|
|||
|
Arab Revolutions Need Not Be AmericanizedPosted on Mar 1, 2011MONACO—The annual meeting of the Club of Monaco’s Institute for Mediterranean Political Studies serendipitously coincided this year with the long-awaited Arab revolutionary awakening, to the disquiet of many Israeli members of the Institute. However, the unrest also inspired passionate attention from them, as well as from the other 40-odd members of the group, all experienced observers of Mediterranean events, and many of them notable actors in recent Middle Eastern developments and conflicts. A new Middle East, indeed! But not the one that American policymakers expected when the George W. Bush administration launched its riposte to the 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington, launching the “Great War on Terror,” which the last few days have made irrelevant. It was not the terrorists or Islamic radicals that launched this revolution or that are likely to unmake it—even if they wished, and even if it could be unmade. It could certainly veer onto a destructive course in some places, as in Libya, and it already seems to be lagging behind the expectations of many of its makers, who are likely to intensify if not radicalize their demands if the provisional governments of Tunisia and the Egyptian army allow themselves to be outstripped by events, and if reform is resisted in Saudi Arabia, the Gulf and Iran. And indeed, if Israel refuses to change course. While touched by apprehension, some officials display an astounding complacence. A high Israeli political figure replied to my suggestion that American policy toward Israel might change by saying, “We got along before without America, and we can get along without America again.” Not all Israelis might be comfortable with that sentiment. So far this revolution has made its way without Western intervention, and it would seem best for it to so continue. The politically and ideologically conditioned American official response in this situation is to search for potential allies to support, hoping they will become the new leaders. Restraint would be a better course, combined with multilateral humanitarian aid in the short run, to cope with the thousands of refugees uprooted by the fighting in Libya, followed by low-key multilateral support sought by the democratic forces that do emerge. The European Union would best lead this because of the residual knowledge and institutional intimacy that still exists between some of the European states and their former colonies. They know better what they are doing and are likely to be regarded locally as sure to eventually go home. Advertisement She hasn’t heard the latest news, which is that Americans are getting fed up with foreign wars. The mood in Washington is shifting toward ending the global adventurism of the past decade that has killed hundreds of thousands of bystanders as well as what the Obama government identifies as “violent extremists,” while also provoking further violent extremism. Lost in the news has been an extremely significant speech Feb. 25 by departing Defense Secretary Robert Gates. Survivor of the Bush administration and often criticized as a careerist, Gates actually is ending his government career as one of the last—or perhaps it is as one of the first—sane men in a Washington gone mad during the past decade. Speaking to the cadet corps of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., he told them that in their military careers they are unlikely to serve in another large ground war like those in Afghanistan, Iraq and, before that, Vietnam—“invading, pacifying and administering a large Third World country.” The odds on that are low, he said. “In my opinion, any future defense secretary who advises the president to again send a big American land army into Asia or into the Middle East or Africa should ‘have his head examined,’ as General [Douglas] MacArthur so delicately put it.” Such was the reply that MacArthur gave President John F. Kennedy when asked whether the U.S. should send combat troops to Vietnam. Kennedy did not do so, so long as he was alive. President Lyndon Johnson was the one who did, under immense pressure from Congress and from Kennedy’s ideologically intoxicated former advisers. Implicitly, Gates was answering two questions that every politically conscious high official in the G.W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations has been afraid to answer, or has suppressed within himself—or herself—the true answer: Why did we attack Iraq? Why are we in Afghanistan? The answers are that we acted to gratify the ego of one president and defend the career interests of another, to serve venal and sectarian interests, and to advance promotions in what has become a militarist professional army. God may forgive us. History—and the Iraqis and Afghans—may not. Visit William Pfaff’s website for more on his latest book, “The Irony of Manifest Destiny: The Tragedy of America’s Foreign Policy,” at www.williampfaff.com. © 2011 Tribune Media Services Inc. (c) 2011 Tribune Media Services Inc. Previous item: Divided on Unions Next item: The Battle of the Budgets: New Fronts in the Afghan and Iraq Wars New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By TDoff, March 2, 2011 at 8:41 pm Link to this comment
Let us hope that the Middle East/African revolutionaries have the intelligence and rationality to not model their emerging governments on the US plutocratic/capitalist ‘democratic’ travesty. Some day, when the US citizenry awakens and revolts, we may use one of the new governments formed in the Middle East as a pattern. Or just rid the current US government of it’s perversions and atrocities and hypocrisies.
Report thisBy copernicist, March 2, 2011 at 7:23 pm Link to this comment
“Flummox” has corrected the irrelevant whinge of “Michael Gross”. Yet I doubt the latter is quite as blind, naive or dense as he would have to be in order to Not Notice that truthdig’s featured articles, despite the rubric of “Reports”, are NOT labelled “NEWS Reports”, but are OBVIOUSLY editorial analyses by signed “Columnists” with well-known or easily determined views, and are clearly understood to be the considered opinions of the named contributing writers. Indeed such opinion pieces are fully understood to be exactly that by all sentient readers not seeking to hide ulterior objections, the nature of which I dare not presume to speculate ‘non-purely-factually’ upon; But complaining on patently spurious grounds is a ludicrous and puerile device for the pretence of not deigning further to stoop. One need not be a philosopher of history nor practitioner of propaganda to realize the non-existence of impeccably value-free unbiased “reporting” utterly uncontaminated by passing through the prism of our deviously human brains, except Of Course when such “Reporting” receives the requisite imprimatur from special-agenda hypocritical pleaders for pseudo-purely-objective “just the facts ma’am” deadpan net-and-knuckle-draggers…
Report thisBy Richard_Ralph_Roehl, March 2, 2011 at 5:42 pm Link to this comment
WARNING:
The current revolutionary zeal spreading across the Muslim world was NOT ‘esparked’ by “terrorists,” a clever propagan-duh term employed by Amerika’s war-mongering ruling class to manipulate der corn-$yrup sheeple-people in faster poo-food Amerika (a.k.a.: the land of big Nazi-Pharma). The current civil unrest in Muslim countries began with the self-immolation of an indigent fruit $eller in Tunisia, a man unable to earn a living because the erstwhile ruling class in Tunisia deprived him of do so.
Yesss… it only take the death of a butterfly to change the world. One little match to start a huge fire, one tiny snowflake to birth an avalanche.
Like the ‘War on Poverty’... and the specious ‘War on Cancer’... the destructive ‘War on Drrrugs’... the glorious [sic] ‘War on Terror’ is a god-damn f*@kin’ lie!
But allass! Everything about the UNITED $TATES OF PERPETUAL WAR PROFITEERING is a lie. Everything!!!
Rememeber the Maine? The Lusitania? Pearl Harbor? The Federal Reserve Bank? All the “lone gunman” lies for Malcolm X, JFK, MLK, RFK, John Lennon, etc.? The Gulf of Tonkin that started the $ovietnam war? “Weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq-nam? $enator Paul Wellstone’s plane crash? Flight 800 crashing into Long Island Sound after taking off for Paris (with an EMPTY center fuel tank)? Flight 93 NOT being shot down? The drone that did NOT hit the Pentagon? Building Seven collapse? The Twin Towers collapse? Shorting all airline $tocks on 9-10-2001? Manual Noriega not pushing drrrugs to finance black opt projects for George H. W. Bush? Bill Casey, Reagan’s CIA Director, having a “stroke” in his office two hours BEFORE he was scheduled to give testimony about IranContra to a $enate investigative committee? PRESIDENT Dick Cheney trrrumping the soidisant presidency of the dry drunk $ociopath (Bush the Lessor)? Ruling class operatives quietly threatening to do harm to one of Mr. Obama’s daughters if he starts acting like Kennedy?
Yesss… Old Coyote Knose that the list of lies in capitalist/fascist Amerika is endless! The Knose knows… because it talks to the ‘Horse’s Mouth’ (a.k.a.: ‘Gold$tein’ & Company).
Ooops! I’d better not go any further here! This posting already says too much. Indeed! There are folks out there terrified that the alleged $tar-ving artist might ‘espeak’ known-unknowns or unknown-knowns.
Not that anybody would believe “that crazy artist.” Nonetheless… THEY are terrified. They’re terrified of papers in Box No. 8. They are terrified the artist might release his third unpublished novel, a $emi-fiction-all(?) tome that ‘espills’ too many beans. Yeah! You know who you are! And Old Coyote Knose who you are! What you are!
Well… HERE’S SOMETHING I DO KNOW FOR SURE! I know that Amerika is a lie! Its foreign policy is delusional, violent and criminally insane. I know that Amerika has devolved into a vicious evil beast that threatens the very survival of humanity (a.k.a.: ewe-man-unkind).
And I know that “WE THE PEOPLE” need to ‘espark’ open rebellion and a full blown revolution against the bankster gambler addicts in the Wall $treet casino and their criminal cousins, the Pentagon boners in the military industrial complex.
And shame on our troops! The troops are dupes! Pumped full of poisonous vaccines. Sad to say… Amerika’s troops are nothing more than agents… doing the bidding of Amerika’s perpetual war profiteers!
Come on! Wake up trooper! Wake the f*@k up! You are NOT making Amerika safer! Quite the opposite! You are making the Amerikan people the most hated and reviled people on Earth. Yes! YOU… acting like EWE!
Be sure and spell my ‘First Amendment name’ correctly (in lieu of correct-lie)... you god-damn $onofabitches!
Report thisBy Shenonymous, March 2, 2011 at 1:42 pm Link to this comment
Yeah, I think Americans are fed up with foreign wars. U.S.
Report thisinvolvement in unnecessary wars and rescinding taxes on the upper
1% of its population who have most of the wealth have nearly depleted
the treasury and that has direly impacted much needed socialized
entitlement programs regardless of how much Republicans kick and
scream, they always kick and scream if one of their dollars are used for
the American economic middle and poor strata of the people. If the
Middle East wants to become Americanized the well able to do it for
themselves. They do not need any help.
By frecklefever, March 2, 2011 at 1:37 pm Link to this comment
ANOTHER GOOD ARTICLE FROM WILLIAM…LIKE RUSSSIA THE U.S. ARROGANCE GOT THEM
Report thisSTUCK IN FIGHTING UNWINABLE WARS THAT WILL LEAD ONLY TO A DEBACLE…BEING IN LOVE
WITH VIOLENCE DESTROYS REASON THAT’S WHY WE FAILED TO LEARN FROM VIET NAM…
By Flummox, March 2, 2011 at 1:13 pm Link to this comment
Michael Gross, obviously leaving the “deductive reasoning” to the reader in your case did not do the trick. If you simply look at the author’s page and read the first sentence of his bio you would be able to see that Pfaff is not a reporter and deduce this article is “political commentary” and not “political news”.
You can disagree with Pfaff’s point of view all you like, but please don’t go sideways just because you expect something else when an article is labeled “report”.
Report thisBy BBFmail, March 2, 2011 at 11:59 am Link to this comment
We can “thank” Jimmy Carter and Brzezinski for our being in Afghanistan. From the translation by William Blum:
http://www.counterpunch.org/brzezinski.html
Zbigniew Brzezinski:
How Jimmy Carter and I Started the Mujahideen
Interview of Zbigniew Brzezinski Le Nouvel Observateur (France), Jan 15-21, 1998, p. 76*
Q: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs [“From the Shadows”], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?
Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.
Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?
Brzezinski: It isn’t quite that. We didn’t push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.
Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn’t believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don’t regret anything today?
Brzezinski: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.
Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic [integrisme], having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
Brzezinski: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated: Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.
Brzezinski: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There isn’t a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.
* There are at least two editions of this magazine; with the perhaps sole exception of the Library of Congress, the version sent to the United States is shorter than the French version, and the Brzezinski interview was not included in the shorter version.
The above has been translated from the French by Bill Blum author of the indispensable, “Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II” and “Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower”
Report thisBy SarcastiCanuck, March 2, 2011 at 10:38 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Sorry to say this Yanks,but if the real world were an episode of Star Trek,you would be the Klingons right now.Might be a good time to curb the hedgemony and chill out for a while.If some other country wants to kill each other off,then let em.Fix yourself internally,advance civility in society and maybe try to put out Mowtown music again(thats for me).We’ll all be loving you again in no time.How about voting in a president that is a black,lesbian,in a wheelchair,has a hairlip,is anti nuke and can bench press 300 pounds.That would look cool to the world.Also,put all your guns under the bed for a while too.Let the Arabs screw thier own revolutions up without your help and they can’t blame you….Luv ya…
Report thisBy Michael Gross, March 2, 2011 at 9:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I do not trust “Reports” that express the opinion of the writer as News Reports. Articles such as this one should be classified as editorials or letters to the editor. How can the truth be found when bias directs where and in what direction the “truthdig” begins and is conducted. There are plenty of news agencies that seek to tell us how to think about the news by weaving their opinions into the facts…I long for the day when a news agency tells “just the facts” and leaves the deductive reasoning to the reader.
Report thisBy Jerry, March 2, 2011 at 8:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“So far this revolution has made its way without Western
Report thisintervention, and it would seem best for it to so
continue”. We would only screw them up.
The revolutions in Tunisia, Libya and Egypt are waking up
the people here, showing them that they don’t have to sit
passively by, accepting all the cuts to the middle class
and the poor. Like one letter writer wrote, “the only thing
that kept Mubarak in power were his thugs”. I think that
when the cuts being enacted against the middle class and
the poor begin to be felt, people here will be marching to
DC and state capitals demanding they be rescinded.