Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
May 27, 2017 Disclaimer: Please read.

Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.

Rising Star

Truthdig Bazaar
Kolyma Tales

Kolyma Tales

By Varlam Shalamov; John Glad (Translator)

more items

Email this item Print this item

Award Recognizes Uncompromising Change-Makers

Posted on Dec 24, 2010

By Nicholas Jahr

As the freshly shellacked president cuts deals with a triumphant Republican Party, the annual Puffin/Nation Prize for Creative Citizenship was awarded to two uncompromising activists: environmentalist Bill McKibben and Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards.

Awarded annually for the last decade by the Nation Institute and the Puffin Foundation, this is the first time the prize has been given to two recipients.

“The times dictated that we’ve got to fight back,” says Gladys Rosenstein, who runs the Puffin Foundation with her husband Perry. Their choices of who to support this year were dictated by the causes under attack: the fight for women’s rights and against global warming. When it comes to the latter, Gladys notes, “they seem to think it’s a farce.”

McKibben was one of the first writers to realize that this was no farce, and to sound the alarm. His book “The End of Nature,” originally serialized in the New Yorker, was the first book on the subject for a general audience.

“I think I always assumed that it was going to be someone else’s job to do the organizing,” McKibben says. “A few years ago I was in Bangladesh when they were having their first big outbreak of dengue fever. Mosquitoes dig this warm, wet world we’re building. And I got sick. Watching people die around me, in a country that has done nothing at all to contribute to this crisis, and yet is already paying an immense price … that just made me think that you should be doing more than writing and speaking about this.”


Square, Site wide
So McKibben, working alongside a handful of college students, formed That’s 350 parts per million carbon dioxide in the atmosphere; above that level, according to NASA’s James Hansen, “the more likely that we will see disastrous and irreversible climate impacts.” We’re currently at 388.

“We’re not going to stop global warming at this point,” McKibben says. “We’ve already raised the temperature a degree.” Nor does McKibben think that measures like the Kerry-Lieberman-Graham bill, which died in the Senate this year, are up to the task. “What happens in 2050 may be less important at this point than what happens in 2020. We’ve got to make really sharp, quick reductions. Cap-and-trade was an attempt by the Beltway environmental groups—and an understandable one—to do what they could without a movement behind them. To try and make a series of compromises and back room deals with industry. That’s why the bill was so warped and tepid by the time it finally emerged. So the trouble was that it wasn’t a very good bill and they still couldn’t win. Even come close. What it demonstrates is the need for a movement.” has set out to build that movement through events like its Global Work Party, bringing people together in 7,400 communities in 188 countries to work on small-scale projects to improve the environment and then lobby their representatives. “We did that not because you can solve climate change one bike path at a time,” McKibben says. “You can’t.” What you can do is try to resurrect the sort of communities we lived in before cars and fossil fuels drove us to ever farther apart, and maybe build a movement in the process.

“The ability to link those things together in a new way is one of the few wild cards working in our favor,” McKibben says. “One of the things that’s important about the Internet is that it’s incredibly cheap to use. So we’ve had no money. And yet one of the first things we did at was take what money we had, about $8,000, and make a really good animated video. The thing has been seen millions and millions of times on YouTube and been a very good organizing tool. The website that we built works in more than a dozen languages, which is pretty rare. It took all the money we had to make it. Exxon-Mobil can spend 70 or 80 million dollars building their website without blinking an eye, but it won’t be any better than ours.”

In contrast to McKibben, Richards started out as a labor organizer, eventually becoming Planned Parenthood’s president in February 2006. “The work I do at Planned Parenthood is directly connected to the work I did right out of college, organizing garment workers,” Richards says. “The same women I was organizing then are the women we see at Planned Parenthood health centers.”

The waiting rooms of those clinics are probably more familiar than most Americans would care to admit. And yet in a recent Los Angeles Times op-ed, historian Nancy L. Cohen declared that it was time to abandon the rhetoric of “pro-choice,” arguing that voters/people inevitably identify with “life” over “choice.”

“Women and young people think of these issues in terms of their health,” Richards says. “Most people don’t get up thinking every morning about choice, but they do get up thinking about do they have access to the health care they need or their kids need or their family needs. This is an issue of access to health care. That’s our mission, and it’s been pretty sobering to see how much work is left to do.”

To that end, Obama’s health care reform was, in Richards’ evaluation, “an imperfect bill.” Even as it expands women’s overall access to health care, it still threatens to severely limit coverage for abortion, and the Department of Health and Human Services will soon decide whether insurers will be required to cover birth control. Planned Parenthood has seized on this as an opportunity to engage with young people throughout the country “who understand what it means to pay $50 a month for your birth control,” Richards says. “We’ve made sure they [HHS] know there’s enormous support at the grassroots level for this kind of policy.”

Planned Parenthood’s political activism isn’t limited to lobbying. In Colorado, the Planned Parenthood Action Fund mailed information on the state’s Senate race to 156,000 independent women voters. Incumbent Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet ultimately defeated challenger Ken Buck by a mere 15,000 votes.

Richards argues that it was the ballot initiative declaring a fertilized egg a full-fledged person that really drove women to the polls. “We beat it 3 to 1 in a state that was evenly divided in partisan terms,” Richards says. Planned Parenthood took advantage of similar gender gaps in Senate races in Oregon and Washington, where Democrats also narrowly held a seat.

The right is paying attention: Indiana Rep. Mike Pence has reintroduced his Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, intended to strip Planned Parenthood of all federal funding.

“The interesting thing,” Richards observes, “is that if Congressman Pence or any of his cohorts really wanted to reduce abortion in this country, they’d be volunteering at a Planned Parenthood health center. We do more to prevent abortions and unintended pregnancies than any other organization in America.”

This is the sort of creative citizenship that Perry Rosenstein wanted to reward when he and former Nation publisher Victor Navasky cooked up the idea for the Puffin Prize a decade ago. Rosenstein made his money in “nuts and screws and bolts” and wanted to put it to work supporting people who have “found a way to bring social issues to the public.” The prize is “a way to keep those people going, even in very difficult times.”

“I’ve been a volunteer in this work for the three years that we’ve done it,” says McKibben. “So it’ll help me go on a little longer.”

Nicholas Jahr is a freelance writer living in Brooklyn, N.Y.

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Join the conversation

Load Comments
Fat Freddy's avatar

By Fat Freddy, December 25, 2010 at 1:15 pm Link to this comment

Or is progress exactly that which you are here to hinder?

Is that what you call it? Progress?

Liberal Democracy—> Totalitarian Democracy—> Totalitarian Bureaucracy

Great progress. Can I get a little freedom with my democracy, or do I only get the freedom that Progressives and Conservatives think I should have?

I want all freedoms. As a human being, it is my Natural Right. Anything less, is slavery. Your “progressive” controls are no better than religious, social or even dictatorial controls.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, December 25, 2010 at 12:27 pm Link to this comment

gerard—Awards seem very macho, very corporate to me.  Corps types are always giving each other awards, along with their favorite corporate athletic teams.  They have ‘most valuable players’ as if no one else on the team mattered.  It’s all great-hero stuff.  I think it’s highly pernicious.  Fortunately, as I say, by the time they’re giving each other awards they’re mostly done.

I’m just trying to imagine the really energetic, committed activists I know being told to show up for an awards ceremony.  They’d tell the organizers to send the plaque or whatever it is to the demonstration, the squat, the food share, whatever, or better, stop fooling around and playing at corporate mummery and come down themselves and join in.

Really, awards are a bad sign.  Sartre got that one right.

Report this

By ardee, December 25, 2010 at 9:40 am Link to this comment

tropicgirl, December 24 at 8:16 pm

Do you honestly believe that your incessantly pessimistic and negative posts are at all helpful? Many are looking for ways to make significant change, many understand that small steps turn into long journeys, you, apparently do not.

You prattle:

“Global Warming, are you freaking kidding? That is nothing but a worldwide carbon tax for the global rulers.”

Certainly the Carbon Tax is but one proposal in a necessary discussion of what to do about a very real problem. Yet your seemingly fatalistic and horrifically negative mind makes it a condemnation of the entire effort, one yet in its infancy.

“The “women’s rights” groups are being used to culture bomb the Muslim community.”

Certainly there are those who twist this movement to their own use, as, by the by, do you. That in no way should lead to a condemnation of the entire movement. Who the hell are you and why does your complete negativity not lead to your suicide?

I cannot recall a single post of yours that offers a positive solution or an optimistic view that change for the better is possible. I cannot, in good conscience, ask you to go away. But I can ask you to explain why you think pouring cold water on everything is a way to progress?

Or is progress exactly that which you are here to hinder?

Report this's avatar

By, December 25, 2010 at 1:43 am Link to this comment

Fight back against conservatives in congress.

Sign this petition demanding congress and the President enact a progressive agenda. Pass this link around. Post it on blogs around this country. The Peaceful revolution has begun.

Report this

By TAO Walker, December 24, 2010 at 4:25 pm Link to this comment

Once again “money” is along-for-the-ride, though the illusion persists that it’s really in the-driver’s-seat.  No wonder virtually everybody in the virtual world-o’-hurt remains CONvinced nothing worthwhile is even possible without the toxic, corrosive, and habit-forming stuff.

Any actual organic good coming from the groups and “individuals” featured here (and others like them), comes always and entirely despite the “money” involved….and never, even in-part, because of it.  Yet paying lip-service to its “power” remains the-order-of-the-day.

Thanks are due Cecile Richards and Bill McKibbon for their efforts at trying to turn some “money” into something instead that we might have some chance to go on Living with.  It’s good practice for The Day when we all together again do without it altogether.

That Day, tame Sisters and Brothers, is coming soon to your Neighborhood.


Report this
tropicgirl's avatar

By tropicgirl, December 24, 2010 at 3:16 pm Link to this comment

There are no real activists anymore who have not been compromised into the progressive machine.

The “women’s rights” groups are being used to culture bomb the Muslim community.


Global Warming, are you freaking kidding? That is nothing but a worldwide carbon tax for the global rulers. It was such a failure that now the globalists are pushing the other lie, over-population. Which is also a farce and mostly a result of globalists creating refugees at will and oppressive trade policies that we have now.

Report this

By gerard, December 24, 2010 at 2:35 pm Link to this comment

Friend, why the wet blanket?  Awards help call public attention.  Awards make people working on desperate, hard-to-sell causes feel encouraged.  Award money can be used for much-needed publicity or to stabilize other aspects of hard, mostly volunteer work.  Awards make the giver feel he/she has done/ is doing the right thing. Awards tend to legitimize unpopular causes. Etc.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, December 24, 2010 at 12:00 pm Link to this comment

People who are making change have no time for awards.  They are out doing their making-change thing.  Their award, if any, is the change they have made.

Once a group of people beginning sitting around giving each other awards, they’re pretty much done.

Report this
Right Top, Site wide - Care2
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide

Like Truthdig on Facebook