|
|||
|
A Selective Definition of Voter FraudPosted on Apr 19, 2007By Joe Conason Even as Alberto Gonzales rehearsed his excuses for the strange dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys, which he performed in public at a Senate hearing this week, he was looking like a marginal player in this scandal. In keeping with his presidential nickname “Fredo,” the attorney general probably never understood the broader plan originating in the Bush White House. Developed by political chief Karl Rove, that scheme was evidently designed to advance his objective of discouraging minority and other voters with the bad habit of supporting Democrats. In Republican parlance, such attempts to hamper registration, intimidate citizens and reduce turnout in targeted communities are lauded as “combating voter fraud.” Several of the fired U.S. attorneys had angered party operatives, including Rove, because they had shown so little enthusiasm for trumping up fraud cases against Democrats. Following the 2004 election, David Iglesias, then serving as the U.S. attorney in New Mexico, set up a task force to investigate Republican allegations of fraud. Those accusations boiled down to a single case of a woman who had created a few phony registrations for financial gain. When Iglesias declined prosecution, local Republicans sought a more pliable and partisan replacement—a demand eventually fulfilled by Rove and President Bush. In Wisconsin, by contrast, U.S. Attorney Steven Biskupic prosecuted voter-fraud allegations regardless of merit, winning big headlines when he indicted 14 black Milwaukee residents for casting ballots illegally. Nine of those cases were either tossed out or lost in court—an awful result compared with the normal conviction rate of over 90 percent. But at least the mediocre Biskupic managed to remain in the good graces of the White House. The Republican cry of “voter fraud” is a specious complaint, especially when the most sustained efforts to interfere with orderly elections and voting rights in recent years can be traced to the Republican National Committee. Advertisement Then came Richard Nixon’s Southern strategy of nurturing racist grievances, around the time that a young operative named Karl Rove was rising in the party. Under his leadership, the GOP has repeatedly been disgraced by conspiracies to diminish voter participation. In 2002, Republican operatives illegally jammed Democratic phone banks in New Hampshire to win a U.S. Senate seat. In 2004, Florida state officials sent armed officers into certain neighborhoods to scare elderly black registrants, while Republicans sought to challenge minority voters en masse in communities in Kentucky, Nevada, South Carolina, Pennsylvania and Ohio, and paid for the destruction of registration forms in Nevada and Oregon. Actual voter fraud of the kind decried in Republican propaganda is rare, according to nonpartisan experts. Although the White House recently rewrote a careful federal study by the Election Assistance Commission to hide that basic fact, very few individuals intentionally fabricate a registration or cast an illegal ballot. There are exceptions, of course—most notably illustrated by Republican celebrity Ann Coulter. When the far-right columnist and television personality registered to vote in Palm Beach, Fla., in 2005, she wrote down the address of her realtor’s office rather than her own home address. She then signed the form, despite its plain warning that falsifying any information on it would make her liable to felony prosecution—and which she, as a lawyer, surely understood. According to Palm Beach County election officials, she also voted in the wrong precinct the following year, disregarding a poll worker who explained her error. (Coulter fans can view her dubious voter-registration form online at www.bradblog.com.) If proved, those acts would be crimes punishable by prison terms of up to five years, but Coulter has stonewalled the ongoing investigation. (She says the Palm Beach officials are syphilitic and mentally defective.) No charges have been filed so far, perhaps because her lawyer is a prominent Republican who worked on Bush v. Gore in 2000—and whom the president then appointed as U.S. attorney for the southern district of Florida. He must know a lot about election fraud. Joe Conason writes for the New York Observer. © 2007 Creators Syndicate Inc. CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By republicanSScareme, April 21, 2007 at 3:51 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“he was looking like a marginal player”
Not to mention looking retarded.
Report thisBy David Macaray, April 21, 2007 at 12:28 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This was no joke? Bush actually calls Attorney General Gonzales “Fredo”? He was the weak, pathetic brother in the The Godfather, right?
I realize Bush loves nicknames for his staff (Howard Kurtz reported that Karl Rove is known as Turd Blossum), but why do people put up with this demeaning nonsense?
Report thisBy 911truthdotorg, April 19, 2007 at 8:21 pm Link to this comment
In 2003 Diebold CEO Walden O’Dell issued a fundraising letter in which he pledged to “deliver Ohio’s electoral votes” to Bush. O’Dell lives in Upper Arlington, a Columbus suburb, and is a major Bush donor a member of the Pioneer and Ranger team.
And the rest is history…unfortunately.
Google video: 9/11 Press for Truth
Report thisBy QuyTran, April 19, 2007 at 6:56 pm Link to this comment
GWB always said to his inner circles which include most of half-man, half-beast that :“After me, the deluge”. He almost correct at least in Iraq !
Report thisBy cann4ing, April 19, 2007 at 5:43 pm Link to this comment
“The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.”—Joseph Stalin
“It’s all over but the counting. And we’ll take care of the counting.”—Congressman Peter King (R. NY), Summer 2003.
“God bless America. (You just keep praying, and leave the vote counting to us).”—Diebold ad.
“If we do not suppress the Detroit vote, we’re going to have a tough time in this election.”—Congressman John Pappageorge (R. MI), July, 2004.
A number of carefully researched books document/a litany of examples of how the Rebubli-crooks expanded the illegal Katherine Harris/Choice Point computerized purge in Florida 2000 to a nation-wide art form in 2004. In Ohio, Democratic poll-watcher Denise Shull discovered that one out of every ten Democratic voters was simply deleted from the master list. Dan Burdish, former director of the NV Republi-crook Party didn’t even attempt concealment when he tried to disenfranchise some 17,000 voters. “I’m looking to take Democrats off the voter rolls.” According to Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Weinstein, “What Happened in Ohio,” between 2000 and 2004 some 500,000 voters, nearly 10% of Ohio’s electorate, were purged from the voting rolls in heavily Democratic areas. In PA, the Bush people tried to slash the Democratic vote via an eleventh-hour relocation of 63 polling stations, mostly in African American districts. In Kenosha & Racine, Wis. the Bushies wrongly told voters they could not register on election day. In “Fooled Again,” Mark Crispin Miller reports, “In Milwaukee, late in the campaign, the local GOP abruptly dumped over 5,600 voters’ addresses onto the desk of the city attorney, claiming they were fraudulent; and by the time City Hall had found them to be genuine, Team Bush came up with many more, finally naming over 37,000 Democrats whom the GOP wished to disenfranchise.”
Yet, these efforts do not begin to tell the story—one made possible by paperless E-voting. In “Was the 2004 presidential election stolen?” renouned expert Steven Freeman, Ph.D., along with Joel Bleifuss, demonstrate that statistical impossibility of explaining away the vast gap between exit-polling and the official count, show how exit-poll data was deliberately altered after the polls closed so as to eliminate the gap, and demolish the multiple, unscientific theories used to justify the official result.
Report thisBy John F. Butterfield, April 19, 2007 at 4:17 pm Link to this comment
After George H. W. Bush, I said that another Republican president would not be elected in my lifetime. So far, my statement has proven to be correct.
Report thisBy dale Headley, April 19, 2007 at 10:51 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Get serious! Alberto Gonzales, whose entire career has been to support George Bush didn’t know that his department was working behind his back to fulfill Bush’s political agenda? Don’t make me laugh!
Report thisBy Lee, April 19, 2007 at 10:35 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This newfangled idea that presidents are above the law, got a big boost when Nixon was pardoned, by his appointee, against the wishes of the majority of the American people. Since 9/11, it’s been assumed by many, that George Bush, who lost the popular vote, is actually more of a Monarch than a President. But Ann Coulter above the law?, Apparently it’s more who you know, then what you do.
At some point we may have to release a substantial number of pot smokers and the like from our prisons. This will free up room for those who have broken laws that actually do harm to our nation. Or we need to put a lot more “misguided” would be voters in prison in order to maintain the current regime.
This newfangled idea that presidents are above the law, got a big boost when Nixon was pardoned, by his appointee, against the wishes of the majority of the American people. Since 9/11, it’s been assumed by many, that George Bush, who lost the popular vote, is actually more of a Monarch than a President. But Ann Coulter above the law?, Apparently it’s more who you know, then what you do.
At some point we may need to release a substantial number of pot smokers and the like from our prisons. This will free up room for those who have broken laws that actually do harm to our nation. Or we need to put a lot more “misguided” would be voters in prison in order to maintain the current regime.
Report thisBy JNagarya, April 19, 2007 at 8:53 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Re. Ann Coulter—
When the far-right columnist and television personality registered to vote in Palm Beach, Fla., in 2005, she wrote down the address of her realtors office rather than her own home address. She then signed the form, despite its plain warning that falsifying any information on it would make her liable to felony prosecutionand which she, as a lawyer, surely understood. According to Palm Beach County election officials, she also voted in the wrong precinct the following year, disregarding a poll worker who explained her error. (Coulter fans can view her dubious voter-registration form online at http://www.bradblog.com.)”
I know Coulter claims to be a lawyer. But not only have I never seen evidence to back up the claim, as a legal professional myself I haven’t heard any legal “opinion” fall out of her mouth that was remotely recognizable as actually being law, or about law. Extremist propaganda falsely, politically repesented as being law, yes.
Report thisBy James Yell, April 19, 2007 at 8:17 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
There is no honor, or morality in the Republican Party as it is consituted in this modern era. Even by their own supposed standards, they are a nasty piece of work.
Report this