|
|||
|
A New Red DawnPosted on Mar 24, 2011By David Sirota The 1984 film “Red Dawn” fantasized about a group of American teenagers called the Wolverines who valiantly repelled an invasion of foreign communists. For its mix of dystopia and hope, the movie became such an enduring cultural touchstone that U.S. military leaders honored it by naming their 2003 effort to apprehend Saddam Hussein “Operation Red Dawn.” Amid the triumphalism, however, we missed the fact that the invaders started winning—a fact that none other than “Red Dawn’s” 2011 remake underscores. That’s the subtext of a Los Angeles Times report this week about MGM taking “the extraordinary step” of digitally removing fictional Chinese villains from the $60 million film “lest the leadership in Beijing be offended.” Why the fear of upsetting such an odiously anti-democratic government? Because movie executives worry that a film involving a negative message about China “would harm their ability to do business with the rising Asian superpower, one of the fastest-growing and potentially most lucrative markets for American movies.” The studio suits are right to be concerned. China’s government allows only about 20 non-Chinese movies per year into its theaters, and in the late 1990s the regime halted Walt Disney, Sony and MGM business in the country after those companies produced films deemed critical of China. Seeking to avoid a similar fate, the film industry now regularly shapes its products to appease—rather than challenge—the political agenda of the Chinese despots. In that sense, the only thing newsworthy about this week’s “Red Dawn” tiff is the public nature of the content revision. Whether you are a “Red Dawn” fan or not, the episode shows that for all the high-minded theories about American cultural exports aiding democratic ferment and challenging autocracy, the dynamic is starting to work the other way as autocracy gives orders to American culture. Indeed, wielding its increasing market leverage, China is now countering our First Amendment ethos with a push for what Times reporter Ben Fritz calls pervasive “self-censorship”—the kind in which America’s media industries preemptively shape content to keep China’s dictators happy. The consequences are more profound and worrisome than just a change of bad guys in a campy ’80s retread. Just ask Rupert Murdoch. In 1993, the world’s leading media baron removed the BBC from his Star TV channel so as to satisfy Beijing and thus secure the station’s access to China’s audience. A few years later, Murdoch’s publishing firm nixed a book by British diplomat Christopher Patten after seeing that the manuscript was critical of the Chinese government, and then the same publishing company released a fawning biography of Premier Deng Xiaoping by the dictator’s daughter. Advertisement In a radio interview this week, Fritz explained the cumulative effect: “If you think the rules and restrictions of the authoritarian government in China are a bad thing and amount to censorship, then in a global economy where products made in America are seen and consumed in China, those rules and that censorship is affecting what we here in America see.” And unfortunately, no band of Wolverines can stop it. David Sirota is a best-selling author of the new book “Back to Our Future: How the 1980s Explain the World We Live In Now.” He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com, follow him on Twitter @davidsirota or visit his website at www.davidsirota.com. © 2011 Creators.com Previous item: Why the GOP Is Obsessed With 'Leadership' Next item: Paradox and Principle in the New Mideast CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By photoshock, March 28, 2011 at 1:26 pm Link to this comment
Night Gaunt, when I referred to the large
Report thiscorporations owning and dictating to the networks
their news programs, I was definitely referring to
GE. GE is the largest stockholder of NBC. The
network’s news programming is run on the basis of
profit and not principle. We have no large scale
independent news organization in the US any longer.
GE, one of the largest military contractors in the
US, building engines, planes and other military
hardware, owns one of the big 3 networks and surely
dictates policy in regards to news.
During the run-up to the Iraqi war, a war which by
any standard was uncalled for and illegal, NBC and
MSNBC did not so much as raise a stink regarding the
necessity for such a debacle. Sure, some of the
outlets anchors and pundits spoke out against the
war, but on the whole, there was tacit approval of
both the Iraqi and Afghani wars.
Mind you, the idea of a free press, is no longer a
viable option. We have only news/entertainment
organizations run by large corporations.
I cannot think of one major news source in this
country that is not run by and accountable to a major
corporation.
By REDHORSE, March 27, 2011 at 12:49 pm Link to this comment
It’s well our journalists report these obvious betrayals of heart, soul and mind by self-proclaimed guardians of the arts in “gee golly how do we make more money wood” but we who profess concern over the moral decay deconstructing American freedom and economics should be well beyond shock and indignation at the baboon antics of immoral baboons.
Great observations one and all but Wall Street grifters, whore Repub/Dems and the international black market thugs they serve have carried themselves beyond redemption. They have made themselves inconsequential to the core reality that now defines survival in America. Like any ponzi scheme their obscene illusion, as any lie would be, is headed for collapse. Don’t let it fall on you.
The Chinese people can take care of themselves. So can we Americans.
POWER TO AMERICAN DEMOCRACY!! INDICT WALL STREET THUGS NOW!! REPEAL THE PATRIOT ACT!! FREE MANNING!!
Report thisBy lasmog, March 27, 2011 at 9:50 am Link to this comment
Corporate America has no better friend than China, so it is not surprising that they would work together on matters of censorship. China’s cheap captive labor have allowed corporations around the world to fatten their profits while killing off domestic labor unions. There is symbiotic relationship between corporations and autocratic regimes because both entities forbid dissent. China’s mastery of censorship is best demonstrated by the fact that no one in China dares discuss the 45 million people killed in Mao’s Great Leap Forward of 1958-1962.
Report thisBy oddsox, March 27, 2011 at 9:38 am Link to this comment
JSD, you must be familiar with Thomas Friedman.
He wrote the Lexus & the Olive Tree; his most recent book is Hot, Flat & Crowded—and an op-ed piece in today’s NYTimes echos some of what you’ve written.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/27/opinion/27friedman.html?_r=1&ref=columnists
Youth will be served.
Report thisVictory for the World Youth Movement is inevitable. Once they have won, however, the new world will be THEIRS, for better or worse.
By then a new, budding spirit of youth will emerge.
(Happens like this every generation.)
By Night-Gaunt, March 26, 2011 at 5:33 pm Link to this comment
They took that name from their football team mascot in the original film that was retro when it came out in 1984. Why would anyone want to do a remake? I like it because it is so ridiculous and unbelievable.(The John Birch Society wet dream of fear if there ever was one.) Just couldn’t happen. And remember in the end the USA won it all back in a flash forward.
Another one in the same vein was the miniseries “Amerika” fun but improbable. In the novel they blame womens’ emancipation for the USA’s down fall. No joke.
Well its the worship & fear of Mammon that should be the star of the movie not China or Fredonia. Hint, China is now become a fascist state not that different from the previous years. Just more obvious.
Photoshock I get more real news from MSNBC than CNN and Fox combined. But you can inform me where they made up stuff, will you?
Report thisBy Spadone, March 26, 2011 at 5:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
DavidByron, PatrickHenry wasn’t referring to China in his post. And in my opinion his
Report thisaddresses the central point best of all so far.
By SB, March 26, 2011 at 12:11 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It is nice to know that, according to Barnes and Noble, the content of books will
Report thissoon be as easily edited due to centralized control of their content. Look for a new
edition of The Fountainhead, one that avoids slighting the architectural heritage of
Greece and Italy, to appear soon in your favorite digital bookstore, right next to
the “N”-free Huckleberry Finn‘s. The Soviet censors never dreamed of such power
as now lies within reach of the “capitalists” corporate-statists.
By gerard, March 26, 2011 at 11:21 am Link to this comment
Yeah, well . . . here in the “democratic” US also, self-censorship is “starting to work the other way as autocracy gives orders to American culture.” Only difference: our “autocracy” is not formally associated with the Communist Party, which of course makes everything they do okay because it’s “private enterprise”—even when it’s at public expense!
We would do well to recognize our own faults and limitations at the same time we are so alert to the faults and limitations of others—especially when they so closely resemble us.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, March 26, 2011 at 9:46 am Link to this comment
Maybe a movie which portrays a third world middle eastern country who whas insidiously taken over the congress, media, judicial and bamking interests in the United States, forcing us into unpopular wars and unconstitutional laws.
Report thisBy Mike789, March 26, 2011 at 8:59 am Link to this comment
[...countering our First Amendment ethos with a push for what Times reporter Ben Fritz calls pervasive “self-censorship”—the kind in which America’s media industries…]
Yep, as the world turn, so do the influences of so-called free marketeering; the calling card of Wall Street. Decisions to usurp the fundamentals of our national philosophy are subject to the scrutiny of hedge fund managers.
Peter Knopfler ~ I appreciate your comment. The decrescendo of American values, fabulous at best, may only be assuaged by global warming. Scientists’ models call for extreme drought in NW China, which will impact Russia in terms of mass migration. The next battles may be over rights to water. We can, with the wherwithal, confront and perhaps prevail in energy transformation, as per H2O, the task is monumental:
•It takes about 1,000 gallons of water to grow the wheat to make a two pound loaf of bread, and about 120 gallons to produce one egg.
Report this•About 1,400 gallons of water are used to produce a meal of a quarter- pound hamburger, an order of fries and a soft drink.
By photoshock, March 26, 2011 at 8:37 am Link to this comment
We have always had censorship of one form or another since the dawn of the U.S. We cannot escape the idea that censorship is an all pervasive element of our society.
Report thisThe problem remains though in giving into the idea of self-censorship.
What are we to do about the self-imposed rules on ideas? Is there nothing that can be done? Well, in the face of avarice and the bottom line, NOTHING! For when profit trumps ideals and democracy, ideals will always lose.
Face facts, Amerikkka has lost the battle of hearts and minds a long time ago.
When the Chinese asserted their right to censor the material that was introduced into their country and the movie studios happily gave in, for the chance to have their products seen by the world’s largest audience, then profit trumped principles.
But as insidious as that seems, Fox Channel is even more insidious, besides the other major networks being owned by large corporations and run on the principle of profit. We have no real large scale independent news organizations any more. News, and the gathering of news, used to be an inviolate thing.
It was part and parcel of the ‘fourth estate.’
Now though, we are faced with large corporations, much of whom are in the war business and the production of weaponry for the military. So war, has become a profitable and seemingly endless cycle of production and use. Rather than stand against the lies that brought us into conflict, the ‘fourth estate’ nows plays up the role of ‘embedded’ journalist. What the hell does a journalist embedded with troops do, when he/she finds these self-same protectors committing war crimes and atrocities? Nothing but sweep the crime/crimes under the rug. Why? Because their bosses have already dictated the policy that war is good for the bottom line and nothing will interfere with their pockets.
What should be done in regards to the independence of the journalist? As far as I can tell, until the
journalist is freed from the restraints of corporate Amerikkka, nothing will happen.
This is a situation which has no remedy, until journalism is again free to report the truth good or bad.
With this said, we have to again demand the freedom of the press. No longer should the ‘press corps,’ cozy up to the governmental newsmakers. There should be no relationship between those who report the news and those whose job it is to make policy. Yet, for the sake of profit, the ‘reporters’ have cozied up to those whose job it is to set the policies that influence all our lives. We are at the mercy of a ‘press’ that is nothing more than a mouthpiece for the corporations. To remain a free nation, freedom of the press must again become a hallmark of our nation. Until this happens we will sink lower and lower into the abyss of fascism and authoritarianism.
Amerikkka will no longer be the bastion of freedom of thought and speech that it once was, if it ever was. Now though, we are faced with a rapidly expanding and rapidly growing authoritarian state. Which state is enhanced by the dull and uninformative reportage that is the hallmark of today’s news. Who cares whether ‘bennifer’ goes to the mall or not?
We cannot long sustain the ideal of freedom faced with a lack of knowledge. Should this continue we well may face in our lifetime, dictatorship and ruthless murder of our citizens.
The solution is for the citizens to stand up to the corporatocracy and demand real news, not the fake news of CNN, Fox Channel, MSNBC and all the rest. Real news which gives objective and unbiased facts.
Until then, nothing will change.
By MeHere, March 25, 2011 at 7:51 pm Link to this comment
China bashing, again, and this time by D. Sirota. The film industry, as well as
Report thisother industries, have always tailored their products to fit the demand from the
most profitable sectors of the market. What has this got to do with China? Why
can’t they buy what they want to buy? Nobody tells US film distributors which or
how many foreign films to buy—in fact they are buying less of them than ever.
This is the only developed country that doesn’t have a culture that regularly sees
an appreciates international films. Big business and its overwhelming advertising
apparatus is our autocracy.
By JSD, March 25, 2011 at 3:51 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I didn’t catch the ‘wolverines’ reference, but wolverines are very ferocious. They are basically a large relative of the weasel. I read somewhere that they have been known to drop down onto the back of a full grown moose and try to kill it. Wow!
I am not suggesting that we try to do something like that to the Chinese Communist Party. We won’t have to.
The world is experiencing a youth movement, mostly in the Arab world, but Chinese of the same age share the same culture. It’s world-wide and reflected in the phenomenon of ‘Facebook’ and other social networking.
Governments, economies—all other institutions in the world: religions, educational institutions—all of them, are irrelevant to this phenomenon of social networking.
This is what is changing the world, and the worlds’ official institutions are as ignorant of this as parents are of what their children really think, feel, and do.
This is a good thing. I trust the spirit of youth. It is not wise, but it is educated, creative, energetic, and it loves freedom and the joys of life.
It is anti-corporatist, anti-authoritarian, anti-hypocrisy, and the younger it is, the closer it is to the true heart of love and true justice.
The revolution in China growing out of this will come about in a way that the Chinese government cannot possibly fathom. One day it will be there, fully enlightened and suddenly unafraid, and China will be transformed over night.—much like Egypt.
Or, unfortunately, like Libya. But, that is unlikely, isn’t it; because this youth movement will most likely be unarmed, Gandhian-like.
Will the Chinese military at that time be like the Egyptian military during their sixteen-day revolution? That’s unlikely, isn’t it? So, we may expect something regional, this spirit having grown so strong there that the change it brings about is impervious to police violence. It is now a culture that resides in the souls of the young.
Now of course, The West treats China like we did Mubarak and Quadafi, ready and eager to do business. But that will change.
Report thisBy Jim Bailey, March 25, 2011 at 2:26 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Censorship of any and all sorts is vile, the cowardice of the studio in the face of the tyrants in China is on a par with the lies and misdirection foisted on the public by Murdoch and company…power can corrupt and censorship is one of the main tools used to maintain that corruption.
Report thisBy Peter Knopfler, March 25, 2011 at 2:24 pm Link to this comment
ARE WE ALL IN A COMMUNIST CHINES TRANCE OR JUST STUCK
Report thisON STUPID:
Communism is dangerous because it takes away your
desire to know and walk into the unknown where
creativity is at its best. Communist China has had no
original thoughts since Mao, General Electric has
been feeding their communist wishes for over 100
years, know your history. We stopped using the label
COMMUNIST so you would feel better about buying their
down graded, contaminated products. This year ,
Chinese year of Rabbit run around kiss and shit on
everyone. The following Year is the YEAR OF THE
DRAGON, AND THAT IS WHEN THE COMMUNIST CHINESE WILL
SHOW YOU EVERYONE WHO THE NEW BOSS IS! Shadow
government. Corporate dictatorship ruled by COMMUNIST
CHINA! YOUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN SLAVES TO
COMMUNISM. How you like them apples!
By TDoff, March 25, 2011 at 12:54 pm Link to this comment
It’s a shame that China, which had the opportunity to become a shining example of a reborn nation, is slavishly following the US examples of hypocrisy in self-censorship, and ‘Mendacity Rules’ overriding the rule of law and all other ‘democratic’ principles.
Report thisBy Queenie, March 25, 2011 at 12:33 pm Link to this comment
Too bad we couldn’t practice a little “self censorship” of our own right here in the good old U.S.of A. Starting with Beck and company.
As far as exporting “culture”, I think the world has had enough already.
Report thisBy SarcastiCanuck, March 25, 2011 at 12:14 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Rupert Murdoch and factual news have nothing to do with each other.Haven’t you seen FOX news?He is an oligarch who manipulates the truth in his corporate media world to make more money or help get his lackies elected.Zero credibility.
Report thisHow about Red Dawn 2.China invades America and brutalizes the population.Then you’ll be able to kill and kick yellow ass all you want and still be the good guys.I even bet it will become the most pirated DVD in China’s history.
By DavidByron, March 25, 2011 at 10:40 am Link to this comment
Say what?
“Why the fear of upsetting such an odiously anti-democratic government?”
China, of course, holds elections, which may be more “democratic” than those in the US.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_the_People’s_Republic_of_China
Certainly the vector for the people of China is on the up, unlike the vector for Americans and their government. How come Al Jazeera can’t get on to American TV? Is it because of the “despots” who run America?
This article just comes across as an example of the American disease. A cancerous case of jingoism. Foreigners are icky. Communism is evil. America is wonderful or at worst just a little confused. Don’t think about any of that. Just obey.
Ask yourself if Hollywood is more likely to produce a film criticising the Chinese army or the US army. Of course the US armed forces have their hooks into Hollywood and essentially have complete veto power over military films which they use to promote their propaganda. This is all well known except the extent of it perhaps.
But would David Sirota call the US government “odious”, “despotic”, “anti-democratic” and “authoritarian”?
Hey Sirota when was the last time the Chinese invaded another country? When was the last time the Chinese killed a million people?
Oh but they are commies so the blinders come down and the jingoistic prattle comes out. We know commies are evil because our wonderfully democratic overlords tell us it is so. And they’d never lie.
Report thisBy oddsox, March 25, 2011 at 7:27 am Link to this comment
so watch Atlas Shrugged, already.
Report thishttp://www.atlasshruggedpart1.com/?gclid=CPCT-eza6acCFRRigwod5Hokrw