|
|
May 21, 2013
|
|
A Punishment BP Can’t Pay OffPosted on Apr 20, 2012
By Abrahm Lustgarten, ProPublica This story by ProPublica was published as an Op-Ed in The New York Times. Two years after a series of gambles and ill-advised decisions on a BP drilling project led to the largest accidental oil spill in United States history and the death of 11 workers on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, no one has been held accountable. Sure, there have been about $8 billion in payouts and, in early March, the outlines of a civil agreement that will cost BP, the company ultimately responsible, another $7.8 billion in restitution to businesses and residents along the Gulf of Mexico. It’s also true the company has paid at least $14 billion more in cleanup and other costs since the accident began on April 20, 2010, bringing the expense of this fiasco to about $30 billion for BP. These are huge numbers. But this is a huge and profitable corporation. What is missing is the accountability that comes from real consequences: a criminal prosecution that holds responsible the individuals who gambled with the lives of BP’s contractors and the ecosystem of the Gulf of Mexico. Only such an outcome can rebuild trust in an oil industry that asks for the public’s faith so that it can drill more along the nation’s coastlines. And perhaps only such an outcome can keep BP in line and can keep an accident like the Deepwater Horizon disaster from happening again. BP has already tested the effectiveness of lesser consequences, and its track record proves that the most severe punishments the courts and the United States government have been willing to mete out amount to a slap on the wrist. Advertisement In at least two of those cases, the company had been warned of human and environmental dangers, deliberated the consequences and then ignored them, according to my reporting. None of the upper-tier executives who managed BP 2014 John Browne and Tony Hayward among them 2014 were malicious. Their decisions, however, were driven by money. Neither their own sympathies nor the stark risks in their operations 2014 corroding pipelines, dysfunctional safety valves, disarmed fire alarms and so on 2014 could compete with the financial necessities of profit making. Before the accident in Texas City, BP had declined to spend $150,000 to fix a part of the system that allowed gasoline to spew into the air and blow up. Documents show that the company had calculated the cost of a human life to be $10 million. Shortly before that disaster, a senior plant manager warned BP’s London headquarters that the plant was unsafe and a disaster was imminent. A report from early 2005 predicted that BP’s refinery would kill someone “within the next 12 to 18 months” unless it changed its practices. Such explicit flirtation with deadly risk was undertaken as part of Mr. Browne’s effort while chief executive to expand BP as quickly as possible. Mr. Browne relentlessly cut costs, including on maintenance and safety. Then he hastily assembled a series of acquisitions and mergers between 1998 and 2001 that added tens of thousands of employees, blurred chains of command and wrought chaos on his operations. His methods 2014 and the demands of Wall Street 2014 became overly dependent on quantitative measures of success at the expense of environmental and human risk. After each disaster, Mr. Browne pledged to refresh his focus on safety, investment in maintenance and commitment to the environment. His successor, Mr. Hayward, followed suit, saying that BP’s culture had to change. But the Deepwater Horizon tragedy 2014 which bears many of the same traits as the company’s past accidents 2014 shows how difficult it has been for the company’s leaders to shift BP’s corporate values and live up to their promises. The question becomes: did they try hard enough, and did the mechanisms of oversight, regulation and law enforcement work sufficiently to provide a recidivist organization the deterrent that could guarantee its compliance? After its previous convictions, BP paid unprecedented fines 2014 more than $70 million 2014 and committed to spend at least another $800 million on maintenance to improve safety. The point was to demonstrate that the cost of doing business wrong far outweighs the cost of doing business right. But without personal accountability, the fines become just another cost of doing business, William Miller, a former investigator for the Environmental Protection Agency who was involved in the Texas City case, told me. The problem then (and perhaps now) is that it is the slow pileup of factors that cause an industrial disaster. Poor decisions are usually made incrementally by a range of people with differing levels of responsibility, and almost always behind a shield of plausible deniability. It makes it almost impossible to pin one clear-cut bad call on a single manager, which is partly why no BP official has ever been held criminally accountable. Instead, the corporation is held accountable. It isn’t clear that charging the company repeatedly with misdemeanors and felonies has accomplished anything. At more than $30 billion and climbing, the amount BP has paid out so far for reparations, lawsuits and cleanup dwarfs the roughly $8 billion that Exxon had to pay after its 1989 spill in Prince William Sound in Alaska. And BP will likely still pay billions more before this is finished. And yet it is not enough. Two years after analysts questioned whether the extraordinary cost and loss of confidence might drive BP out of business, it has come roaring back. It collected more than $375 billion in 2011, pocketing $26 billion in profits. What the gulf spill has taught us is that no matter how bad the disaster (and the environmental impact), the potential consequences have never been large enough to dissuade BP from placing profits ahead of prudence. That might change if a real person was forced to take responsibility 2014 or if the government brought down one of the biggest hammers in its arsenal and banned the company from future federal oil leases and permits altogether. Fines just don’t matter.
New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By theTribster, April 21, 2012 at 6:31 pm Link to this comment
Oil companies rule the planet, that’s why they call it a petrodollar. They’ll never hurt big oil, no matter what they do. Now they (oil industry) are asking for retroactive immunity so they can turn all their actions into a free for all destroying the planet for a few more pennies of profit…
Hasn’t Obama passed an executive order for that already? He certainly made sure he can take ANYTHING from the people and I mean ANYTHING via the hoarding law or eminent domain rights of the gubmint. He’s sneaky and dangerous, I think ted knows this.
Report thisAll indications are that they knew the deep water rig was destined to have serious problems but the finances dictated that they operate anyway. This is why they have insurance, it just becomes a financial decision: “Yeah, we will ruin the Gulf and the LA Bayous for 100 years but we’ll make 100 billion dollars even after all the lawsuits and slapping on the wrist”.
I think the gubmint just committed to 40 billion in subsidies for the oil industry (year after year), meanwhile we are broke and borrowing .41 of every dollar! Insane it is, stupid we are.
America should take the Argentinian approach and nationalize all of our energy companies, in fact nationalize every company that makes a profit, I mean why not the companies (via lobbyists) write our legislation anyway. It would help our debt situation
Its no wonder Ted is pissed off! Look at the Patriot Act or the NDAA or the executive orders that this President has signed. We might find out that Ted is dead or is missing soon, Obama now has authority to eliminate Ted if he wants to, for any reason he wants. Has a choice of either indefinite detention or, if he’s feeling spunky, then just assignation. Either way, not good for Ted. Since Obummer likes to beat his chest I expect Ted to disappear, it would send a very strong message to the NRA and the people Obummer hates.
Goodbye Ted, may they allow hunting where your going….
By vector56, April 21, 2012 at 3:24 pm Link to this comment
grokker; I can’t say that I did agree with your assessment. The countless capped wells are the “perfect storm” waiting on the horizon!
Report thisBy grokker, April 21, 2012 at 12:14 pm Link to this comment
First of all, vector, let’s dismiss all talk of a “cleanup” as bullshit and fantasy land. You can’t clean this up no matter how many boats and how many skimmers and giant paper towels you have. And let’s also stop the erroneous terminology of this disaster as being a “spill”. You spill milk on your kitchen floor. That’s a spill. This was 80+ days of Exxon Valdez disaster all rolled into one. Yes, I’m all for a corporate death sentence, but in a more literal sense. I’d start with Monsanto, Dow Chemical, all the pharmaceuticals, and then on to the oil companies. You will notice that it’s all business as usual in the Gulf with oil production at an all time high as well as exploration. The tens of thousands of “capped wells” won’t hold forever and are already leaking. Humans are such an ingenious bunch, aren’t they?
Report thisBy vector56, April 20, 2012 at 4:50 pm Link to this comment
The cost of the clean of the cleanup in the gulf was conservatively estimated at about 25 billion; BP payed 7.5 billion. The US tax payers will pick up the tab for the other 17.5 billion; corporate welfare for foreign companies.
Report thisBy D.R. Zing, April 20, 2012 at 1:29 pm Link to this comment
I would take this issue one step further and say
there needs to be a corporate death penalty.
Not talking about people, talking about corporate
entities.
Certain crimes and blunders should result in
companies being broken up and all the executives
fired.
BP should be first on corporate death row. Appeals
Report thisshould be quite limited.