LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 21, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Acts of Love

Fearful GOP May Hope for a Brokered Convention

Santorum Staffer Links Obama, Islam Via 'Slip'

Ideological Hypocrites

The .0000063% Election

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Acts of Love
Ideological Hypocrites
The Lowdown on Fracking

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Déjà Pooh

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
The Making of the Atomic Bomb

The Making of the Atomic Bomb

By Richard Rhodes
$20.00

more items

 
Reports

A Partial Truce in the Religious Wars

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Dec 23, 2009

By E.J. Dionne, Jr.

It is 2009’s quiet story—quiet because it’s about what didn’t happen, which can be as important as what did.

In this highly partisan year, we did not see a sharpening of the battles over religion and culture.

Yes, we continued to fight over gay marriage, and arguments about abortion were a feature of the health care debate. But what’s more striking is that other issues—notably economics and the role of government—trumped culture and religion in the public square. The culture wars went into recession along with the economy.

The most striking transformation occurred on the right end of politics. For now, the loudest and most activist sections of the conservative cause are not its religious voices but the mostly secular, anti-government tea-party activists.

Especially revealing is the reemergence of former House Majority Leader Dick Armey, a prime mover behind the tea parties and a longtime critic of the religious right. He once said that James Dobson of Focus on the Family and his allies were a “gang of thugs” and “real nasty bullies.”

Advertisement

Armey and his supporters speak a libertarian language that contrasts sharply with the message of Christian conservatives. “When Republicans are fighting against the power of the state, we win,” Armey told The New York Times recently. “When we are trying to advance it, we lose.”

At the same time, President Barack Obama has been unabashed in offering his views on religious questions. Two of the most important speeches of his first year—his addresses at the Notre Dame graduation in May and in Oslo this month when he received the Nobel Peace Prize—were suffused with the language of faith. At Notre Dame, the president lavishly praised the Catholic social justice tradition. In Oslo, he spoke as a Christian realist clearly conversant with the ideas of Reinhold Niebuhr, the great 20th century theologian.

On President George W. Bush’s faith-based initiative, Obama has made reforms but largely avoided or postponed dealing with the most controversial questions.

Even the cultural and religious conflicts that have persisted were debated at a lower volume. Going into the health care skirmishes, both supporters and opponents of abortion rights pledged that they would not try to upset current arrangements that bar federal funding of abortion. Although they feuded bitterly over what this meant in practice, their opening positions reflected a pulling back from the brink.

The Senate compromise on abortion negotiated by Sens. Ben Nelson, Bob Casey and Barbara Boxer did not fully satisfy either camp in the abortion struggle, and there will be fallout in the new year. (“Imagine, we Democrats managed to make both sides on the abortion issue unhappy,” said one House member, wryly but accurately.) Nonetheless, those who expected the abortion controversy to sink the cause of health care reform have, so far, been proved wrong.

And while gay marriage continues to roil politics at the state and local level, this argument has now become part of the routine of American politics. Republican politicians have shown a limited appetite for nationalizing the issue, something they did eagerly before the 2004 election. Judging by the closeness of some of the referendum votes—notably this year in Maine, where it lost narrowly—support for gay marriage has grown, although its backers are still short of a majority in most places.

In the meantime, religious progressives are mobilized to a degree not seen since the civil rights years. They weighed in regularly on health care, providing energy for the compromises on abortion that would otherwise have won little organized support.

Of course, it was inevitable that cultural and religious issues would at least partially recede during a sharp economic downturn. Such matters also declined in importance during the Great Depression of the 1930s, and none more so than the previous decade’s struggle over the prohibition of alcohol.

At the time, historian William E. Leuchtenburg reported, a Missouri Democrat told James Farley, one of Franklin Roosevelt’s top lieutenants, that it was “ridiculous for a jobless wet Democrat to wrangle with a jobless dry Democrat over liquor when neither could afford the price of a drink.”

The paradox for Obama is that if the economy continues its comeback in 2010, his overall standing will improve, but the risk of renewed conflict over religion and values will also rise. It’s a trade the president will happily take, even if he would then face a much tougher test of his credentials as a cultural peacemaker.
   
E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com.
   
© 2009, Washington Post Writers Group


Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By johannes, December 29, 2009 at 4:18 pm Link to this comment

Reed the older historys, where it started all, the Aryans, who where standing by the cradle of human enlighting and beginnig of thinking.

Its also very curious that the whole thinking world, is or want to forget, the migty and enormes learned Byzantium, with Constantinopel as its axis of knowledge and spiritual vulcano.

Our future is to be found in our history, all history.

Report this

By Ernie, December 28, 2009 at 6:51 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Seems like the only religious wars are ocurring between sects. Well then there is the war on Christmas that the Christian right is waging.

Report this
drbhelthi's avatar

By drbhelthi, December 26, 2009 at 12:07 pm Link to this comment

What, what?  US presidents displaying religious dishonesty?  Who expects otherwise?  Meanwhile, the “Nobel Committee” distorts its value system, awards Nobel Prizes to two political vultures, both of whom deserve jail terms for their fraud.  Has it become necessary for the Nobel Committee to chalk up political points with US politicians for itself, or for its homeland, or for both?  Sad, sad.

This committee would do itself and the world a vast honor by withdrawing the prize from comrades Al Gore and Hussein Obama.  Such an honest precedent would greatly benefit the western world, perhaps even “religiosity” in the western world.

Report this

By sharonsj, December 26, 2009 at 7:56 am Link to this comment

The Depression not withstanding, I still hear about the “war” on Xmas, on the radio and TV.  The right-wing commentators are outrageous as usual.  And callers in my area complain about the Channukah menorah being too close to the manger scene.  Radio listeners, in particular, just parrot right-wing talking points without any comprehension of historical or constitutional facts.

Report this
drbhelthi's avatar

By drbhelthi, December 26, 2009 at 12:28 am Link to this comment

Greek mythology vs. US democracy mythology? The US with its fourth “president” installed via elements of illegality - ?

Greek leadership has declared bankruptcy.  USA “leadership” has added a few more trillion dollars to its “national debt.”

Compared to the leadership” of the USA, the leadership of Greece is remarkably honest.  Or, are they preparing the world for a “bailout” request, from CIA black-monies?  We will know by March 2010.

Report this
D.R. Zing's avatar

By D.R. Zing, December 25, 2009 at 9:35 am Link to this comment

Thank you Inherit. 

Yeah, I don’t know crap about Greek mythology. I was just glancing at this Web page: 

http://www.theoi.com/greek-mythology/olympian-gods.html

But, yeah, thanks. It is strange being a part of this society, so advanced technologically and scientifically and yet still incredibly superstitious—cavemen with nuclear warheads in tow.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, December 25, 2009 at 9:30 am Link to this comment

D.R. Zing:
Thanks for the laugh—I really enjoyed it, even with the mistakes…(like Zeus loved a young male so much he put him in the stars for eternity—Ganymede. And Hera was tne goddess of childbirth, not the virgin Artemis).

Still, I feel as you do, like when I hear some dogmatic say “God is under attack. We have to defend God!”  Hello? Is this the same God who is “Master of the Universe”?  The all-powerful and all-knowing?  What can such a being POSSIBLY need from us??????

Report this
D.R. Zing's avatar

By D.R. Zing, December 25, 2009 at 9:05 am Link to this comment

I believe in Zeus. Anyone who does not believe in Zeus will have to answer to the mighty war cry of Ares as he descends from Mt. Olympus to vanquish all you apostates and blasphemers. 

The reason we have problems with abortion is you miserable dogs have lost your faith in Artemis, the hunting goddess who also protects children.  Go build an altar now and pray to her. Abortions will end immediately. 

Gay marriage would not be an issue if we continued to worship Dionsysus.  Gays don’t need marriage. They just need an occasional drunken orgy where no petty distinctions are made about glands that protrude and glands that are cleft. 

Even this global climate change thing could be resolved by the great god Poseidon, god of the sea, rivers, flood and drought.  Visit the ocean soon. Pray to Poseidon. The climate will change for the good.

Sound like bullshit? 

Now you know how I feel when I flip through religious channels on television. 

It’s not that I’m against theism, believing in comprehensive forces governing the universe and therefore us.

I’m all for it. 

I’m for moving forward, realizing the limitations of past creation myths, past religious laws, past religious history, past personified deities, and taking our theistic concepts to the next level, which will mean taking all the knowledge we have, particularly scientific knowledge, and basing our theistic concepts on that knowledge—which is exactly our what ancestors did when they wrote the old and new testaments. They weren’t idiots. They were the brightest of the bright and they compiled all the knowledge they had to form their theistic concepts and supporting laws. 

We should do the same. We don’t need a culture war to do it. Just a little common sense.   

With that, I can happily say:  Merry Christmas to all!

Report this

By George, December 25, 2009 at 4:56 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Because it isn’t reported means it is not happening?

Report this

By FRTothus, December 24, 2009 at 4:32 pm Link to this comment

A tempest in a Tea-Pot.

How about this, Gerard:

‘One’s religion is a personal choice. Keep it personal.’

I don’t know about others, but what disturbs me is the crowing.  I don’t understand why it is anyone else’s business, a subject up for discussion. 

We could read about the corporate control of the State and the Press, but that (among others) is a subject understandably avoided in the speaches of officials of the State, or recorded in the corporate journals. It’s better to write about nothing at all.

“Political discussion in the United States is usually restricted to the moderate to conservative range that precludes discussion of class conflict. If “class warfare” is mentioned, it is because a conservative wants to suggest that certain matters should be kept off-limits in American political discussion”
(Steve Brouwer)

“[The meaning of “being informed” has been altered] by creating a species of information that might properly be called disinformation… Disinformation does not mean false information. It means misleading information - misplaced, irrelevant, fragmented or superficial information - information that creates the illusion of knowing something, but which in fact leads one away from knowing.”
(Neil Postman)

“You don’t need a totalitarian dictatorship like Hitler’s to get by with murder ... you can do it in a democracy as long as the Congress and the people Congress is supposed to represent don’t give a damn.”
(William Shirer)

“The greatest threats to U.S. society are not coming from “terrorists” or “rogue nations” abroad. They are coming from the words and actions of elected officials here at home. Actions of the Department of Justice - emboldened by the USA-Patriot Act passed by Congress - threaten to turn the U.S. into a permanent security state.
Likewise, the greatest threats to global peace - and to human development and security worldwide - are coming from U.S. policymakers carrying out their lawful duties.”
(Friends Committee on National Legislation)

“We now live in a state of permanent war - a global arms industry, apparently the largest single international business, must have its products used up so more can be sold. There must be profits for the capitalists and jobs for the proles… Are we not still in Caligula’s Rome?
(New Internationalist magazine)

Just food for thought.

Happy Holidays, none the less.

Report this

By gerard, December 24, 2009 at 11:51 am Link to this comment

I’m looking for a way to reduce the religious argumentation to the “you like tomahhhtos” level where it belongs. 

It’s the urge to convert that wipes out the urge to converge. Why not let everybody be what they freely choose to be, without pressure, briberty and threat?  Why not agree to disagree, since none of us can prove that any of it either has validity or is nonsense.

And one more thing:  Let’s get it out of politics and keep it out.  The combination is always dynamite.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, December 24, 2009 at 9:19 am Link to this comment

I guess EJ hasn’t been reading TD where the anti-semites have been out in FULL FORCE all year.

Report this

By Rev. Lauren Unruh, December 24, 2009 at 8:50 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

You missed a couple of points, it is now possible to criticize zionism and
Indigenous people are becoming more demanding.

Indigenous delegates ask Pope to repudiate Doctrine of Discovery
http://www.indiancountrytoday.com/home/content/79636552.html

E.J. doesn’t seem to realize yet that the left is operating with new spiritual
leadership.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.