The fourth Tea Party Express of the apocalypse: Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin speaks to the crowd during the kickoff of the nationwide Tea Party Express bus tour in Reno, Nev., on Oct. 18.
Apocalypse is the big threat in every major election, and this forecast of doom proves useful to both corporate parties. Heaven or hell, it’s a free country and it’s your choice. Midterm elections are within spitting distance of Halloween, and the party started early with lawn signs portraying the other party’s candidates as the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, spreading plague and panic from sea to shining sea. Oh, your house has been foreclosed? No lawn signs for you, but you can wear tea bags from the brim of your camouflage helmet if you care to keep company with Rand Paul and Sarah Palin. We don’t quite know from day to day whether the tea party movement is a real breakaway faction of “libertarians” and “independents,” or just another front group for Republican CEOs.
Seriously, the Republican Party is scary. But there is this other creature in the living room we need to talk about, and it’s a donkey, not an elephant. The Democratic Party has the bad habit of coming on to voters like the neighborhood mafia extortion team. The Democrats have the incurably bad breath of reliably broken promises. They collar and corner us with mobster charm, they pick our pockets while pretending to pick our brains. Then as the big election day draws near, they lean heavily upon us and whisper an almost romantic confession: “Sure, we spit in your faces and ask you to pretend it’s rain. But the other guy is a real brute and would also break your arms.”
If this does not seduce us, they try the next pickup line: “Politics is the art of the possible.” If that gets old, they can still try this key to your heart: “Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.” If all else fails, they try personal compliments: “Why would a nice boy or girl like you pick a date with some skanky Red or skeevy Green? You have such a beautiful mind, you can appreciate the finer things in life, you deserve a lifelong marriage with the Democratic Party.” If you run screaming for the nearest exit, they will still chase you through the streets with this sweet love song: “We can light candles and burn incense in the inner sanctum, and no one else but you and me needs to see our lovely gilded idol of Franklin Roosevelt. Why can’t that be our secret?”
Those deep romantic secrets finally count for nothing, since what counts in the realm of politics can only be public policy. The contents of Bill Clinton’s heart, or Barack Obama’s, or Nancy Pelosi’s should remain as secret as the contents of their stomachs. What we really want to know is how they pick their friends and enemies in public life, and what battles they choose to fight before the whole world. I confess that I, too, was once a member of the Democratic Party. But like many other voters, I had to write that Dear John (or Dear Bill, or Dear Barack, or Dear Nancy) letter—you know, the one that spells out The End of Our Relationship: “I do not love you and I learned a lesson. Cheap dates get raw fucks.”
Advertisement
Yes, I am free to go to the voting booth like a drunk to the local bar, and I can thank my lucky stars that the cheap gin is not actually arsenic. There’s no accounting for taste? Oh, but there must be! The expensively groomed candidate of the Democratic Party must be a dry martini while the expensively groomed candidate of the Republican Party must be fermented cat piss.
Career politicians depend upon the biggest protection racket in this country, which is often called “our two-party system.” Ours? Really? Certainly that system has no foundation whatsoever in the Constitution of the United States. Nor did we, the people, ever vote for a bipartisan lockdown of every major election.
We are assured by Ivy League economists that economic booms are chiefly the product of an elite group of entrepreneurs, while economic busts inevitably shed workers with yesterday’s skills like dandruff. It’s the best of all possible worlds, so do keep that in mind the next time you read an Op-Ed column telling you politics is the art of the possible. If you grow suspicious that the recurrent breakdowns of capitalism are not simply the Nature of Things, but rather the all too human result of human decisions, then you are well on your way to becoming a socialist. The boom-and-bust cycles of the corporate economy cannot be graphed directly upon the boom-and-bust cycles of corporate politics. That is asking for too much order and symmetry in the universe. But we also go too far if we pretend the regular breakdowns of this economic system bear only an accidental relation to the regular breakdowns of this political system.
Are we condemned to ping-pong matches between Fox News and MSNBC from now till kingdom come? It’s easy to laugh at the blackboard lectures of Glenn Beck, who is busy making common nonsense of Thomas Paine and every other Founding Father. But if thinking youths get their politics from “The Rachel Maddow Show,” they are not yet thinking. The introductory caption for Maddow on my cable system always advertises the fact that she holds a degree from Oxford, but what do we find when she then invites a Princeton professor on her show to talk politics? Lo and behold, we find that the political terrain is no bigger than the usual bipartisan sandbox and fits the television screen perfectly. Maddow is best when she reminds us of forgotten history, and worst when she reverts to the usual scorekeeping of spectator sports.
The sit-down comedians at Comedy Central, Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, never lack for great punch lines because the daily news is surreal when it is not truly sad. Their humor, however, would rarely make any Democrat break a sweat, while they give regular acid baths to Republicans. Their scripts are funny but predictably partisan. A comedian taking a wide view of our political system would need an anarchist free spirit as well as a tragic sense of life.
Partisan politics in the United States is a perennial game of Capture the Flag between Team Red and Team Blue. Sometimes as harmless as summer camp, sometimes as lethal as imperial adventures. If our political system is one big binary code, then choosing either Democratic or Republican candidates on Election Day is like typing forever in either Column A or in Column B. You don’t get to create the political script, but you get to choose Dishwater Dull over Batshit Crazy, or maybe Hipster Dude over Has-Been War Hero. The job of career politicians is to convince you that you have a perfectly free choice to hit yourself on the head with a brick or a baseball bat.
We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.
In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.
Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.
Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.
Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.
By Nelly, April 27, 2011 at 4:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
DJC: American elections don’t serve any good purpose because near every person participating in them votes defensively within the corporate party.
Those who feel this way should come live in a multi-party system with its merry-go-round elections.
It’s got so bad that some countries institute a double-barrel electoral process. The first to separate the wheat from the chaff and the second to select one of the remaining two.
Which is, some say, tantamount to our Primary System in the US. But, I tend to disagree. In a large plurality, there are more voices to be heard in the debate. But that is just the problem—too many voices lead to cacophony and thus confusion.
Perhaps the Brits are ahead of us, but, then they always had the plurality of a three-party system. The Liberal-Democrats always came in third and sometimes second, but never first. And yet, they played king-maker in the last British election.
We could as well, perhaps, establish a Social Democrat party, truly Left-of-Center, but not extreme. One that championed, for instance, a Public Health Option (as all the countries of the EU enjoy today) and nearly-free education up to and beyond post-secondary schooling. And, lest we forget, Income Fairness.
Unlike Britain, however, this would leave the traditional Democrat Party in the Center - since a Social Democrat Party would be even further to the Left.
And the beauty of this political setup is the following: Were Social Dems voted into Congress by their constituencies, then, in order to govern in Congress, the Center would have to deal with the Center-Left. And that could make all the difference. Why?
Here’s why: The Americans, in this last mid-term election, did no vote “For the Republicans” as much as they voted “Against the Democrats”. What would have been the outcome had the body-politic a third choice, the Social Democrats? Would that have brought those who stayed on the sidelines into the voting booths? Methinks, yes.
If the outcome followed the same pattern as in Europe, in stead of fleeing to the Right in disgust—many Dems would have voted further to the Left.
And the Democratic Center and Left would be in power in Congress today—With BO as PotUS.
QUOTE: mdgr wrote, “I certainly won’t be voting for [Greens] this election, partly because they don’t have it together enough to have anyone to vote for.”
___________________
The 2010 Green candidate for Governor of New York, Howie Hawkins, definitely has “it” together.
If voters had their shit together (instead of piled between their ears), Andrew Cuomo, the real retrograde (D) that the corporate party pre-installed would be in court today seeking to overturn the popular vote landslide that had truly “historically” seated Hawkins.
American elections don’t serve any good purpose because near every person participating in them votes defensively within the corporate party. The (R)s get defensive votes from the corporate party faction that fears being contaminated by depraved liberals, and the (D)s get defensive votes from the corporate party faction that fears everything that might not always be nice and very pleasant to them — and them alone — in their special backyards. The (R) and (D) voters routinely choose the dictatorship they each hope will be more benevolent to their (entitled to special privilege) corporate state supporting faction… while it’s being all the medieval malevolent it can be to everyone and everything upon the planet (including those who vote for it).
The result is regular 99% corporate (R) & (D) party popular vote mandates for a diseased global corporate culture continuum that exploits everything natural, with the same concern that cancer has for its host… a continuum that, if continued, will surely eventually result in the extermination of all of the corporate culture’s hosts. Cancer kills until it kills itself.
For elections to be useful, for some possible good, a large majority of voters need to purposefully defend natural persons and Nature (whom we all existentially depend upon), by always very aggressively voting as offensively as possible against the corporate (R) & (D) party.
There’s not much time left for natural persons to keep wasting elections.
you all can bloviate all you want about the dorky spineless dems.
TRY AS YOU LIKE, YOU CANNOT, MR AUTHOR INCLUDED, DENY THE PLAIN FACT
THAT THE REPUGS OBSTRUCTED EVERY SINGLE ISSUE THAT WAS PRESENTED. WHY
CANT PEOPLE SEE THIS GLARING TRUTH??
By Bia, November 3, 2010 at 9:11 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This article and this ELECTION are perfect examples of why we NEED IRV (Instant Runoff Voting) or some other system of ranked voting to re-establish our Democracy!
If everyone could have a back-up vote for their second-choice candidate, they would be free to vote their conscience as their FIRST choice without having to constantly leverage against the Spoiler Effect.
Counting would be only a little more complicated than the existing system ( First Choice gets TWO points, Second Choice gets ONE…add em up!) but well worth it for the health and RESPONSIVENESS and health of our Representative Democracy!
As it is, this Binary system of “GoodCop/BadCop only serves the power elite, especially now after the horrid SCROTUS “Citizens United” ruling allowing Corporations to rape the system with their obscenely huge and secret tonguebaths of cash!
This election has been a perfect example everything that’s WRONG with our system.
The Governments we elect are the real problem and, as it stands and without any real, radical change to this electoral system, we are just as well to pick the winning candidates, who would form a Government, out of a (un?)lucky bag.
Heaven or hell, it’s a free country and it’s your choice.
Pray tell, do explain:
* What is the purpose of “freedom” when one is incarcerated in poverty?
* What is the benefit of “choice”, when the two sole options are pathetically incompetent?
It’s time for a third-way, called Centrist. Which, summed up, means leaving the Capitalist Cash-Cow as it is, but learning how to milk it such that its produce leads to a better distribution for everyone. Communist propaganda, you think?
Not really. The above premise wont happen until Americans learn the facts about their economic predicament, which boils down to this: If you are a member of the middle and lower class of America (meaning that you earn less than $350K per year), then you a part of the 80% of Americans that are sharing 7% of the country’s financial wealth. Yep, all the rest – all 93% of it – goes to the upper-class 20% of the population. (Don’t believe that sad fact of exceptionally warped distribution of America’s Financial Wealth? Then go here.)
Now, knowing that, do explain why anyone should work themselves to exhaustion for the benefit of just 20% of the population that live off their rents? Answer: Because one does not have much choice in a highly competitive America, where the Law of the Jungle prevails far too often.
More foolish, yet, America is one of the very few countries that has such a meager number of vacation days – and yet 17% of the working population give at least 10% of their vacation time back to their employers?
That’s dumber than dumb. So, please, enough of the “Liberty Bell” BS. All that mellifluous pap for the masses is just folklore, long since past.
Our founding fathers would not recognize today the United States they worked so hard to create.
This was a nice declaration of principles and may even be a declaration of war on the elites. I’m certain in for the long haul on this struggle. We need to start at the local level and build a new way of doing business in this country.
I’ve been pondering the current rightward drift all over the world of late and have concluded that it is really a drift toward the Chinese way of doing government. I know for a fact that several governments here in Eastern Europe are seeking to emulate the Chinese model, with a single political entity closely tied to the wealthy elite of the country. Russia is almost completely there while Ukraine is making a strong move in that direction with the elections on Sunday. I also can see European politicians salivating at the idea of eliminating all this dirty, uncomfortable political wrangling and replacing it with something cleaner and easier (for them). One need not look too far to see the same ideas being pushed in America and elsewhere. And why not ... China is blowing the world apart with their state capitalist model. It’s like the wild west with the sheriff on the crook’s side.
The revolution we need to make is not one of violence although conscious civil disobedience is certainly needed. The rule of law no longer applies when the laws have been distorted and stacked against us. So we need to form small groups, like the nurses did, and then grow the organizations through affiliation and common goals. We need to make governing impossible for the elites, to throw their stupid laws and bones back in their faces. We can refuse to participate and can, eventually, win. Think about your town when most of the people refuse to go along with decisions made by your local mayor or city council. How do you think they will prevail? They can’t. If we say no, they have no choice but to go along with us. That is our revolution ... not deciding between worthless Republicans or worthless Democrats.
The republicans/most democrats can be lumped together as corporatist serial killer right wing scum. We need real democracy, which will mean the end of corporate funding, career politicians, the murdochs and coch’s and clintons, and the time when we can really rule instead of the plutocracy.
Morpheus, some of the stuff on the Revolution site is true. We could do a lot better if we used our technology to reduce work hours and supplied people fairly with the things they need instead of creating economic crises with it by reducing our workforce and lining the pockets of big business. What he’s talking about would be true democratic socialism. The problem is how you institute such a thing in a country so highly controlled as ours. I’ve been preaching this stuff for decades, but changing people’s minds is harder than finding a tea-bagger with a PH.D.
Things are only going to get worse because of you. You refuse to take any action while you wait for Democrats and Republicans to save the day. I have news for you. This is not another financial downturn or downcycle. Democrats, Republicans and economist don’t know squat.
I can relate to the deep feelings of disillusionment with our government that the author certainly felt.It seems that we are constantly going from bad to worse,and taking our government back from the wealthy elite seems to be near impossible as they control the media and suppress our rights to protest as they turn us into another third world country. We watch helplessly as our jobs are shipped overseas, our trade deficits increase and our middle class disappears. Labor unions are becoming a thing of the past as the jobs they protected vanish. In the last few decades we have watched as our government became a hollow shell, most of the functions it used to perform for the public good being privatized to corporations interested only in making as much profit as possible. We are now 47th in life expectancy in this country, and still they try to tell us we are ‘the greatest nation on earth’! I keep trying to figure out how so many of our people can be so gullible. Have we just become intellectually lazy? Has life just become too complicated, have we lost faith in ourselves? I am amazed constantly when I talk to people just how uninformed they seem to be, and just how much misinformation they seem to have absorbed. Maybe when things get bad enough, we will see a change. Maybe then a third party with the average person’s welfare in mind will become viable. I am starting to wonder just how bad things will have to get first, though!
The recent visual vividly illustrating the Obama administration’s failure, shows
Obama in a ‘backyard session’, ‘listening’ to the American people.
If President Obama had been listening for the last two years, he’d have heard
American people wanted change in three areas:
1 The American people wanted a government administered plan like Medicare -
for everyone. (72% - CBS/New York Times poll June 2009)
1A. Democrats gave private sector insurers a windfall: mandated customers, with
a taxpayer-paid overhead rate of 20% for ‘mandated customers’ (20% of our
premium spent on administration, CEO salaries, bonuses, Boards to set rates and
decide who’s covered and ‘profits’).
2 64% of the American people opposed expanding the war in Afghanistan and
wanted to disentangle from Bush-era ‘War on Terror’ and ‘preventive war’
policies.
2B. Democrats gave us an expansion of the war in Afghanistan.
3 The vast majority of Americans opposed the transfer of taxpayer wealth to
cover private company debt – the bailout.
3B. Democrats kept the 6 too-big-to-fail banks – now bigger than ever; kept
deposits at risk by maintaining huge grey areas between commercial and
investment banking; didn’t ‘punish’ the financial industry - now even more
profitable, with bonuses among the biggest ever.
None are so blind as those who will not see, nor deaf as those who will not hear.
What a choice; two corporatist parties to choose from. There doesn’t seem to be anyway to punish the sleazy Democrats without rewarding the sleazier Republicans. We deserve much better than Clinton or Obama but do deserve President Palin?
This article reflects all that is good and not so good about the Green Party.
First of all, let it be said that Scott Tucker can write. On the other hand, he is even wordier than Scott Ritter, and unlike the former, after just a little while he begins to lose the forest through the trees.
We’re talking about a serious need for an editor, and this is true for the Green Party in general. I mean, in the state of Washington, the Green’s didn’t even have a Senate candidate, and their site looked like it had been constructed by culturally deprived four year old.
They are strong on idealism, yes, but in matters of execution, they typically get lost in their own patter and become excessively cerebral. While they may be able to play three-dimensional chess in their heads, they typically are unable to put forward succinctly compelling points without inadvertently “screwing the pooch” in the presentation.
And they continue to nominate totally unelectable candidates, while patting themselves on the back and feeling very martyr-like. Still, I generally agree with the thrust of Mr. Ticker’s argument even if the Green’s are unable to maintain much of a state presence, much less a national presence. I certainly won’t be voting for them this election, partly because they don’t have it together enough to have anyone to vote for.
Excellent article and personally I came to the same conclusion for this election. I refused to be fear mongered into voting for the “lesser evil” again.
I like Nader’s suggestion also: vote your conscience.
By ralph, November 2, 2010 at 3:24 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Mills wrote in detail about the power elite and the masses. Written in 1956 but as fresh and pertinent as then. ” The Power Elite” says it all. Truly remarkable.
Say ‘Hi-Ho!’ as They Strip-Search You
Email
Print
Share
Digg
Facebook
TwitThis
StumbleUpon
Reddit
YahooBuzz
Email
BlinkList
del.icio.us
Fark
Furl
Google
LinkedIn
Mixx
MyShare
NewsVine
Propeller
SphereIt
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
Newsletter 
Become a Fan
Follow Us
Subscribe
By Nelly, April 27, 2011 at 4:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It’s spooky how clever some ppl are. Thakns!
Report thisBy basho, November 4, 2010 at 12:03 pm Link to this comment
great article scott.
should be required reading for anyone with an attention span of more than 2 minutes.
Report thisBy Lafayette, November 4, 2010 at 7:18 am Link to this comment
A THREE PARTY SYSTEM?
Those who feel this way should come live in a multi-party system with its merry-go-round elections.
It’s got so bad that some countries institute a double-barrel electoral process. The first to separate the wheat from the chaff and the second to select one of the remaining two.
Which is, some say, tantamount to our Primary System in the US. But, I tend to disagree. In a large plurality, there are more voices to be heard in the debate. But that is just the problem—too many voices lead to cacophony and thus confusion.
Perhaps the Brits are ahead of us, but, then they always had the plurality of a three-party system. The Liberal-Democrats always came in third and sometimes second, but never first. And yet, they played king-maker in the last British election.
We could as well, perhaps, establish a Social Democrat party, truly Left-of-Center, but not extreme. One that championed, for instance, a Public Health Option (as all the countries of the EU enjoy today) and nearly-free education up to and beyond post-secondary schooling. And, lest we forget, Income Fairness.
Unlike Britain, however, this would leave the traditional Democrat Party in the Center - since a Social Democrat Party would be even further to the Left.
And the beauty of this political setup is the following: Were Social Dems voted into Congress by their constituencies, then, in order to govern in Congress, the Center would have to deal with the Center-Left. And that could make all the difference. Why?
Here’s why: The Americans, in this last mid-term election, did no vote “For the Republicans” as much as they voted “Against the Democrats”. What would have been the outcome had the body-politic a third choice, the Social Democrats? Would that have brought those who stayed on the sidelines into the voting booths? Methinks, yes.
If the outcome followed the same pattern as in Europe, in stead of fleeing to the Right in disgust—many Dems would have voted further to the Left.
And the Democratic Center and Left would be in power in Congress today—With BO as PotUS.
Report thisBy David J. Cyr, November 3, 2010 at 10:31 am Link to this comment
QUOTE: mdgr wrote, “I certainly won’t be voting for [Greens] this election, partly because they don’t have it together enough to have anyone to vote for.”
___________________
The 2010 Green candidate for Governor of New York, Howie Hawkins, definitely has “it” together.
If voters had their shit together (instead of piled between their ears), Andrew Cuomo, the real retrograde (D) that the corporate party pre-installed would be in court today seeking to overturn the popular vote landslide that had truly “historically” seated Hawkins.
American elections don’t serve any good purpose because near every person participating in them votes defensively within the corporate party. The (R)s get defensive votes from the corporate party faction that fears being contaminated by depraved liberals, and the (D)s get defensive votes from the corporate party faction that fears everything that might not always be nice and very pleasant to them — and them alone — in their special backyards. The (R) and (D) voters routinely choose the dictatorship they each hope will be more benevolent to their (entitled to special privilege) corporate state supporting faction… while it’s being all the medieval malevolent it can be to everyone and everything upon the planet (including those who vote for it).
The result is regular 99% corporate (R) & (D) party popular vote mandates for a diseased global corporate culture continuum that exploits everything natural, with the same concern that cancer has for its host… a continuum that, if continued, will surely eventually result in the extermination of all of the corporate culture’s hosts. Cancer kills until it kills itself.
For elections to be useful, for some possible good, a large majority of voters need to purposefully defend natural persons and Nature (whom we all existentially depend upon), by always very aggressively voting as offensively as possible against the corporate (R) & (D) party.
There’s not much time left for natural persons to keep wasting elections.
Report thisBy Jimnp72, November 3, 2010 at 9:29 am Link to this comment
you all can bloviate all you want about the dorky spineless dems.
Report thisTRY AS YOU LIKE, YOU CANNOT, MR AUTHOR INCLUDED, DENY THE PLAIN FACT
THAT THE REPUGS OBSTRUCTED EVERY SINGLE ISSUE THAT WAS PRESENTED. WHY
CANT PEOPLE SEE THIS GLARING TRUTH??
By Bia, November 3, 2010 at 9:11 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This article and this ELECTION are perfect examples of why we NEED IRV (Instant Runoff Voting) or some other system of ranked voting to re-establish our Democracy!
If everyone could have a back-up vote for their second-choice candidate, they would be free to vote their conscience as their FIRST choice without having to constantly leverage against the Spoiler Effect.
Counting would be only a little more complicated than the existing system ( First Choice gets TWO points, Second Choice gets ONE…add em up!) but well worth it for the health and RESPONSIVENESS and health of our Representative Democracy!
As it is, this Binary system of “GoodCop/BadCop only serves the power elite, especially now after the horrid SCROTUS “Citizens United” ruling allowing Corporations to rape the system with their obscenely huge and secret tonguebaths of cash!
Report thisThis election has been a perfect example everything that’s WRONG with our system.
By tedmurphy41, November 3, 2010 at 8:58 am Link to this comment
The Governments we elect are the real problem and, as it stands and without any real, radical change to this electoral system, we are just as well to pick the winning candidates, who would form a Government, out of a (un?)lucky bag.
Report thisBy Lafayette, November 3, 2010 at 4:25 am Link to this comment
VOX POPULI
Pray tell, do explain:
* What is the purpose of “freedom” when one is incarcerated in poverty?
* What is the benefit of “choice”, when the two sole options are pathetically incompetent?
It’s time for a third-way, called Centrist. Which, summed up, means leaving the Capitalist Cash-Cow as it is, but learning how to milk it such that its produce leads to a better distribution for everyone. Communist propaganda, you think?
Not really. The above premise wont happen until Americans learn the facts about their economic predicament, which boils down to this: If you are a member of the middle and lower class of America (meaning that you earn less than $350K per year), then you a part of the 80% of Americans that are sharing 7% of the country’s financial wealth. Yep, all the rest – all 93% of it – goes to the upper-class 20% of the population. (Don’t believe that sad fact of exceptionally warped distribution of America’s Financial Wealth? Then go here.)
Now, knowing that, do explain why anyone should work themselves to exhaustion for the benefit of just 20% of the population that live off their rents? Answer: Because one does not have much choice in a highly competitive America, where the Law of the Jungle prevails far too often.
More foolish, yet, America is one of the very few countries that has such a meager number of vacation days – and yet 17% of the working population give at least 10% of their vacation time back to their employers?
That’s dumber than dumb. So, please, enough of the “Liberty Bell” BS. All that mellifluous pap for the masses is just folklore, long since past.
Our founding fathers would not recognize today the United States they worked so hard to create.
Report thisBy C.Curtis.Dillon, November 3, 2010 at 2:47 am Link to this comment
This was a nice declaration of principles and may even be a declaration of war on the elites. I’m certain in for the long haul on this struggle. We need to start at the local level and build a new way of doing business in this country.
I’ve been pondering the current rightward drift all over the world of late and have concluded that it is really a drift toward the Chinese way of doing government. I know for a fact that several governments here in Eastern Europe are seeking to emulate the Chinese model, with a single political entity closely tied to the wealthy elite of the country. Russia is almost completely there while Ukraine is making a strong move in that direction with the elections on Sunday. I also can see European politicians salivating at the idea of eliminating all this dirty, uncomfortable political wrangling and replacing it with something cleaner and easier (for them). One need not look too far to see the same ideas being pushed in America and elsewhere. And why not ... China is blowing the world apart with their state capitalist model. It’s like the wild west with the sheriff on the crook’s side.
The revolution we need to make is not one of violence although conscious civil disobedience is certainly needed. The rule of law no longer applies when the laws have been distorted and stacked against us. So we need to form small groups, like the nurses did, and then grow the organizations through affiliation and common goals. We need to make governing impossible for the elites, to throw their stupid laws and bones back in their faces. We can refuse to participate and can, eventually, win. Think about your town when most of the people refuse to go along with decisions made by your local mayor or city council. How do you think they will prevail? They can’t. If we say no, they have no choice but to go along with us. That is our revolution ... not deciding between worthless Republicans or worthless Democrats.
Report thisBy lichen, November 3, 2010 at 12:08 am Link to this comment
The republicans/most democrats can be lumped together as corporatist serial killer right wing scum. We need real democracy, which will mean the end of corporate funding, career politicians, the murdochs and coch’s and clintons, and the time when we can really rule instead of the plutocracy.
Report thisBy bodhidharma, November 2, 2010 at 11:23 pm Link to this comment
Morpheus, some of the stuff on the Revolution site is true. We could do a lot better if we used our technology to reduce work hours and supplied people fairly with the things they need instead of creating economic crises with it by reducing our workforce and lining the pockets of big business. What he’s talking about would be true democratic socialism. The problem is how you institute such a thing in a country so highly controlled as ours. I’ve been preaching this stuff for decades, but changing people’s minds is harder than finding a tea-bagger with a PH.D.
Report thisBy Morpheus, November 2, 2010 at 10:40 pm Link to this comment
Wake the Hell up America! - Join the Revolution!
Read “Common Sense 3.1” at ( http://www.revolution2.osixs.org )
We don’t have to live like this anymore.
Things are only going to get worse because of you. You refuse to take any action while you wait for Democrats and Republicans to save the day. I have news for you. This is not another financial downturn or downcycle. Democrats, Republicans and economist don’t know squat.
Report thisBy bodhidharma, November 2, 2010 at 9:50 pm Link to this comment
I can relate to the deep feelings of disillusionment with our government that the author certainly felt.It seems that we are constantly going from bad to worse,and taking our government back from the wealthy elite seems to be near impossible as they control the media and suppress our rights to protest as they turn us into another third world country. We watch helplessly as our jobs are shipped overseas, our trade deficits increase and our middle class disappears. Labor unions are becoming a thing of the past as the jobs they protected vanish. In the last few decades we have watched as our government became a hollow shell, most of the functions it used to perform for the public good being privatized to corporations interested only in making as much profit as possible. We are now 47th in life expectancy in this country, and still they try to tell us we are ‘the greatest nation on earth’! I keep trying to figure out how so many of our people can be so gullible. Have we just become intellectually lazy? Has life just become too complicated, have we lost faith in ourselves? I am amazed constantly when I talk to people just how uninformed they seem to be, and just how much misinformation they seem to have absorbed. Maybe when things get bad enough, we will see a change. Maybe then a third party with the average person’s welfare in mind will become viable. I am starting to wonder just how bad things will have to get first, though!
Report thisBy the worm, November 2, 2010 at 7:43 pm Link to this comment
The recent visual vividly illustrating the Obama administration’s failure, shows
Obama in a ‘backyard session’, ‘listening’ to the American people.
If President Obama had been listening for the last two years, he’d have heard
American people wanted change in three areas:
1 The American people wanted a government administered plan like Medicare -
for everyone. (72% - CBS/New York Times poll June 2009)
1A. Democrats gave private sector insurers a windfall: mandated customers, with
a taxpayer-paid overhead rate of 20% for ‘mandated customers’ (20% of our
premium spent on administration, CEO salaries, bonuses, Boards to set rates and
decide who’s covered and ‘profits’).
2 64% of the American people opposed expanding the war in Afghanistan and
wanted to disentangle from Bush-era ‘War on Terror’ and ‘preventive war’
policies.
2B. Democrats gave us an expansion of the war in Afghanistan.
3 The vast majority of Americans opposed the transfer of taxpayer wealth to
cover private company debt – the bailout.
3B. Democrats kept the 6 too-big-to-fail banks – now bigger than ever; kept
deposits at risk by maintaining huge grey areas between commercial and
investment banking; didn’t ‘punish’ the financial industry - now even more
profitable, with bonuses among the biggest ever.
None are so blind as those who will not see, nor deaf as those who will not hear.
Report thisBy lasmog, November 2, 2010 at 6:14 pm Link to this comment
What a choice; two corporatist parties to choose from. There doesn’t seem to be anyway to punish the sleazy Democrats without rewarding the sleazier Republicans. We deserve much better than Clinton or Obama but do deserve President Palin?
Report thisBy mdgr, November 2, 2010 at 5:01 pm Link to this comment
This article reflects all that is good and not so good about the Green Party.
First of all, let it be said that Scott Tucker can write. On the other hand, he is even wordier than Scott Ritter, and unlike the former, after just a little while he begins to lose the forest through the trees.
We’re talking about a serious need for an editor, and this is true for the Green Party in general. I mean, in the state of Washington, the Green’s didn’t even have a Senate candidate, and their site looked like it had been constructed by culturally deprived four year old.
They are strong on idealism, yes, but in matters of execution, they typically get lost in their own patter and become excessively cerebral. While they may be able to play three-dimensional chess in their heads, they typically are unable to put forward succinctly compelling points without inadvertently “screwing the pooch” in the presentation.
And they continue to nominate totally unelectable candidates, while patting themselves on the back and feeling very martyr-like. Still, I generally agree with the thrust of Mr. Ticker’s argument even if the Green’s are unable to maintain much of a state presence, much less a national presence. I certainly won’t be voting for them this election, partly because they don’t have it together enough to have anyone to vote for.
Report thisBy grumps, November 2, 2010 at 4:09 pm Link to this comment
Excellent article and personally I came to the same conclusion for this election. I refused to be fear mongered into voting for the “lesser evil” again.
Report thisI like Nader’s suggestion also: vote your conscience.
By Matzpen, November 2, 2010 at 3:52 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
That’s the terrible thing about American politics. The two parties already have too much in common but then they add bipartisanship into the mix. Why bother even voting at this point
Report thishttp://sherrytalksback.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/why-im-not-voting/
By Smoove, November 2, 2010 at 3:40 pm Link to this comment
“Understanding Libertarian Morality: The Psychological Roots of an Individualist Ideology”
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1665934
Report thisBy ralph, November 2, 2010 at 3:24 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Mills wrote in detail about the power elite and the masses. Written in 1956 but as fresh and pertinent as then. ” The Power Elite” says it all. Truly remarkable.
Report this