|
|||
|
Barack Obama: Paradoxical WhigPosted on Jan 26, 2011Be ready for the paradoxical phase of Barack Obama’s presidency. Many things will not be exactly as they appear. Paradox No. 1: Because over the next two years he can’t get sweeping, progressive legislation through the Republican-led House, Obama will be doing far more to make the core progressive case that energetic government is essential to prosperity, growth and equity. Paradox No. 2: His talk about the new, the bold and the innovative is in the oldest of political traditions. The Obama of Tuesday night represented not the rambunctious liberalism of the late 1960s but the unifying, John Kennedy-style liberalism of the decade’s beginning—with a dash of Dwight Eisenhower moderation. Obama also sounded like a Whig, the insufficiently appreciated 19th-century American political party that proudly included Henry Clay and Abraham Lincoln. Paradox No. 3: Obama used a conciliatory speech to pick some carefully chosen fights. It will be amusing to watch Republicans defend the oil companies’ tax loopholes that Obama would like to scrap. Paradox No. 4: It may never be clear if American business is co-opting Obama, or if Obama is co-opting business. Advertisement The era of no politicking is over. This speech laid out a rationale for the Obama presidency that stands a chance of enduring through Election Day 2012. The choice is between backward-looking Republicans who talk grumpily about government spending and “Obamacare,” and forward-looking Obama Democrats who would use government—carefully and efficiently, of course—to restore American leadership and a humming, innovative economy. This Obama is all about balance. Notice that when he spoke of making regulation less intrusive, he actually defended rules protecting our food, water and air. His overarching case was also nuanced. “Our free enterprise system is what drives innovation,” he said. “But because it’s not always profitable for companies to invest in basic research, throughout our history, our government has provided cutting-edge scientists and inventors with the support that they need.” In other words, without smart and active government, China will leave us in the dust. This speaks to the paradox of Mr. Innovation operating in a very old tradition. When they want to look modern and moderate, progressive political parties always talk about technology. Seeking to become Britain’s first Labor Party prime minister after years of Conservative rule, Harold Wilson spoke in 1963 of the “white heat” of a technological “revolution.” Kennedy pledged to “get the country moving again,” and sent us to the moon. And it was Eisenhower, president during the original “Sputnik moment,” who pushed through the interstate highway system and federal student loans, early efforts to “out-build” and “out-educate” the world. Let’s also honor the Whigs who championed Clay’s “American System.” Its aim was to promote and protect our manufacturing entrepreneurs and use tariff money to finance “internal improvements,” a better term for roads and canals than our unsightly talk of “infrastructure.” Welcome to Obama’s New American System. As for coming battles, watch how Republicans deal with the president’s call “to eliminate the billions in taxpayer dollars we currently give to oil companies” to pay for his innovation program. Defending big oil does not play well outside of Texas, Oklahoma and Louisiana. Here is an Obama effort to split the business community and isolate a very Republican constituency. Business people emerged as heroes in Obama’s America of “inventors and entrepreneurs.” But the glory went to those who devise, make and sell things, not to the finance jockeys of Wall Street. Business leaders like the useful endeavors Obama wants government to undertake. The president, in turn, hopes to enlist them to battle congressional Republicans who are mocking those “investment” initiatives as mere “spending.” Even if he wanted to, Obama couldn’t beat a unified business community. His bet is that business people tend to be conservative but not ideological. By bringing some CEOs to his side, he can isolate the GOP as a doctrinaire party uninterested in practical things. It will be the trickiest alliance of his presidency, but perhaps also the shrewdest. An Obama who roared straight ahead hit a political wall. This next Obama is using finesse and subtlety to get to the same place. E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com. New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By McKevin, January 29, 2011 at 3:53 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
In my heart I hope of course that Dione’s assessment is accurate but disheartened by the fact that it is all we can hope for. The President’s biggest mistake was not making the financial industry pay a criminal price for what they did to the economy. This would have made the Tea Party irrelevant and would have made it easier for many progressives to accept the glass half full explanation of the first two years.
Report thisBy oldog, January 29, 2011 at 10:46 am Link to this comment
Sounds good, even plausible. Except, after so many
good speeches during his campaign for president,
Barrack Obama did not stop the war, close gitmo,
restore “the rule of law” and freedom from gov surveillance, prosecute the individuals whose ponsi
schemes and gambling with client funds drove our (and
the world’s) economy into a ditch, fund health care
reforms, or allow courts to modify evictions (and
save millions of Americans from homelessness, or even
at the very least, start a jobs program.
If he would have just pushed, we would have gotten
Report thissome progressive action. But by taking them off the
table beforehand he started debate already far-right
of the “center” he claims to work toward. His
timidity guaranteed continuation of the worst of the
Bush presidency.
By Anarcissie, January 27, 2011 at 7:03 pm Link to this comment
I am mystified by this remark. The era of Karl Marx would have to be from about 1840, when his earliest published works were written, to 1883, when he died. While the term ‘Whig’ is indeed redolent of this era, the concerns of the America of that age, and its dominant philosophical issues, seem far from the thoughts and words of those who presently call themselves ‘progressives’. It’s an odd way to describe the period anyway, because Marx himself and the Marxists in general had little influence on it, and they have almost as little to do with contemporary self-styled progressives, who are by and large moderate social democrats who have no intention of seriously troubling the social and economic order of the country, but are interested only getting its ruling class to be nicer though gentle persuasion. I wonder if there’s an explanation.
Report thisBy Mr. Raven, January 27, 2011 at 4:17 pm Link to this comment
Fifty gigs if i wanted a neo-con Republican I would
Report thisvote for a globalist outsourcing environment and labor
destroying, war mongering neo-con Republican. You are
right though that we live in a one party state which
means democracy that implies choices in political
representation is dead. :(
By Mr. Raven, January 27, 2011 at 4:06 pm Link to this comment
Obushlers horrible record continued:
9. Obama’s crushing of government whistleblowers of
U.S. War crimes and other government malfesance like
wikileaks:
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/6/17/wikileaks_whist
leblowers
10. Assassination orders against American Citizens
overseas:
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/201
0/04/07/assassinations
11. Support for expanding Bush’s Unconsitutional
surveillance of American citizens:
http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-
keating/internet/obama-aims-to-wiretap-skype-
facebook-blackberry-the-e…
12. Health insurance reform that is a giveway of a
trillion taxpayer dollars to the big insurance
companies that broke the system in the first place
with no price caps:
http://static1.firedoglake.com/1/files/2010/03/mythfa
ctshcr-2.pdf
13. FBI raids on antiwar activists:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100928/ap_on_re_us/us_fb
i_raid_terrorism
14. Vastly expanded TSA mandate that violates the 4th
amendment.
http://www.refinery29.com/stick-it-to-tsa-body-scans-
with-these-shirts-containing-a-hidden-message.php
15. Cave on fighting for progressive tax cut
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/dec2010/taxe-
d08.shtml
16. Make illegal indefinite detention of prisoners of
wars peranent after lying about closing down
Guantanamo:
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/12/22-5
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/12/22-7
17. Cave on net neutrality after promising to fight
for it:
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/12/22-0
See also:
http://stpeteforpeace.org/obama.html
http://ia700107.us.archive.org/21/items/PaulStreet-
Report thisTheEmpiresNewClothesTalkAtEncuentro58252010/Stre
By Mr. Raven, January 27, 2011 at 4:05 pm Link to this comment
What a bunch of apologist spin, Obummer is nothing
but Bush term III:
Obama as bad as Bush the documented record:
1. The escalated wars even compared to overt war
criminal Bush?
http://www.alternet.org/world/144449/obama_far_outdoes_bush_
in_e…
2. The continuation of the abrogation of Habeas
Corpus just like Bush?
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2009/04/11
/bagram
3. The continuation of military tribunals just like
Bush:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2010/03/04/...
4. The continuation of rendition to countries that
torture just like Bush:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/11/target-of-obama-
era-ren…
5. The continuation of a prison camp that tortures in
gross violation of the Geneva conventions just like
Bush:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,650324,00.h
tml
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/51564
6. Continuation of of Bush’s TARP program to transfer
money from the poor and middle class to unaccountable
banksters rather than helping the mainly African
American victims of sub prime loans?
http://www.abcnews.go.com/GMA/Economy/story?
id=6626721&page=1
http://www.detroitnaacp.org/civilrights/predatory.asp
7. The appointment of industry insiders in the
industry that supported Obama in the Campaign shades
of Cheney and Halliburton:
http://www.helium.com/items/1813307-goldman-sachs-ties-to-
the-ob…
8. Obama’s support for “clean coal,” nuclear power
and the first offshore oil drilling in 20 years which
was only halted with a moratorium after the
disastrous Gulf oil spill:
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2010/02/obama-defends-clean-
coal…
http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/02/16/obama.nuclear.power/i
ndex…
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/01/science/earth/01energy.htm
Report thisl
By TDoff, January 27, 2011 at 12:26 pm Link to this comment
All politicians are not bloviating hypocritical obfuscators. But that 99% of them sure give the rest a bad name.
Report thisBy RayLan, January 27, 2011 at 12:09 pm Link to this comment
” It may never be clear if American business is co-opting Obama, or if Obama is co-opting business.”
That’s not a paradox - it is a plain operative principle. Obama is in no way distinct from Big Business - he is their page and ambassador.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, January 27, 2011 at 9:51 am Link to this comment
Great speech,
But how to implement those nuanced policies with a stand-pat GOP? Not happening.
Best thing the speech can do is start tarring the GOP and forcing them to “own” the negative effects on the nation that their policies forced through.
Yeah, let ‘em defend subsidies for oil companies that we pay for.
But unless Obama and the Dims keep the harangue up on a 4 or 5 bullet points, it will get nowhere and the GOP will take the Senate and WH in 2012.
Naturally, the Dims will be expected to be spineless and give long, boring laundry lists of their “achievements” and policy aims that nobody listens to.
To keep doing the same thing and expecting a different result is insanity.
Report thisBy Louis Proyect, January 27, 2011 at 8:26 am Link to this comment
For a well paid reporter to have missed this point is reason enough to stop listening to him as well.
—-
Isn’t it the job of well paid reporters to serve as stenographers to power? I think that E.J. Dionne has earned every penny.
Report thisBy SoTexGuy, January 27, 2011 at 7:58 am Link to this comment
Is an economically muscular China the new bug-a-boo? Used to march us in one direction domestically the way that the threat of nuclear annihilation from the Soviets kept us under our school desks and paying to build fortress-world USA?
I quote the author; “.. without smart and active government, China will leave us in the dust.’
What exactly does that mean? .. by many popular measures and tests right now and for decades we’re No.1. There’s lots of very nice places on earth that we’ve been ‘dusting’ for quite some time.. The citizens of these downtrodden nations live and die without showing any particular signs of the tragedy of not being No.1.. or even No.2, 3 or whatever. In fact many of these second and third rate countries boast a standard of living that is enviable.. especially for the average working person.
So when economists and politicians warn us of slipping from the top spot and tell us to dig in, accept lower wages and benefits and workplace conditions.. abandon plans and actions to preserve our air and water.. and to generally rally to whatever measures our leaders propose.. that’s about their concerns for business profits.
Personally, I’d be ok with being No.2 or even No.3.. and especially if it meant an end to the 24HR hustle Americans are forced to run and boom and bust economic cycles.. a renewed focus on clean water, breathable air.. and most especially an end to crisis politics and policies.
Adios.
Report thisBy FiftyGigs, January 27, 2011 at 7:44 am Link to this comment
The political strategy of this is beyond the comprehension of so-called “progressives”.
The paradox is that “progressives” are stuck in the era of Karl Marx. Conservatives have cleaned their clocks so thoroughly that all this so-called “movement” can manage is a weak plea that somebody else revolt.
Report thisBy democratz.org, January 27, 2011 at 1:31 am Link to this comment
We the progressives will need to demand the legislation we want. To this end:
My message of hope for Liberals and Progressives in America. http://www.hoflink.com/~dbaer/speech1-22-2011.wmv
Sign this petition at http://WWW.DEMOCRATZ.ORG if you want to get congress to enact a $10 an hour minimum wage, The Employee Free Choice act, a real prescription drug benefit for Medicare in part B, an End to 2 expensive wars, a single payer government health insurance plan, Tier 5 unemployment benefits extension and the women’s freedom of choice act into law. Post this message on facebook groups, pages and profiles. Thank you.
Protest the companies that give money to conservatives in both parties. These companies fund conservatives and allow conservatives to inflict punishment on the less fortunate so let us hold those companies accountable by boycotting them until we get the legislation we want.
After you sign this petition Join the the facebook page at
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Sign-this-petition-for-progressive-legislation-at-wwwdemocratzorg/181036078591739
Report thisBy Textynn, January 26, 2011 at 10:36 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It has gotten to the point that I don’t even know why I read anything or listen to anything about politics. The country is taken of by a corrupt and rotten aristocracy. They steal from us right in our faces and they enact legislation that giant majorities don’t want because it is obviously designed to steal more..
Report thisBy Awi, January 26, 2011 at 10:00 pm Link to this comment
“This Obama is all about balance”
This Obama is the same old Obama and not worth listening to. For a well paid reporter to have missed this point is reason enough to stop listening to him as well.
Report thisBy Dave24, January 26, 2011 at 8:46 pm Link to this comment
Dennis Miller mentioned during his standup that he once asked his son about the
debt, and how his son felt in knowing that his generation would inherit today’s
mess. The son replied, “I’ll just pass it on to my children.”
Forget the debt. Like AIG and the evil empires of banks, the US is too big to fail.
The economy is not what will bring our country down. It will be scientific illiteracy
that does it, especially in light of China’s enormous push forward in terms of
research and technological investment. (And the rampant religious irrationality
that exists throughout Congress won’t help, either.)
Fundamental understanding in science and technology will be what swings the
Report thispendulum of global power: not the ever-fluctuating, pyramid-scheme economy.
By entropy2, January 26, 2011 at 8:06 pm Link to this comment
Congrats, Mr. Dionne…who would’ve dreamed that one person could pack so much baloney into a single column?
For example, your “Paradox” No. 1. Of course BHO will be pushing progressive policies now that they have no chance of passage. Firing up the base with hot air over issues you really don’t care about is not paradoxical. It’s just typical crass political manipulation to get re-elected.
“Paradox” No. 2 isn’t a paradox. It’s just gibberish. I mean, seriously, the freakin’ Whigs?? Besides, things turned out great for that party, didn’t they.
“Paradox” No. 3 is also a joke. Closing the oil companies’ tax loopholes sounds great in a speech, but will just be portrayed by Repubs as a tax increase which discourages exploration and modernization. And even if, by some chance, it passes, then the subsequent spike in gas prices can be blamed on the Dems. Great way to pick a fight! If this were the context of a comprehensive war against taxpayer-funded corporate welfare, then it might have some validity. But Mr. Prez would never walk that walk.
“Paradox” No. 4 is just silly. Who gives a rip who’s co-opting whom? The middle and lower classes continue to get the sh*t end of the stick, and neither BHO nor his corporate buddies are lifting a finger to change it.
And that’s just the first part of your article. Jeez Louise.
Report this