmysticDJ, November 29, 2010 at 7:25 am Link to this comment

Paleo-conservative? I suppose you can make a purse from a sow’s ear, but it will still be a sow’s ear purse, not one made from silk.

The reality, that Dionne and others point to, is a reality which only complicates rational responses to other, more important, realities.

Report this
markulyseas's avatar

By markulyseas, November 29, 2010 at 6:48 am Link to this comment

This is so typical of American politics, Republicans pulling down the Democrats every chance they get…even stalling important international negotiations. Unfortunately this is not the time for such political gymnastics when the Nation is faced with the Wikileaks’ revealations,a possible war between the Koreas and the financial crisis in Europe.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.