|
|
May 25, 2013
|
|
At Last: A President, Not a RefPosted on Apr 13, 2011President Obama has finally decided to take his own side in the philosophical struggle that is the true engine of this nation’s budget debate. After months of mixed signals about what he was willing to fight for, Obama finally laid out his purposes and his principles. His approach has difficulties of its own, and much will depend on execution. But the president was unequivocal in arguing that the roots of our fiscal problems lie in the tax cuts of the last decade that we could not afford. And he raised the stakes in our politics to something more fundamental than dry numbers on a page or computer screen. “We are rugged individualists, a self-reliant people with a healthy skepticism of too much government,” he declared. “But there has always been another thread running throughout our history—a belief that we are all connected; and that there are some things we can only do together, as a nation. We believe, in the words of our first Republican president, Abraham Lincoln, that through government, we should do together what we cannot do as well for ourselves.” There are at least four things to like about his approach. First, without mentioning Rep. Paul Ryan by name, he called out Ryan’s truly reactionary budget proposal for what it is: an effort to slash government programs, in large part to preserve and expand tax cuts for the wealthy. “That’s not right,” he said, “and it’s not going to happen as long as I’m president.” Second, he was willing to speak plainly about raising taxes, and he insisted correctly on restoring the Clinton-era tax rates for the wealthy. Tax reform, which he also proposed, is a fine idea, though there is ample reason for skepticism as to how much revenue it can produce. It would be far better to return to all of the Clinton tax rates and then build tax reform on that base, in particular through higher taxes on investment income. Advertisement Finally, he was eloquent in defending Medicare and Medicaid. He proposed saving money by building on last year’s heath reform law. There are two ways to reduce the government’s heath care expenses. One is Ryan’s path, which, Obama said, “lowers the government’s health care bills by asking seniors and poor families to pay them instead.” The alternative, which the president rightly embraced, “lowers the government’s health care bills by reducing the cost of health care itself.” But a good speech is only a first step. For his allies, the president’s negotiating method has been, well, petrifying: concede, concede and concede again—and then compromise from an already heavily compromised position. That’s why his promised cuts in domestic spending straight out of the box are worrying. This problem will be even worse if the Obama plan comes to be defined as the “left” pole in the negotiation. It’s not. A truly progressive budget would include more revenue raised in more progressive ways. And contrary to what you might hear on Fox News, the established media wisdom on budget issues is center-right, and Ryan’s extreme budget has pushed the perceived center still further right, aggravating the tendency to locate Obama’s plan far to the left of where it is. And there is something fundamentally wrong about making the deficit the central issue in our politics. Here’s a little secret: The deficit is actually not a hard problem. Only the taxophobia that Republicans have created and Democrats cower before has made this so complicated. Yes, health care costs are also a big deal. But they are a challenge for the whole economy and too many conservatives demagogue all serious efforts to grapple with them (see “death panels”). For all that, there was a bigness about Obama’s speech that was a relief after his recent sojourn as a sideline judge. “We believe that in order to preserve our own freedoms and pursue our own happiness, we can’t just think about ourselves,” he said. “We have to think about the country that made those liberties possible. We have to think about our fellow citizens with whom we share a community.” Obama is back on the field, and this is where he needs to stay. E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com. Previous item: The False Debate on the Debt Next item: What Stanley McChrystal Did to Pat Tillman’s Family New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By MarthaA, April 20, 2011 at 9:13 am Link to this comment
I’m still looking for one time where Obama
represented the majority population of the
United States and haven’t found one,
can’t remember one and don’t know anyone who
does. I am a member of the majority population,
which means I have no political representation
whatsoever from Obama or any member of the
Corporate DLC New Democrats in Congress that
joined the Republicans and brought the majority
population to their knees with all the
economic woe carried out consistently for the past
40 years against the majority population,
and Obama goes along with the Right-Wing’s
agenda of not representing the majority
population, as if the majority population
aren’t suppose to be represented.
Neither Obama nor any member of the Corporate
New Democrats deserve to be reelected. As
with Bush, Obama should be impeached as a
traitor to the majority population of the United
States, but as with Bush, if there is still enough
Corporate New Democrats in power in Congress
impeachment will be taken off the table.
If Bernie Sanders would run, I would vote for
Report thisBernie Sanders, he has always stood up for the
majority population, as does Governor Howard
Dean.
By Alan, April 19, 2011 at 7:42 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Obama has never missed an opportunity to sell
Report thiscommon folk down the river. I suspect he never
will. He has had ample time to demonstrate any
differences he might have with the fascist plan for
overt replacement of the republic with a form
of corporate fascism. Bottom line: I don’t trust
Obama, why should you?
Dump Obama in 2012. run Bernie Sanders or some
like minded individual who is an actual progressive.
By MarthaA, April 18, 2011 at 8:05 pm Link to this comment
Mack, April 18 at 11:58 pm.
Obama is a DLC New Democrat that argues within
Report thisthe Right-Wing’s frame of dialectic.
By MarthaA, April 18, 2011 at 7:58 pm Link to this comment
When the candidates of the Left start arguing
Report thisdialectical frames of the political Left with the
political Right, instead of arguing within the
Political Right’s dialectical frames, the Left will
win, but the conservative DLC New Republican
Lite Democrats argue for the supposed Left
within the conservative safety of the Right’s
dialectical frames and it isn’t logical for the Left to
argue political benefit and best interest of the
Left using the frame of the political dialectic of
the Right, because dialectic is a logical LOOP that
is causal in nature and arguing a causal loop that
does not support the thesis of your argument is
not beneficial to the best interest and outcome of
your argument, therefore the DLC New
Democrats always help the Republicans with the
appearance of representing the Left.
By berniem, April 18, 2011 at 7:31 pm Link to this comment
Sorry, I fell for Obama’s rap in ‘08! Mr. “Look Ahead, Not Back” is trying to pander to the base he so fervently betrayed in an effort to raise a billion for another go-round! I find our dear POTUS to be every bit as reprehensible and criminal as his predecessor and no longer believe anything that he says!
Report thisBy MarthaA, April 16, 2011 at 10:02 pm Link to this comment
Political dialectic of the Left is the logical
proof of the political agenda of the political
Left.
Political dialectic of the Right is the logical
proof of the political agenda of the political
Right.
It is not logical for the Left to argue political
benefit and best interest of the Left using the
frame of the political dialectic of the
Right, because dialectic is a
logical loop that is causal in
nature and arguing a “causal loop” that
does not support the thesis of your own
argument is not beneficial to the best interest
and outcome of your argument, but is always
how the Left argues with the Right.
There is more space for logical discourse in
political dialectic than there is for emotions that
lead the logically challenged to support the
argument of opposing political dialectic by
arguing within the frame of opposing political
dialectic while never becoming aware that
their own argument is false to the frame
of their own political dialectic.
Does anyone think that it will serve the aims of
the Left’s political agenda to use the proof of the
Right’s opposing political dialectic to prove the
Left’s argument? —— Or, do you think that it
would better serve the Left’s political agenda to
use the proof of the Left’s political dialectic to
prove the Left’s arguments??
Success in any argument on logic lies in the
latter, rather than the former argument; this is
why the Right has been so successful since the
time of Nixon and why the Left has been so
dismal and pathetic.
My natural inclination is to believe that no one is
Report thisignorant and unaware enough to willingly
use someone else’s dialectical frame that
is contrary to their own frame of dialectic,
and that when it is done, that it is done with
disingenuous intent and purpose to lead others
to accept false conclusions and a false sense of
advantage.
By Anarcissie, April 15, 2011 at 9:59 am Link to this comment
There is no organized Left in mainstream American politics today. While leftist ideas of peace, freedom and equality are widely dispersed among the people and have many admirers, they are not represented by any large organizations or voting blocs.
The present struggle in Washington, if it is not entirely a sham, is between capitalists who think, rather reasonably, that their position at the head of the social order can be assured and stabilized by a certain amount of Welfare and regulation—we can call these people ‘conservatives’—and a rather variegated collection of right-wing radical dissidents who oppose this existing order on a variety of grounds. Both groups are heavily infested with kleptocrats. This is more of a problem with the conservatives than the radicals, since the conservatives want to save something whereas the radical prefer mere destruction.
Mr. O’s political fate depends on whether he will be able to convince the ruling class that moderation, rather than radical kleptocracy, is the best policy. Whether moderation includes Medicare and Medicaid is hard to say. My guess is this: the poor have been quiet in recent years, so Medicaid will be gutted. The working class made trouble in Wisconsin, so Medicare will be saved.
Report thisBy Gil, April 15, 2011 at 9:33 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
And, E.J., Obama is gratefully accepting the help of Paul Ryan. And Paul Ryan is in
Report thislove with a corpse, the corpse of Aayan Rand. He learned all his selfish greed
from the mistress of that most despicable of human traits. Another of Rand’s
lover, actual beloved friends, was Alan Greenspan. And didn’t we learn enough
bad stuff about Rand’s pseudo-economic thought while he was in office. Of
course, Obama then kept Bernanke on, renamed him, and hired Geithner. It just
never stops. Obama has a lot of debt to repay to Wall St. because he was the
biggest recipient of their largesse in 2008, significantly more than even John
McCain! Now that should tell you a very great deal.
By Litl Bludot, April 15, 2011 at 2:12 am Link to this comment
“I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and
causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. ... corporations
have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will
follow, and the money power of the country will endeavour to
prolong it’s reign by working upon the prejudices of the people
until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is
destroyed.“Abraham Lincoln
Report this“The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the
growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than
their democratic State itself. What, in its essence, is Fascism, but
ownership of government by an individual, by a group or by any
controlling private power.”
Franklin D. Roosevelt
By Jeffrey C. Goldfarb, April 14, 2011 at 7:42 pm Link to this comment
The project of the left will be supported by this centrist President, http://www.deliberatelyconsidered.com/2011/04/president-obama-on-taxing-and-spending-and-the-american-center/
Report thisBy alturn, April 14, 2011 at 5:00 pm Link to this comment
Yes, Obama was eloquent. Yes, he did draw a line in the sand. Yes, he said he was not an extreme republican.
But the real ideas presented yesterday were way out in the cheap seats when Maxine Waters and the rest of the progressive caucus presented what should be discussed in the unveiling of the People’s Budget. Obama was as close to that as he was to appointing Krugman to a cabinet position.
“Power politics will give way to the politics of food, shelter and protection.
Report thisThis will spread the world over. Socialism and capitalism will converge. They are the two wheels which are essential. Politics cannot function with only one wheel.”
- World Teacher Maitreya through an associate as reported by Share International
By John M, April 14, 2011 at 4:56 pm Link to this comment
Cash pours in for Obama’s events
President Obama is starting his fundraising for the
2012 election by raising money from some of his
richer supporters.
An hour after Obama lands in Chicago Thursday
evening, he’s scheduled to start his parade of
campaign events that will benefit his own war chest
and that of the Democratic National Committee. In the
course of three hours, Obama will speak at three
fundraisers — two at restaurants and one at Navy
Pier.
The Chicago Tribune reports that the restaurant
appearances are “high-dollar events,” and that the
Navy Pier “fundraising kickoff” will include the
Chicago Bulls star Derrick Rose. The paper says that
for each donor, the first $2,500 goes to Obama for
America for the primary election for which he is
unlikely to be challenged; the next $2,500 is for the
general election; and another $30,800 benefits the
DNC.
The fundraisers are expected to raise more than $2
million. Read more about the expectations, and the
guest list including Rahm Emanuel, in Mike Allen’s
Playbook.
http://www.politico.com/politico44/perm/0411/trifecta
Report this_09197e15-e85d-4d58-954b-518b163ddbca.html
By EdWatters, April 14, 2011 at 4:45 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Even Dionne is falling for Obama’s eloquent verbiage. Look at what he does, not what he says.
Report thisBy who'syourdebs, April 14, 2011 at 3:37 pm Link to this comment
What? Our President has finally drawn a line in the sand? Tell me this has been Obama’s take on Ali’s rope-a-dope; he covered up on the ropes, looked deliberately more tired than he actually was, and now he’s going to zero in for the kill on tax breaks for the super-wealthy. Someone said: “if you don’t stand for something, you’ll fall for anything”. I hope in going to bat for the little guy, if that’s what he’s doing, he sharpens his critique of the Republican house-of-mirrors. They deserve to be called out on the carpet for their truly reactionary and cutthroat program.
Report thisBy Anarcissie, April 14, 2011 at 2:24 pm Link to this comment
justconnect—can you give URLs? I’d like to follow up your observation. I think some investigation and research is called for.
Report thisBy justconnect, April 14, 2011 at 2:02 pm Link to this comment
Within the past two weeks, I’ve seen 3 different ads (Craigs List and local ad circular) recruiting people to be paid right-wing bloggers on popular websites.
I used to read TruthDig comments, but now believe they are being populated by pay-for-post “writers”.
I have no solution, no recommendation. Perhaps only: “reader beware.”
Report thisBy laceration, April 14, 2011 at 1:52 pm Link to this comment
A battered wife that keeps on going back…
Report thisBy rob, April 14, 2011 at 1:32 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
here we go again. ryans tax proposal is less than what obamas own commission recommended. even if we recommend what robert reich says the deficit would still be 1.2 billion. the problem is govt is just to big. our deficit today is larger than our entire budget in 1990. it is out of control and soon there will nothing for no one.
Report thisBy eagle bill, April 14, 2011 at 11:53 am Link to this comment
“Obama is back on the field and this is where he needs to stay”. Why, so he can fumble or throw another interception? This guy is the Ryan Leaf of presidents.
Report thisBy MK Ultra, April 14, 2011 at 11:49 am Link to this comment
Wanna bet on that one? It’s not over till the fat lady sings and I say Oblahblah will do a 180 before long. That’s all he knows how to do, shoot his mouth and then turn around and do the complete opposite of that which he said he would or wouldn’t do. I’m so sick of the guy and his forked tongue.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, April 14, 2011 at 8:20 am Link to this comment
Great Speech! But I don’t believe it anymore than the Re-thugs do.
And I WON’T believe it until he signs his first veto, when he FINALLY decides that as bad as the Fed Govt closing down, giving in to Ryan’s insane budget demands are worse, and lets it shut down.
They call his bluff every time and every time he folds rather than calling them and laying down his hand.
Report thisBy madisolation, April 14, 2011 at 8:04 am Link to this comment
E.J. Dionne licks the Blue Dog Democratic Lollipup once again, up to and including praise for the Reaganesque part of Obama’s speech. “Rugged indiviualism,” “faith in free markets,” and “skepticism of government” are Reagan talking points. Speak for yourself, E.J. and Ronnie Obama.
Report thisFurthermore, as John Nichols wrote:
“At a time when House Republicans are talking up the notion of raising the retirement age to 70 and otherwise reducing benefits and imposing budgets on the elderly, the president is expressing a willingness to negotiate away a lot of what is social and secure about Social Security.”
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/04/13-6
As long as Ronnie Obama starts with a belief that the budget should be balanced on the backs of the citizens, he is worthless as a President. As long as he believes in giving our hard-earned money away to military contractors and defense corporations, he is worthless as a President. As long as he believes that the rich should get richer and the poor should waste away, he remains the same lying creepy narcissist, enchanted by opulence—a con man who who’s so stupid he’s conning himself.
Don’t let him con you. He is not a man you can take at his word.
By Brian Routh, April 14, 2011 at 6:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Obama is the boy who cried wolf….....I don’t believe him this time….it’s all another
Report thisBS attempt to get voters…..he is nothing more than a lackey for the rich and
corporate world which pays him and backs him…..so Obama screw you!
By kerryrose, April 14, 2011 at 6:04 am Link to this comment
It would be absolutely foolish to believe Obama again. This was the same crap that he spewed during the last election only to turn around and betray Progressive values.
How dare you put on the smiley face and ask us to believe that this time Obama really means it?
Report thisBy ardee, April 14, 2011 at 5:38 am Link to this comment
There have been far too many eloquent speeches followed by inaction or even opposite actions from President Obama for me to believe this latest one.
Much of the economic problems are caused by theft, by fraud, and there has been little to no attempt to punish the guilty and correct the regulations that failed to regulate. Further, this nation’s wealth is being squandered in the Middle East with no solutions occurring and no end in sight.
The ire of much of America is being directed at unions and decent working people while firms such as General Electric pay no taxes on 16 Billion in profits. Obama then rewards the CEO of GE with a place in his administration! So do not expect me to swallow his kool aid .
Report thisBy TDoff, April 14, 2011 at 4:46 am Link to this comment
The president took some small steps in the right direction. He did not say many things that needed to be said. If he were to try to state all the corrections needed in this society in one speech, he would need to speak continuously for months.
Report thisBut he better follow up his words with actions on the corrections he did outline, increased taxation and sharing of the load for the wealthiest amongst us, and continued protection and support for the disadvantaged amongst us, or he will have lost the last vestiges of his credibility, and deservedly so.
He will not only have lost his personal credibility, but it’s possible that if he caves in yet again to the amoral ‘powers-that-be’, the tipping point for the patience and forbearance (some would say ‘stupidity’ or ‘inertia’) of the public, the poor saps putting up with all this crap from ‘their’ government, will have been reached with the realization that ‘their’ government is a fake, a fraud, a malignant enterprise with a phony facade.
And massive, widespread, hopefully non-violent but effective resistance to the charade the US ‘democracy’ has become, could commence. At least we can so hope, we cannot continue as we are indefinitely.
One last thought re: our President. If he were to try doing all the things that need to be done to reverse and correct the disastrous courses our nation has taken for the past five administrations, as his campaign speeches seemed to promise he would, his sworn, determined enemies would be the current ‘powers-that-be’. Since they are cumulatively not only the wealthiest, most powerful creatures on earth, and have proven themselves almost unanimously, completely self-interested and amoral, just imagine the pressures, tactics, and threats that they pose to anyone who opposes their interests. The Presidency is not only a very wearing, tiring, aging occupation, but for Obama, or any aspiring reformer, it may be a matter of life or death, as it has so proven in the past.
By Lord, April 14, 2011 at 4:38 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This article perfectly exemplifies the kind of blind stupidity on the left. The hero worship on the left for undeserving politicians who have done nothing but pander to fascists and corporatists just because they have a big D appended to the end of their names is PART OF THE PROBLEM NOT PART OF THE SOLUTION.
Report thisBy thebeerdoctor, April 14, 2011 at 4:33 am Link to this comment
The first shovel throw of manure is only a first step, Mr. Dionne,Jr. His fretting over President Obama becoming “the left pole” is utter nonsense. No, the pole he should be fretting over is the one used by the shameless ones, as the late Hunter Thompson referred to it as: “No, this pole is different. It is dark like a stovepipe and slick with human grease, criss-crossed with long scars and teeth marks that will give you a queasy feeling if you stare at them too long.”
Report thisBy cripes, April 14, 2011 at 2:30 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
We should all know by now the chasm between mr obama’s words and deeds; mr dionne apparently has chosen to forget.
The same obama that decries robbing the poor to pay the hedge fund crowd—in lofty rhetoric—has kept devils like alan simpson, geithner, Immelt, Rubin, Summers, et al, at the nexus of power, with labor, seniors, black folks, immigrants, and poor people scratching at the gate.
No EJ, it’s not what he says that counts, it’s what he does.
And what he does is shepard the batshit republican “policy” (if you can call this lunacy a policy) into effect.
It’s pretty simple really; black, democrat prez neuters entire liberal, black, labor alliance and ushers in 1890’s.
Report thisBy Litl Bludot, April 14, 2011 at 2:00 am Link to this comment
This guy must get paid by Obama and his corporate pals. He’s one of the most
disgusting journalists posing as a progressive, and that’s saying a lot.
Just wondering with whom Dionne has a rapport at Truthdig? I mean, did Scheer
Report thisand Dionne have lunch before he was hired? Who talks seriously with this
intellectual fraud and can still look in the mirror? Except, our frenemy Obama,
perhaps. Yes, they’re probably great friends.
By gerard, April 14, 2011 at 12:54 am Link to this comment
Nothing at all said about stopping the wars? Nothing about the preponderant economic dependence upon the military industrial complex for jobs and revenues?
Report thisNothing about the obscenity—the absolute obscenity of permitting a tiny percent at the top to steal its riches from the poor and confine millions of their fellow citizens to poor education, poor health and poor job prospects?
The truth has still not been stated frankly enough; only hinted at, in terms so vague and inoffensive that most ordinary people will still not have the root facts of the situation to guide their attitudes and decisions.
“Prevarication Lite” is an all too accurate judgment, sad to say. These ignorant Republicans really have Obama over a barrel—also sad to say.
We citizens are going to have to do more to make an impact on the national decisions somehow.
By driving bear, April 13, 2011 at 9:45 pm Link to this comment
I am sorry to say that Mr. Dionne is suffering from Alzheimers, because if he was well he would remember we heard this same speech from Obama back in 2007-8
Report thisI suggest he start using google now that his memory is falling; and google the phrase ” fool me once shame on you , fool me twice shame on me”. So in conclusion Shame on Obama.
By Morpheus, April 13, 2011 at 9:44 pm Link to this comment
Memo to America: Stop waiting for Democrats and Republicans to save you.
“WAKE UP!” - JOIN THE REVOLUTION
Read “Common Sense 3.1” at ( http://www.revolution2.osixs.org )
FIGHT THE CAUSE - NOT THE SYMPTOM
Report thisWe don’t have to live like this anymore. “Spread the News”