LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     robert scheer     barack obama     gay marriage     ndaa     chris hedges
Most Read

Say 'Hi-Ho!' as They Strip-Search You

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Massive Wildfire Rages in New Mexico

I Can't Hear Myself Think

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
One State, Two States

One State, Two States

By Benny Morris
$17.16

more items

 
Reports

A Movement Too Big to Fail

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Oct 16, 2011
AP / Ted S. Warren

Protesters in Seattle melt a Bank of America debit card.

By Chris Hedges

There is no danger that the protesters who have occupied squares, parks and plazas across the nation in defiance of the corporate state will be co-opted by the Democratic Party or groups like MoveOn. The faux liberal reformers, whose abject failure to stand up for the rights of the poor and the working class, have signed on to this movement because they fear becoming irrelevant. Union leaders, who pull down salaries five times that of the rank and file as they bargain away rights and benefits, know the foundations are shaking. So do Democratic politicians from Barack Obama to Nancy Pelosi. So do the array of “liberal” groups and institutions, including the press, that have worked to funnel discontented voters back into the swamp of electoral politics and mocked those who called for profound structural reform.

Resistance, real resistance, to the corporate state was displayed when a couple of thousand protesters, clutching mops and brooms, early Friday morning forced the owners of Zuccotti Park and the New York City police to back down from a proposed attempt to expel them in order to “clean” the premises. These protesters in that one glorious moment did what the traditional “liberal” establishment has steadily refused to do—fight back. And it was deeply moving to watch the corporate rats scamper back to their holes on Wall Street. It lent a whole new meaning to the phrase “too big to fail.”

Tinkering with the corporate state will not work. We will either be plunged into neo-feudalism and environmental catastrophe or we will wrest power from corporate hands. This radical message, one that demands a reversal of the corporate coup, is one the power elite, including the liberal class, is desperately trying to thwart. But the liberal class has no credibility left. It collaborated with corporate lobbyists to neglect the rights of tens of millions of Americans, as well as the innocents in our imperial wars. The best that liberals can do is sheepishly pretend this is what they wanted all along. Groups such as MoveOn and organized labor will find themselves without a constituency unless they at least pay lip service to the protests. The Teamsters’ arrival Friday morning to help defend the park signaled an infusion of this new radicalism into moribund unions rather than a co-opting of the protest movement by the traditional liberal establishment. The union bosses, in short, had no choice.

The Occupy Wall Street movement, like all radical movements, has obliterated the narrow political parameters. It proposes something new. It will not make concessions with corrupt systems of corporate power. It holds fast to moral imperatives regardless of the cost. It confronts authority out of a sense of responsibility. It is not interested in formal positions of power. It is not seeking office. It is not trying to get people to vote. It has no resources. It can’t carry suitcases of money to congressional offices or run millions of dollars of advertisements. All it can do is ask us to use our bodies and voices, often at personal risk, to fight back. It has no other way of defying the corporate state. This rebellion creates a real community instead of a managed or virtual one. It affirms our dignity. It permits us to become free and independent human beings.

Martin Luther King was repeatedly betrayed by liberal supporters, especially when he began to challenge economic forms of discrimination, which demanded that liberals, rather than simply white Southern racists, begin to make sacrifices. King too was a radical. He would not compromise on nonviolence, racism or justice. He understood that movements—such as the Liberty Party, which fought slavery, the suffragists, who fought for women’s rights, the labor movement and the civil rights movement—have always been the true correctives in American democracy. None of those movements achieved formal political power. But by holding fast to moral imperatives they made the powerful fear them. King knew that racial equality was impossible without economic justice and an end to militarism. And he had no intention of ceding to the demands of the liberal establishment that called on him to be calm and patient.

Advertisement

“For years, I labored with the idea of reforming the existing institutions in the South, a little change here, a little change there,” King said shortly before he was assassinated. “Now I feel quite differently. I think you’ve got to have a reconstruction of the entire system, a revolution of values.”

King was killed in 1968 when he was in Memphis to support a strike by sanitation workers. By then he had begun to say that his dream, the one that the corporate state has frozen into a few safe clichés from his 1963 speech in Washington, had turned into a nightmare. King called at the end of his life for massive federal funds to rebuild inner cities, what he called “a radical redistribution of economic and political power,” a complete restructuring of “the architecture of American society.” He grasped that the inequities of capitalism had become the instrument by which the poor would always remain poor.

“Call it democracy, or call it democratic socialism,” King said, “but there must be a better distribution of wealth within this country for all of God’s children.”

On the eve of King’s murder he was preparing to organize a poor people’s march on Washington, D.C., designed to cause “major, massive dislocations,” a nonviolent demand by the poor, including the white underclass, for a system of economic equality. It would be 43 years before his vision was realized by an eclectic group of protesters who gathered before the gates of Wall Street.


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By Alf, October 17, 2011 at 5:01 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Those protesters who occupy wall street do so free of charge, out of a moral principle for what is truthful and right for themselves and the vast majority of people throughout the USA. 

The people who work in wall street can only be amoral. They must be temporary blinded by their vanity and self imposed power for what they do.  I find it difficult to understand how a person can work for such organizations who deliberately cause so much chaos and turmoil throughout the world for something as little and worthless as money.

Report this

By lasmog, October 17, 2011 at 4:59 am Link to this comment

How does the US Green Party fit into any of this? The Greens seem to represent a real progressive alternative to our two corporate parties but I never hear it mentioned by Hedges or virtually any other progressive commentator. Could it become a viable political party if we actually treated it like one?

Report this
OzarkMichael's avatar

By OzarkMichael, October 17, 2011 at 4:53 am Link to this comment

“For to accuse requires less eloquence, such is man’s nature, than to excuse; and condemnation, than absolution, more resembles justice.” Hobbes, Leviathon

That is so true. And what else is the Occupation of Wall Street but an accusation of our economic system, and requires less eloquence.

The Occupation is also a condemnation of our political system. Condemnation merely resembles justice. I am glad ardee brought that up, it is so true.

“When a true genius appears in the world you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him.” Jonathan Swift

Be assured that the confederacy of dunces have plenty of accusations at their disposal against a true genius, who is always alone, not part of a mob. One favorite accusation is that the genius is crazy. Did you know that, ardee?

Report this

By ardee, October 17, 2011 at 4:28 am Link to this comment

“America,” Langston Hughes wrote, “never was America to me.”

“When a true genius appears in the world you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him.” Jonathan Swift

I may have inaccurately stated the quote a bit but the essential meaning is certainly there. We here at TD seem to have our very own confederacy who rise, seemingly terrified of this burgeoning movement, so afraid that we will have a nation restored to rule by the people that they must, perforce, denigrate and defame.

Considering the actions of the neoconservatives these defamers support one must stand aghast and bemused by their posturing and prattling.

“For to accuse requires less eloquence, such is man’s nature, than to excuse; and condemnation, than absolution, more resembles justice.” Hobbes, Leviathon

I offer that this movement is yet in its infancy, still taking shape, born to a single ideal, namely; the ending of the creeping fascism that has overtaken our governance , born,perhaps re-born really, in the Reagan years and nurtured thereafter by both Republican and Democrat alike.

Neither I nor anyone else, sitting on our behinds in the comfort of our homes, can state with any accuracy what will evolve from this remarkable gathering. Yet there are always those, perhaps scared shiteless by the ideals of the movement, or threatened by the lose of power of their own loyalties this populist uprising indicates, who will attempt to co-opt or interpret to their own devices the significance and the future course it will take. Do not listen to them, do not fear their impotent forecasts either.

“And there is a lust in Man no charm can tame, of loudly publishing our neighbors shame; On eagles wings immortal scandals fly, while virtuous actions are but born and die.”
Juvenal

Report this

By bpawk, October 17, 2011 at 4:25 am Link to this comment

(corrected from previous posting) You are not going to effect change by sitting in a park or occupying a museum - you need to go to the source which is Washington - without doing that, it’s just complaining - laws are made in Washington that govern you, me and Wall Street. I think that as a lot of protesters voted for Obama, and having realized he betrayed them on most issues, they don’t want to admit now they were hoodwinked and criticizing Obama is criticizing themselves for voting for him - a hard pill to swallow. Remember the adage: Fool me once, shame on you - Fool me twice, shame on me. So what are you protesters going to do about that!

Report this

By bpawk, October 17, 2011 at 4:22 am Link to this comment

You are not going to effect change by sitting in a park or occupying a museum - you need to go to the source which is Washington - without doing that, it’s just complaining - laws are made in Washington that govern you, me and Wall Street. I think that as a long of protesters voted for Obama, and having realized they betrayed him on most issues, they don’t want to admit now they were hoodwinked and criticizing Obama is criticizing themselves for voting for him - a hard pill to swallow. Remember the adage: Fool me once, shame on you - Fool me twice, shame on me. So what are you protesters going to do about that!

Report this

By bpawk, October 17, 2011 at 4:10 am Link to this comment

What I see in a lot of these postings is a want for change but going to Wall Street or a museum isn’t going to effect change. Change happens at the federal, state and local authorities level - why not be radical and march on Washington to the White House or Congress with a list of demands to change laws that make American a more equitable country.  I think a lot of people who are protesting voted for Obama and now, having realized he betrayed them on most issues, don’t want to admit they were hoodwinked - criticizing Obama means you have to criticize yourself for voting for him - and that’s a hard pill to swallow. But complaining about wall street greed isn’t going to change anything without changes laws that govern them.

Report this

By KeepLeft, October 17, 2011 at 4:01 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

What a shame, that C.H. chooses to quote Karl Marx and slander him in the same sentence. Hedges clearly has a very limited understanding of Marxism and consequently will always succumb to the “liberalism” that he is so much against. Too bad.

Report this
thecrow's avatar

By thecrow, October 17, 2011 at 3:53 am Link to this comment

“On September 11 2002, one year Anniversary of the death of our son, we were informed that the Recovery team at Ground Zero have found the ATM Bank card of Waleed and that it will be mailed to us in Northridge. When we received it, we found it in good condition. How could a plastic card survive the fire of the terrorist attack of the Black Tuesday on the USA? I consider it as a sign from Waleed to his parents on the first Anniversary of his loss.”

http://www.iskandar.com/waleed911/atmcard.html

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2010/09/10/ghosts-in-the-machine/

Report this
OzarkMichael's avatar

By OzarkMichael, October 17, 2011 at 3:42 am Link to this comment

There is no danger that the protesters who have occupied squares, parks and plazas across the nation in defiance of the corporate state will be co-opted by the Democratic Party or groups like MoveOn.

Ah, ‘there is no danger’... that is the sort of grand proclamation which ensures when the danger happens, you wont know it. The DCCC has already included OWS in its fundraising and has been wildly successful.

But ‘there is no danger’ that the OWS protesters will be co-opted!

Report this

By balkas, October 17, 2011 at 3:39 am Link to this comment

we can change the structure of governance and society via education. that is the
option i favor. however, how is one going to wrest the education from our brutal
leaders—both secular and priestly?

perhaps, only by violent means! there is no way today’s clero-noble class wld give up
willingly [and a smile on its face] its addiction to wealth and power over their serfs.

so i wld not a priori discard use of violence as the only method of weaning off some
people of this horrible addiction of owning people.
it is these addicts that cause all ills that befall us on interpersonal, interethnic, and
inter-religious levels.

i haven’t read marx; so i cannot say that he did ask us to violently stop these addicts
from using us as meat for war, hard/dangerous work, etc., while they send their kids
to colleges, universities and train them how to keep the rest of us in eternal
servitude.
hedges may underestimate what an addict won’t do to maintain herhis habit! tnx

Report this

By balkas, October 17, 2011 at 3:12 am Link to this comment

as i see it, hedges is wrong in saying “that once those in power become redundant
and impotent, yet retain the trappings and privileges of power, they are brutally
discarded”.

the history proves [and not shows] that the more things change, the more they
stay the same. and most of our ‘dear leaders’ die peacefully in sleep [?and with a
smile on their faces or sense of great accomlishments]
i am not counting how many of them were discarded but do suggest very few do
get discarded.

true, ‘nobles’ do not rule europeans and most other earthlings any longer [in arab
world they still do, tho] but they have been replaced by same-thinking/doing
people in nearly all lands.

and the structure of governance and society, say, in u.s, india [i use india/u.s
because they best exemplify that basicly nothing ever changes] has not changed
an iota from the time some 8k yrs ago when the first such structure had been
established by priests in mesopotamia and which later or much later ‘nobles’ and
priests emulated on three of five continents. tax

Report this

By balkas, October 17, 2011 at 2:33 am Link to this comment

“what kind of nation”, says hedges wld do this or that! but can one sort u.s as a
nation, an empire, or a region?
a region, i’d say and with 300 or so ethnic groups all led by most avaricious,
selfish people among us.

i do not deem u.s a nation nor its inhabitants as americans. as i have said many
times years ago there are no longer americans in the multinat’l region called
“america”.
and one cld also say that some of its inhabitants were not americans from day
one after euros ‘discovered’ it. tnx

Report this

By balkas, October 17, 2011 at 2:13 am Link to this comment

MLK spoke for “better distribution of wealth”. better is, i think, “better ownership
of wealth”, which wld also include the governance; i.e.,, schooling, information
distribution, transport, etc.

hope protesters are thinking like this. tax

Report this
skimohawk's avatar

By skimohawk, October 17, 2011 at 1:56 am Link to this comment

Well done, Mr. Hedges.
You made me glad I stayed up late.

re:
“The liberal class… has become a useless and despised appendage of corporate power.”

True. Unfortunately not apparent yet to many.

re:
“An ineffectual liberal class means there is no hope of a correction or a reversal through the formal mechanisms of power.”

Also true. Unfortunately that correction or reversal requires that in which most are not willing to become involved.

Report this

By Maxwell Berins, October 17, 2011 at 1:28 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I’ve been reading Chris Hedges’ writings for some time now and I’ve noticed a tendency on his part to make sweeping statements without backing them up with examples.  For instance, when he says, “[The liberal class] collaborated with corporate lobbyists to neglect the rights of tens of millions of Americans, as well as the innocents in our imperial wars,” it would be helpful if he exemplified how so.

This is but one of many instances in this article alone where Mr. Hedges makes grand allegations against “the liberal class” without backing up his statements with facts.  It’s time he stops assuming everyone knows what he’s talking about and start substantiating his claims.  It will make him a better writer.

Report this
Lafayette's avatar

By Lafayette, October 17, 2011 at 12:53 am Link to this comment

A PROGRESSIVE AGENDA

And now for a message from the Looney Left:

CH: There is no danger that the protesters who have occupied squares, parks and plazas across the nation in defiance of the corporate state will be co-opted by the Democratic Party or groups like MoveOn. The faux liberal reformers, whose abject failure to stand up for the rights of the poor and the working class,

As much as many of us would like to do so, given the present structure of the electoral system, a third party – a Progressive Party – hasn’t a chance in hell of electing a PotUS.

Hedges should know better, but he is so embittered by his own prejudices that he is blind to the facts if he insists on getting around the established two-party system.

Which is why a better tactic is to reform the present system by proposing A Progressive Agenda that any politician ( from the Right or the Left or Center) can abide with. Such an Agenda, if a politician accepts it, is a litmus-test of their candidacy as a progressive in favor of a generalized reformation of the American economic political systems.

Remember, a key objective of a Progressive Agenda would be to change the present electoral system. Till then,however, we must work within it to achieve a Social Democrat party faction. (There, I said it. That evil word “social”.)

Most progressive politicians will be found in the Left and Left of center. Many others will refuse to accept the Agenda because they feel Americans “are not ready for it”. They could be right, but I figure they are wrong and the present demonstrations show clearly the outrage and indignation of a vast number of our fellow citizens.

The challenge is to inform and teach America that Now is the moment! … or never. That is, otherwise we must just get along with the status quo and bow our heads like the sheeple we are.

POST SCRIPTUM

Hedges, like most of us, wants to see revolutionary not evolutionary change. He hopes it can be done peacefully, but it must be done quickly. Next November.

We did not get into the Present Mess, both economically and politically, overnight. It took decades to do it. Most of our suffering today is due to Ronald Reagan who brought down tax-rates precipitously throughout his administration in the 1980s.

But Income Inequality, research shows, has been with America at least since the advent of the Industrial Age (which exacerbated it) but quite possibly since the inception of our nation.

THERE IS NO QUICK-FIX. American must be taught the virtues of Progressive Politics, which takes their generalized well-being as a predominant priority. But that takes time ...

Report this

By C.Curtis.Dillon, October 17, 2011 at 12:36 am Link to this comment

Does this movement have legs? I would say yes, simply because they are into the 5th week and the demonstrations grow with each passing day. It may become just a weekend surge but I expect to see more and more people come out and push for change. With the core of young and old occupying locations around the country I expect that will form the nucleus for this to keep growing. It will take time but this is real and expanding. Thank you each and every one of who has taken up this important task. Let the revolution begin!

Report this

Page 3 of 3 pages  <  1 2 3

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.