LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 26, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

British Terror Attack Suspect Had Watched Friend Cut to Pieces

Truthdigger of the Week: Medea Benjamin

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Taking Gay Hypocrites to Task Over Bradley Manning

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * A Cooler Century? Wait and See

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
PornoPower

The Pornography of Power

By Robert Scheer
$11.89

more items

 
Reports

All Shook Up for BP

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jun 21, 2010

By Eugene Robinson

Joe Barton is not alone. The Texas congressman’s lavish sympathy for BP—which he sees not as perpetrator of a preventable disaster but as victim of a White House “shakedown”—is actually what passes for mainstream opinion among conservative Republicans today.

The GOP leadership came down hard on Barton after he apologized to the oil company for the beastly way it was being treated by the White House, saying he was “ashamed” that BP was being pressured to put $20 billion into a “slush fund” to compensate victims of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Barton was reportedly threatened with losing his powerful position as ranking member of the Energy and Commerce Committee if he didn’t retract his words, and pronto.

But Barton was only echoing a statement that Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga., had issued a day earlier in the name of the Republican Study Committee, a caucus of House conservatives whose website claims more than 115 members. The statement groused that there is “no legal authority for the president to compel a private company to set up or contribute to an escrow account” and accused the Obama administration of “Chicago-style shakedown politics.”

Just to review: A group comprising roughly two-thirds of all Republicans in the House takes the position that President Barack Obama was wrong to demand that BP set aside money to guarantee that those whose livelihoods are being ruined by the oil spill will be compensated. In other words, it’s more important to kneel at the altar of radical conservative ideology than to feel any sense of compassion for one’s fellow Americans. This, ladies and gentlemen, is how today’s GOP rolls.

To be sure, there are Republicans who realize that this is not the message the party should be sending as the midterm election nears. “I couldn’t disagree with Joe Barton more,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. Party leaders insisted that there was nothing to see at the cliff where Barton went through the political guard rails and that everyone should just move along.

Advertisement

But no. Let’s slow down and crane our necks. 

Barton’s remarks were no spontaneous gaffe. They came in a prepared statement and clearly represent his genuine view of the situation: that the rights of a private company are absolute even when weighed against the clear interests of the public.

While the party leadership has managed to squelch members of Congress who might have been tempted to weigh in on Barton’s side, the conservative amen chorus can’t help itself. Rush Limbaugh called the agreement on the $20 billion escrow fund “unconstitutional” and accused the administration of acting like “a branch of organized crime.” Newt Gingrich said the White House was “extorting money from a company.” Stuart Varney of Fox News claimed—falsely—that Obama had moved to “seize a private company’s assets” and complained that the action was “Hugo Chavez-like.” Weekly Standard Editor Bill Kristol said that “I have no sympathy for BP,” but then proceeded to be sympathetic, offering that “it’s not helpful for the country, for the economy as a whole, for the president to bully different companies and different industries.”

I’d advise these people to get a grip, but they’re just saying what they believe. It just happens that what they believe is absurd.

There is ample evidence that BP, one of the biggest and most profitable oil companies in the world, cut corners in operating the Deepwater Horizon rig that resulted in the worst spill ever to despoil U.S. waters. BP’s assertions about its ability to prevent, contain and clean up any leakage of oil turned out to be patently false. If we were not dealing with such a tragic situation, the company’s tin ear for public relations would be comic; the unforgettable line from BP’s chairman—“We care about the small people”—sounds like something Mel Brooks might dream up for a sequel to “The Producers.”

Meanwhile, thousands of fishermen, shrimpers, oil rig workers, restaurant owners and others along the Gulf Coast are suffering the economic effects of the spill. The environmental damage, still worsening, will be felt for decades. A mile beneath the surface, that noxious plume of gas and oil continues to billow.

Yes, President Obama used the power of his office to pressure BP to set money aside for compensation. If Republicans believe he shouldn’t have, then by all means they should speak up. Come November, the voters will be able to decide who’s right.

Eugene Robinson’s e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com.
   
© 2010, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By huckleberry_finn, July 18, 2010 at 8:46 am Link to this comment

Oh c’mon. New caps has been placed. But does change the
lucrative BP nature?

Report this

By last_boy_scout, July 1, 2010 at 4:49 am Link to this comment

BP’s and Obama’s two-faced position on the matter of that oil spill shouldn’t come as a surprise to everyone, taking the long-term history of theirs, into the consideration.

I’ve come to read an interesting article on the history of BP and its
predecessors and, which is much more important, on
the issues of their connection to the Wall Street
financiers.

Oh, and their shared profiteering, of course.

Report this
JDmysticDJ's avatar

By JDmysticDJ, June 24, 2010 at 10:41 am Link to this comment

Delving into the realm of the metaphysical, I’ll suggest that in biblical times catastrophes similar to this oil catastrophe would be considered the wrath of God, or at the least, a sign from the divine.

Being more rational, I’ll suggest that this oil catastrophe is the result of Republican/Libertarian deregulation policies, and from Republican energy priorities. Cheney is either an agent of God, or an agent of energy multi-nationals. You decide.

Report this

By Tish C, June 23, 2010 at 9:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Sen. Barack Obama was the top recipient of BP campaign cash.  His science adviser worked for BP for 4 years and heavily promoted BP as a green company.

Joe Barton was correct -  the $20 billion fund was a shakedown, because BP is now paying for the damages caused directly by the Obama Administration and for those exacerbated by it, in addition to what it’s legally liable for.  Was Barton ham-handed in expressing that?  Sure.  But no matter how hard Robinson and company try, it can’t disguise the fact that the Obama Administration is more interested in enforcing regulations hampering efforts at remediation than in fixing the problem.

Report this
Fat Freddy's avatar

By Fat Freddy, June 23, 2010 at 8:01 am Link to this comment

tedmurphy41

http://www.opensecrets.org/

We already know, mostly. We know 3 of the 4 top contributors to Rep Mel Watt’s (D-NC)(Mr Big Bank) campaigns over his career are BoA, Wachovia and the American Banker’s Assn. So what? What do we do now?

Report this

By Charlie, June 23, 2010 at 7:32 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Barton is a pink blob.

http://coyotesings.wordpress.com/

Report this

By tedmurphy41, June 23, 2010 at 6:19 am Link to this comment

For representatives to behave like this must say a lot about who finances their election campaigns.
Perhaps complete transparency on all donations to candidates standing in any election will, at least, give everyone a clear idea of who represents them and who pays for them.

Report this
Fat Freddy's avatar

By Fat Freddy, June 22, 2010 at 12:15 pm Link to this comment

Don’t you all worry your pretty little heads. Goldman Sachs in on the case. They are in the process of raising $50 billion (IIRC) for BP through bond sales and “other” types of investment vehicles. We can all rest easy. Thank God for market makers rent seekers.

This goes beyond the interests of BP and the other oil companies. It’s about counter parties. Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, BlackRock, et al. Oil company stocks are embedded in worthless paper investments like ETFs, Mutual Funds, and the latest (from the county’s best and brightest), collateralised synthetic obligations (CSO), not to mention all of the CDSs that back them. It’s about financial institutions, not “The Evil Corporations” who only wish to maximize profits.

Of course, businesses wish to maximize profits. Don’t you? If somebody offered you a job that doubled your salary, would you not take it? Even if it meant that you had to start the next day, would you not screw over your boss and not give him a week’s notice? Of course you would, because you are a greedy bastard just like he is. Just like we all are.

If people would just stop, and take a look at the underlying problems of our flawed financial and economic policies they would see that it is those policies that are responsible for most of the “greed” in the world, including yours, and most of the redistribution of wealth in the world. All you have to do is look at the pages at The Federal Reserve’s and the FDIC’s website, and it’s all right there. Fraudulent banking. That is the root cause of most of our ills. If it were not for artificially low interest rates, and exotic paper investments, BP would not have been able to raise all of the capital that they have, to fund all of the wells that they have. Oil drilling is very profitable, but it requires a heavy, up-front, capital investment. And BP, like almost every other company in the US, is heavily over-leveraged, thanks mostly to rent seeking financial institutions, like GS, JPM and BlackRock.

The top 20 shareholders of BP are asset management companies, not individuals. Some of those companies have already been deemed Too Big To Fail. I’m not trying to be a dick, but when it happens, don’t say I didn’t warn you.

Report this

By REDHORSE, June 22, 2010 at 11:29 am Link to this comment

WAKE UP!! Let us listen to ourselves.

      Over and over we have conversations about morally bankrupt professional thieves as if we somehow need to convince ourselves that they really are morally bankrupt professional thieves. Hey, what is that?

      They have stuffed their pockets w/special interest $$$$$$ and stood by while America was gutted. Twice now we have voted for change and twice now we have been betrayed. We all know, IT’S TIME!!

      They are paranoid, dangerous psychopaths. They must be removed. Fight the mental and financial depression that has seized you—get political and VOTE! VOTE! VOTE!  Register NOW!! It’ll do wonders for your mental health.

        (Gee EUGENE—you do have a some fire in your belly——apply it as needed.)

Report this

By felicity, June 22, 2010 at 11:25 am Link to this comment

Back to Karl Rove who left the WH but hasn’t left the GOP smoked-filled back rooms.  A true man of Republican vision, Rove sought, and seeks a “fundamental historic realignment of power in America.”  “Bush’s Brain,” Moore and Slater.

His, and his fellow Republican’s ultimate wish is the establishment of a new Republican majority (for generations) much like the 30-year reign of the GOP a century ago that was built on a rising industrial elite - a period marked by conservative values and easy money and Gilded Age crooks, only ending with the catastrophe of the Depression.

Barton was merely voicing a Republican agenda.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, June 22, 2010 at 9:51 am Link to this comment

Barton/Limbaugh/Palin thinking:

“I apologize, Lord Aristocrat. I’m SO sorry your carriage wheel was damaged when you ran over that peasant child after you whipped your horses into a crowd.  We’ll get you a government grant to compensate you, and we’ll charge the mother with negligence.”

Report this
Samson's avatar

By Samson, June 22, 2010 at 9:43 am Link to this comment

It is of course perfectly reasonable that either BP should be putting aside assets to pay for the damages that they have obviously caused.  And if they were not, it would be perfectly reasonable for the US government to be seizing BP assets to ensure payment of said damages.

So, what the Republicans are arguing is that BP should be allowed to get off completely free.

Another example of how the Republicans support socialism, in that they feel the costs of this disaster should be socialized amongst the American people.  ‘Responsibility’ only applies to welfare mothers.

Of course, we can now see that our choice in the last election was this.

Republicans ... drill, baby, drill.  And if anything goes wrong, work closely with the oil company and take their side in the dispute.

Democrats .... drill, baby, drill.  And if anything goes wrong, work closely with the oil company, but for PR purposes, make some critical statements about BP.

Report this

By balkas, June 22, 2010 at 9:38 am Link to this comment

I forgot to posit a caveat!
I don’t want any complaints ab my english and numerous abbreviation from any nonjew.{goy}
Complaints by ‘jews’ are always welcome! So please, don’t hurt selves by complaining; i may get mad and get even worse at it. spasibo!

Report this

By balkas, June 22, 2010 at 9:32 am Link to this comment

And many americans: how many? 98%?, taught that congress-WH-prez was in charge even of a tea party, but not the oil gush.

Aah, yes! I remember now: the adhoc alliance for enserfment of own and ‘alien’ peoples did not know how big and perilous the oil gush was and is now.

This begs the answer: in future elect the people who wld know all that cld be known ab any disaster + be in command of damage control.

And the same people do not know what is going on in palestine, iraq, and afpak. In charge of palestine is a ‘jew’ [read please a cultist sans an ethnicity]; in iraq it is an admiral + one iraqi.

Karzai in afgh’n does talk a lot, but it is palin who is in charge of business there.

And in charge of our home is my small head: young-old wife and i never know what she’l do next. tnx

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, June 22, 2010 at 7:20 am Link to this comment

Shakedown?

Judging others by their own selves is more like it! 

The party of no talking, to the party of mini no!

Report this

By Jerry Elsea, June 22, 2010 at 4:51 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Footnote on the BP chairman’s jaw-dropping “small people” quote, based on a
guess as to what the guy really meant:

English is his second language. So after 55 days of hearing and reading about the
plight of small businesses, he bloops it into “small people,” not realizing how
elitist and belittling it sounds.

No excuse, though. In light of the disaster’s enormity, the English-challenged
head of the biggest, richest oil company anywhere should have his every
utterance screened before releasing.

Report this
Fat Freddy's avatar

By Fat Freddy, June 22, 2010 at 3:14 am Link to this comment

I must have missed this article the other day in the Wall St. Journal. Michael Feroli, chief US economist at JP Morgan Chase, has predicted, that the overall net effect of the Gulf oil spill will slightly increase GDP growth in the near to medium term.

...cleaning up the spill will likely be enough to slightly offset the negative impact of all this on GDP, J.P. Morgan said. The bank cites estimates of 4,000 unemployed people hired for the cleanup efforts, which some reports have said could be worth between $3 and $6 billion.

This is a textbook example of the Parable of the broken window. It’s sort of like “cash for clunkers” and other “Stimulus” type programs.

Thank God, “we are all Keynesians, now”

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/06/15/oil-spill-may-end-up-lifting-gdp-slightly/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broken_window_fallacy

Report this

By noman, June 21, 2010 at 11:01 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Gene, you know there are no Conservative Republicans, so knock it off. These weasels are opportunists (as are many Dems). They are anti-Christian, not religious. They offer elite, reactionary government, lots of it, while hiding like diseased rats under the flag of honest conservatism. Don’t feed them their promo lines.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.