LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 18, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

The History That Birthed the Tsarnaev Boys

Jerry Brown: California's Mystery Man

Chris Hedges: The 'Terrifying' State Assault on Press Freedom

'The Daily Show': Stewart Slams Hypocrites Cheney and Rumsfeld

This Is Water: Fishy Advice From David Foster Wallace

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Arctic Tundra ‘Will Turn to Forest’
 * NEW! * How the IRS’ Nonprofit Division Got So Dysfunctional
Recurring Nightmares? Wake Up and Take Action

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
Lords of the Land

Lords of the Land

By Idith Zertal and Akiva Eldar
$ 19.77

Engaging the Muslim World

Engaging the Muslim World

By Juan Cole
$11.47

more items

 
Reports

A Victim, After All

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Feb 7, 2010

By Ruth Marcus

Jenny Sanford was my role model, until I read her book. Well, not role model, exactly, but improbable heroine. When her cheating, blubbering, disappearing-with-his-soul-mate husband turned up on national television to confess that he had not been hiking the Appalachian Trail, Jenny Sanford was neither standing by his side nor crawling into a hole.

As I wrote then, the wife of South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford offered “a new and improved version of the betrayed political spouse—neither enabler nor victim.” In contrast to her moonstruck husband, Sanford had her feet on the ground. “I believe enduring love is primarily a commitment and an act of will,” she said in her statement the day of her husband’s rambling news conference. She confronted his adultery with the toughness one might expect of a one-time Lazard Freres investment banker. “He was told in no uncertain terms not to see her,” she told The Associated Press.

Then I was asked to review Jenny Sanford’s new book, “Staying True.” The delicious part is that Mark Sanford is an even bigger heel than you thought—than I thought, and that’s saying something. This is a man who had the nerve to call his wife, post-news conference, and ask, “How’d I do?” Who, after another other woman surfaced, called his wife and asked “what I thought he should reveal in the interview.” If “Staying True” is Jenny Sanford’s payback time, it must be said: He gave her a lot to work with.

The disappointing part is that Jenny Sanford is, well, the very victim I had imagined her not to be. The book is replete with instances of Jenny-as-doormat, from the very start of their relationship and continuing, excruciatingly, months after her discovery of his affair.

After one of the all-too-rare pre-affair moments in which Jenny gets angry, Mark enlists leaders of a congressional Christian fellowship to talk her down. They told her she was right to be angry, Jenny recounts, but that “staying angry with Mark was not an option. If I wanted to heal the relationship, I had to open my heart and be kind, even if Mark was in the wrong. They would work on Mark. We even went so far as to talk about sex and [one of the leaders] told me not to withhold it as punishment as that would make everything worse.” Worse, I wonder, for whom?

Advertisement

The creepiest moment, though, and even Jenny seems to recognize this in retrospect, is when she lets her husband go to New York for two nights to see Maria Belen Chapur, his supposedly ex-mistress—accompanied by a friend-cum-chaperone to keep him in line.

“Later in the year, when I confided in friends about what was happening and what Mark was asking to do, I better understood that allowing him to see Belen in New York—which is what I eventually agreed to let him do—was ludicrous,” Sanford writes. “Of course, it was ludicrous of him to continue to ask me to let him go, but he wore me down, asking again and again and insisting that the way for this to be over was to allow him the closure he needed.” Sorry, but the only closure that Mark Sanford needed at that point involved his zipper.

So the disturbing question about Jenny Sanford remains: Why would a woman so obviously smart, well-educated, successful and attractive allow herself to be treated so badly for so long? Sanford’s situation may be uniquely public, but she is certainly not alone in allowing herself to be undervalued—indeed, in undervaluing herself. I confess: I am better at diagnosing this tendency than I am at explaining it; I’ll leave discussions of women and self-esteem to the psychologists, pop and otherwise.

In the meantime, though, I’m bringing home my copy of “Staying True” for my teenage daughters. If they read it as a how-not-to dating manual, maybe Jenny Sanford will end up my heroine after all.

Ruth Marcus’ e-mail address is marcusr(at symbol)washpost.com.

© 2009, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By berniem, February 10, 2010 at 3:26 pm Link to this comment

Look at the SOUTH; their “values”, reactionary conservatism, bigotry, solid “christian” ethics, intolerance, anti-intellectualism, and cotinued vindictiveness for being dragged out of their antebellum stagnation. Isn’t REALLY past time for a them to secede again only this time with our “blessing”?

Report this

By John, February 10, 2010 at 2:05 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

How quickly the pundits forget that this was the woman who blamed it all on so-called “Gay Marriage” See “South Carolina First Lady Jenny Sanford Blames Gay Marriage for Her Failed Marriage” Where she said,

“Of course I’m not saying that Mark is gay. But he may as well be.  The moral decay in this country has claimed another victim and this time it was my family.  Our marriage was perfect until these laws started passing around the country. Clearly the slow dissolution of the sanctity of marriage in America seeped into Mark’s psyche until he no longer felt compelled to abide by our vows.”

Do we really need to elevate ignorant bigots to the status of hero?

Report this

By djnoll, February 10, 2010 at 10:54 am Link to this comment

I have not read Jennie Sanford’s book but having been an abused wife and daughter, I can get a fairly good feel what went on here.  For the record, I am just as intelligent as Mrs. Sanford, though not as accomplished.  I understand when something is inherently wrong, and I know when something should or should not be done.  I know these things intellectually, but not always emotionally, just like Jenny Sanford. 

For example, my mother is and will always be a world-class verbal abuser (so much so that a care assistant and a nurse both warned me to be careful not to be alone with my mother and my own father said that 1200 miles between us would be best.), but I could not believe that my own mother would actually harm me.  I was wrong, but until she actually turned my own daughter against me, try to drive me to suicide through a forced commitment and drugs I did not want, and attempted to kill me through interference with medical care that nearly led to my bleeding to death after a surgical procedure, I would never have believed I was being abused.  And that was after 30 years of abuse, which because it was not physical or sexual, did not meet the level of abuse as I understood it at the time.

In Jenny Sanford’s case, apparently, she was heavily influenced by church officials who did not believe in anything other than a woman is chattel and must allow a man to do whatever he wants.  This seems to be a common theme among some Evangelical religious folks, but it is tantamount to psychological abuse, and should be criminally outlawed.  But, for the woman who trusts her church, this seems reasonable.

Since Jenny Sanford was both a political and religious person, the two seemed mutually compatible.  It leads to a kind of blinders approach to your own emotional health and well-being.  You turn off the intellectual alarm bells, and listen to the emotional support group (in this case the church advisers), and you get hurt, and hurt badly.  You trust the wrong people for the right reasons - to keep a relationship together, especially if you have children.

It would seem that at some point Jenny Sanford turned on the alarm bells at last, and moved on and out of this man’s life.  I hope he finds out just what a fool is when his Argentinian soulmate dumps him, but I am sure it is going to be a long time before Jenny Sanford goes back to church or listens to religious marriage counseling in place of common decency and human respect.

Report this

By LA, February 10, 2010 at 8:51 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Wow, you got some really nasty comments mixed in with some funny ones. I saw Jenny on the Daily Show. She said the part she misses the most is not having the “inmates” that take care of the Gov. mansion around to wash her two dogs and take care of the roses at her Sullivan Island home. She also talked about being surrounded by her four self-centered teen sons. I also think she truly hates her ex-husband, expression did NOT match “christian values” comments.

Report this

By plenum, February 10, 2010 at 7:03 am Link to this comment

The author asks (and provides a start of a good reply), “Why would a woman so obviously smart, well-educated, successful and attractive allow herself to be treated so badly for so long? Sanford’s situation may be uniquely public, but she is certainly not alone in allowing herself to be undervalued—indeed, in undervaluing herself.”

Abuse is rampant in American society. (The “empire” couldn’t exist without conquering and continually manipulating itself.)  Whether physical or emotional, racism is abuse. The same for sexism as sexism is abuse.  Child and spousal abuse IS ABUSE.

Abuse is learned by many children through “family values”, reinforced in popular culture in a myriad of ways.  It is a form of self-oppression in which a person de-values themselves and by being rewarded for being so.  We learn to admire and respect our oppressors.  And the unfortunate senator’s wife’s ethical, moral, and emotional compass became so disoriented over time, that she was willingly accepted what almost appeared, to her, as “normal”.  She knew deep down that even if wrong, she was right.

Report this

By dihey, February 9, 2010 at 1:26 pm Link to this comment

Nobody, absolutely nobody has considered the moment when some mid-life married men and women look at their life and greatly disturbed ponder: “what on Earth has happened to the 7-year, or 14-year old me”? “Where has he/she gone”? I have gone through that moment and most of my friends have too. It is utterly wrenching.
Some of my friends have accepted that the 7-year or 14-year-old was gone. Others, like myself, have changed our lives and revived some of what we were as children and young adults. I am not a psychiatrist or psychologist but I have a hunch that this is exactly what happened to Governor Sanford. I also have a hunch that Jennie intuitively knows this.

Report this
screamingpalm's avatar

By screamingpalm, February 9, 2010 at 12:58 pm Link to this comment

Jesus, what did Marie Cocco have the day off for the man-bashing article? Perhaps Ms. Marcus should look up the word ‘karma’.

Role model/heroine or just another materialistic gold digger? I thought Mark Sanford was the sort of stuff women claim to be attracted to.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-february-8-2010/jenny-sanford

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, February 8, 2010 at 10:11 am Link to this comment

She’s as guilty as Bernie Madoffs wife.

Report this

By bozh, February 8, 2010 at 9:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Please don’t read this!!
Try to top this news!? Since i have told my youngold wife that she’s a small head and i a big head and that a small head shld not ever argue with a big head, she stopped arguing.

When she get’s angry, her anger lasts only ab 2 secs; being a small head that’s all she can handle.

When she was 18 she was a TEN. Now that shes 77 she’s still a NINE. So, in 60 yrs, she only lost one point.

Since her brain is working better than mine today, i’ll let her do all the thinking and talking!
tnx

Report this

By Howie Bledsoe, February 8, 2010 at 7:31 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Poor victim…
I wonder what the divorce settlement gave her.
I´m sure she as a line of “new and improved husbands” stretching around the corner of her gated community.

Report this

By SoTexGuy, February 8, 2010 at 6:33 am Link to this comment

Isn’t Mrs. Sanford’s story simply about greed? She chose to stay in that marriage for what it brought her (publicly, privately, emotionally?) ... and what she would lose by leaving or kicking the bum out. Her as a victim, especially a helpless victim, is a stretch..

It’s very probable that lacking Mr. Sanford’s public outing and humiliation she would not yet have made any fuss. And I doubt that what anyone has yet said or ever will say about the Sanfords, their private lives or their politics will ever be the complete truth.

I think much too much attention has been given to these people and their sordid lives.. and here I’ve just added some more.

Thanks.

Report this

By liecatcher, February 7, 2010 at 10:06 pm Link to this comment

A Victim, After All
Posted on Feb 7, 2010
By Ruth Marcus

Thank you Ruth Marcus for a straight forward
infomercial & not your usual political fecal vomiting.
I hope you were smart enough not to GARDASIL your
daughters.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.