LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     robert scheer     barack obama     gay marriage     ndaa     chris hedges
Most Read

Say 'Hi-Ho!' as They Strip-Search You

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Massive Wildfire Rages in New Mexico

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

I Can't Hear Myself Think

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
States of Emergency: The Object of American Studies

States of Emergency: The Object of American Studies

By Russ Castronovo (Editor), Susan Gillman (Editor)
$19.95

more items

 
Reports

Big Oil Is Still Boss

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Jun 9, 2010
Obama in Louisiana
White House / Pete Souza

President Barack Obama, flanked by local, state and federal officials, remarks on the BP oil spill after a tour of Fourchon Beach and a briefing at the U.S. Coast Guard station in Grand Isle, La., on May 28.

By Bill Boyarsky

A lot of pundits want President Barack Obama to turn terrible tempered in his handling of the Gulf of Mexico disaster. These critics ignore the real issue—the death grip the oil industry has on Washington and the state capitals of oil-producing states.

Oil industry power was the cause of the explosion and spill and will cause those that will no doubt occur in the future. Such power is also why Obama and his successors will find it next to impossible to shift the nation from its fatal dependence on foreign oil and, in the long run, to convert to alternative energy.

For Obama, keeping his temper under control was not his mistake. His error was made before the Gulf of Mexico disaster when he decided in March to greatly expand coastal drilling for oil and natural gas. In doing this, he and his team mistakenly accepted assurances by oil company engineers and geologists that offshore oil drilling was safe.

“Obama’s commitment to lift a moratorium on offshore oil drilling reflected the widely held belief that offshore oil operations, once perceived as dirty and dangerous, were now so safe and technologically advanced that risks of a major disaster were infinitesimal, and managing them a matter of technocratic skill,” environmental journalist John McQuaid wrote in Yale Environment 360, a publication of the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies. “Today, the notion that offshore drilling is safe seems absurd.”

If good grades and academic achievement count for anything, the administration members should have known better. In his book about Obama’s first year, “The Promise,” Jonathan Alter wrote: “Eventually a full quarter of Obama’s appointees would have some connection [as alumni or faculty] to Harvard, just one of several elite universities represented en masse in the government. More than 90 per cent of early appointees had advanced degrees. … He surrounded himself with the best credentialed, most brilliant policy mandarins he could find even though almost none of them knew anything about what it was like to work in small business, manufacturing, real estate or other parts of the real economy.”

Advertisement

Oil company leaders are some of the more sophisticated, cynical and hardened veterans of the real economy, and they rolled over the Obama administration. They, too, are well educated. Oilmen tend to be engineers or geologists, a lot of them with graduate degrees in their fields. From their universities many of them headed into the oil fields for experience exploring and drilling for oil throughout the world, many times in corrupt Third World dictatorships such as Myanmar and Nigeria—no places for theorists or softheaded idealists.

They absorbed the oil business culture, shaped by generations of wildcatters, characters who drilled in areas given up by the risk-averse. The best of them have the hearts and minds of gamblers. Of course they would say drilling in deep water is perfectly safe. Taking chances is part of their business. In dealing with them, the Obama team should have heeded novelist Nelson Algren’s famous warning: “Never play cards with a man called Doc. …”

Industry executives and lobbyists are smarter and tougher at politics than the Obama team is. The industry has long dominated city councils, county boards, state legislatures, Congress and regulatory agencies. They control both Democrats and Republicans. The most recent example of their power in the Republican Party was when a Bush administration task force, headed by Vice President Dick Cheney and filled with industry people, secretly wrote an energy policy.

The Center for Responsive Politics reported that individuals and political action committees affiliated with oil and gas companies have donated $238.7 million to candidates and parties since the 1990 election cycle, 75 percent of which has gone to Republicans. Obama received $884,000 from the industry during the 2008 presidential campaign. His Republican opponent, Sen. John McCain, received even more, the center said.

After the oil rig explosion in the Gulf, Obama imposed a six-month moratorium on 33 deep-water Gulf Coast exploratory wells and stopped other oil projects. He also appointed an independent commission to investigate the Gulf explosion and named as its leaders former Florida Sen. Bob Graham and Bill Reilly, who once led the Environmental Protection Agency. The president said the commission would follow “every lead without fear or favor.”

But the oil business is already maneuvering for representation on the commission. John Breaux, a former powerful senator from Louisiana who’s now an oil lobbyist, told Bruce Alpert of the New Orleans Times-Picayune that he is working to put on the commission some oil industry representatives, from companies such as Shell, one of his clients. The Center for Responsive Politics said oil giant Chevron is another one of Breaux’s clients, as are the National Propane Gas Association and Plains Exploration and Production.

Shell has plenty of experience with oil spills. John Vidal reported in The Observer newspaper that more than 1,000 spill cases have been filed with the Nigerian federal government against Shell. Shell blamed rebel vandalism for the spills. “More oil is spilled from the [Niger] delta’s network of terminals, pipes, pumping stations and oil platforms every year than has been lost in the Gulf of Mexico,” Vidal wrote. Chevron also has fields in Nigeria.

The BP disaster in the Gulf hasn’t stopped the industry. Neither have Obama’s demands for more safety.

Shell and Chevron, according to Chris Kromm of the Institute of Southern Studies, have leased new drilling rigs from Transocean, the company whose Deepwater Horizon rig blew up in the Gulf on April 20 and then sank. Kromm quoted an industry publication story about Transocean that said, “Transocean [is] still strong and growing.” He concluded, “Despite the disaster still unfolding in the Gulf, the energy and offshore drilling industries feel the same way about their future.”

So far, the oil business remains in charge.


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By textynn, June 24, 2010 at 12:24 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Big Oil and the War Industrial Complex are the same. Get it. WArs are about OIl. The citizens of the US are the subjects of the War Industrial Complex and subsequently BIG OIL.

How else would a miscreant like Cheney wield so much unchecked power and operate as a war criminal with impunity.  They actually court marshaled our solders for these crimes when it was said we, the US, were torturers at first and when it was proven that it came from the top months later, we did nothing for these soldiers.

Americans simple mindedly had nothing to say and have already forgotten.  We are the servants of big oil and we live and die and toil for it everyday.

Report this

By logician, June 15, 2010 at 8:18 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Off topic:

Hey, hey, “Fat Freddy”!

Where, oh where, is your cat?

A mighty No Prize if’n y’all can tell me where “Fat Freddy’s Cat” was last seen.

Report this

By Ed, June 15, 2010 at 7:44 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The BP oil spill in the Gulf is the classic “chickens coming home to roost.” The wake-up call happened 35 years ago during the energy crisis of the ‘70’s. But, instead of making the hard choices at the time to insure a stable energy future, Americans opted for the short term easy way out: low taxes and ridiculously cheap energy prices.

Eventually cheap energy from petroleum is going to end. How will the U.S. economy fare when oil prices rocket off the charts?

Taxes on petroleum products should have been been raised on a yearly basis starting 30 years ago. That would have, by far, been the best solution. It would have encouraged conservation and spurred energy innovation.What are we going to do now that we’re nearing/passing peak oil production? What’s the plan when crude oil stays permanently above $200 per barrel? How’s that short-sightedness working for you, America?

Report this

By ofersince72, June 14, 2010 at 6:33 pm Link to this comment

BP is a braintrust….

They figured out how to take all the carbon out of the
ground, bypass the SUVs, and put it right in the
atmosphere.

What a great idea it is to burn off the excess oil.
I wish I would have thought of that idea, but I didn’t
understand that oil burnt so well and so black, I do
remember the County fire department years ago, while
I was at work , reprimand my wife for burning a big
piece of plastic, said it was against the law and sent
poisonous gases into the atmosphere.

Report this

By ofersince72, June 14, 2010 at 5:33 pm Link to this comment

One does not have to examine any more than the days
of the Robber Barons to understand the shape this
country would be in without any federal gov regulations.

Sinclair’s Jungle well depicts the standard of living
without these regulations.

More and more our society is reflecting those times
of the Original Robber Barons.

Report this

By last_boy_scout, June 14, 2010 at 3:31 am Link to this comment

BP’s hypocrisy on the matter of that oil spill
shouldn’t come as a surprise to everyone, taking the
long-term history of theirs, into the consideration.

I’ve come to read an
interesting article on the history of BP and its predecessors
and, which is much more important, on the issues of
their connection to the Wall Street financiers and
their shared profiteering.

Report this
Fat Freddy's avatar

By Fat Freddy, June 14, 2010 at 1:25 am Link to this comment

glider,

Agreed. Insurance companies must hold the capital reserves, why shouldn’t a company that chooses to self-insure. Personally, I don’t like the idea of self-insurance. It is irresponsible, to say the least. I don’t think I’d feel comfortable hiring an electrician to wire my house that wasn’t insured, regardless of how much money he has in the bank.


ofersince72,

That’s a different type of insurance. It’s not liability insurance. Here’s an article from 1993 that explains how health insurance evolved in the US.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1094/is_n2_v28/ai_13834930/?tag=content;col1

<blockquote>These hospital plans changed the concept of insurance and forever changed the American health care system. Unlike other forms of insurance, the primary purpose of these plans was not to protect consumers from large, unforeseen expenses, but rather to keep hospitals in business by guaranteeing them a regular income. While these plans benefited consumers by giving them a predictable method of paying for their medical care, they contained serious flaws that would become increasingly apparent as our health care system developed.</blockquote

Report this

By ofersince72, June 13, 2010 at 2:24 pm Link to this comment

That insurance company idea has worked well in
the health care industry.

Report this

By Ephraiyim, June 13, 2010 at 1:28 pm Link to this comment

?/?

Report this

By glider, June 13, 2010 at 12:53 pm Link to this comment

Fat Freddy,
I like that idea.  But too make it effective one must not allow liability limits!  Simply make oil companies responsible for all damages and require them to be insured or put up the required multi-billions in a separate reparations account up front.

Report this
Fat Freddy's avatar

By Fat Freddy, June 13, 2010 at 11:44 am Link to this comment

ofersince72

Ron Paul has advocated eliminating all government subsidies. As far as RP being a Republican, well, that is an ongoing debate amongst Libertarians.

I strongly believe in a well regulated
OSHA, FDA, MMS, ect.
that is the job of government, look out for the public
in those areas,

I agree, however,

We must realize that much of the government-sponsored regulations put in place for “safety” or “fair trade” merely serve to increase bureaucracy, which increases the end cost to the consumer, prevents competition from smaller firms, and creates a higher barrier of entry for new businesses.

That was from Jake Towne, a libertarian minded independent running in PA’s 15th district.

I can tell you first hand, that many regulations are also antiquated. Having worked in construction most of my life, that insurance companies place much higher safety standards on construction sites than OSHA ever will. In fact, on the really big jobs, an insurance company may place a safety inspector on site, full time, with the authority to shut down the job and remove any person, at any time, for any reason. At some point, the government is just doing the job of the insurance companies. Insurance companies are much more culpable for ensuring workplace safety, because they have a vested, financial stake in it. Government employees can’t even be held accountable, unless they get caught taking bribes, and even then it can be difficult. Half of government employees are corrupt, and the other half are incompetent, and most are in their positions because of Cronyism.

http://towneforcongress.com/mission/

Report this

By ofersince72, June 13, 2010 at 10:54 am Link to this comment

Where Paul and I disagree, is on government
regulation of the Health , Safety, and Welfare of
the laboring class.

I strongly believe in a well regulated
OSHA, FDA, MMS, ect.
that is the job of government, look out for the public
in those areas,

finanaces, no

Report this

By ofersince72, June 13, 2010 at 10:49 am Link to this comment

Freddy,  it is called

OFERECONOMICS,  don’t put your money in places that
          have know idea what is happening to it
          for if you do, and loose, it is shame
          on you !!!

Report this

By ofersince72, June 13, 2010 at 10:37 am Link to this comment

Freddy, I will add this,

As long as Ron Paul is in the Republican Party,
he is not a Libertarian no matter how much he wants to
profess this,,,,,he is a Republican… my observations
of that party and listening to republican lawmakers on
Capitol Hill,  I don’t want anything to do with that
party,,, but I am not prejudice,  I feel the same exact
way about the Democrat Party.

Wall Street, for many, many years has been nothing but a
legal place for illegal activity, even with Glass-Stegall
and all the other government watch ........
So if you want to buy stock, do it at your own risk.

Report this

By ofersince72, June 13, 2010 at 10:31 am Link to this comment

I know that many of my views make me sound like
a Ron Paul libertarian, (I do have respect for Paul)
but my ideology really is different.
I don’t believe in government subsidizing any industry
if they are selling stock. period.
That is not a free market…
If the the government is going to subsidize any
manufacturing, then the public ought to be the ones
benifiting from the profits.
Once you mix, you get what we have to day, a big mess.
Either socialism, of hands of capitolism, one or the other

Report this

By ofersince72, June 13, 2010 at 10:25 am Link to this comment

Hey Feddy, you are right about that.
Finance is a whole different world, that takes much
education to understand…
I was going around the back door to make this point.

It is made way too complicated, to many futures,
to much study to understand what a derivitive is, how
many different types there are, ect…

For just this reason,  I believe I am one of the only
lefties that believies their shouldn’t be ANY government
regulation of the Stock Market.
If someone is going to invest money in something that
they have no understanding of how it works, shame on them
if they loose. Once again, buyer beware.

Report this
Fat Freddy's avatar

By Fat Freddy, June 13, 2010 at 9:28 am Link to this comment

ofersince72

Economics and finance are two different areas of study. Unfortunately, one does not have much knowledge of the other.

Only about 6% of high school students are taught personal finance. In a world where money is so important, you would think that number would be a little higher. In my high school we were taught how to balance a checkbook. I don’t even use a fucking checkbook for my personal finances, anymore.

Report this

By ofersince72, June 13, 2010 at 7:24 am Link to this comment

Everybody tries to make economics a whole lot harder
than it really is.

Like you need a PH.D from Harvard or Yale to understand
debit and credit.

Report this

By ofersince72, June 13, 2010 at 7:16 am Link to this comment

whoa,  It is a free market,

if one chooses to put their savings and retirement
in funds of the Stock Market and loose, shame on them,
buyer beware,  you lose. Don’t expect me to have to
pay your bill when known crooks handle your money that
you willingly handed over to them.

Report this
Fat Freddy's avatar

By Fat Freddy, June 13, 2010 at 7:02 am Link to this comment

Tobysgirl,

I certainly agree with you that people need to take a more pro-active approach towards their investments and retirement accounts, but there’s an underlying issue at play here. That is, investments in risky paper is highly encouraged in or current economic climate.

First of all, most people invest in ETFs (exchange traded funds), and mutual funds. Some are transparent, some are not. Meaning you buy into a fund, which is comprised of a combination of different stocks and bonds, sometimes you know what’s in them, sometimes you don’t. These funds are intended to decrease risk, and increase returns, and are extremely popular.

Second, take a look at interest rates of traditional investments. 10-year T-Bills are at what, 3.5%? At the height of the bubble they were as low as 2.5%. Have you checked the rate on a savings account or a 2-year CD lately? Banks have been buying out CD holders that have higher rates of return. They are not being allowed to roll them over, and in some cases, they have been bought out mid-term.

Add to that fact, people have been borrowing against their retirement and pension funds. Once you borrow against a 401(k), you are basically locked into it.

Many pension and trust funds are handled by bureaucrats. They hire asset management companies to make all or most of the decisions, and only look at the bottom line. In my state of NJ, some bureaucrat decided to invest a large chunk of the state worker’s pension fund in Enron.

These economic conditions that exist have not been addressed by politicians, policy makers, or the media. In fact, they have been intentionally ignored. When our parents and grandparents invested, many years ago, money actually had some amount of a “store of value”. It no longer does.

Read this article, it may shed some light on the situation:

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/02/we-are-all-austrians-now/

And please do not confuse Austrian economics with supply-side or “Reaganomics” economics, as many people on the left seem to do.

Report this

By nickmammano, June 13, 2010 at 3:55 am Link to this comment

Why doesn’t Obama reactivate ie. fund, OTA—Office of Technology Assessment?  My understanding is that it it still exists but has not been funded since (and due to) Reagan and his corporation-friendly Republicans.

It is fairly evident by now that Obama as president is not the guy I voted for.  I agree very much with John Ellis’s assessment(above)of the man and his character. He is ill-equipped for the job and worse, has surrounded himself with all these brilliant guys who are turning out to be jerks.

Where are the “wise men” in public life who might have counseled him?

Report this
Ouroborus's avatar

By Ouroborus, June 13, 2010 at 2:16 am Link to this comment

ofersince72, June 13 at 6:52 am #

A must read IMO.
Here’s a link to The Oil Drum;

http://tinyurl.com/3xawxf8

Dougr, the commenter, will scare the hell out of you
with his knowledge of the facts.
We can kiss off the gulf.

Report this

By ofersince72, June 13, 2010 at 1:52 am Link to this comment

Ouroborus,,,,go to Pacalert and read,  and weep.

this is a sing-a-long

The ocean floor has a hole in it
the ocean floor has a hooolllle in it
the ocean floor has a hhhhhooollllleeee in it
right down to the core….......

Oil and magma spewing out of it
oil and magma spewing out of it
and there is nothing we can do….

has anyone seen the flames coming out with the oil??
it is very impresive watching flames five thousand feet
under water…....wow.
THE OCEAN FLOOR HAS A HOLE IN IT…. come on, sing a long

Report this

By As If, June 12, 2010 at 10:33 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Tobysgirl, you make some excellent points, but there is something about pension funds that I don’t think you’re considering.

Pension funds are not all “self-managed” the way a 401(k) is.  The people dependent on this stock for a modest retirement did not necessarily have a choice as to where pension funds should be invested.  In the case of defined benefit plans, options don’t exist at all.

In those cases, the pensioners are also victims of the corporation, and should be just as furious at BP as the Gulf residents are.

Don’t buy into that “it’s their own fault” bullshit.  That’s one more way that ordinary working people whose fundamental interests are really the same end up being divided.  Divide and conquer is a very old game.

How else does the top 2% control as much of the global wealth as it does?

What I haven’t seen is top management offer to forego their dividends, bonuses, and compensation, and work for one dollar (or one British pound—forty cents more) this year. 

I’m old enough to remember when that was the expected gesture.  Interesting that it seems to have been entirely forgotten, while those victimized fight among themselves.  Or at least that is what they are being encouraged to do.  But then, the game was structured that way.

(As for that braggart at your job who actually tells you she’s buying the riskiest investments, she is such a complete fool that it’s hard to believe she is fit for any serious job.  Actually, she probably isn’t, but it’s too much of a pain to fire her.  Don’t let her get under your skin.)

Report this
Ouroborus's avatar

By Ouroborus, June 12, 2010 at 6:57 pm Link to this comment

I posted this elsewhere and it seems relevant here;

I would venture a guess this will be the largest…
...human caused environmental catastrophe in our
short history on this planet. We’ve actually uncorked
the Genie and can’t get it back into the bottle.
Further; I do not think the government or BP will
make this right and this whole disaster isn’t going
to turn out okay! The entire gulf coast and possibly
the gulf itself will become a dead zone; a kind of
monument to big oil and 1st world philosophy of life.
Corporations are the ones running things; governments
are the handmaidens of corporations.
Words and rhetoric will flow like the oil, but in the
end, the people living on the gulf will be forgotten
and corporations and the government will find another
distraction and move on.
We’re like stupid little children playing with big
dangerous toys.

Report this

By pal, June 12, 2010 at 10:09 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It’s called corpoRAT power.  Obama is merely a doorman.

Report this

By Tobysgirl, June 12, 2010 at 7:55 am Link to this comment

No sympathy with shareholders, including widows and orphans, the spectre of whom has been a sentimental favorite of oligarchs for decades.

If you choose to put your hard-earned money into risky, high-return plans, you deserve whatever happens. My husband works with a woman who has her retirement fund at work in the highest-risk category. The plan clearly offers everything from an extremely conservative, safe investment with a low return to the category this woman chose.

I grew up in a family in which investment in stocks was considered gambling and an exploitation of workers for profit. See, e.g., Tuesdays with Morrie. I have never invested money in the stock market or bonds, and of course consequently don’t have a lot of money. However, what I do have is in a local credit union which uses it to lend to other members.

If people choose to remain ignorant of what their money is doing, they may end up suffering the consequences. But of course human beings never see much connection between their choices and what happens.

Old Man Turtle has the human species down pat.

Report this

By As If, June 12, 2010 at 1:12 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

What do you think our dependence on oil HAS been doing to our society?  (What did you think the word “dependence” meant?)

We have been at war for oil for generations, and in the current Gulf War for over six years.

Contemplating the most recent catastrophe has made me physically ill, but when I read some of these comments, I’m not getting the sense that the “outrage” of others always has quite the same basis.  Some of it has a petulant, narcissistic flavor about it.

When no one brings up all of the Gulf War veterans who have lost multiple limbs and the use of parts of their brain, much less the death toll on the civilian population of Iraq, I have trouble believing in the sincerity of the outrage over this.  All of that could be comfortably ignored, until this.  Now, when gas might actually go up again, and SUVs may have to be put aside for smaller cars and (gasp!) even public transit, suddenly everyone is an environmentalist.  The outrage seems to me to be far too selective.

(As a friend of mine from India once said, if you don’t want to see animals hurt, at least stop eating them.)

I like this article for shedding light on the big picture, which always seems to get buried.  Now we need to confront the even Bigger Picture.  Unless we do, I fear that once this well is capped, and some other scandal hits the front page, this incident will be forgotten by most people. 

Our veterans have been.  (They come home to no job in remarkably disproportionate numbers.)  Please don’t tell me you don’t see a connection between oil—and blood.

Report this

By Roberto, June 12, 2010 at 12:44 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Great, another dark day for 420

Report this

By Old Man Turtle, June 11, 2010 at 12:44 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

A species unable to adapt its behavior to radical changes in its circumstances is courting not simply disaster, but outright extinction.  That the changes are themselves largely consequences of their own past and present behavioral choices will not work to suspend the operation of that natural law, despite still widespread persistent expectations to the contrary.

This is going to be a particularly painful process for modern humans, since it has been their species’ ability to accommodate itself to virtually every ecosystem on the planet that has served as its most effective survival trait.  Apparently thinking it was a “better idea,” however, they set-out instead trying ambitiously to force the world to conform everywhere to their own stunted notions of comfort and convenience.

Today we see this artificial mono-culture going, disastrously, the way all such pipe-dreams always go.  So the moderns’ right-now, real-time failure to break habits that are plainly destroying them, as these alter their environment in ways and at a pace they’re helpless to adapt-to and keep-up-with, adds the ignominy of willful stupidity to a bunch of people now obviously exposed as quite unjustifiably proud of their own self-proclaimed cleverness.

Talk about greasing the skids.

Report this
natera's avatar

By natera, June 11, 2010 at 12:44 pm Link to this comment

Dear Ed:

You are totally right and there is nothing paranoid or conspiracy-theory about it.  It is simply raw unchecked power as you said.  And it is power for which checking is virtually impossible.

I grew up in an oil family, my mother worked for it, her husband worked for it, my sister worked for it and my uncle eventually became the president they all worked for it.  I also worked for it before going to college.  The numbers in the oil industry are astounding.  An exploratory well for example can easily run a budget of $1 million per month. That is the budget of a small city. The company my family worked for normally had between 150 to 250 of those wells operating at any given time.

When my uncle was president, he went to Japan to receive and christen two supertankers the company bought and hung out with the presidents of Mitsubishi and Toyota for days.  He also wined and dined with Japanese government officials.  He confided to me in detail how Adnnan Kashoggi tried to bribe him once, it was a favorite story of his after he retired.

When we discussed politics he would always tell me:  The oil industry’s dimensions are beyond the comprehension of most politicians, including powerful presidents.  I didn’t know then exactly what he meant but now when I watch Obama literally paralized in inaction I can totally see what he meant.

Thanks again Ed, that was awesome.

Report this

By Old Ed Of The Delta, June 11, 2010 at 12:20 pm Link to this comment

BIG Oil has the USA power structure by the balls. Petroleum is what makes the world go around.

Why lose sleep over a few dead pelicans, roughnecks, or fishermen? They can be replaced.

It is the total picture that counts. It is the underpinnings of our national security. Without an adequate supply of petroleum we as a world power might as well pack it in.

The power players within these organizations are the ones who are very difficult to ID. The CEO’s and their ilk are the chore boys and spear carriers for the industry. The big boys keep a very low profile, but wield the power. That’s the way they like it.

They have hidden wealth in all counties of the world that they can tap in to anytime.

The personal income taxes these gangsters of the oil cartels pays to the US is miniscule compared with their true worth and what they owe.

These are the guys who have access to private jets and yachts and a fleet of limos. Not one mode of transportation in their own names. Just unlimited access anytime to any place by any means at their disposal. Their traveling companions carry the credit cards so no paper trail can be traced to them.

If you have the misfortunate to get on their bad apple list they have the connections either to set you up or completely eliminate you.

These big boys are neither Democrats or Republicans. They can buy through lobbyists the politicians who will do the bidding for their corporations.

This is an power structure that is not accountable to no one.—totally corrupt.

Report this

By Tony, June 11, 2010 at 11:49 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I appreciate the very thorough analysis supporting the thesis postulated here and agree with it almost entirely.  That’s why we must keep the pressure necessary to create outrage and promote immediate action.

Take it from someone who used to work for the oil industry and has worked for EPA for more than twenty years:

BP may not be able to plug the hole right now but it has the power and the money to effectively contain the spill and it has not.

Court orders under emergency declarations can carry contempt-of-court enforcement provisions that include arrests and:

THE PRESIDENT MUST ISSUE COURT ORDERS AND ARREST BP EXECUTIVES THAT DON’T OBEY THEM NOW!

It’s THE ONLY WAY he will get them to respond proportionately to this catastrophe.

The Gulf Disaster is an economic, cultural and environmental holocaust:  The direct result of an avalanche of crimes: criminal negligence, lying to public officials, misleading and endangering emergency response teams, destroying life support systems, private and public property, threatening through deadly force the public and the environment.

The President and government officials not only can, they MUST:

ARREST BP EXECUTIVES NOW!!

Report this
Blackspeare's avatar

By Blackspeare, June 11, 2010 at 6:45 am Link to this comment

I’m not sure whether it’s big oil or labor unions that are in the way, but a little known law entitled, “The Jones Act” is actually stopping advanced technology and expertise from entering the gulf!  Many foreign countries extracting oil from the ocean floor have experienced underwater releases and have the technology to combat and clean up the spill.  The Jones Act is a maritime law protecting American labor from foreign competition and prevents foreign flag ships from entering American waters for certain activities and the gulf spill is one of them!  If the US had allowed such foreign technology to be used, the situation would have been well in hand by now.

As a side note there is much clamor about oil douse pelicans, but when a drone takes out a family of ten there is hardly a peep——no pun intended!

Report this

By ofersince72, June 11, 2010 at 3:44 am Link to this comment

???????????????????????
  ***********************
  ???????????????????????
      Do What

p.s. the guardian ????????????

Report this
Gloria Picchetti's avatar

By Gloria Picchetti, June 11, 2010 at 3:23 am Link to this comment

Predident Obama is doing just fine on this crisis. I have heard that Great Britain wants him to tone down on BP because their econ is being trashed. Our econ & our precious animals are being trashed. It’s time to step on BP with everything that is within us while we get off oil & coal & on solar & wind.
This article may also be of interest to you. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/oil-spill-fallout-could-pollute-the-special-relationship-1997395.html

Report this

By NZDoug, June 10, 2010 at 11:55 pm Link to this comment

There goes the neighbourhood.
All the oil companies should help and get the military in there too!
Its only a century or so of cancers the area and its inhabitants will face, as the
food chain is exterminated and pestilence and disease sets in.
Time to sell the condo in Florida and maybe a little upstream where the gulf
goes, like Great Britain.
Glad I was born in 1946 because the planet is screwed and we, you and me
trashed it.

Report this

By bachu, June 10, 2010 at 5:42 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I would like to see the Obama man bow before Tony the BP boss in his customary manner.

Report this
Ed Harges's avatar

By Ed Harges, June 10, 2010 at 12:45 pm Link to this comment

Big oil is definitely a huge political power, especially in the oil-producing
states.

But “boss”? That implies that no other lobby is more powerful, and that’s simply
untrue.

When it comes to lobbies in Washington, the Israel lobby is definitely more
powerful. Politicians of both parties, from all regions of the country, are not
only afraid to cross Israel, they are even afraid to voice criticism, even in the
face of the most outrageous acts by the Israeli government, and even when
those acts are committed against American citizens.

In the case of the ongoing BP disaster, many politicians in Congress, and our
President as well,  have not been afraid to criticize, even condemn BP. Not so in
the case of Israel’s outrageous flotilla raid. Virtually every Senator and member
of Congress has expressed nothing but praise and support for dear little Israel.

Report this

By felicity, June 10, 2010 at 7:57 am Link to this comment

Obama should definitely think twice about surrounding himself with brainiacs.  “Smart people believe weird things because they are skilled at defending beliefs they arrived at for non-smart reasons.”  Shermer, “Why People Believe Weird Things.”

And it’s always a good idea to seek ‘advice’ from other than people you think have all the answers. 

Take the invention of the outside elevator.  Needing to increase the number of elevators in a high-rise, advice was sought from, of course, engineers who design and install elevators/shafts.  The building janitor, hearing of the impending mess inevitable when walls and floors etc. get torn up - conditions that would definitely increase his work load - suggested why not put the extra elevators on the outside of the building. People we least suspect will have answers to much of anything often are the very people who have the best answers.

Report this

By Ephraiyim, June 10, 2010 at 4:25 am Link to this comment

there is evidence that supports the fact that this whole thing was done to send a message to the British who have, for months sought to get payment for monies owed by the US treasury to The Crown.
Obama and his cronies have been deliberately withholding these payments even though the world court in Brussels has made a demand for them. This is a distraction.
THE GULF OF MEXICO OIL PLATFORM EXPLOSION:
CEMENT CASING THAT BLEW WAS INSTALLED BY HALLIBURTON :
MORE U.S./DVD SABOTAGE AGAINST THE BRITISH? YES… SEE UPDATE
http://worldreports.org/news/288_endemic_corruption_in_brussels_and_halliburton

It is also a good way to further undermine the economy which is necessary if we are to move to the New World Order.
Now I realize most folks think that is conservative talk against progressive programs but actually more supposedly conservatives have been involved in the past few decades than liberals.

Report this

By FiftyGigs, June 10, 2010 at 3:52 am Link to this comment

Big Oil still boss, huh.

A lot of liberals are making hay out of this classic
“good guy - bad guy” storyline. Like George Bush
struttin’ on an aircraft carrier, it gives them a
platform for sounding tough. Why, we ought’a go get
them there varmints, dead or alive.

But how do you feel about Google? Oh, not them,
because they do special home page graphics, and
people think they’re cool, right?

Okay, maybe Apple. But Apple wears turtle necks and
makes programs look like metal, and people think
they’re ultra cool, right?

What’s the beef anyway! We’re talking Big Oil!

Well, Google went around collecting personal
information through its little scooter mappermobile,
and, despite claiming to have rigorous control of
projects, is trying to “pr” the notion that this was
just an errant, eager beaver engineer.

And Apple? In their rush to harvest the public’s
monetary resources, they put out an iPad with a flaw
that allows personal data to be obtained by
unauthorized persons, and is trying to “pr” that
episode by saying little critical data is at risk.

Just a small spill, you see.

The fact is the “death grip” big oil has on us is
nothing compared to the “death grip” all business has
on us, due to a conservatism that makes us all
servants of business. We are the gulf, tappable, and
obliged to forgive all oopsies.

Bash big oil, if you need to get your jollies, meet a
deadline, or just want a few extra bucks for the
weekend. Just don’t loose site of the Big Picture,
and undermine what little liberal power we DO have,
just so you can strut your impressive intellectuality
and help elect another Bush.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, June 9, 2010 at 3:46 pm Link to this comment

Nationalize big oil.

Report this

By ofersince72, June 9, 2010 at 2:32 pm Link to this comment

You betcha

Report this
Fat Freddy's avatar

By Fat Freddy, June 9, 2010 at 2:02 pm Link to this comment

BTW,

RIG is TransOcean Ltd.

DO is Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc

APC is Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

Report this
Fat Freddy's avatar

By Fat Freddy, June 9, 2010 at 12:53 pm Link to this comment

OK. Friends at zerohedge have posted a list of the largest shareholders of BP. Care to take a gander? Think you can handle the truth? What is the truth? Pension funds, investment firms and banks, which includes many 401(k)s, charities, and foundations. Guess what America and Euro zone, you own BP.

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/here-are-todays-very-unhappy-campers

BlackRock: 1.1 billion shares

BlackRock is a truly global firm that combines the benefits of worldwide reach with local service and relationships. We manage assets for clients in North and South America, Europe, Asia, Australia, the Middle East and Africa. The firm employs more than 8,500 talented professionals and maintains offices in 24 countries around the world. Our client base includes corporate, public, union and industry pension plans; governments; insurance companies; third-party mutual funds; endowments; foundations; charities; corporations; official institutions; sovereign wealth funds; banks; financial professionals; and individuals worldwide.

[my emphasis]

http://www2.blackrock.com/global/home/AboutUs/index.htm

How about the Scottish Widows Investment Partnership Limited with 81 million shares? I just know they are just a bunch of greedy Capitalists who are only interested in profits.


I guess there will be a government bailout of BP, after all.

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.